流程工业一体化安全管控探讨

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20240057

化工学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 75 ›› Issue (6): 2375-2384.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20240057

• 过程安全 • 上一篇

流程工业一体化安全管控探讨

张建文¹^,²(), 赵挺生³, 万平玉⁴, 王倩琳¹, 窦站¹, 徐波⁵()

^1.北京化工大学安全工程系，北京 100029
^2.北京化工大学化学工程学院，北京 100029
^3.华中科技大学数字建造与工程管理系，湖北武汉 430074
^4.北京化工大学新危险化学品评估及事故鉴定基础研究实验室，北京 100029
^5.中国安全生产科学研究院，北京 100012

收稿日期:2024-01-11 修回日期:2024-04-02 出版日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2024-07-03
通讯作者: 张建文,徐波
作者简介:张建文（1969—），男，博士，教授，zhangjw@buct.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFB3301100);北京化工大学交叉学科研究基金项目(XK2023-07);黄河三角洲可持续发展研究院项目

Discussion on integrated security control in process industry

Jianwen ZHANG¹^,²(), Tingsheng ZHAO³, Pingyu WAN⁴, Qianlin WANG¹, Zhan DOU¹, Bo XU⁵()

^1.Department of Safety Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
^2.College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
^3.Department of Digital Construction and Engineering Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China
^4.National Fundamental Research Laboratory of New Hazardous Chemicals Assessment & Accident Analysis, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
^5.China Academy of Safety Science and Technology, Beijing 100012, China

Received:2024-01-11 Revised:2024-04-02 Online:2024-06-25 Published:2024-07-03
Contact: Jianwen ZHANG, Bo XU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

化工、冶金、石化、钢铁、造纸、电力等流程工业是国家经济社会发展的重要支柱，其安全高效生产具有重要的战略意义。流程工业生产过程工艺繁多、流程长、工序关联耦合，从原料到产品涉及诸多物理化学变化、物质转移转化和能量转换转移等多源、多尺度与多时空因素的交互作用，影响生产安全、物效能效与生态环境。如何实现流程工业一体化安全管控，是一个长期存在又不断变化的问题。一体化安全管控困难的本质在于物质流能量流到数字流的映射、数字流到高质量信息流的转化、信息流到控制流的转换等问题。探讨如何突破物质流、能量流到数字流映射过程的数字化鸿沟，突破数字流到高质量信息流转变的数智化壁垒、信息流到控制流转换的数滞化障碍，保障物质流能量流不失控、数字流信息流不失真、控制流不失误，提出了流程工业一体化安全管控的“五流三化三不”新思路，以期为流程工业一体化安全管控提供新的框架体系基础，促进流程工业的可持续发展。

关键词: 流程工业, 生产, 安全, 过程控制, 五流三化三不

Abstract:

Process industries such as chemical industry, metallurgy, petrochemicals, steel, papermaking, and electric power are important pillars of the country's economic and social development, and their safe and efficient production is of great strategic significance. The prominent characteristics of the process industry are the complicated long production processes and complex correlation and coupling of various processes. From raw materials to products, it involves various physical and chemical processes, such as mass and heat transfer processes, and interactions occurring in multi-source, multi-scale and multi-temporal and spatial, affecting the production safety, the efficiency of material and energy exchange and ecological environment as well. It has been a long-existing and changing problem for process industry to realize the integrated security. The core concern of integrated safety control of process industry lies in the reflection of mass flow and energy flow to digital flow, the transformation of digital flow to high-quality information flow, and the transformation of information flow to control flow. This paper puts forward a novel idea of integrated safety controls in process industry titled “five flows-three transformations-three controls”, and discusses how to break through the digitalization of the mapping process from mass and energy flows to digital flow, break through the digital intelligence problem of the transformation from digital flow to high-quality information flow, and the decision lag problem of the transformation from information flow to control flow. It is expected to provide a new framework system basis for the integrated safety management and control in processindustry and promote the sustainable development of process industry.

Key words: process industry, production, safety, process control, five flows-three transformations-three controls

中图分类号:

TK 012

张建文, 赵挺生, 万平玉, 王倩琳, 窦站, 徐波. 流程工业一体化安全管控探讨[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(6): 2375-2384.

Jianwen ZHANG, Tingsheng ZHAO, Pingyu WAN, Qianlin WANG, Zhan DOU, Bo XU. Discussion on integrated security control in process industry[J]. CIESC Journal, 2024, 75(6): 2375-2384.

