密闭空间内聚乙烯粉尘爆炸火焰传播特性的实验研究

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20181072

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用竖直、可视粉尘爆炸火焰传播实验平台，结合粒子图像测速PIV技术测得喷粉的冷态流场分布，研究聚乙烯粉尘在密闭容器内的爆炸火焰传播特性，探讨火焰结构与锋面位置的动态变化、火焰传播速度等参数的变化规律。结果表明，在200～1000 g/m³浓度范围内，低浓度聚乙烯粉尘爆炸火焰呈不连续片羽状结构，火焰锋面呈离散的星点状。粉尘浓度增加，火焰连续性及亮度增强，锋面呈齿状，并在400 g/m³火焰最明亮，火焰平均传播速度均随粉尘浓度的增加先增大后减小。采用均方根湍流速度量化体系整体脉动幅度，浓度接近最佳爆炸浓度400 g/m³时，均方根湍流速度为3.21 m/s。

关键词: 密闭空间, 粉体, 湍流, 爆炸, 火焰结构, 火焰传播速度

Abstract:

An experimental apparatus which could withstand high pressure and with good visibility was modified. PIV technology was applied to measure the distribution of cold pulverized flow field. Flame propagation characteristics of polyethylene dust explosion were investigated in closed vessel. In experiments, flame structure, flame brightness, flame front location, flame propagation speed and other parameters variation were analyzed. The results show that in the concentration range of 200—1000 g/m³, the low-concentration polyethylene dust explosion flame has a discontinuous fin-like structure, and the flame front is discrete star-shaped. On further increasing the dust concentration the flame continuity as well as the luminance increased and reached the top at the concentration of 400 g/m³. The velocity fluctuated obviously during the flame propagation process of polyethylene dust explosion at different concentrations, which increased at first and then decreased. The velocity-fluctuation of the flame was more obvious when it was close to the optimum explosion concentration range. The RMS turbulent velocity equation was adopted to quantify overall pulsation amplitude. Dust concentration was close to the optimal explosion concentration of 400 g/m³ and the RMS turbulent velocity was 3.21 m/s.

Key words: confined space, powders, turbulent flow, explosions, flame structure, flame propagation velocity

中图分类号:

X 937

喻健良, 侯玉洁, 闫兴清, 纪文涛, 于小哲, 王祎博. 密闭空间内聚乙烯粉尘爆炸火焰传播特性的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(3): 1227-1235.

Jianliang YU, Yujie HOU, Xingqing YAN, Wentao JI, Xiaozhe YU, Yibo WANG. Experimental study on flame propagation characteristic of polyethylene dust explosion under confined chamber[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(3): 1227-1235.

图/表 13

图1 聚乙烯粉尘粒径分布（内图为50 μm尺度下的扫描电镜图）

Fig.1 Diameter distribution of polyethylene dust

图2 可视化粉尘爆炸装置

Fig.2 Schematic diagram of visual dust explosion chamber

图3 不同浓度下聚乙烯粒子冷态流场随时间变化规律

Fig.3 Distribution of cold aerodynamic field of polyethylene varying with time at different dust concentrations

图4 不同浓度时聚乙烯粒子冷态流场速度矢量图

Fig.4 Velocity vector maps of cold aerodynamic field of polyethylene at different dust concentrations

图5 200 g/m3聚乙烯粉尘爆炸火焰结构随时间变化规律

Fig.5 Flame structure of polyethylene varying with time at dust concentration of 200 g/m3

图6 400 g/m3聚乙烯粉尘爆炸火焰结构随时间变化规律

Fig.6 Flame structure of polyethylene varying with time at dust concentration of 400 g/m3

图7 600 g/m3聚乙烯粉尘爆炸火焰结构随时间变化规律

Fig.7 Flame structure of polyethylene varying with time at dust concentration of 600 g/m3

图8 800 g/m3聚乙烯粉尘爆炸火焰结构随时间变化规律

Fig.8 Flame structure of polyethylene varying with time at dust concentration of 800 g/m3

图9 1000 g/m3聚乙烯粉尘爆炸火焰结构随时间变化规律

Fig.9 Flame structure of polyethylene varying with time at dust concentration of 1000 g/m3

图10 不同浓度的聚乙烯粉尘爆炸火焰锋面位置随时间变化

Fig.10 Flame front position of polyethylene dust explosion along with time at different concentrations

图11 火焰传播时聚乙烯粒子微观运动图(橙色表示粒子受自身重力作用开始向下运动，蓝色表示此时向上运动的粒子，红色表示此时受力平衡静止的粒子)

Fig.11 Micrograph of polyethylene dust motion in flame propagation

图12 不同浓度的聚乙烯粉尘爆炸火焰传播瞬时速度(a)及脉动程度(b)随时间的变化

Fig.12 Flame propagation velocities (a) and fluctuant deviation (b) of polyethylene dust explosion along with time at different dust concentrations

