加装旋转叶轮T型通道流场的模态分解

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20230377

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用动态模态分解方法对加装旋转叶轮T型通道内热混合数值模拟获得的压力场和涡量场进行了研究。通过对比不同叶片数（2~4片）的动态模态分解结果，获得了偏转射流条件（M_R=0.49）下，主支管管径比为2的T型通道在转速为20 r/min时流场相干结构的特征模态。通过观察压力分布特征模态的空间结构，发现相干结构主要出现在叶轮内部区域；涡量场特征模态的空间结构主要分布在叶尖处，同时在管壁附近也出现了少量条状相干结构。主导压力场和涡量场的2阶~4阶模态频率相等，对应叶片通过频率的1倍频、2倍频和3倍频。二者的第5阶模态频率随着叶片数的增加而趋于相等。此外，当模态频率为叶片通过频率倍频时，在叶片附近出现了“辐射状干涉条纹”。研究结果可为T型通道中的流动控制提供理论指导。

关键词: 旋转叶轮, T型通道, 数值模拟, 混合, 动态模态分解

Abstract:

The dynamic mode decomposition method was used to study the pressure and vorticity fields obtained from numerical simulation of thermal mixing in a T-junction with a rotating impeller. By comparing the dynamic mode decomposition results of different blade numbers (2—4), the characteristic modes of the coherent structure of the flow field in a T-junction were obtained at a speed of 20 r/min under the condition of deflecting jet flow (M_R=0.49). The diameter ratio of the main duct to branch duct is 2. By observing the spatial structure of the characteristic modes of pressure distribution, it is found that coherent structures mainly appear in the internal region of the impeller, the spatial structure of the characteristic mode of the vorticity field is mainly distributed at the blade tip, and a small amount of strip coherent structures appear near the duct wall. The second-order to fourth-order mode frequencies of the dominant pressure field and vorticity field are equal, corresponding to the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd harmonic frequencies of the blade passing frequency. Their fifth order mode frequencies tend to be equal as the number of blades increases. In addition, when the mode frequency is doubled by the blade passing frequency, “radial interference fringes” appear near the blade. The research results can provide theoretical guidance for flow control in T-junction channels.

Key words: rotating impeller, T-junction, numerical simulation, mixing, dynamic mode decomposition

中图分类号:

TK124

黄可欣, 李彤, 李桉琦, 林梅. 加装旋转叶轮T型通道流场的模态分解[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2848-2857.

Kexin HUANG, Tong LI, Anqi LI, Mei LIN. Mode decomposition of flow field in T-junction with rotating impeller[J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 2848-2857.

图/表 12

图1 物理模型

Fig.1 Physical model

表1 计算边界条件

Table 1 Computational boundary condition

进口	速度/(m/s)	温度/K	Re
主管	0.15	343.48	6578
支管	0.30	296.78	13424

图2 动态模态分解区域

Fig.2 Region of dynamic mode decomposition

图3 特征值（叶片数为2）

Fig.3 Eigenvalues (Np=2)

图4 时间系数和频率的关系

Fig.4 Time coefficient and frequencies

图5 z/Lm=0截面的压力场特征模态的空间分布(Np=2)

Fig.5 DMD modes of pressure field with Np=2 at z/Lm=0

图6 z/Lm=0截面的压力场特征模态的空间分布(Np=3)

Fig.6 DMD modes of pressure field with Np=3 at z/Lm=0

图7 z/Lm=0截面的压力场特征模态的空间分布(Np=4)

Fig.7 DMD modes of pressure field with Np=4 at z/Lm=0

图8 z/Lm=0截面的涡量场特征模态的空间分布(Np=2)

Fig.8 DMD modes of vorticity field with Np=2 at z/Lm=0

图9 z/Lm=0截面的涡量场特征模态的空间分布(Np=3)

Fig.9 DMD modes of vorticity field with Np=3 at z/Lm=0

图10 z/Lm=0截面的涡量场特征模态的空间分布(Np=4)

Fig.10 DMD modes of vorticity field with Np=4 at z/Lm=0

表2 流场参数模态频率

Table 2 DMD mode frequency

叶片数	物理量	模态频率/Hz
叶片数	物理量	Mode 2	Mode 3	Mode 4	Mode 5
N_p=2	压力	0.7	1.3	2.0	19.8
	涡量	0.7	1.3	2.0	4.0
	速度	0.7	0.9	3.9	5.5
	温度	0.7	5.2	6.3	13.0
N_p=3	压力	1.0	2.0	3.0	5.0
	涡量	1.0	2.0	3.0	5.0
	速度	1.0	5.9	6.7	9.3
	温度	1.0	6.2	8.8	14.2
N_p=4	压力	1.3	2.6	4.0	5.3
	涡量	1.3	2.6	4.0	5.3
	速度	1.3	2.7	4.0	6.4
	温度	1.3	2.7	4.0	8.5

