磁响应分离膜研究进展

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20200169

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着智能材料和纳米技术的发展，具有刺激响应的新型功能膜材料是膜分离技术发展的主要方向之一。磁响应分离膜是一种由磁性颗粒和聚合物高分子混合制备的，可以对磁场刺激产生响应的分离膜。磁响应分离膜兼具膜分离技术的低能耗、高效率等优点和磁性颗粒的磁性响应和催化性能等。磁性颗粒对磁场的响应不仅会影响膜的结构和分离选择性，还会改变膜材料的润湿性以及提高膜抗污染性能。本文从共混法、涂层法、接枝法和原位生长法对磁响应分离膜的制备方法展开论述，介绍了不同制备方法的优缺点及未来发展方向。从调控膜表面润湿性、调控膜抗污染性、调控膜孔径三部分对磁响应分离膜的磁场响应机理进行了详细阐述。并从过滤、吸附、降解、交换分离四方面对磁响应分离膜的应用领域展开论述。最后对磁响应分离膜的发展进行了总结，并对其发展前景进行了展望。

关键词: 磁响应膜, 磁性颗粒, 分离, 刺激响应, 机理

Abstract:

With the development of intelligent materials and nanotechnology, new functional membrane materials with special stimulus-response have been one of the main directions of membrane separation technology. Magnetically responsive membrane is a kind of separation membrane prepared by mixing magnetic particles and polymers, which can respond to magnetic field stimulation. Magnetically responsive membrane has the advantages of low energy consumption and high efficiency of membrane separation technology and the magnetic and catalytic properties of magnetic particles. The response of magnetic particles to magnetic field not only affects the structure and separation performance of the membrane, but also benefits the wettability and anti-fouling of the membrane. In this paper, the preparation methods of magnetically responsive membrane including blending method, coating method, grafting method and in-situ growth method are discussed in detail. Then the advantages and disadvantages of different preparation methods and their future development are compared. And from four aspects of filtration, adsorption, degradation, exchange separation, the application field of magnetic response separation membrane is discussed. Finally, the development of magnetically responsive membrane is summarized and its development is prospected.

Key words: magnetically responsive membrane, magnetic particle, separation, stimulus-response, mechanism

中图分类号:

TB 333

王雅洁,李蕾,张倩,李倩,李望良. 磁响应分离膜研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(7): 2933-2944.

Yajie WANG,Lei LI,Qian ZHANG,Qian LI,Wangliang LI. Progress of magnetically responsive membranes[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(7): 2933-2944.