图13 不同浓度的聚乙烯粉尘爆炸火焰均方根湍流速度

Fig.13 RMS turbulence velocity of polyethylene dust explosion along at different dust concentrations

参考文献 30

1	刘义, 赵东风, 路帅, 等. 聚乙烯粉体粒径对静电放电点火的影响[J]. 河北大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 27(6): 625-629.
	LiuY, ZhaoD F, LuS, et al. Effects of polyethylene size on ignition of electrostatics discharge[J]. Journal of Hebei University (Natural Science Edition), 2007, 27(6): 625-629.
2	由衷. 聚乙烯工厂爆炸原因分析[J]. 化工科技动态, 1991, (3): 34-35.
	YouZ. Cause analysis of polyethylene plant explosion[J]. Chemical Technology Trends, 1991, (3): 34-35.
3	YanX Q, YuJ L. Dust explosion incidents in China[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2012, 31(2): 187-189.
4	冯文萍. 高密度聚乙烯生产火灾爆炸危险性分析及评价[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2005.
	FengW P. Risk analysis and assessment of fire explosion for high-density polyethylene production[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2005.
5	GaoW, MogiT, SunJ H, et al. Effects of particle size distributions on flame propagation mechanism during octadecanol dust explosions[J]. Powder Technology, 2013, 249: 168-174.
6	GaoW, DobashiR, MogiT, et al. Effects of particle characteristics on flame propagation behavior during organic dust explosions in a half-closed chamber [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2012, 25(6): 993-999.
7	孙金华. PMMA 微粒子云中传播火焰的基本结构[J]. 热科学与技术, 2004, 3(1): 76-80.
	SunJ H. Structure of flame propagating through PMMA particle cloud[J]. Journal of Thermal Science and Technology, 2004, 3(1): 76-80.
8	ChenJ L, DobashiR, HiranoT. Mechanisms of flame propagation through combustible particle clouds[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1996, 9(3): 225-229.
9	YuJ L, ZhangX Y, ZhangQ, et al. Combustion behaviors and flame microstructures of micro- and nano-titanium dust explosions[J]. Fuel, 2016, 181: 785-792.
10	SunJ H, DobashiR, HiranoT. Structure of flames propagating through aluminum particles cloud and combustion process of particles[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, 19(6): 769-773.
11	SunJ H, DobashiR, HiranoT. Temperature profile across the combustion zone propagating through an iron particle cloud [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2001, 14(6): 463-467.
12	孙金华, 卢平, 刘义. 空气中悬浮金属微粒子的燃烧特性[J]. 南京理工大学学报, 2005, 29(5): 582-588.
	SunJ H, LuP, LiuY. Combustion behavior of metal particles suspended in air[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2005, 29(5): 582-588.
13	潘峰, 马超, 曹卫国, 等. 玉米淀粉粉尘爆炸危险性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(7): 46-51.
	PangF, MaC, CaoW G, et al. Research on explosion risk of corn starch dust[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011, 21(7): 46-51.
14	高聪, 李化, 苏丹, 等. 密闭空间煤粉的爆炸特性[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2010, 30(2): 164-168.
	GaoC, LiH, SuD, et al. Explosion characteristics of coal dust in a sealed vessel[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2010, 30(2): 164-168.
15	黄丽媛. 石松子粉粉尘爆炸特性研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2014.
	HuangL Y. Research on dust explosion characteristics of lycopodium[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2014.
16	尹同山. 乙烯氛围下的聚乙烯热解动力学研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2014.
	YinT S. Study on pyrolysis kinetics of polyethylene in the ethylene[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum, 2014.
17	HanO, LeeJ S. Pyrolysis characteristic and ignition energy of high-density polyethylene powder[J]. Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas, 2014, 18(3): 31-37.
18	MittalM, GuhaB K. Minimum ignition temperature of polyethylene dust: a theoretical model[J]. Fire & Materials, 2015, 21(4): 169-177.
19	马小明, 周可. 不饱和聚酯树脂钮扣粉尘静电爆炸敏感性研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(3): 149-154.
	MaX M, ZhouK. Study on sensitivity of electrostatic explosion for dust of unsaturated polyester resin button[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2016, 12(3): 149-154.
20	BenedettoA D, RussoP. Thermo-kinetic modelling of dust explosions[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2007, 20(4/5/6): 303-309.
21	GanB, GaoW, JiangH, et al. Flame propagation behaviors and temperature characteristics in polyethylene dust explosions[J]. Powder Technology, 2018, 328: 345-357.
22	GanB, LiB, JiangH, et al. Ethylene/polyethylene hybrid explosions（Ι）: Effects of ethylene concentrations on flame propagations[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2018, 54: 93-102.
23	TraoréM, DufaudO, PerrinL, et al. Dust explosions: how should the influence of humidity be taken into account[J]. Process Safety and Environment Protection, 2009, 87(1): 14-20.
24	罗宏昌. 粉尘爆炸及“杂混合物”对其特性的影响[J]. 交通部上海船舶运输科学研究所学报, 2000, 23(1): 21-26.
	LuoH C .Explosion of powder dust and effect of scramble compound on its characteristics[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ship and Shipping Research Institute, 2000, 23(1): 21-26.
25	葛毅钧. 聚乙烯装置料仓闪爆原因分析及预防措施[J]. 安全、健康和环境, 2017, 17(1): 5-8.
	GeY J. Cause analysis and preventive measures of flash explosion in silo of polyethylene units[J]. Safety Environment Health, 2017, 17(1): 5-8.
26	马冉, 高建村, 杨凯, 等. 聚乙烯粉尘爆炸研究进展[J]. 中国粉体技术, 2017, 23(6): 59-63.
	MaR, GaoJ C, YangK, et al. Progress research on polyethylene dust explosion[J]. China Powder Science and Technology, 2017, 23(6): 59-63.
27	喻健良, 纪文涛, 孙会利, 等. 乙烯/聚乙烯两相体系爆炸特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4841-4847.
	YuJ L, JiW T, SunH L, et al. Explosibility of hybrid mixtures of ethylene and polyethylene dust[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(12): 4841-4847.
28	곽민철, 김기홍, 여재익. The change of deflagration to detonation transition by wall cooling effect in ethylene-air mixture[C]//한국추진공학회 2011년도 제회 춘계학술대회 논문집，2011.
29	JiW T, YanX Q, SunH L, et al. Explosibility of hybrid mixtures of lycopodium dust and methane [C]//11th International Symposium on Hazards, Prevention, and Mitigation of Industrial Explosions. Dalian, 2016.
30	李新光, RadandtS, 赫冀成, 等. 哈特曼装置上均方根湍流速度的测量及研究[J]. 中国粉体技术, 1999, 5(4): 11-14.
	LiX G, RadandtS, HeJ C, et al. Measurement and research of root-mean-square turbulence velocity on Hartmann bomb[J]. China Power Science and Science and Technology, 1999, 5(4): 11-14.

