玉米秸秆高浓度厌氧发酵的启动过程特性

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.05.043

化工学报

玉米秸秆高浓度厌氧发酵的启动过程特性

师晓爽^1,2, 袁宪正¹, 贾智莉¹, 邱艳玲¹, 王传水¹, 郭荣波¹

1 中国科学院青岛生物能源与过程研究所, 山东青岛 266101;
2 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2014-01-06 修回日期:2014-02-06 出版日期:2014-05-05 发布日期:2014-05-05
通讯作者: 郭荣波
基金资助:
山东省沼气工业化生产与利用工程实验室项目（2013-377）；山东省泰山学者海外特聘专家项目（11-2-4-15-YX）；国家科技支撑计划项目（2013BAD22B03）。

Start-up process for high-solid anaerobic fermentation of corn straw

SHI Xiaoshuang^1,2, YUAN Xianzheng¹, JIA Zhili¹, QIU Yanling¹, WANG Chuanshui¹, GUO Rongbo¹

1 Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266101, Shandong, China;
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2014-01-06 Revised:2014-02-06 Online:2014-05-05 Published:2014-05-05
Supported by:
supported by the Shandong Industrial Engineering Laboratory of Biogas Production & Utilization (2013-377), the Mount Tai Scholars Construction Project (11-2-4-15-YX) and the National Science and Technology Support Program (2013BAD22B03).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 高浓度厌氧发酵具有单位体积产气率高、原料处理量大、需水量小、能耗低等优点，同时存在启动难和易酸化的问题。以玉米秸秆为原料，研究秸秆高浓度发酵过程接种物、分批进料结合渗滤液回流对启动的影响。结果表明，分批进料结合渗滤液回流工艺可有效实现高浓度厌氧发酵系统的稳定启动，反应器启动运行22 d，以污泥为接种物的秸秆累积产沼气量为43.54 ml·（g TS）^-1，以湿法发酵的沼液为接种物的秸秆累积产沼气量为115.15 ml·（g TS）^-1。与以厌氧污泥为接种物的发酵系统相比，以湿式发酵沼液为接种物的高浓度厌氧发酵系统秸秆微观结构变化更明显，主要表现为半纤维的溶解；荧光原位杂交技术（FISH）结果也表明两种接种物系统的甲烷菌形态存在明显差异。

关键词: 厌氧, 发酵, 废物处理, 接种物, 高浓度, 启动

Abstract: High-solid anaerobic fermentation has the advantages, such as higher biogas yield per unit volume, more organic waste disposal, smaller water requirement and less energy consumption. However, the reactor is difficult to start and easy to acidize due to high concentration of feedstock. Using corn stalk as substrate, the performance of start-up process, different inocula and slurry recycling methods were studied during the start-up process for high solid anaerobic fermentation. The reactor system remained stable during the start-up phase with the combined method of feedstock feeding and slurry recycling. The cumulative biogas yields were 43.54 ml·(g TS)^-1 with sludge as inoculum and 115.15 ml·(g TS)^-1 with corn straw wet fermentation slurry as inoculum in 22 days. X-Ray diffraction (XRD) showed that the CrI was strongly influenced by the microflora, which showed that semicellulose was mainly dissolved. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) demonstrated that the methanogenic archaea exhibited an obvious difference in the two methane fermentation systems inoculated with sludge and corn straw biogas slurry, respectively.

Key words: anaerobic, fermentation, waste treatment, inoculum, high-solid, start-up

中图分类号:

X705

师晓爽, 袁宪正, 贾智莉, 邱艳玲, 王传水, 郭荣波. 玉米秸秆高浓度厌氧发酵的启动过程特性[J]. 化工学报, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.05.043.

SHI Xiaoshuang, YUAN Xianzheng, JIA Zhili, QIU Yanling, WANG Chuanshui, GUO Rongbo. Start-up process for high-solid anaerobic fermentation of corn straw[J]. CIESC Journal, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.05.043.

