正弦波纹流道印刷电路板换热器热工水力性能

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20200491

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

印刷电路板换热器换热性能好、紧凑性高，在超临界CO₂布雷顿循环等领域有着广阔的应用前景。本文通过数值计算，首先比较了湍流条件下15°～30°范围内不同波纹角对正弦波纹流道流动换热性能的影响，结果表明，波纹流道内的换热效果随波纹角的增大而增强（换热量最大增长了7.1%），且热侧的压降相对于冷侧增大更明显。其次，分节研究并分析了流道内不同区域的局部流动换热特性，发现了在热侧和冷侧入口区域各存在着1个大、小温差区，同时，需要对入口处进行合理的优化设计以减小入口处的压降。最后，进一步设计了一种“正弦波纹+直通道”的复合结构并初步探究了该结构的流动换热性能。

关键词: 印刷电路板换热器, 超临界CO₂, 正弦波纹流道, 热工水力性能, 数值模拟

Abstract:

Printed circuit heat exchanger (PCHE) is a promising candidate in the field of supercritical CO₂ Brayton cycle due to its high thermal efficiency and compactness. In this paper, the effects of wave angles (15°—30°) on the heat transfer performance of sinusoidal channels under turbulent conditions are numerically studied at first. The results show that the heat transfer performance increases with the increase of wave angle (the maximum increase of the heat transfer rate is 7.1%), while the pressure drop on the hot side increases more significantly when compared with that on the cold side. Secondly, the local flow and heat transfer characteristics in the different regions of the channels are analyzed by pitches. Zones with large and small temperature differences are observed in the inlet zones on the hot and cold sides, respectively. Meanwhile, the inlet zones are found to be related to great pressure drops and should be carefully optimized. Finally, a novel hybrid structure of sinusoidal channel combined with straight channel is designed and its thermal hydraulic performance is tentatively investigated.

Key words: printed circuit heat exchanger, supercritical carbon dioxide, sinusoidal channel, thermal hydraulic performance, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TK 172

吕义高, 李庆, 文哲希. 正弦波纹流道印刷电路板换热器热工水力性能[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(S2): 142-151.

Yigao LYU, Qing LI, Zhexi WEN. Thermal-hydraulic performance of sinusoidal channel printed circuit heat exchanger[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(S2): 142-151.

图/表 15

图1 几何模型

Fig.1 Geometric model

表1 边界条件

Table 1 Boundary conditions

参数	冷侧流体		热侧流体
参数	入口	出口	入口	出口
T_in /K	350	—	675	—
p_out /MPa	—	20	—	8
m_in /(kg?h)	0.6、1.0、1.4、1.8	—	0.6、1.0、1.4、1.8	—

图2 计算域截面的网格结构

Fig.2 Grid structure of computational domain cross section

图3 网格无关性检验

Fig.3 Grid independence test

图4 模拟结果与实验数据对比

Fig.4 Comparison between numerical results and experimental data

图5 不同波纹角流道的热工水力性能

Fig.5 Thermal hydraulic performance of wavy channels with various angle

图6 每一节流道进出口温差和热流量沿流动方向的变化

Fig.6 Variations of temperature difference between inlet and outlet and heat transfer rate at each pitch

图7 θ=15°时冷、热侧流体沿程的温度变化

Fig7 Temperature variations along flow direction on cold and hot sides when θ=15°

图8 每一节流道内Nu和Re沿流动方向的变化

Fig.8 Variations of Nu and Re at each pitch along flow direction

图9 每一节流道内压降Δpp和f沿流动方向的变化

Fig.9 Variations of pressure drop Δpp and f at each pitch along flow direction

图10 热侧入口处第一节流道内速度场

Fig.10 Velocity field at first pitch on hot side

图11 “正弦波纹+直通道”的复合结构

Fig.11 Hybrid structure of sinusoidal channel combined with straight channel

图12 不同结构流道沿程局部流动换热性能

Fig.12 Local flow and heat transfer characteristics along the flow direction of different structure channels

