大管径液氢输送管线分阶段预冷传热特性研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20250779

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

低温液氢是重要的化工产品，作为未来低碳能源重要载体备受关注。液氢管道预冷是其液氢高效输运的关键一环。建立系统完善度较高的一维液氢流动模型，通过增加径向高真空多层绝热材料传热方案，应用合适压降、传热经验关联式，并设计适用大管径液氢输送管线的分阶段预冷方案。在对公称直径DN314、长度300 m的水平管预冷过程模拟中，气冷阶段降温平缓，内金属管壁面热通量低于1 kW/m²，预冷耗时37 h。液冷阶段降温速率先快后慢，两相流壁面热通量最大约9.4 kW/m²，耗时约0.45 h，对比常规恒流量预冷方案减小液氢质量消耗55%。管内最大压降60 kPa，呈现脉动动态变化，随流动趋于稳定脉动幅度减小稳定至40 kPa。研究结果可为长距离输运液氢高效预冷技术提供理论支撑。

关键词: 低温液氢, 管道预冷, 流动沸腾, 气液两相流, 传热特性

Abstract:

Cryogenic liquid hydrogen is a crucial chemical product and has garnered significant attention as a key carrier for future low-carbon energy. Precooling of liquid hydrogen pipelines is a critical step in ensuring efficient liquid hydrogen transportation. This study establishes a comprehensive one-dimensional liquid hydrogen flow model by incorporating a radial high-vacuum multilayer insulation heat transfer scheme, applying appropriate empirical correlations for pressure drop and heat transfer, and designing a staged precooling strategy suitable for large-diameter liquid hydrogen pipelines. In the simulation of the precooling process for a 300 m horizontal pipe with a nominal diameter of 314, the vapor cooling stage exhibits a gradual temperature reduction, with an inner metal pipe wall heat flux below 1 kW/m², taking 37 h to complete. During the liquid cooling phase, the cooling rate initially increased rapidly and then decreased, with the maximum two-phase wall heat flux reaching approximately 9.4 kW/m². The cooling process took approximately 0.45 h, reducing liquid hydrogen mass consumption by 55% compared to conventional constant-flow pre-cooling schemes. The maximum pressure drop inside the pipe reaches 60 kPa, displaying dynamic pulsating fluctuations that stabilize at 40 kPa as the flow becomes steadier. The findings of this study provide theoretical support for the development of efficient precooling technologies for long-distance liquid hydrogen transportation.

Key words: liquid hydrogen, pipeline precooling, flow boiling, two-phase flow, heat transfer characteristics

中图分类号:

TK 91

陆新宇, 朱少龙, 甘浩然, 王凯, 邱利民, 包士然. 大管径液氢输送管线分阶段预冷传热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(12): 6562-6572.

Xinyu LU, Shaolong ZHU, Haoran GAN, Kai WANG, Limin QIU, Shiran BAO. Study on staged precooling heat transfer characteristics of large-diameter liquid hydrogen pipelines[J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(12): 6562-6572.

图/表 18

图1 绝热层结构示意图

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of insulation layer structure

图2 内金属管段微元传热计算示意图

Fig.2 Heat transfer calculations of inner pipe microelement

图3 管段微元离散方案示意图

Fig.3 Discrete scheme for pipeline segment elements

表1 分阶段预冷方案

Table 1 Staged chilldown process

预冷阶段		工质种类	工质温度	流量
气冷阶段	阶段一	氮气	110 K	196~2457 L/min
	阶段二	氢气	120 K	3000 L/min
	阶段三	氢气	50 K	523~1080 L/min
液冷阶段	阶段四	液氢	20.3 K	2.7547 kg/s

表2 管线模型参数

Table 2 Pipeline geometric parameters

几何尺寸与边界条件	数值
管道长度/m	300
管道内径/mm	314
管道外径/mm	348
环境温度/K	293.15
管道初始温度/K	293.15
管内初始压力/kPa	100
管内初始干度	1