图/表 9

参考文献 72

1	涂家祎. 高分子膜材料在膜分离过程中的应用[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2016, 16(121): 2095-2945.
	Tu J Y. Application of polymer membrane material in membrane separation process[J]. Technology Innovation and Application, 2016, 16(121): 2095-2945.
2	Chen X, Cheng L, Li H, et al. Magnetic nanofibers: unique properties, fabrication techniques, and emerging applications [J]. Chemistry Select, 2018, 3(31): 9127-9143.
3	Mehrnia M R, Homayoonfal M. Fouling mitigation behavior of magnetic responsive nanocomposite membranes in a magnetic membrane bioreactor [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 520: 881-894.
4	陈萍超. 磁性改性聚苯胺的制备及其吸附重金属离子和染料性能[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2018.
	Chen P C. Preparation of magnetically modified polyaniline and its adsorption of heavy metal ions and dyes[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu Univerisity of Technology, 2018.
5	Homayoonfal M, Mehrnia M R, Shariaty-Niassar M, et al. Fabrication of magnetic nanocomposite membrane for separation of organic contaminant from water [J]. Desalination Water Treatment, 2015, 54(13): 3603-3609.
6	Ger T R, Huang H T, Huang C Y, et al. Study of polyvinyl alcohol nanofibrous membrane by electrospinning as a magnetic nanoparticle delivery approach [J]. Journal Appllied Physics, 2014, 115(17): 173908.
7	Ye X Y, Liu Z M, Wang Z G, et al. Preparation and characterization of magnetic nanofibrous composite membranes with catalytic activity [J]. Materials Letters, 2009, 63(21): 1810-1813.
8	Jian P, Yahui H, Yang W, et al. Preparation of polysulfone-Fe₃O₄ composite ultrafiltration membrane and its behavior in magnetic field [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 284(1): 9-16.
9	Han P, Yahui H, Yang W, et al. Preparation of polysulfone-Fe₃O₄ composite ultrafiltration membrane and its behavior in magnetic field [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 284(1/2): 9-16.
10	Upadhyaya L, Semsarilar M, Nehache S, et al. Nanostructured mixed matrix membranes from supramolecular assembly of block copolymer nanoparticles and iron oxide nanoparticles [J]. Macromolecules, 2016, 49(20): 7908-7916.
11	Upadhyaya L, Semsarilar M, Quemener D, et al. Block copolymer based novel magnetic mixed matrix membranes-magnetic modulation of water permeation by irreversible structural changes [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 551: 273-282.
12	Wu H, Teng C, Tian H F, et al. Fabrication of functional magnetic cellulose nanocomposite membranes for controlled adsorption of protein [J]. Cellulose, 2018, 25(5): 2977-2986.
13	Sun H, Zhang Y, Li S, et al. Multifunctional core-shell zwitterionic nanoparticles to build robust, stable antifouling membranes via magnetic-controlled surface segregation [J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(38): 35501-35508.
14	Abdi G, Alizadeh A, Zinadini S, et al. Removal of dye and heavy metal ion using a novel synthetic polyethersulfone nanofiltration membrane modified by magnetic graphene oxide/metformin hybrid [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 552: 326-335.
15	Huang Y, Xiao C F, Huang Q L, et al. Magnetic field induced orderly arrangement of Fe₃O₄/GO composite particles for preparation of Fe₃O₄/GO/PVDF membrane [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 548: 184-193.
16	Feng M, Meng F, Pu Z, et al. Introducing magnetic-responsive CNT/Fe₃O₄ composites to enhance the mechanical properties of sulfonated poly(arylene ether nitrile) proton-exchange membranes [J]. Journal of Polymer Research, 2015, 22(3): 37.
17	Mosaffa E, Ghafuri H, Zand H R E. Improvement on physical properties of polyethersulfone membranes modified by poly(1-vinylpyrrolidone) grafted magnetic Fe₃O₄@SiO₂ nanoparticles [J]. Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2019, 33(1): e4639.
18	Low S C, Ng Q H, Tan L S. Study of magnetic-responsive nanoparticle on the membrane surface as a membrane antifouling surface coating [J]. Journal of Polymer Research, 2019, 26(3): 70.
19	Ng Q H, Lim J K, Ahmad A L, et al. Efficacy evaluation of the antifouling magnetite–PES composite membrane through QCM-D and magnetophoretic filtration performances [J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2014, 132: 138-148.
20	Ng Q H, Lim J K, Ahmad A L, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles augmented composite membranes in removal of organic foulant through magnetic actuation [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 493: 134-146.
21	Azmi N A, Ng Q H, Low S C. Ultrafiltration of aquatic humic substances through magnetically responsive polysulfone membranes [J]. Journal Applied Polymer Science, 2015, 132(21): 41874.
22	Yang Q, Himstedt H H, Ulbricht M, et al. Designing magnetic field responsive nanofiltration membranes [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 430: 70-78.
23	Song G H, Sengupta A, Qian X H, et al. Investigation on suppression of fouling by magnetically responsive nanofiltration membranes [J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 205: 94-104.
24	Mino Y, Ogawa D, Matsuyama H. Functional magnetic particles providing osmotic pressure as reusable draw solutes in forward osmosis membrane process [J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2016, 27(5): 2136-2144.