图/表 12

图1 单系列2500万吨/年炼油加工工艺流程图

Fig.1 Single-series 25 million tons per year oil refining process flowchart

图2 典型炼钢生产工艺流程图

Fig.2 Typical steelmaking production process flowchart

图3 典型流程工业“五流”结构

Fig.3 Typical structure of “five flows” in process industry

图4 “五流”逻辑结构

Fig.4 Logic structure of “five flows” in process industry

图5 流程工业“五流”的传递逻辑

Fig.5 Transformation logic of “five flows” in chemical process

图6 流程工业“五流三化”壁垒

Fig.6 Barriers of “five flows-three transformations” in process industry

图7 流程工业一体化安全管控“五流三化”结构

Fig.7 Structure of “five flows-three transformations” for integrated safety control in process industry

图8 流程工业“五流-安全”逻辑结构

Fig.8 Logical structure of “five flows-safety” in process industry

图9 固定流化床催化裂化模拟装置系统结构

Fig.9 Schematic representation of fixed bed catalytic cracking simulation system architecture

表1 催化裂化仿真装置节点划分

Table 1 Node division of catalytic cracking simulation device

序号	节点名称	节点描述
1	进料流程	来自界区外的氧气和空气经减压后与原料油和预热后的水混合进入气化器
2	进料控制	利用工业控制系统控制气体和液体进料过程
3	气化-反应流程	利用气化器将液态气体和原料加热至气态后通入反应器与催化剂反应
4	气化-反应控制	利用工业控制系统控制气化器、反应器和冷却器的正常运行
5	产品分离流程	初步冷却后的反应物进入冷却分离器进一步冷却，完成液态产品和气态产品的分离
6	产品分离控制	利用工业控制系统控制冷阱和阀门等设备

图10 装置“五流”风险分布

Fig.10 Risk distribution of “five flows” in device

图11 催化裂化仿真装置风险后果分类

Fig.11 Classification of risk consequences in catalytic cracking simulation device