图4 网格无关性验证

Fig.4 Mesh irrelevance verification

表3 LNG接收站预冷过程系统参数

Table 3 System parameters of liquid unloading process at LNG receiving terminal

预冷阶段	参数	数值
气冷阶段	体积流量/(L/min)	2000~8000
	来流温度/K	193.15~253.15
	管线初始温度/K	295.15
	管内初始压力/kPa	100
液冷阶段	质量流量/(kg/s)	0.55
	来流温度/K	115.15
	管内初始温度	气冷阶段最终温度
	管内初始压力/kPa	100

图5 气冷阶段实验值对比模拟值

Fig.5 Natural gas chilldown: comparison between experimental and simulated values

图6 液冷阶段实验值对比模拟值

Fig.6 LNG chilldown: comparison between experimental and simulated values

图7 气冷阶段不同管段温度变化

Fig.7 Temperature changes in different pipe sections during the vapor chilldown stage

图8 气冷阶段不同管段内壁面热通量

Fig.8 Heat flux in different pipe sections during the vapor chilldown stage

图9 液冷阶段不同管段温度变化

Fig.9 Temperature changes in different pipe sections during the liquid chilldown stage

图10 不同管段内气相体积分数变化

Fig.10 Vapor phase volume fraction change in different pipe sections

图11 液冷阶段不同管段内壁面热通量

Fig.11 Heat flux in different pipe sections during the liquid chilldown stage

图12 150 m管段的沸腾特性曲线

Fig.12 Boiling characteristic curve at 150 m pipe section

图13 不同管段质量流量

Fig.13 Mass flow rate in different pipe sections

图14 不同管段压力

Fig.14 Pressure in different pipe sections

图15 不同管段动态压降

Fig.15 Dynamic pressure drop in different pipe sections

参考文献 32

[1]	Muhammed N S, Gbadamosi A O, Epelle E I, et al. Hydrogen production, transportation, utilization, and storage: recent advances towards sustainable energy[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 73: 109207.
[2]	吴朝玲. 氢气储存和输运[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2021.
	Wu Z L. Hydrogen Storage and Transportation [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2021.
[3]	Ikeuba A I, Sonde C U, Charlie D, et al. A review on exploring the potential of liquid hydrogen as a fuel for a sustainable future[J]. Sustainable Chemistry One World, 2024, 3: 100022.
[4]	Wallington T J, Woody M, Lewis G M, et al. Green hydrogen pathways, energy efficiencies, and intensities for ground, air, and marine transportation[J]. Joule, 2024, 8(8): 2190-2207.
[5]	全国氢能标准化技术委员会. 液氢贮存和运输技术要求: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.
	National Technical Committee for Hydrogen Energy Standardization. Technical requirements for storage and transportation of liquid hydrogen: [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2021.
[6]	Mustafi S. High Reynolds number vertical up-flow parameters for cryogenic two-phase helium I[R]. Digital Repository at the University of Maryland, 2014.
[7]	Hartwig J, Styborski J, Stiegemeier B, et al. Liquid hydrogen line chilldown experiments at high Reynolds numbers(Ⅱ): Analysis[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 156: 119805.
[8]	Hartwig J, Styborski J, McQuillen J, et al. Liquid hydrogen line chilldown experiments at high Reynolds numbers. Optimal chilldown methods[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 137: 703-713.
[9]	Hartwig J, Chung J N, Dong J, et al. Nitrogen flow boiling and chilldown experiments in microgravity using pulse flow and low-thermally conductive coatings[J]. NPJ Microgravity, 2022, 8: 33.
[10]	Hartwig J, Hu H, Styborski J, et al. Comparison of cryogenic flow boiling in liquid nitrogen and liquid hydrogen chilldown experiments[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, 88: 662-673.
[11]	Hu H, Chung J N, Amber S H. An experimental study on flow patterns and heat transfer characteristics during cryogenic chilldown in a vertical pipe[J]. Cryogenics, 2012, 52(4/5/6): 268-277.
[12]	Shirai Y, Shiotsu M, Kobayashi H, et al. DNB heat flux in forced flow of subcooled liquid hydrogen under pressures[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2012, 1434(1): 1067-1074.