参考文献 30

1	Hosseini S M, Yuki K, Hashizume H. Classification of turbulent jets in a T-junction area with a 90-deg bend upstream[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2008, 51(9/10): 2444-2454.
2	Lin C H, Ferng Y M. Investigating thermal mixing and reverse flow characteristics in a T-junction using CFD methodology[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 102: 733-741.
3	Miyoshi K, Utanohara Y, Kamaya M. Penetration flow into a branch pipe causing thermal fatigue at a mixing tee[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2020, 360: 110496.
4	Hekmat M H, Saharkhiz S, Izadpanah E. Investigation on the thermal mixing enhancement in a T-junction pipe[J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2019, 41(7): 276.
5	Kuhn S, Braillard O, Ničeno B, et al. Computational study of conjugate heat transfer in T-junctions[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2010, 240(6): 1548-1557.
6	Nan Z Z, Gu M Z, Li Y R, et al. Effects of the incident angle of branch pipe on the thermal mixing of impinging jets in T-junctions[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 185: 122433.
7	Lampunio L, Duan Y, Eaton M D. The effect of inlet flow conditions upon thermal mixing and conjugate heat transfer within the wall of a T-Junction[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2021, 385: 111484.
8	Su B, Zhu Z L, Ke H B, et al. Large eddy simulation of flow and mixing characteristics in a T-junction under inflow pulsation[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020, 181: 115924.
9	Su B, Zhu Z L, Wang X Y, et al. Effect of temperature difference on the thermal mixing phenomenon in a T-junction under inflow pulsation[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2020, 363: 110611.
10	张航, 张巍, 李伟锋, 等. T型反应器内流动、混合及界面反应特征[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(10): 5064-5073.
	Zhang H, Zhang W, Li W F, et al. Characteristics of flow, mixing and interfacial reaction in T-jet reactor[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(10): 5064-5073.
11	Wu H L, Peng X F, Chen T K. Influence of sleeve tube on the flow and heat transfer behavior at a T-junction[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2003, 46(14): 2637-2644.
12	Lu T, Jiang P X, Guo Z J, et al. Large-eddy simulations (LES) of temperature fluctuations in a mixing tee with/without a porous medium[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2010, 53(21/22): 4458-4466.
13	Wang Y W, Lu T, Wang K S. Effect of particle diameter of porous media on flow and heat transfer in a mixing tee[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2012, 49: 122-130.
14	王永伟. 多孔介质T型管道混合区流动与传热机理和实验研究[D]. 北京: 北京化工大学, 2012.
	Wang Y W. Mechanism and experimental study on flow and heat transfer in mixing zone of porous medium T-shaped pipe[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2012.
15	Huang K X, Su B, Li T, et al. Numerical simulation of the mixing behaviour of hot and cold fluids in the rectangular T-junction with/without an impeller[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2022, 204: 117942.
16	王芳, 贾胜坤, 张会书, 等. 基于实验数据的湍流扩散POD模态分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(9): 4531-4543.
	Wang F, Jia S K, Zhang H S, et al. POD modal analysis of turbulent diffusion based on experimental data[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(9): 4531-4543.
17	Schmid P J. Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 656: 5-28.
18	Schmid P J, Li L, Juniper M P, et al. Applications of the dynamic mode decomposition[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2011, 25(1): 249-259.
19	Sarkar S, Ganguly S, Dalal A, et al. Mixed convective flow stability of nanofluids past a square cylinder by dynamic mode decomposition[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2013, 44: 624-634.
20	Le Clainche S, Vega J M, Soria J. Higher order dynamic mode decomposition of noisy experimental data: the flow structure of a zero-net-mass-flux jet[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2017, 88: 336-353.
21	Menon K, Mittal R. Dynamic mode decomposition based analysis of flow over a sinusoidally pitching airfoil[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2020, 94: 102886.
22	Liu Q, Luo Z B, Deng X, et al. Numerical investigation on flow field characteristics of dual synthetic cold/hot jets using POD and DMD methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(1): 73-87.
23	Wynn A, Pearson D S, Ganapathisubramani B, et al. Optimal mode decomposition for unsteady flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 733: 473-503.
24	Sampath R, Chakravarthy S R. Proper orthogonal and dynamic mode decompositions of time-resolved PIV of confined backward-facing step flow[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2014, 55(9): 1792.
25	Kalghatgi P, Acharya S. Modal analysis of inclined film cooling jet flow[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2014, 136(8): 081007.
26	Roy S, Yi T, Jiang N, et al. Dynamics of robust structures in turbulent swirling reacting flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 816: 554-585.
27	Huang Z W, Li T, Huang K X, et al. Predictions of flow and temperature fields in a T-junction based on dynamic mode decomposition and deep learning[J]. Energy, 2022, 261: 125228.
28	Huang K X, Li T, Su B, et al. Dynamic mode decomposition of mixing characteristics in a T-junction with a rotation impeller[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(9): 095127.
29	Addad Y, Gaitonde U, Laurence D, et al. Optimal unstructured meshing for large eddy simulations[M]//Meyers J, Geurts B J, Sagaut P. Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008: 93-103.
30	Lobanoff V S, Ross R R. Centrifugal Pumps: Design and Application[M]. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992.

[1]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[2]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[3]	叶展羽, 山訸, 徐震原. 用于太阳能蒸发的折纸式蒸发器性能仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 132-140.
[4]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[5]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[6]	谈莹莹, 刘晓庆, 王林, 黄鲤生, 李修真, 王占伟. R1150/R600a自复叠制冷循环开机动态特性实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 213-222.
[7]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[8]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[9]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[10]	程小松, 殷勇高, 车春文. 不同工质在溶液除湿真空再生系统中的性能对比[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3494-3501.
[11]	刘文竹, 云和明, 王宝雪, 胡明哲, 仲崇龙. 基于场协同和耗散的微通道拓扑优化研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3329-3341.
[12]	汪尔奇, 彭书舟, 杨震, 段远源. 含HFO混合体系气液相平衡的理论模型评价[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3216-3225.
[13]	洪瑞, 袁宝强, 杜文静. 垂直上升管内超临界二氧化碳传热恶化机理分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3309-3319.
[14]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[15]	史方哲, 甘云华. 超薄热管启动特性和传热性能数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2814-2823.