低流速燃料电池重力辅助排水

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.z1.067

化工学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (S1): 415-420.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.z1.067

低流速燃料电池重力辅助排水

裴后昌¹, 涂正凯², 刘志春¹, 沈俊¹, 邱子朝¹, 刘帆¹, 刘伟¹

1. 华中科技大学能源与动力工程学院, 湖北武汉 430074;
2. 武汉理工大学材料复合新技术国家重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430070

收稿日期:2014-02-11 修回日期:2014-02-21 出版日期:2014-05-30 发布日期:2014-05-30
通讯作者: 刘伟
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划项目（2012AA1106016）。

Low gas velocity of PEMFC aided by gravity water drainage

PEI Houchang¹, TU Zhengkai², LIU Zhichun¹, SHEN Jun¹, QIU Zizhao¹, LIU Fan¹, LIU Wei¹

1. School of Energy and Power Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China

Received:2014-02-11 Revised:2014-02-21 Online:2014-05-30 Published:2014-05-30
Supported by:
supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China(2012AA1106016).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 实验研究了反应气体低流速下质子交换膜燃料电池内液滴自身重力对电池性能的影响。结果显示，自身重力有利于液滴脱离气体扩散层，使液态水有效排出电池堆。电池水平放置阴极向下时，液滴重力与其脱离气体扩散层方向一致，电池性能最佳；电池竖直放置时，液滴重力与气体将其吹扫出电池方向一致，其向外排水能力最强。反应气体流速较低时，电池在不同放置方式下，提高其温度，电池性能上升；电池竖直放置时，气体加湿对电池性能影响不大。电池测试时，应该避免电池阴极水平向上。

关键词: 燃料电池, 排水, 低流速, 重力, 水管理

Abstract: Low gas velocity in proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) can be occurred as gas distribution inconformity. Low gas velocity of PEMFC aided by gravity water drainage was investigated experimentally. It released that gravity can help droplets separate from gas diffusion layer (GDL) which help the liquid water drainage from PEMFC stack too. The experiment released that the performance of stack will be the best when the cathode downward and the droplet gravity accordance to the orientation of the droplet separate from GDL; Gravity drops consistent with the direction of purge gas in the PEMFC stack when the channel was vertical which improved the water management. In different orientation of PEMFC stack channel the output of stack would be increasing as the temperature rising when the reaction gas flow rate was low. The gas humidification had little effect on stack performance when the channel was vertical. It should be avoided that the cathode was horizontal and upwards when the stack was working.

Key words: fuel cells, drainage, low velocity, gravity, water management

中图分类号:

TM911.4

裴后昌, 涂正凯, 刘志春, 沈俊, 邱子朝, 刘帆, 刘伟. 低流速燃料电池重力辅助排水[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(S1): 415-420.

PEI Houchang, TU Zhengkai, LIU Zhichun, SHEN Jun, QIU Zizhao, LIU Fan, LIU Wei. Low gas velocity of PEMFC aided by gravity water drainage[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(S1): 415-420.

