基于EMMS模型的大型催化裂化装置再生器气固分布数值模拟

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20150821

化工学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (8): 2911-2919.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20150821

基于EMMS模型的大型催化裂化装置再生器气固分布数值模拟

刘雅宁¹, 鲁波娜¹, 卢利强¹, 陈飞国¹, 葛蔚¹, 吴雷², 王韶华², 李静海¹

1 中国科学院过程工程研究所多相复杂系统国家重点实验室, 北京 100190;
2 中国石化工程建设有限公司, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2015-06-03 修回日期:2015-06-23 出版日期:2015-08-05 发布日期:2015-08-05
通讯作者: 葛蔚
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(21306201,21225628);国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAE05B01)。

EMMS-based numerical simulation on gas and solids distribution in large-scale FCC regenerators

LIU Yaning¹, LU Bona¹, LU Liqiang¹, CHEN Feiguo¹, GE Wei¹, WU Lei², WANG Shaohua², LI Jinghai¹

1 State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2 SINOPEC Engineering Incorporation, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2015-06-03 Revised:2015-06-23 Online:2015-08-05 Published:2015-08-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21306201, 21225628) and the National Science and Technology Infrastructure Program (2012BAE05B01).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

大型催化裂化装置中再生器的规模庞大,其中的气固分布装置对整体性能有重要影响。与传统的冷模实验相比,对再生器整体和气固分布器局部的多尺度计算机模拟有利于更深入地了解其流动规律,高效便捷地考察不同结构设计与操作条件对气固分布的影响,辅助其优化设计。结合双流体模型和EMMS曳力模型,首先模拟了中石化现有3.5 Mt·a^-1大规模清洁汽油生产装置的再生反应器,进而模拟并分析了基于同一工艺设计的7 Mt·a^-1超大规模再生反应器内不同气体和固体分布器对流动与混合过程的影响。模拟结果表明:3环较2环分布器能有效改善气体分布的均匀性,但增加每个环上的气体入口数对其分布的改善有限;而对固体分布器,开孔率减小可增加其阻力,并在一定程度上改善混合性能。进一步讨论了研究分布环喷口处的气固流动与混合细节的必要性,初步展示了基于EMMS模型的离散颗粒模拟方法(EMMS-DPM)对其的有效性。

关键词: EMMS模型, EMMS-DPM, 催化裂化再生器, 气体分布器, 固体分布器, 混合

Abstract:

Micro-scale discrete particle method (DPM) and meso-scale computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, both based on the energy-minimization multi-scale (EMMS) model, were carried out on the complex gas-solid flow in the regenerators of fluid catalytic cracking (FCC), aiming to provide visualized quantitative analysis for the performance improvement of the newly designed systems with unprecedented 7 Mt·a^-1 throughput. For verification, a current 3.5 Mt·a^-1 regenerator was first successfully simulated. Then, a 7 Mt·a^-1 regenerator was simulated to investigate the performance of the air and solids distributors. The simulation results showed that increasing the gas ring number from 2 to 3 can improve the homogeneity of solids distribution significantly, while increasing the gas inlet number from 1 to 2 for the 3-gas-ring case made little improvement. For solid phase distributor, the injection of solids and their mixing with the internal material were simulated and analyzed. It was demonstrated that decreasing the hole fraction can effectively increase the resistance and improve the mixing performance. The necessity of understanding the detailed flow field around the nozzles for further improvements is demonstrated, and EMMS-DPM can be a powerful tool for this purpose.

Key words: EMMS model, EMMS-DPM, FCC regenerator, gas distributor, solids distributor, mixing

中图分类号:

TQ021.1

刘雅宁, 鲁波娜, 卢利强, 陈飞国, 葛蔚, 吴雷, 王韶华, 李静海. 基于EMMS模型的大型催化裂化装置再生器气固分布数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(8): 2911-2919.

LIU Yaning, LU Bona, LU Liqiang, CHEN Feiguo, GE Wei, WU Lei, WANG Shaohua, LI Jinghai. EMMS-based numerical simulation on gas and solids distribution in large-scale FCC regenerators[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(8): 2911-2919.

