高压肉豆蔻酸甲酯比定压热容的实验测量

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20190430

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用流动型量热法实验系统测量了肉豆蔻酸甲酯的比定压热容，温度测量范围为323.20~393.26 K，压力测量范围为0.11~25.12 MPa。实验系统的温度和压力扩展不确定度分别为0.02 K和5 kPa，比定压热容的相对扩展不确定度为1.45%。基于实验数据，建立了一个可用于高压肉豆蔻酸甲酯比定压热容的计算关联式，其计算值与实验值的相对偏差绝对平均值为0.13%，最大偏差为0.38%。

关键词: 生物柴油, 流动, 比定压热容, 高压, 测量, 关联式

Abstract:

The biodiesel, comprised of fatty acid methyl ester and ethyl ester, is considered as an environment-friendly and promising alternative of fuel. The thermophysical properties of biodiesels as well as their components are essential information for the better knowledge of their industrial applications. For instance, in the spray and combustion processes of engine, isobaric specific heat capacity (c_p) of fuel has a significant influence on its heat-transfer characteristic. In this work, the c_p of methyl myristate are investigated using a flow calorimeter at the temperature range of 323.20—393.26 K and pressures up to 25.12 MPa. The expanded uncertainties of temperature and pressure are decided to be 0.02 K and 5 kPa respectively, while the relative expanded uncertainty of c_p is 1.45%. Then based on the experimental data, a correlation is proposed for calculating the c_p of methyl myristate, and a satisfactory agreement between calculated results and experimental values can be observed, with the average absolute relative deviation and maximum deviation of 0.13% and 0.38% respectively.

Key words: biodiesel, flow, isobaric specific heat capacity, elevated pressure, measurement, correlation

中图分类号:

TK 121

朱晨阳, 杨峰, 刘向阳, 何茂刚. 高压肉豆蔻酸甲酯比定压热容的实验测量[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(S2): 15-19.

Chenyang ZHU, Feng YANG, Xiangyang LIU, Maogang HE. Experimental study on isobaric specific heat capacities of methyl myristate at elevated pressures[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(S2): 15-19.