图13 波纹流道和复合结构流道的综合性能

Fig.13 Overall performance of sinusoidal and hybrid structure channels

图14 待进一步研究的其他复合结构示例

Fig.14 Samples of other hybrid structure remain to be further studied

参考文献 28

1	Ahn Y, Bae S J, Kim M, et al. Review of supercritical CO₂ power cycle technology and current status of research and development [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2015, 47(6): 647-661.
2	Dostal V, Hejzlar P, Driscoll M J. High-performance supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for next-generation nuclear reactors [J]. Nuclear Technology, 2017, 154(3): 265-282.
3	Mecheri M, Moullec Y L. Supercritical CO₂ Brayton cycles for coal-fired power plants [J]. Energy, 2016, 103: 758-771.
4	Sharan P, Neises T, Mctigue J D, et al. Cogeneration using multi-effect distillation and a solar-powered supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle [J]. Desalination, 2019, 459: 20-33.
5	Olumayegun O, Wang M H. Dynamic modelling and control of supercritical CO₂ power cycle using waste heat from industrial processes [J]. Fuel, 2019, 249: 89-102.
6	Tsuzuki N, Kato Y, Ishiduka T. High performance printed circuit heat exchanger [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2007, 27(10): 1702-1707.
7	Meshram A, Jaiswal A K, Khivsara S D, et al. Modeling and analysis of a printed circuit heat exchanger for supercritical CO₂ power cycle applications [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 109: 861-870.
8	Lee S M, Kim K Y. Comparative study on performance of a zigzag printed circuit heat exchanger with various channel shapes and configurations [J]. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2013, 49(7): 1021-1028.
9	Lee S M, Kim K Y. Thermal performance of a double-faced printed circuit heat exchanger with thin plates [J]. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 2014, 28(2): 251-257.
10	Kim D E, Kim M H, Cha J E, et al. Numerical investigation on thermal-hydraulic performance of new printed circuit heat exchanger model [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2008, 238(12): 3269-3276.
11	Kwon J G, Kim T H, Park S H, et al. Optimization of airfoil-type PCHE for the recuperator of small scale Brayton cycle by cost-based objective function [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2016, 298: 192-200.
12	Chu W X, Li X H, Ma T, et al. Study on hydraulic and thermal performance of printed circuit heat transfer surface with distributed airfoil fins [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 114: 1309-1318.
13	Cui X Y, Guo J F, Huai X L, et al. Numerical study on novel airfoil fins for printed circuit heat exchanger using supercritical CO₂ [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 121: 354-366.
14	Baik S, Kim S G, Lee J, et al. Study on CO₂-water printed circuit heat exchanger performance operating under various CO₂ phases for S-CO₂ power cycle application [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 113: 1536-1546.
15	Aneesh A M, Sharma A, Srivasatava A, et al. Effects of wavy channel configurations on thermal-hydraulic characteristics of printed circuit heat exchanger (PCHE) [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 118: 304-315.
16	Baik Y J, Jeon S, Kim B, et al. Heat transfer performance of wavy-channeled PCHEs and the effects of waviness factors [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 114: 809-815.
17	Wang J, Sun Y W, Lu M J, et al. Study on the thermal-hydraulic performance of sinusoidal channeled printed circuit heat exchanger [J]. Energy Procedia, 2019, 158: 5679-5684.
18	Yang Y, Li H Z, Yao M Y, et al. Investigation on the effects of narrowed channel cross-sections on the heat transfer performance of a wavy-channeled PCHE [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 135: 33-43.
19	Wen Z X, Lü Y G, Li Q, et al. Numerical study on heat transfer behavior of wavy channel supercritical CO₂ printed circuit heat exchangers with different amplitude and wavelength parameters [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 147: 118922.
20	Wen Z X, Lü Y G, Li Q. Comparative study on flow and heat transfer characteristics of sinusoidal and zigzag channel printed circuit heat exchangers [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2020, 63(4): 655-667.
21	Kim I H, No H C, Lee J I, et al. Thermal hydraulic performance analysis of the printed circuit heat exchanger using a helium test facility and CFD simulations [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2009, 239(11): 2399-2408.
22	Menter F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications [J]. AIAA, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605.
23	National Institute of Standards and Technology. NIST Chemistry Webbook [DB/OL]. [2019-03-15]. http: //webbook. nist. gov/chemistry/fluid. html
24	Li Z H, Jiang P X, Zhao C R, et al. Experimental investigation of convection heat transfer of CO₂ at supercritical pressures in a vertical circular tube [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2010, 34(8): 1162-1171.
25	Liu W, Liu Z C, Guo Z Y, Physical quantity synergy in laminar flow field of convective heat transfer and analysis of heat transfer enhancement [J]. Science Bulletin, 2009, 54: 3579-3586.
26	Koo G W, Lee S M, Kim K Y. Shape optimization of inlet part of a printed circuit heat exchanger using surrogate modeling [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 72(1): 90-96.
27	Pasquier U, Chu W X, Zeng M, et al. CFD simulation and optimization of fluid flow distribution inside printed circuit heat exchanger headers [J]. Numerical Heat Transfer Part A - Applications, 2016, 69(7): 710-726.
28	Chu W X, Bennett K, Cheng J, et al. Numerical study on a novel hyperbolic inlet header in straight-channel printed circuit heat exchanger [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 146: 805-814.

[1]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[2]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[3]	叶展羽, 山訸, 徐震原. 用于太阳能蒸发的折纸式蒸发器性能仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 132-140.
[4]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[5]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[6]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[7]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[8]	程小松, 殷勇高, 车春文. 不同工质在溶液除湿真空再生系统中的性能对比[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3494-3501.
[9]	刘文竹, 云和明, 王宝雪, 胡明哲, 仲崇龙. 基于场协同和耗散的微通道拓扑优化研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3329-3341.
[10]	洪瑞, 袁宝强, 杜文静. 垂直上升管内超临界二氧化碳传热恶化机理分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3309-3319.
[11]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[12]	黄可欣, 李彤, 李桉琦, 林梅. 加装旋转叶轮T型通道流场的模态分解[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2848-2857.
[13]	史方哲, 甘云华. 超薄热管启动特性和传热性能数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2814-2823.
[14]	朱兴驰, 郭志远, 纪志永, 汪婧, 张盼盼, 刘杰, 赵颖颖, 袁俊生. 选择性电渗析镁锂分离过程模拟优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2477-2485.
[15]	陈巨辉, 张谦, 舒崚峰, 李丹, 徐鑫, 刘晓刚, 赵晨希, 曹希峰. 基于DEM方法的旋转流化床纳米颗粒流动特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2374-2381.