参考文献 25

[1]	Chen Junwu(陈俊武), Lu Hanwei(卢捍卫). Prospects of status and role of FCC in refinery—FCC will continue to play a leading role in petroleum refining industry [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica: Petroleum Processing Section(石油学报:石油加工), 2003, 19(1): 1-11.
[2]	Cui Shouye(崔守业), Xu Youhao(许友好), Cheng Congli(程从礼), Gong Jianhong(龚剑洪). Commercialization and new developments of MIP technology [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica: Petroleum Processing Section(石油学报:石油加工), 2010, (suppl.): 23-28.
[3]	Shan Honghong(山红红), Li Chunyi(李春义), Niu Genlin(钮根林), Yang Chaohe(杨朝合), Zhang Jianfang(张建芳). Research progress in fluid catalytic cracking technology [J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum(石油大学学报), 2005, 29(6): 135-150.
[4]	Xu Youhao. Advance in China fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process [J]. Scientia Sinica Chimica, 2014, 44(1): 13-24.
[5]	Jin Yong(金涌), Yu Zhiqing(俞芷青), Sun Zhufan(孙竹范), Peng Bingpu(彭秉璞). Investigationon branched pipe distributors for fluidized beds (Ⅱ): Deternination of desigh parameters for branched pipe distributors [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China)(化工学报), 1984, (3): 203-213.
[6]	Wang Zhangmao(王樟茂), Zhang Nianying(张年英), Lü Dewei(吕德伟), Chen Gantang(陈甘棠), Liu Qing(刘青), Jiang Yinrui(江银瑞), Lai Chenlie(赖成烈). Study on characteristics of perforated gas-sidtributors in a commercial fluidized bed [J]. PetroChemical Technoloty(石油化工), 1986, 7: 399-405.
[7]	Wu Chunlian(巫春连), Wei Yaodong(魏耀东), Cai Lianbo(蔡连波), Chen Qiang(陈强). CFD simulation of bubble-type gas distributor's flow field for gas-liquid bubble column [J]. Chemical Engineering &Machinery(化工机械), 2013, 40(30): 340-346.
[8]	Wang Weiwen(王伟文), Xu Kai(许凯), Li Jianlong(李建隆), Li Xingang(李鑫钢). Numerical simulation of the flow field in double cone-diversion gas distributo [J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities(高校化学工程学报), 2009, 23(6): 945-950.
[9]	Li Guang, Yang Xiaogang, Dai Gance. CFD simulation of effects of the configuration of gas distributors on gas-liquid flow and mixing in a bubble column [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2009, 64: 5104-5116.
[10]	Akbari V, Borhani T N G, Godini H R, Hamid M K A. Model-based analysis of the impact of the distributor on the hydrodynamic performance of industrial polydisperse gas phase fluidized bed polymerization reactors [J]. Powder Technology, 2014, 267: 398-411.
[11]	Bahadori F, Rahimi R. Simulations of gas distributors in the design of shallow bubble column reactors [J]. Chem. Eng. Tech., 2007, 30: 443-447.
[12]	Chen Junwu(陈俊武). Fluid Catalytic Cracking Technology and Engineering (催化裂化工艺与工程)[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: China PetroChemical Press, 2005
[13]	Li Jinghai(李静海), Ge Wei(葛蔚), Ouyang Jie(欧阳洁), Yang Ning(杨宁), Gao Shiqiu(高士秋), Song Wenli(宋文立). Multi-scale Simulation of Particle-Fluid Complex Systems (颗粒流体复杂系统的多尺度模拟)[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2005.
[14]	Yang Ning, Wang Wei, Ge Wei, Li Jinghai. Simulation of heterogeneous structure in a circulating fluidized bed riser by combining the two-fluid model with the EMMS approach [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43(18): 5548-5561.
[15]	Yang Ning, Wang Wei, Ge Wei, Li Jinghai. CFD simulation of concurrent-up gas-solid flow in circulating fluidized beds with structure-dependent drag coefficient [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2003, 96: 71-80.
[16]	Xiao Haitao(肖海涛), Qi Haiying(祁海鹰), You Changfu(由长福), Xu Xuchang(徐旭常). The oretical model of drag between gas and solid phase [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China)(化工学报), 2003, 54(3): 311-315.
[17]	Wang Wei, Li Jinghai. Simulation of gas-solid two-phase flow by a multi-scale CFD approach-of the EMMS model to the sub-grid level [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62: 208-231.
[18]	Wang Junwu, Ge Wei, Li Jinghai. Eulerian simulation of heterogeneous gas-solid flows in CFB risers: EMMS-based sub-grid scale model with a revised cluster description [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, 63: 1553-1571.
[19]	Lu Bona(鲁波娜), Cheng Congli(程从礼), Lu Weimin(鲁维民), Wang Wei(王维), Xu Youhao(许友好). Numerical simulation of reaction process in MIP riser based on multi-scale model [J]. CIESC Journal(化工学报), 2013, 64(6): 1983-1992.
[20]	Lu Bona, Wang Wei, Li Jinghai, Wang Xianghui, Gao Shiqiu, Lu Weimin, Xu Youhao, Long Jun. Multi-scale CFD simulation of gas-solid flow in MIP reactors with a structure-dependent drag model [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62: 5487-5494.
[21]	Hong Kun, Shi Zhansheng, Ullah Atta, Wang Wei. Extending the bubble-based EMMS model to CFB riser simulations [J]. Powder Technology, 2014, 266: 424-432.
[22]	Shi Zhansheng, Wang Wei, Li Jinghai. A bubble-based EMMS model for gas-solid bubbling fluidization [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66: 5541-5555.
[23]	Liu Yaning, Chen Jianhua, Ge Wei, Wang Junwu, Wang Wei. Acceleration of CFD simulation of gas-solid flow by coupling macro-/meso-scale EMMS model [J]. Powder Technology, 2011, 212: 289-295.
[24]	Liu Xinhua, Hu Shanwei, Jiang Yuefang, Li Jinghai. Extension and application of energy-minimization multi-scale (EMMS) theory for full-loop hydrodynamic modeling of complex gas-solid reactors [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 278: 492-503
[25]	Lu Liqiang, Xu Ji, Ge Wei, Yue Yunpeng, Liu Xinhua, Li Jinghai. EMMS-based discrete particle method (EMMS-DPM) for simulation of gas-solid flows [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2014, 120: 67-87.