图/表 5

参考文献 30

1	Al-RabghiO M, BeiruttyM, AkyurtM, et al. Recovery and utilization of waste heat[J]. Heat Recovery Systems and CHP, 1993, 13(5): 463-470.
2	HungT C, ShaiT Y, WangS K. A review of organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) for the recovery of low-grade waste heat[J]. Energy, 1997, 22(7): 661-667.
3	WuP, YangC J. Identification and control of blast furnace gas top pressure recovery turbine unit[J]. ISIJ International, 2012, 52(1): 96-100.
4	XuC, CangD. A brief overview of low CO₂ emission technologies for iron and steel making[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International, 2010, 17(3): 1-7.
5	TobiesenF A, SvendsenH F, MejdellT. Modeling of blast furnace CO₂ capture using amine absorbents[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(23): 7811-7819.
6	PaivaA, CraveiroR, ArosoI, et al. Natural deep eutectic solvents-solvents for the 21st century[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2014, 2(5): 1063-1071.
7	ShahidE M, JamalY. A review of biodiesel as vehicular fuel[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008, 12(9): 2484-2494.
8	杨鑫. 己酸甲酯和醇混合燃料着火延迟反应机理的研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2014.
	YangX. Experimental and kinetic modeling study on ignition delay of methyl hexanoate with n-butanol and ethanol[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2014.
9	NguyenT T X, NguyenHuynhD. Predicting the phase equilibria of esters/alcohols mixtures and biodiesel density from its fatty acid composition using the modified group-contribution PC-SAFT[J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2018, 472: 128-146.
10	PaulyJ, KouakouA C, HabriouxM, et al. Heat capacity measurements of pure fatty acid methyl esters and biodiesels from 250 to 390 K[J]. Fuel, 2014, 137: 21-27.
11	van BommelM J, OonkH A J, van MiltenburgJ C. Heat capacity measurements of 13 methyl esters of n-carboxylic acids from methyl octanoate to methyl eicosanoate between 5 K and 350 K[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2004, 49(4): 1036-1042.
12	ZaitsauD H, PaulechkaY U, BlokhinA V, et al. Thermodynamics of ethyl decanoate[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2009, 54(11): 3026-3033.
13	van MiltenburgJ C, OonkH A J. Thermal properties of ethyl undecanoate and ethyl tridecanoate by adiabatic calorimetry[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2005, 50(4): 1348-1352.
14	DzidaM, JężakS, SumaraJ, et al. High pressure physicochemical properties of biodiesel components used for spray characteristics in diesel injection systems[J]. Fuel, 2013, 111: 165-171.
15	DzidaM, JężakS, SumaraJ, et al. High-pressure physicochemical properties of ethyl caprylate and ethyl caprate[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2013, 58(7): 1955-1962.
16	AissaM A, IvanisG R, RadovicI R, et al. Experimental investigation and modeling of thermophysical properties of pure methyl and ethyl esters at high pressures[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(7): 7110-7122.
17	BogatishchevaN S, FaizullinM Z, NikitinE D. Heat capacities and thermal diffusivities of n-alkane acid ethyl esters—biodiesel fuel components[J]. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2017, 91(9): 1647-1653.
18	LiuX Y, HeM G, SuC, et al. Heat capacities of fatty acid methyl esters from 300 K to 380 K and up to 4.25 MPa[J]. Fuel, 2015, 157: 240-244.
19	LiuX Y, SuC, QiX T, et al. Isobaric heat capacities of ethyl heptanoate and ethyl cinnamate at pressures up to 16.3 MPa[J]. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 2016, 93: 70-74.
20	LiuX Y, ZhuC Y, SuC, et al. Isobaric molar heat capacities of binary mixtures containing methyl caprate and methyl laurate at pressures up to 16.2 MPa[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 2017, 651: 43-46.
21	SuC, ZhuC Y, YangF, et al. Isobaric molar heat capacity of ethyl octanoate and ethyl decanoate at pressures up to 24 MPa[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2018, 63(6): 2252-2256.
22	LiuX Y, ZhuC Y, YangF, et al. Experimental and correlational study of isobaric molar heat capacities of fatty acid esters: ethyl nonanoate and ethyl dodecanoate[J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2019, 479: 47-51.
23	ZhuC, YangF, LiuX, et al. Isobaric molar heat capacities measurement of binary mixtures containing ethyl laurate and ethanol at high pressures[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2019, 280: 301-306.
24	WilhelmE. What you always wanted to know about heat capacities, but were afraid to ask[J]. Journal of Solution Chemistry, 2010, 39(12): 1777-1818.
25	SegoviaJ J, Vega-MazaD, ChamorroC R, et al. High-pressure isobaric heat capacities using a new flow calorimeter[J]. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2008, 46(3): 258-264.
26	IshmaelM P E, LukawskiM Z, TesterJ W. Isobaric heat capacity (C_p) measurements of supercritical fluids using flow calorimetry: equipment design and experimental validation with carbon dioxide, methanol, and carbon dioxide-methanol mixtures[J]. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2016, 117: 72-79.
27	KagawaN, MatsuguchiA, YamayaK, et al. Behavior of isobaric heat capacity of R32 in the gas phase[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2013, 36(8): 2216-2222.
28	MiyazawaT, KondoS, SuzukiT, et al. Specific heat capacity at constant pressure of ethanol by flow calorimetry[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2012, 57(6): 1700-1707.
29	HeiT K, RaalJ D. Heat capacity measurement by flow calorimetry: an exact analysis[J]. AIChE Journal, 2009, 55(1): 206-216.
30	HeM, SuC, LiuX, et al. Measurement of isobaric heat capacity of pure water up to supercritical conditions[J]. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2015, 100: 1-6.

p/MPa	T/K	c_p/(J?g^-1?K^-1)	p/MPa	T/K	c_p/(J?g^-1?K^-1)
0.11	323.20	2.11	0.12	363.22	2.22
4.98	323.21	2.11	4.94	363.22	2.22
10.11	323.20	2.11	10.07	363.22	2.21
14.94	323.20	2.11	15.08	363.22	2.21
20.11	323.21	2.10	20.07	363.22	2.21
24.91	323.21	2.10	24.90	363.22	2.21
0.15	333.20	2.13	0.12	373.21	2.25
5.00	333.21	2.13	4.97	373.22	2.25
9.93	333.22	2.13	10.06	373.22	2.25
14.93	333.22	2.13	15.11	373.22	2.24
19.94	333.22	2.13	20.16	373.22	2.24
25.10	333.23	2.13	25.12	373.22	2.24
0.14	343.18	2.16	0.12	383.21	2.28
5.02	343.19	2.16	5.05	383.22	2.28
10.04	343.20	2.16	10.10	383.22	2.28
14.95	343.20	2.15	15.13	383.23	2.27
20.05	343.21	2.15	19.97	383.23	2.27
24.90	343.22	2.15	25.03	383.23	2.26
0.13	353.19	2.19	0.12	393.25	2.32
4.99	353.20	2.19	4.96	393.26	2.31
10.00	353.20	2.18	10.15	393.25	2.31
14.97	353.21	2.18	15.14	393.26	2.30
20.05	353.21	2.18	20.01	393.26	2.30
24.94	353.22	2.18	24.97	393.25	2.29