[1]	杨克, 贾岳, 纪虹, 邢志祥, 蒋军成. 垃圾焚烧飞灰对瓦斯爆炸压力及火焰传播的抑制作用及机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3597-3607.
[2]	李珍宝, 李超, 王虎, 王绍瑞, 黎泉. MPP抑制铝镁合金粉尘爆炸微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3608-3614.
[3]	岳林静, 廖艺涵, 薛源, 李雪洁, 李玉星, 刘翠伟. 凹坑缺陷对厚孔板喉部空化流动特性影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3292-3308.
[4]	丁俊华, 俞树荣, 王世鹏, 洪先志, 包鑫, 丁雪兴. 多重效应下超高速干气密封流场模拟及密封性能试验[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2088-2099.
[5]	何汉兵, 刘真, 陈勇, 王小锋, 曾婧. 直写成型电极锰氧化物粉末的合成与浆料调控[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2239-2247.
[6]	衣思敏, 马亚丽, 刘伟强, 张金帅, 岳岩, 郑强, 贾松岩, 李雪. 微晶菱镁矿蒸氨及水化动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1578-1586.
[7]	朱兵国, 何吉祥, 徐进良, 彭斌. 冷却条件下渐扩/渐缩管内超临界压力二氧化碳的传热特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1062-1072.
[8]	张伟政, 赵吉军, 马学忠, 张琦璇, 庞益祥, 张俊涛. 湍流效应对高速机械密封端面型槽冷却性能影响分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1228-1238.
[9]	武子超, 汪志雷, 李荣业, 李可昕, 华敏, 潘旭海, 王三明, 蒋军成. 点火方式对欠膨胀氢气射流爆炸超压影响规律研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1409-1418.
[10]	杨克, 王辰升, 纪虹, 郑凯, 邢志祥, 毕海普, 蒋军成. 聚多巴胺包覆混合粉体抑制甲烷爆炸的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4245-4254.
[11]	王燕, 何佳, 杨晶晶, 林晨迪, 纪文涛. 草酸盐和碳酸氢盐抑制聚乙烯粉尘爆炸特性[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4207-4216.
[12]	王永倩, 王平, 程康, 毛晨林, 刘文锋, 尹智成, Ferrante Antonio. 氨气/甲烷贫预混旋转湍流火焰稳定性及NO生成[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4087-4094.
[13]	张建伟, 高伟峰, 董鑫, 冯颖. 浸没式撞击流反应器流场涡特性的数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3553-3564.
[14]	王利民, 郭舒宇, 向星, 付少童. 湍流系统的能量最小多尺度模型研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2415-2426.
[15]	施炜斌, 龙姗姗, 杨晓钢, 蔡心悦. 计及气泡诱导与剪切湍流的气泡破碎、湍流相间扩散及传质模型[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2573-2588.