参考文献 33

8	Gao P, Li W, Sun Y, et al. Risk assessment for gas transmission station based on cloud model based multilevel Bayesian network from the perspective of multi-flow intersecting theory[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2022,159:887-898.
9	Moeller A, Prox M, Schmidt M, et al. Simulation and optimization of material and energy flow systems[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC),IEEE. Austin, TX, USA, 2009: 1444-1455.
10	Wright A J, Oates M R, Greenough R. Concepts for dynamic modelling of energy-related flows in manufacturing[J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 112: 1342-1348.
11	殷瑞钰. 论钢厂制造过程中能量流行为和能量流网络的构建[J]. 钢铁, 2010, 45(4): 1-9.
	Yin R Y. Comment on behavior of energy flow and construction of energy flow network for steel manufacturing process[J]. Iron & Steel, 2010, 45(4): 1-9.
12	国务院安全生产委员会办公室. 国务院安委会办公室关于中国石油天然气集团公司在大连所属企业“7·16”输油管道爆炸火灾等4起事故调查处理结果的通报[J]. 国家安全生产监督管理总局国家煤矿安全监察局公告, 2011(12): 11-20.
	Work Safety Committee of the State Council. Notice of the Work Safety Committee of the State Council on the investigation and handling results of four accidents, including the “July 16” oil pipeline explosion and fire in Dalian, a subsidiary of China Petroleum and Natural Gas Corporation[J]. Gazette of the State Administration of Work Safety and the State Administration of Coal Mine Safety, 2011(12): 11-20.
13	广东省应急管理厅. 茂名石化“6·8”泄漏起火事故调查报告及处理结果公布[EB/OL]. 2023-03-17. .
	Guangdong Provincial Emergency Management Office. The Maoming Petrochemical “June 8” leakage fire accident investigation report and handling results announced[EB/OL]. 2023-03-17. .
14	浜尚亮. 国外企业犯罪案例系列: 环境污染公害之印度博帕尔事件[J]. 人民公安, 2016(5): 58-62.
	Bang S L. A series of foreign corporate crime cases: Bhopal incident in India, a public hazard of environmental pollution[J]. People's Police, 2016(5): 58-62.
15	国务院安全生产委员会办公室. 国务院安委会办公室关于辽宁营口钢铁有限公司“6·22”较大灼烫事故情况的通报: 安委办函〔2023〕86号[EB/OL]. 2023-07-10. .
	Work Safety Committee of the State Council. Notice from the Office of the State Council Safety Committee on the “June 22” large scorching accident at Liaoning Yingkou Iron and Steel Co.[EB/OL]. 2023-07-10. .
16	中金网. 印尼镍冶炼炉火灾造成多人伤亡[EB/OL]. 2023-12-25. .
	China International Capital Corporation. Indonesian nickel smelting furnace fire causing multiple casualties[EB/OL]. 2023-12-25. .
17	上海市人民政府. 关于《上海石油化工股份有限公司“6·18”1#乙二醇装置爆炸事故调查报告》的批复[EB/OL]. 2023-03-31. .
	Shanghai Municipal People's Government. Approval of the investigation report on the “June 18” 1# glycol plant explosion at Shanghai Petrochemical Co.[EB/OL]. 2023-03-31. .
18	新华社. 天津港“8·12”瑞海公司危险品仓库特别重大火灾爆炸事故调查报告公布[EB/OL]. 2016-02-05. .
	Xinhua News Agency. Investigation report on the “August 12” fire and explosion accident at the Ruihai Dangerous Goods Warehouse in Tianjin Port [EB/OL]. 2016-02-05.
19	Wu C, Huang L. A new accident causation model based on information flow and its application in Tianjin Port fire and explosion accident[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2019, 182: 73-85.
20	安全监管总局政策法规司. 吉化“11·13”特大爆炸事故及松花江特别重大水污染事件基本情况及处理结果[EB/OL]. 2006-12-21. .
	Department of Policies and Regulations of the General Administration of Safety Supervision. Basic situation and results of the Jilin Petrochemical “November 13” mega-explosion accident and the particularly significant water pollution incident on the Songhua River[EB/OL]. 2006-12-21.
21	Pallardy R. Deepwater horizon oil spill[EB/OL]. [2023-08-10]. .
22	上海市应急管理局. 上海市应急管理局关于上海宝山宝钢股份冷轧厂“2·24”机械伤害事故调查报告的批复[EB/OL]. 2023-06-16. .
	Shanghai Emergency Management Bureau. Shanghai Municipal Emergency Management Bureau's reply on the investigation report of the “February·24” mechanical injury accident at Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. cold rolling mill in Shanghai[EB/OL]. 2023-06-16. .
1	Qian F, Zhong W M, Du W L. Fundamental theories and key technologies for smart and optimal manufacturing in the process industry[J]. Engineering, 2017, 3(2): 154-160.
2	周恒. 高能耗过程智能操作优化方法研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2021.
	Zhou H. Intelligent optimization of high energy consumption processes[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2021.
3	樊炯明, 胡山鹰, 陈定江, 等. 流程制造业本质性分析[J]. 中国工程科学, 2017, 19(3): 80-88.
	Fan J M, Hu S Y, Chen D J, et al. A study on the essence of process manufacturing[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2017, 19(3): 80-88.
4	He F, Ma X M, Shen K, et al. Study on material and energy flow in steel forging production process[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 8: 12921-12932.
5	黄浪, 吴超, 王秉. “流”视域下的系统安全协同理论模型构建[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(5): 50-55.
	Huang L, Wu C, Wang B. Theoretical modeling of system safety synergy from perspective of “flow”[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(5): 50-55.
6	龙妍, 黄素逸, 刘可. 大系统中物质流、能量流与信息流的基本特征[J]. 华中科技大学学报 (自然科学版), 2008, 36(12): 87-90.
	Long Y, Huang S Y, Liu K. Basic characteristics of material flow, energy flow and information flow in large-scale systems[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Nature Science Edition), 2008, 36(12): 87-90.
7	Ma F M, O'Hare G, Zhang T F, et al. Model property based material balance and energy conservation analysis for process industry energy transfer systems[J]. Energies, 2015, 8(10): 12283-12303.
23	Tao F, Zhang H, Liu A, et al. Digital twin in industry: state-of-the-art[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2019, 15(4): 2405-2415.
24	江海凡, 丁国富, 张剑. 数字孪生车间演化机理及运行机制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(7): 824-832, 841.
	Jiang H F, Ding G F, Zhang J. Evolution and operation mechanism of digital twin shopfloors[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 31(7): 824-832, 841.
25	Kumar S, Moolchandani D, Sarangi S. Hardware-assisted mechanisms to enforce control flow integrity: a comprehensive survey[J]. J. Syst. Archit., 2022, 130: 102644.
26	朱蔚恒, 印鉴, 谢益煌. 基于数据流的任意形状聚类算法[J]. 软件学报, 2006, 17(3): 379-387.
	Zhu W H, Yin J, Xie Y H. Arbitrary shape cluster algorithm for clustering data stream[J]. Journal of Software, 2006, 17(3): 379-387.
27	付建平, 赵海燕, 曹健, 等. 基于事件日志的业务过程控制流异常检测算法: 现状与评测[J/OL]. 计算机集成制造系统, .
	Fu J P, Zhao H Y, Cao J, et al. Anomaly detection algorithm for business process control flow based on event log: status and evaluation[J/OL]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, .
28	刘剑, 苏璞睿, 杨珉, 等. 软件与网络安全研究综述[J]. 软件学报, 2018, 29(1): 42-68.
	Liu J, Su P R, Yang M, et al. Software and cyber security-a survey[J]. Journal of Software, 2018, 29(1): 42-68.
29	陈大伟, 徐茹枝. 工控系统中PLC安全漏洞及控制流完整性研究[J]. 电子科技, 2021, 34(2): 33-37.
	Chen D W, Xu R Z. Research on security vulnerabilities and control flow integrity of PLC in industrial control system[J]. Electronic Science and Technology, 2021, 34(2): 33-37.
30	Ferrario E, Pedroni N, Zio E. Evaluation of the robustness of critical infrastructures by Hierarchical Graph representation, clustering and Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2016, 155: 78-96.
31	Hovden J, Albrechtsen E, Herrera I A. Is there a need for new theories, models and approaches to occupational accident prevention?[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48(8): 950-956.
32	Rasmussen B, Grønberg C D. Accidents and risk control[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1997, 10(5/6): 325-332.
33	Zhang F, Chen L, Zhang B. An integrated STPA with MFM for the identification of cyber-physical hazards in process industry[J/OL]. Process Safety Progress, .

