• •
收稿日期:
2024-01-25
修回日期:
2024-04-18
出版日期:
2024-04-19
通讯作者:
包志铭
作者简介:
吕方明(2000—),男,硕士研究生,fangming@tju.edu.cn
基金资助:
Fangming LV1(), Zhiming BAO1,2(), Bowen WANG1, Kui JIAO1,2
Received:
2024-01-25
Revised:
2024-04-18
Online:
2024-04-19
Contact:
Zhiming BAO
摘要:
质子交换膜燃料电池在装配过程中,气体扩散层(GDL)会因为装配压力产生形变而侵入流道。基于流体体积法建立截面形状分别为矩形、梯形和正方形的流道在GDL不同侵入程度下的数值模型,并对其进行气-液两相流行为研究,得到了液体滞留、排水效果、GDL面传质面积等方面规律。GDL侵入流道时液体在排出过程中破碎程度减小,液体更容易积聚在一起,影响液体滞留效果。矩形截面流道排液时间更长,梯形和正方形截面流道液体排出时刻滞后。GDL侵入流道时,进气流速的增加使得较为聚集的液体排出速度稳定,并未大幅减小。GDL侵入流道程度较大时,矩形截面流道更多液滴粘附在流道侧壁与GDL面使得GDL面覆盖率较大,梯形截面流道顶部会形成稳定的薄膜流,排液速度大且GDL面覆盖率小。
中图分类号:
吕方明, 包志铭, 王博文, 焦魁. 气体扩散层侵入流道对燃料电池水管理影响研究[J]. 化工学报, DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20240113.
Fangming LV, Zhiming BAO, Bowen WANG, Kui JIAO. Investigation on impact of gas diffusion layer intrusion into channel on water management in fuel cell[J]. CIESC Journal, DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20240113.
流道截面 | 流道尺寸 (x×y×z)/mm3 | 接触角θ/(°) | 侵入比φ | 入口气体速度Uin/(m·s-1) (随侵入程度递增) |
---|---|---|---|---|
矩形 | 0.7×0.4×20 | 壁面 100 GDL 130 | 0、0.125、0.175、0.225 | 6、6.46、6.72、7 |
梯形 | (0.5+0.9)/2×0.4×20 | 6、6.72、7、7.3 | ||
正方形 | 0.53×0.53×20 | 6、6.46、6.72、7 |
表1 算例参数设置
Table 1 Parameters of case
流道截面 | 流道尺寸 (x×y×z)/mm3 | 接触角θ/(°) | 侵入比φ | 入口气体速度Uin/(m·s-1) (随侵入程度递增) |
---|---|---|---|---|
矩形 | 0.7×0.4×20 | 壁面 100 GDL 130 | 0、0.125、0.175、0.225 | 6、6.46、6.72、7 |
梯形 | (0.5+0.9)/2×0.4×20 | 6、6.72、7、7.3 | ||
正方形 | 0.53×0.53×20 | 6、6.46、6.72、7 |
图4 GDL侵入流道液体行为文献实验结果[37]与仿真结果对比
Fig.4 Comparison between experimental results [37] and simulation results on liquid behavior with GDL intrusion into gas channel
图5 三种流道排水过程液体分布(从左到右分别为矩形截面流道、梯形截面流道和正方形截面流道)
Fig.5 Liquid distribution in drainage processes of three types of channels (from left to right: rectangular cross-section channel, trapezoidal cross-section channel, and square cross-section channel)
1 | Chu S, Majumdar A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future[J]. Nature, 2012, 488(7411): 294-303. |
2 | de las Nieves Camacho M, Jurburg D, Tanco M. Hydrogen fuel cell heavy-duty trucks: Review of main research topics[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(68): 29505-29525. |
3 | Staffell I, Scamman D, Velazquez Abad A, et al. The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2019, 12(2): 463-491. |
4 | Ajanovic A, Haas R. Prospects and impediments for hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles in the transport sector[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(16): 10049-10058. |
5 | Guan D Q, Wang B W, Zhang J G, et al. Hydrogen society: from present to future[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2023, 16(11): 4926-4943. |
6 | Wang Y, Chen K S, Mishler J, et al. A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research[J]. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(4): 981-1007. |
7 | Dubau L, Castanheira L, Maillard F, et al. A review of PEM fuel cell durability: materials degradation, local heterogeneities of aging and possible mitigation strategies[J]. WIREs Energy and Environment, 2014, 3(6): 540-560. |
8 | Jiao K, Xuan J, Du Q, et al. Designing the next generation of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Nature, 2021, 595(7867): 361-369. |
9 | Taherian R. RETRACTED: a review of composite and metallic bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cell: Materials, fabrication, and material selection[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 265: 370-390. |
10 | Bao Z M, Niu Z Q, Jiao K. Gas distribution and droplet removal of metal foam flow field for proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 280: 116011. |
11 | Kandlikar S G, Lu Z, Domigan W E, et al. Measurement of flow maldistribution in parallel channels and its application to ex-situ and in-situ experiments in PEMFC water management studies[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2009, 52(7/8): 1741-1752. |
12 | Schmittinger W, Vahidi A. A review of the main parameters influencing long-term performance and durability of PEM fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 180(1): 1-14. |
13 | Yousfi-Steiner N, Moçotéguy P, Candusso D, et al. A review on PEM voltage degradation associated with water management: Impacts, influent factors and characterization[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 183(1): 260-274. |
14 | Theodorakakos A, Ous T, Gavaises M, et al. Dynamics of water droplets detached from porous surfaces of relevance to PEM fuel cells[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2006, 300(2): 673-687. |
15 | Ferreira R B, Falcão D S, Oliveira V B, et al. Numerical simulations of two-phase flow in proton exchange membrane fuel cells using the volume of fluid method–A review[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 277: 329-342. |
16 | Le A D, Zhou B, Shiu H R, et al. Numerical simulation and experimental validation of liquid water behaviors in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell cathode with serpentine channels[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2010, 195(21): 7302-7315. |
17 | Cai Y H, Chen T, Yang T Q, et al. Mechanism of water transport in serpentine cathode channels of proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2012, 209: 90-104. |
18 | Mancusi E, Fontana É, Ulson de Souza A A, et al. Numerical study of two-phase flow patterns in the gas channel of PEM fuel cells with tapered flow field design[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(5): 2261-2273. |