25	Galland S, Andersson R L, Salajkova M, et al. Cellulose nanofibers decorated with magnetic nanoparticles - synthesis, structure and use in magnetized high toughness membranes for a prototype loudspeaker [J]. Journal Materials Chemistry C, 2013, 1(47): 7963-7972.
26	Strečková M, Mudra E, Sebek M, et al. Preparation and investigations of Ni_0.2Zn_0.8Fe₂O₄ ferrite nanofiber membranes by needleless electrospinning method [J]. Acta Physica Polonica A, 2017, 131(4): 729-731.
27	Xing R S, Wu H, Zhao C H, et al. Fabrication of chitosan membranes with high flux by magnetic alignment of in situ generated Fe₃O₄ [J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2016, 39(5): 969-978.
28	Si Y, Tang X M, Ge J L, et al. In situ synthesis of flexible magnetic gamma-Fe₂O₃@SiO₂nanofibrous membranes [J]. Nanoscale, 2014, 6(4): 2102-2105.
29	Si Y, Yan C C, Hong F F, et al. A general strategy for fabricating flexible magnetic silica nanofibrous membranes with multifunctionality [J]. Chemical Communications, 2015, 51(63): 12521-12524.
30	Krasowska M, Rybak A, Dudek G, et al. Structure morphology problems in the air separation by polymer membranes with magnetic particles [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 415: 864-870.
31	Krasowska M, Strzelewicz A, Rybak A, et al. Structure and transport properties of ethylcellulose membranes with different types and granulation of magnetic powder [J]. Physica A, 2016, 452: 241-250.
32	Tayefeh A, Wiesner M, Mousavi S A, et al. Modeling magneto-mechanical behavior of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticle/polyamide nanocomposite membrane in an external magnetic field [J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 2018, 52(11): 1505-1517.
33	Daraei P, Madaeni S S, Ghaemi N, et al. Fouling resistant mixed matrix polyethersulfone membranes blended with magnetic nanoparticles: study of magnetic field induced casting [J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2013, 109: 111-121.
34	Xu Z, Wu T, Shi J, et al. Manipulating migration behavior of magnetic graphene oxide via magnetic field induced casting and phase separation toward high-performance hybrid ultrafiltration membranes [J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(28): 18418-18429.
35	Huang Z Q, Chen L, Chen K, et al. A novel method for controlling the sub layer microstructure of an ultrafiltration membrane: the preparation of the PSF-Fe₃O₄ ultrafiltration membrane in a parallel magnetic field [J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2010, 117(4): 1960-1968.
36	Huang Z Q, Zheng F, Zhang Z, et al. The performance of the PVDF-Fe₃O₄ ultrafiltration membrane and the effect of a parallel magnetic field used during the membrane formation [J]. Desalination, 2012, 292: 64-72.
37	Zinadini S, Zinatizadeh A A L, Rahimi M, et al. Magnetic field-augmented coagulation bath during phase inversion for preparation of ZnFe₂O₄/SiO₂/PES nanofiltration membrane: a novel method for flux enhancement and fouling resistance [J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2017, 46: 9-18.
38	Rastgar M, Shakeri A, Bozorg A, et al. Highly-efficient forward osmosis membrane tailored by magnetically responsive graphene oxide/Fe₃O₄ nanohybrid [J]. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 441: 923-935.
39	Du M, Cao X Z, Xia R, et al. Magnetic field aligned orderly arrangement of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles in CS/PVA/Fe₃O₄ membranes [J]. Chinese Physics B, 2018, 27(2): 581-581.
40	Hu X H, Sun J J, Peng R C, et al. Novel thin-film composite reverse osmosis membrane with superior water flux using parallel magnetic field induced magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 242: 118423.
41	Himstedt H H, Sengupta A, Qian X H, et al. Magnetically responsive nano filtration membranes for treatment of coal bed methane produced water [J]. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2019, 94: 97-108.
42	Himstedt H H, Yang Q, Dasi L P, et al. Magnetically activated micromixers for separation membranes [J]. Langmuir, 2011, 27(9): 5574-5581.
43	Himstedt H H, Yang Q, Qian X H, et al. Toward remote-controlled valve functions via magnetically responsive capillary pore membranes [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 423: 257-266.
44	Huang Z Q, Chen Z Y, Guo X P, et al. Structures and separation properties of PAN-Fe₃O₄ ultrafiltration membranes prepared under an orthogonal magnetic field [J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45(23): 7905-7912.
45	Gajda A M, Ulbricht M. Magnetic Fe₃O₄ nanoparticle heaters in smart porous membrane valves [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2014, 2(10): 1317-1326.
46	Qian X H, Yang Q, Vu A, et al. Localized heat generation from magnetically responsive membranes [J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55(33): 9015-9027.
47	Lin X, Nguyen Q B, Ulbricht M. Magnetoresponsive poly(ether sulfone)-based iron oxide cum hydrogel mixed matrix composite membranes for switchable molecular sieving [J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(42): 29001-29014.
48	Rybak A, Grzywna Z J, Kaszuwara W. On the air enrichment by polymer magnetic membranes [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 336(1/2): 79-85.