p/MPa	T/K	c_p/(J?g^-1?K^-1)	p/MPa	T/K	c_p/(J?g^-1?K^-1)
0.11	323.20	2.11	0.12	363.22	2.22
4.98	323.21	2.11	4.94	363.22	2.22
10.11	323.20	2.11	10.07	363.22	2.21
14.94	323.20	2.11	15.08	363.22	2.21
20.11	323.21	2.10	20.07	363.22	2.21
24.91	323.21	2.10	24.90	363.22	2.21
0.15	333.20	2.13	0.12	373.21	2.25
5.00	333.21	2.13	4.97	373.22	2.25
9.93	333.22	2.13	10.06	373.22	2.25
14.93	333.22	2.13	15.11	373.22	2.24
19.94	333.22	2.13	20.16	373.22	2.24
25.10	333.23	2.13	25.12	373.22	2.24
0.14	343.18	2.16	0.12	383.21	2.28
5.02	343.19	2.16	5.05	383.22	2.28
10.04	343.20	2.16	10.10	383.22	2.28
14.95	343.20	2.15	15.13	383.23	2.27
20.05	343.21	2.15	19.97	383.23	2.27
24.90	343.22	2.15	25.03	383.23	2.26
0.13	353.19	2.19	0.12	393.25	2.32
4.99	353.20	2.19	4.96	393.26	2.31
10.00	353.20	2.18	10.15	393.25	2.31
14.97	353.21	2.18	15.14	393.26	2.30
20.05	353.21	2.18	20.01	393.26	2.30
24.94	353.22	2.18	24.97	393.25	2.29

[1]	周绍华, 詹飞龙, 丁国良, 张浩, 邵艳坡, 刘艳涛, 郜哲明. 短管节流阀内流动噪声的实验研究及降噪措施[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 113-121.
[2]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[3]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[4]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[5]	仪显亨, 周骛, 蔡小舒, 蔡天意. 光纤后向动态光散射测量纳米颗粒的浓度适用范围研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3320-3328.
[6]	闫琳琦, 王振雷. 基于STA-BiLSTM-LightGBM组合模型的多步预测软测量建模[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3407-3418.
[7]	涂玉明, 邵高燕, 陈健杰, 刘凤, 田世超, 周智勇, 任钟旗. 钙基催化剂的设计合成及应用研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2717-2734.
[8]	邵伟明, 韩文学, 宋伟, 杨勇, 陈灿, 赵东亚. 基于分布式贝叶斯隐马尔可夫回归的动态软测量建模方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2495-2502.
[9]	赵健, 周兴超, 夏丹, 董航. 机械搅拌对原油储罐射流加热过程传热特性的影响规律研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1982-1999.
[10]	周必茂, 许世森, 王肖肖, 刘刚, 李小宇, 任永强, 谭厚章. 烧嘴偏转角度对气化炉渣层分布特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1939-1949.
[11]	张浩, 徐惠斌, 高健, 刘帝宏, 周泽华. Geldart-D类湿颗粒倾斜落料行为及其强化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1519-1527.
[12]	王倩倩, 刘明言, 马永丽. 水中超声波脱气的效应研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1693-1702.
[13]	郑书闽, 郭鹏程, 颜建国, 王帅, 李文博, 周淇. 微小通道内过冷流动沸腾阻力特性实验及预测研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1549-1560.
[14]	陈俊先, 姬忠礼, 赵瑜, 张倩, 周岩, 刘猛, 刘震. 基于微波技术的天然气管道内颗粒物在线检测方法研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1042-1053.
[15]	张梦波, 楼琳瑾, 冯艺荣, 郑雨婷, 张浩淼, 王靖岱, 阳永荣. 烷基铝氧烷合成技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 525-534.