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

125

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	8	0	0	117

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	73	52
比例	58%	42%

摘要

216

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	216

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	34	182
比例	16%	84%

[1]	苏彬, 董浩伟, 罗振敏, 邓军, 王涛, 程方明. 气粉两相体系爆炸动力学特性及机理研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(6): 2109-2122.
[2]	常蕊, 邢蕊蕊, 闫学海. 基于非共价化学的绿色生物可循环肽材料[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1317-1332.
[3]	何宇航, 谢丹, 吕阳成. 微反应器内阳离子聚合研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1302-1316.
[4]	曹跃, 余冲, 李智, 杨明磊. 工业数据驱动的加氢裂化装置多工况切换过渡状态检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3841-3854.
[5]	康飞, 吕伟光, 巨锋, 孙峙. 废锂离子电池放电路径与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3903-3911.
[6]	李珍宝, 李超, 王虎, 王绍瑞, 黎泉. MPP抑制铝镁合金粉尘爆炸微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3608-3614.
[7]	刘晓洋, 喻健良, 侯玉洁, 闫兴清, 张振华, 吕先舒. 螺旋微通道对掺氢甲烷爆轰传播的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3139-3148.
[8]	贠程, 王倩琳, 陈锋, 张鑫, 窦站, 颜廷俊. 基于社团结构的化工过程风险演化路径深度挖掘[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1639-1650.
[9]	高小永, 黄付宇, 郑万鹏, 彭雕, 杨一旭, 黄德先. 考虑调度操作安全平稳性的炼油化工生产过程调度优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1619-1629.
[10]	肖忠良, 尹碧露, 宋刘斌, 匡尹杰, 赵亭亭, 刘成, 袁荣耀. 废旧锂离子电池回收工艺研究进展及其安全风险分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1446-1456.
[11]	苏晓丹, 朱干宇, 李会泉, 郑光明, 孟子衡, 李防, 杨云瑞, 习本军, 崔玉. 湿法磷酸半水工艺考察与石膏结晶过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1805-1817.
[12]	武子超, 汪志雷, 李荣业, 李可昕, 华敏, 潘旭海, 王三明, 蒋军成. 点火方式对欠膨胀氢气射流爆炸超压影响规律研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1409-1418.
[13]	张中秋, 李宏光, 石逸林. 基于人工预测调控策略的复杂化工过程多任务学习方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1195-1204.
[14]	张江淮, 赵众. 碳三加氢装置鲁棒最小协方差约束控制及应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1216-1227.
[15]	杜江龙, 杨雯棋, 黄凯, 练成, 刘洪来. 复合相变材料/空冷复合式锂离子电池模块散热性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 674-689.

流程工业一体化安全管控探讨

Discussion on integrated security control in process industry

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价