49	Rybak A, Strzelewicz A, Kaszuwara W, et al. Influence of various parameters on the air separation process by magnetic membranes [J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2012, 47(9): 1395-1404.
50	Rybak A, Grzywna Z J, Sysel P. Mixed matrix membranes composed of various polymer matrices and magnetic powder for air separation [J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2013, 118: 424-431.
51	Rybak A, Dudek G, Krasowska M, et al. Magnetic mixed matrix membranes consisting of PPO matrix and magnetic filler in gas separation [J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2014, 49(11): 1729-1735.
52	Rybak A, Dudek G, Krasowsk M, et al. Magnetic mixed matrix membranes in air separation [J]. Chemical Paper, 2014, 68(10): 1332-1340.
53	Rybak A, Krasowsk W. Magnetic properties of the magnetic hybrid membranes based on various polymer matrices and inorganic fillers [J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2015, 648: 205-214.
54	Rybak A, Rybak A, Kaszuwara W, et al. The rheological and mechanical properties of magnetic hybrid membranes for gas mixtures separation [J]. Materials Letters, 2016, 183: 170-174.
55	Rybak A, Rybak A, Kaszuwara W, et al. The studies on novel magnetic polyimide inorganic-organic hybrid membranes for air separation [J]. Materials Letters, 2017, 208: 14-18.
56	Rybak A, Rybak A, Kaszuwara W, et al. Metal substituted sulfonated poly(2, 6-dimethyl-1, 4-phenylene oxide) hybrid membranes with magnetic fillers for gas separation [J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 210: 479-490.
57	Rybak A, Rybak A, Kaszuwara W, et al. The magnetic inorganic-organic hybrid membranes based on polyimide matrices for gas separation [J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2017, 110: 161-710.
58	Favvas E P, Heliopoulos N S, Karousos D S, et al. Mixed matrix polymeric and carbon hollow fiber membranes with magnetic iron-based nanoparticles and their application in gas mixture separation [J]. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2019, 223: 220-229.
59	Harami H R, Asghari M, Mohammadi A H. Magnetic nano Fe₂O₃ incorporated PEBA membranes for CO₂/CH₄ and CO₂/N₂ separation: experimental study and grand canonical Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations [J]. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2019, 9(2): 306-330.
60	Madaeni S S, Enayati E, Vatanpour V. Separation of nitrogen and oxygen gases by polymeric membrane embedded with magnetic nano-particle [J]. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 2011, 22(12): 2556-2563.
61	Dudek G, Tueczyn R, Strzelewicz A, et al. Studies of separation of vapours and gases through composite membranes with ferroferric oxide magnetic nanoparticles [J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2013, 109: 55-63.
62	Dudek G, Strzelewicz A, Tueczyn R, et al. The study of ethanol/water vapors permeation through sulfuric acid cross-linked chitosan magnetic membranes [J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2014, 49(11): 1761-1767.
63	Dudek G, Gnus M, Tueczyn R, et al. The study of ethanol and water vapour permeation process through alginate membranes modified by magnetic powders [J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2017, 64: 339-344.
64	Wang R, Chen Y, Xie H, et al. Polysaccharide separation mechanism in polysulfone-Fe₃O₄ magnetic composite membranes [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2011, 56(18): 1951-1956.
65	Hong F F, Yan C C, Si Y, et al. Nickel ferrite nanoparticles anchored onto silica nanofibers for designing magnetic and flexible nanofibrous membranes [J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7(36): 20200-20207.
66	Khan A, Begum S, Alin N, et al. Preparation of crosslinked chitosan magnetic membrane for cations sorption from aqueous solution [J]. Water Science and Technology, 2017, 75(9): 2034-2046.
67	Kang J, Zhang H Y, Duan X G, et al. Magnetic Ni-Co alloy encapsulated N-doped carbon nanotubes for catalytic membrane degradation of emerging contaminants [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 362: 251-261.
68	Gebreyohannes A Y, Dharmjeet M, Swusten T, et al. Simultaneous glucose production from cellulose and fouling reduction using a magnetic responsive membrane reactor with superparamagnetic nanoparticles carrying cellulolytic enzymes [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 263: 532-540.
69	Hosseini S M, Sohrabnejad S, Nabiyouni G, et al. Magnetic cation exchange membrane incorporated with cobalt ferrite nanoparticles for chromium ions removal via electrodialysis [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 583: 292-300.
70	Hasanabadi N, Ghaffarian S R, Hasani-Sadrabadi M M. Magnetic field aligned nanocomposite proton exchange membranes based on sulfonated poly (ether sulfone) and Fe₂O₃ nanoparticles for direct methanol fuel cell application [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(23): 15323-15332.
71	Feng M N, Meng F B, Pu Z J, et al. Introducing magnetic-responsive CNT/Fe₃O₄ composites to enhance the mechanical properties of sulfonated poly(arylene ether nitrile) proton-exchange membranes [J]. Journal of Polymer Research, 2015, 22(3): 37.
72	Chen N J, Wang D, Long C, et al. Magnetic field-oriented ferroferric oxide/poly(2, 6-dimethyl-1, 4-phenylene oxide) hybrid membranes for anion exchange membrane applications [J]. Nanoscale, 2018, 10(39): 18680-18689.