参考文献 22

[1]	Jiang D, Zhuang D, Fu J, Huang Y, Wen K. Bioenergy potential from crop residues in China: Availability and distribution [J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(3): 1377-1382
[2]	Bhattacharya T K, Mishra T N. Biodegradability of dairy cattle manure under dry anaerobic fermentation process [J]. ASAE Publication, 2003, 84(7): 9-11
[3]	Parawira W, Read J S, Mattiasson B, Bjornsson L. Energy production from agricultural residues: high methane yields in pilot-scale two-stage anaerobic digestion [J]. Biomass Bioenergy, 2008, 32(1): 44-50
[4]	Zhu B, Zhang R H, Gikas P, Rapport J, Jenkins B, Li X J. Biogas production from municipal solid wastes using an integrated rotary drum and anaerobic phased solids digester system [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(16):6374-6380
[5]	Zeshan, Karthikeyan O P, Visvanathan C. Effect of C/N ratio and ammonia-N accumulation in a pilot-scale thermophilic dry anaerobic digester [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 113: 294-302
[6]	Li Y, Park Y P, Zhu J. Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste [J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(1): 821-826
[7]	Quan Guixiang(全桂香), Chang Zhizhou(常志州), Ye Xiaomei(叶小梅), Du Jing(杜静), Wang Shimei(王世梅). Study on condition of start-up of dry anaerobic digestion for rice straw [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Science(江苏农业科学), 2009(3): 366-369
[8]	Jing Liangxiao(井良霄), Qiu Ling(邱凌), Li Zilin(李自林), Liu Fang(刘芳), Zhou Yanfeng(周彦峰). The influence of inoculum on high-solids anaerobic digestion about corn wastes and pig manure for biogas production [J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research(农机化研究), 2013(7): 237-240
[9]	Xi Dengbao(郗登宝), Huang Xiao(黄枭), Qiu Xin(邱鑫), Zhang Yongfeng(张永锋). Effects of different inoculations on biogas production by anaerobic fermentation of corn straw [J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology (现代农业科技), 2013(9): 213-216
[10]	Zhang Wang(张望), Li Xiujin(李秀金), Pang Yunzhi(庞云芝), Cai Luping(蔡璐平). A pilot study on mesophilic dry anaerobic digestion of rice straw [J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science (农业环境科学学报), 2008, 27(5): 2075-2079
[11]	Bai Na(白娜), Mei Zili(梅自力), Fu Zhengge(符征鸽), Kong Chuixue(孔垂雪), Yang Hao(杨浩). The effects of temperature on anaerobic digestion of three different straws for biogas production [J]. China Biogas (中国沼气), 2011, 29(1): 16-21
[12]	Wei Fusheng (魏复盛). Methods for Monitoring and Analysis of Water and Wastewater (水和废水监测分析方法) [M]. 4th ed. Beijing: Chinese Environmental Science Press, 2002
[13]	Goering H K, Van Soest P S. Forage Fiber Analysis USDA 2ARS Agric Handbook [M]. Washington: Gov Print, 1971: 387-598
[14]	Kim S, Holtzapple M T. Effect of structural features on enzyme digestibility of corn stover [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2006, 97(4): 583-591
[15]	Jupraputtasri W, Boonapatcharoen N, Cheevadhanarak S, Chaiprasert P, Tanticharoen M, Techkarnjanaruk S. Use of an alternative archaea-specific probe for methanogen detection [J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2005, 61(1): 95-104
[16]	Xing Wei(邢薇), Zuo Jian'e(左剑恶), Sun Yujiao(孙寓姣), Li Jianping(李建平). Study on microbial community in methanogenic granular sludge by FISH and DGGE [J]. Environmental Science(环境科学), 2006, 27(11): 2268-2272
[17]	Madsen M, Holm-Nielsen J B, Esbensen K H. Monitoring of anaerobic digestion processes: A review perspective [J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(6): 3141-3155
[18]	Duarte A, Anderson G. Inhibition modelling in anaerobic digestion [J]. Water Science& Technology, 1982, 14: 749-763
[19]	Rittmann B E, McCarty P L. Environmental Biotechnology：Principles and Applications [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001
[20]	Veeken A, Hamelers B. Effect of temperature on hydrolysis rates of selected biowaste components [J]. Bioresource Technology, 1999, 69(3): 249-254
[21]	Kang Jiali(康佳丽). High-efficiency mesophilic biogasification of rice straw by anaerobic digestion [D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2007
[22]	Zuo Jian'e(左剑恶),Yang Yang(杨洋), Shen Ping(沈平), Gu Xiasheng(顾夏声). Application of fluorescent in situ hybridization technology in study on anaerobic granular sludge [J].China Biogas(中国沼气), 2004, 22(1): 3-6

玉米秸秆高浓度厌氧发酵的启动过程特性

Start-up process for high-solid anaerobic fermentation of corn straw

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[2]	张曼铮, 肖猛, 闫沛伟, 苗政, 徐进良, 纪献兵. 危废焚烧处理耦合有机朗肯循环系统工质筛选与热力学优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3502-3512.
[3]	吕龙义, 及文博, 韩沐达, 李伟光, 高文芳, 刘晓阳, 孙丽, 王鹏飞, 任芝军, 张光明. 铁基导电材料强化厌氧去除卤代有机污染物：研究进展及未来展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3193-3202.
[4]	史方哲, 甘云华. 超薄热管启动特性和传热性能数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2814-2823.
[5]	屈园浩, 邓文义, 谢晓丹, 苏亚欣. 活性炭/石墨辅助污泥电渗脱水研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3038-3050.
[6]	陈朝光, 贾玉香, 汪锰. 以低浓度废酸驱动中和渗析脱盐的模拟与验证[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2486-2494.
[7]	高学金, 姚玉卓, 韩华云, 齐咏生. 基于注意力动态卷积自编码器的发酵过程故障监测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2503-2521.
[8]	胡南, 陶德敏, 杨照岚, 王学兵, 张向旭, 刘玉龙, 丁德馨. 铁炭微电解与硫酸盐还原菌耦合修复铀尾矿库渗滤水的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2655-2667.
[9]	黄玉龙, 吕凡, 仇俊杰, 章骅, 何品晶. 易腐垃圾厌氧消化沼液理化性质及VOCs分子特征[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1275-1285.
[10]	钱志广, 樊越, 王世学, 岳利可, 王金山, 朱禹. 吹扫条件对PEMFC阻抗弛豫现象和低温启动的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1286-1293.
[11]	刘定平, 陈爱桦, 张向阳, 何文浩, 王海. 铝灰半干法水解脱氮研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1294-1302.
[12]	魏进家, 刘蕾, 杨小平. 面向高热流电子器件散热的环路热管研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 60-73.
[13]	罗欣宜, 冯超, 刘晶, 乔瑜. 污泥不同热处理工艺产物磷的浸出回收实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4034-4044.
[14]	王悦琳, 晁伟, 蓝晓程, 莫志朋, 佟淑环, 王铁峰. 合成气生物发酵法制乙醇的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3448-3460.
[15]	郭志强, 燕可洲, 张吉元, 柳丹丹, 高阳艳, 郭彦霞. 煤矸石/粉煤灰对赤泥钠化还原焙烧反应的影响机制[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 2194-2205.