19 | Qin Y Z, Li X G, Jiao K, et al. Effective removal and transport of water in a PEM fuel cell flow channel having a hydrophilic plate[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 113: 116-126. |
20 | Kim J H, Lee G G, Kim W T. Comparison of liquid water dynamics in bent gas channels of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell with different channel cross sections in a channel flooding situation[J]. Energies, 2017, 10(6): 748. |
21 | Niu Z Q, Wang R F, Jiao K, et al. Direct numerical simulation of low Reynolds number turbulent air-water transport in fuel cell flow channel[J]. Science Bulletin, 2017, 62(1): 31-39. |
22 | Bao Z M, Wang Y, Jiao K. Liquid droplet detachment and dispersion in metal foam flow field of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2020, 480: 229150. |
23 | Zamel N, Li X G. Effective transport properties for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells–With a focus on the gas diffusion layer[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2013, 39(1): 111-146. |
24 | Morgan J M, Datta R. Understanding the gas diffusion layer in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. I. How its structural characteristics affect diffusion and performance[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 251: 269-278. |
25 | Bao Z M, Li Y N, Zhou X, et al. Transport properties of gas diffusion layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Effects of compression[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 178: 121608. |
26 | Zhou X, Niu Z Q, Li Y N, et al. Investigation of two-phase flow in the compressed gas diffusion layer microstructures[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(48): 26498-26516. |
27 | Zhang H, Xiao L S, Chuang P Y A, et al. Coupled stress–strain and transport in proton exchange membrane fuel cell with metallic bipolar plates[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 251: 113316. |
28 | Liu Y, Liu P W, Ren J Y, et al. Effect of flow channel shapes of proton exchange membrane fuel Cell on its performances[J]. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 2022, 17(3): 220319. |
29 | Hoppe E, Janßen H, Müller M, et al. The impact of flow field plate misalignment on the gas diffusion layer intrusion and performance of a high-temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2021, 501: 230036. |
30 | Carrère P, Prat M. Impact of non-uniform wettability in the condensation and condensation-liquid water intrusion regimes in the cathode gas diffusion layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2019, 145: 106045. |
31 | Niu Z Q, Bao Z M, Wu J T, et al. Two-phase flow in the mixed-wettability gas diffusion layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 232: 443-450. |
32 | Bao Z M, Niu Z Q, Jiao K. Analysis of single- and two-phase flow characteristics of 3-D fine mesh flow field of proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2019, 438: 226995. |
33 | Keller N, Hübner P, von Unwerth T. Investigation of intrusion effects of a gas diffusion layer into channel cross sections depending on channel parameters of metallic bipolar plates[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(30): 15366-15379. |
34 | Ali Atyabi S, Afshari E, Wongwises S, et al. Effects of assembly pressure on PEM fuel cell performance by taking into accounts electrical and thermal contact resistances[J]. Energy, 2019, 179: 490-501. |
35 | Lorenzini-Gutierrez D, Kandlikar S G, Hernandez-Guerrero A, et al. Residence time of water film and slug flow features in fuel cell gas channels and their effect on instantaneous area coverage ratio[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 279: 567-580. |
36 | Tongpun P, Bumrungthaichaichan E, Wattananusorn S. Investigation of entrance length in circular and noncircular conduits by computational fluid dynamics simulation[J]. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology (SJST), 2014, 36(4): 471-475. |
37 | Jeon D H, Kim H. Effect of compression on water transport in gas diffusion layer of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell using lattice Boltzmann method[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 294: 393-405. |
[1] | 李文俊, 赵中阳, 倪震, 周灿, 郑成航, 高翔. 基于气-液传质强化的湿法烟气脱硫CFD模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(2): 505-519. |
[2] | 詹小斌, 王会彬, 蒋亚龙, 史铁林. 声共振混合器高黏度流体混合的功耗特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(2): 531-542. |
[3] | 陈宏, 江坤, 唐廷江, 黄易元, 池滨, 廖世军. 大功率质子交换膜燃料电池电堆膜电极一致性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(2): 637-646. |
[4] | 麻雪怡, 刘克勤, 胡激江, 姚臻. POE溶液聚合反应器内混合与反应过程的CFD研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 322-337. |
[5] | 张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301. |
[6] | 肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95. |
[7] | 李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840. |
[8] | 温凯杰, 郭力, 夏诏杰, 陈建华. 一种耦合CFD与深度学习的气固快速模拟方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3775-3785. |
[9] | 陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902. |
[10] | 邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406. |
[11] | 岳林静, 廖艺涵, 薛源, 李雪洁, 李玉星, 刘翠伟. 凹坑缺陷对厚孔板喉部空化流动特性影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3292-3308. |
[12] | 汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255. |
[13] | 牛超, 沈胜强, 杨艳, 潘泊年, 李熠桥. 甲烷BOG喷射器流动过程计算与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2858-2868. |
[14] | 何晓崐, 刘锐, 薛园, 左然. MOCVD生长AlN单晶薄膜的气相和表面化学反应综述[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2800-2813. |
[15] | 刘道银, 陈柄岐, 张祖扬, 吴琰. 颗粒聚团结构对曳力特性影响的数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2351-2362. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||