[1]	赵亚欣, 张雪芹, 王荣柱, 孙国, 姚善泾, 林东强. 流穿模式离子交换层析去除单抗聚集体[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3879-3887.
[2]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[3]	刘爽, 张霖宙, 许志明, 赵锁奇. 渣油及其组分黏度的分子层次组成关联研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3226-3241.
[4]	张佳怡, 何佳莉, 谢江鹏, 王健, 赵鹬, 张栋强. 渗透汽化技术用于锂电池生产中N-甲基吡咯烷酮回收的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3203-3215.
[5]	张瑞航, 曹潘, 杨锋, 李昆, 肖朋, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8纳米流体天然气乙烷回收工艺的产品纯度关键影响因素分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[6]	陈吉, 洪泽, 雷昭, 凌强, 赵志刚, 彭陈辉, 崔平. 基于分子动力学的焦炭溶损反应及其机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2935-2946.
[7]	张缘良, 栾昕奇, 苏伟格, 李畅浩, 赵钟兴, 周利琴, 陈健民, 黄艳, 赵祯霞. 离子液体复合萃取剂选择性萃取尼古丁的研究及DFT计算[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2947-2956.
[8]	高金明, 郭玉娇, 鄂承林, 卢春喜. 一种封闭罩内顺流多旋臂气液分离器的分离特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2957-2966.
[9]	文兆伦, 李沛睿, 张忠林, 杜晓, 侯起旺, 刘叶刚, 郝晓刚, 官国清. 基于自热再生的隔壁塔深冷空分工艺设计及优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2988-2998.
[10]	韩奎奎, 谭湘龙, 李金芝, 杨婷, 张春, 张永汾, 刘洪全, 于中伟, 顾学红. 四通道中空纤维MFI分子筛膜用于二甲苯异构体分离[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2468-2476.
[11]	朱兴驰, 郭志远, 纪志永, 汪婧, 张盼盼, 刘杰, 赵颖颖, 袁俊生. 选择性电渗析镁锂分离过程模拟优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2477-2485.
[12]	蔺彩虹, 王丽, 吴瑜, 刘鹏, 杨江峰, 李晋平. 沸石中碱金属阳离子对CO₂/N₂O吸附分离性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2013-2021.
[13]	孙永尧, 高秋英, 曾文广, 王佳铭, 陈艺飞, 周永哲, 贺高红, 阮雪华. 面向含氮油田伴生气提质利用的膜耦合分离工艺设计优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2034-2045.
[14]	张正, 何永平, 孙海东, 张荣子, 孙正平, 陈金兰, 郑一璇, 杜晓, 郝晓刚. 蛇形流场电控离子交换装置用于选择性提锂[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2022-2033.
[15]	王蕾, 王磊, 白云龙, 何柳柳. SA膜状锂离子筛的制备及其锂吸附性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2046-2056.