[13]	Shirai Y, Tatsumoto H, Shiotsu M, et al. Forced flow boiling heat transfer of liquid hydrogen for superconductor cooling[J]. Cryogenics, 2011, 51(6): 295-299.
[14]	Sakamoto Y, Kobayashi H, Naruo Y, et al. Investigation of boiling hydrogen flow characteristics under low-pressure conditions — flow regime transition characteristics[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(11): 8239-8252.
[15]	Sakamoto Y, Kobayashi H, Naruo Y, et al. Investigation of boiling hydrogen heat transfer characteristics under low-pressure conditions[J]. Cryogenics, 2023, 131: 103652.
[16]	Wang L, Shangguan S, Qu M, et al. Experimental study on cryogenic chilldown performance through a thick-wall tube[J]. Cryogenics, 2022, 122: 103436.
[17]	Mercado M, Wong N, Hartwig J, et al. Assessment of two-phase heat transfer coefficient and critical heat flux correlations for cryogenic flow boiling in pipe heating experiments[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 133: 295-315.
[18]	Darr S R, Hartwig J W. Two-phase convection heat transfer correlations for liquid hydrogen pipe chilldown[J]. Cryogenics, 2020, 105: 102999.
[19]	Darr S, Hartwig J, Dong J, et al. Two-phase pipe quenching correlations for liquid nitrogen and liquid hydrogen[J]. American society of mechanical engineers, 2019, 141(4): 042901.
[20]	Broughton J, Joshi Y K. Flow boiling in geometrically modified microchannels[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(10): 103308.
[21]	Chen J, Zeng R, Zhang X, et al. Numerical modeling of flow film boiling in cryogenic chilldown process using the AIAD framework[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 124: 269-278.
[22]	Chen J Y, Zeng R, Chen H, et al. Effects of wall superheat and mass flux on flow film boiling in cryogenic chilldown process[J]. AIP Advances, 2020, 10: 015123.
[23]	曾锐锐. 低温流体传输管预冷过程的两相流动与传热耦合数值研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2020.
	Zeng R R. Numerical study on coupled two-phase flow and heat transfer in pre-cooling process of cryogenic fluid transfer pipes[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2020.
[24]	Kunniyoor K R, Ghosh P. Development of transient flow film boiling heat transfer correlations for energy efficient cryogenic fluid management during feed line quenching operation[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2023, 204: 123806.
[25]	Kunniyoor K R, Govind R, Venkateswaran K S, et al. Liquid hydrogen pipeline chill-down: mathematical modelling and investigation[J]. Cryogenics, 2021, 118: 103324.
[26]	Luchinsky D G, Khasin M, Timucin D, et al. Inferential framework for two-fluid model of cryogenic chilldown[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 114: 796-808.
[27]	Majumdar A K, Steadman T E, Maroney J L, et al. Numerical modeling of propellant boil-off in a cryogenic storage tank[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2008, 985(1): 1507-1514.
[28]	Collier J G, Thome J R. Convective Boiling and Condensation[M]. Oxford Engineering Science Series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
[29]	Churchill S W. Friction factor equations spans all fluid-flow regimes[J]. Chemical Engineering, 1977, 84: 91-92.
[30]	Friedel L. Improved friction pressure drop correlations for horizontal and vertical two-phase pipe flow[C]// European Two-phase Group Meeting. Ispra, 1979.
[31]	Steiner D, Taborek J. Flow boiling heat transfer in vertical tubes correlated by an asymptotic model[J]. Heat Transfer Engineering, 1992, 13(2): 43-69.
[32]	Wang L, Wang J J, Huang X N, et al. Experimental investigation on cryogenic chilldown performance under high-Reynolds number condition and using interior micro-fin structure[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 182: 121979.