基于EMMS模型的大型催化裂化装置再生器气固分布数值模拟

EMMS-based numerical simulation on gas and solids distribution in large-scale FCC regenerators

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[2]	谈莹莹, 刘晓庆, 王林, 黄鲤生, 李修真, 王占伟. R1150/R600a自复叠制冷循环开机动态特性实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 213-222.
[3]	程小松, 殷勇高, 车春文. 不同工质在溶液除湿真空再生系统中的性能对比[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3494-3501.
[4]	汪尔奇, 彭书舟, 杨震, 段远源. 含HFO混合体系气液相平衡的理论模型评价[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3216-3225.
[5]	黄可欣, 李彤, 李桉琦, 林梅. 加装旋转叶轮T型通道流场的模态分解[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2848-2857.
[6]	张艳梅, 袁涛, 李江, 刘亚洁, 孙占学. 高效SRB混合菌群构建及其在酸胁迫条件下的性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2599-2610.
[7]	姚晓宇, 沈俊, 李健, 李振兴, 康慧芳, 唐博, 董学强, 公茂琼. 流体气液临界参数测量方法研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1847-1861.
[8]	党玉荣, 莫春兰, 史科锐, 方颖聪, 张子杨, 李作顺. 综合评价模型联合遗传算法的混合工质ORC系统性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1884-1895.
[9]	唐茹意, 潘罕骞, 郑侠俊, 张广欣, 汪星平, 崔希利, 邢华斌. Z型全氟聚醚的结构表征[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 479-486.
[10]	席国君, 刘子涵, 雷广平. FeTPPs-CuBTC协同强化低浓度煤层气吸附分离[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3940-3949.
[11]	杨克, 王辰升, 纪虹, 郑凯, 邢志祥, 毕海普, 蒋军成. 聚多巴胺包覆混合粉体抑制甲烷爆炸的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4245-4254.
[12]	裴仁花, 王永洪, 张新儒, 李晋平. 碳纳米管/环糊精金属有机骨架协同强化混合基质膜的CO₂分离[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3904-3914.
[13]	孟辉波, 蒙彤, 禹言芳, 王宗勇, 吴剑华. Ross LPD型静态混合器内湍流传热与混合强化特性[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3541-3552.
[14]	侯跃辉, 刘璇, 廉应江, 韩梅, 尧超群, 陈光文. 超声微反应器内三硝基间苯三酚合成工艺研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3597-3607.
[15]	禹言芳, 刘桓辰, 孟辉波, 刘励图, 李毓, 吴剑华. Lightnin静态混合器内气泡分散流体动力学特性实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3565-3575.