参考文献 15

[1]	Tu Z K, Zhang H N, Luo Z P, Liu J, Wan Z M, Pan M. Evaluation of 5kW proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack operated at 95℃ under ambient pressure[J]. J. Power Sources, 2013, 222: 277-281
[2]	Li Q, Zhang H N, Tu Z K, Yu J, Xiong C, Pan M. Impregnation of amine-tailoredtitanate nanotube sinpolymer electrolyte membranes[J]. J. Membr. Sci., 2012, 423/424: 284-292
[3]	Wang Y, Chen K S, Mishler J, Cho S C, Adroher X C. A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research[J]. Appl. Energ., 2011, 88: 981-1007
[4]	Dai W, Wang H, Yuan X Z, Martin J J, Yang D. A review on water balance in the membrane electrode assembly of proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34 (23):9461-9478
[5]	Perng S W, Wu H W. Non-isothermal transport phenomenon and cell performance of a cathodic PEM fuel cell with a baffle plate in a tapered channel[J]. Appl. Energ.,2011, 88: 52-67
[6]	Wan Z M, Liu J, Tu Z K, Pan M. Water recovery and air humidification by condensing the moisture in the outlet gas of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack[J]. Appl. Therm. Eng., 2012, 42:173-178
[7]	Yu Y, Tu Z K, Zhan Z G, Pan M. Gravity effect on the performance of PEM fuel cell stack with different gas inlet/outlet positions[J]. Int. J. Energ. Res., 2012, 36(7):845-855
[8]	Ma H P, Zhang H M, Hu J, Cai Y H, Yi B L. Diagnostic tool to detect liquid water removal in the cathode channels of proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. J. Power Sources, 2006,162:469-473
[9]	Cho E, Ko J J, Ha H Y, Hong S A, Lee K Y. Effects of water removal on the performance degradation of PEMFCs repetitively brought to
[10]	Lee S Y, Kim S U, Kim H J. Water removal characteristics of proton exchange membrane fuel cells using a dry gas purging method[J]. J. Power Sources, 2008,180:784-790
[11]	Esposito A, Montello A D, Guezennec Y G, Pianese C. Experimental investigation of water droplet-air flow interaction in a non-reacting PEM fuel cell channel[J]. J. Power Sources, 2010,195(9):2691-2699
[12]	Ma Haipeng(马海鹏), Zhang Huamin(张华民), Hu Jun(胡军), Cai Yinghua(才英华).Effects of humidification temperature and gas velocity on liquid water distribution and removal in cathode channel of PEMFC[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China)(化工学报), 2007,58(9):2357-2362
[13]	Li H, Tang Y H, Wang Z W,et al. A review of water flooding issues in the proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. J. Power Sources, 2008,(178):103-117
[14]	Larminie J, Dicks A. Fuel Cell Systems Explained[M].New York:John Willey & Sons Inc., 2006:32-33
[15]	Wan Z M, Liu J, Luo Z P, Tu Z K, Liu Z C, Liu W. Evaluation of self-water-removal in a dead-ended proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Appl. Energ., 2012,DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.12.008

低流速燃料电池重力辅助排水

Low gas velocity of PEMFC aided by gravity water drainage

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 15

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[2]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[3]	王瑞恒, 何品晶, 吕凡, 章骅. 垃圾焚烧飞灰水洗后三种固液分离方法参数比较及优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1712-1723.
[4]	罗来明, 张劲, 郭志斌, 王海宁, 卢善富, 相艳. 1~5 kW高温聚合物电解质膜燃料电池堆的理论模拟与组装测试[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1724-1734.
[5]	杨辉著, 兰精灵, 杨月, 梁嘉林, 吕传文, 朱永刚. 高功率平板热管传热性能的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1561-1569.
[6]	钱志广, 樊越, 王世学, 岳利可, 王金山, 朱禹. 吹扫条件对PEMFC阻抗弛豫现象和低温启动的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1286-1293.
[7]	陈建勋, 刘金平, 许雄文, 余银豪. 一种新型环路重力热管的数值模拟和性能优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 721-734.
[8]	郭祥, 乔金硕, 王振华, 孙旺, 孙克宁. 碳燃料固体氧化物燃料电池结构研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 290-302.
[9]	雍加望, 赵倩倩, 冯能莲. 基于非线性动态模型的质子交换膜燃料电池故障诊断[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3983-3993.
[10]	张婉晨, 陈晓阳, 吕秋秋, 钟秦, 朱腾龙. Co掺杂SrTi_0.3Fe_0.7O_3-_δ 阳极SOFC在化工副产气燃料下的性能及稳定性[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4079-4086.
[11]	邵健, 冯军宗, 柳凤琦, 姜勇刚, 李良军, 冯坚. 酚醛树脂基炭微球结构调控与功能化制备研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3787-3801.
[12]	方辉煌, 程金星, 罗宇, 陈崇启, 周晨, 江莉龙. 氨电氧化催化剂及其低温直接氨碱性膜燃料电池性能的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3802-3814.
[13]	张童, 杨扬, 叶丁丁, 陈蓉, 朱恂, 廖强. 催化剂分布对可渗透阳极微流体燃料电池性能特性影响的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4156-4162.
[14]	艾承燚, 乔金硕, 王振华, 孙旺, 孙克宁. 原位析出纳米合金的PrBaFe₂O_6-_δ 基阳极构筑及其在固体碳燃料电池中的应用研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3708-3719.
[15]	魏琳, 郭剑, 廖梓豪, Dafalla Ahmed Mohmed, 蒋方明. 空气流量对空冷燃料电池电堆性能的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3222-3231.