煤及油母中常见C-X(X=N,S)的解离能

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170377

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (10): 3900-3905.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170377

煤及油母中常见C-X(X=N,S)的解离能

李璐¹, 樊红军¹, 胡浩权²

1 中国科学院大连化学物理研究所分子反应动力学国家重点实验室, 辽宁大连 116023;
2 大连理工大学化工学院, 精细化工国家重点实验室, 辽宁大连 116024

收稿日期:2017-04-10 修回日期:2017-06-23 出版日期:2017-10-05 发布日期:2017-10-05
通讯作者: 樊红军,FAN Hongjun,fanhj@dicp.ac.cn;胡浩权,hhu@dlut.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFB0600301）。

Bond dissociation enthalpies of C-X (X=N, S) in coal and kerogen

LI Lu¹, FAN Hongjun¹, HU Haoquan²

1 State Key Laboratory of Molecular Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China;
2 State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Institute of Coal Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China

Received:2017-04-10 Revised:2017-06-23 Online:2017-10-05 Published:2017-10-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFB0600301).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

煤及油页岩中除了碳、氢和氧原子是主要的组成元素外，氮和硫等杂原子大都以C-X（X=N，S）的键合形式存在，在其结构及转化利用中同样发挥重要的作用。认识C-X的解离能，有助于建立氮、硫热解过程中的迁移模型，丰富对煤及油母中常见化学键性质的认识，对发展高效清洁的能源利用技术至关重要。利用双杂化密度泛函方法，系统研究了煤及油母中典型C-X键的解离能（BDE）范围。研究结果表明，煤及油母中常见C-N和C-S键的BDE值范围分别是154.1~55.7 kcal·mol^-1和83.0~56.6 kcal·mol^-1。在热解过程中，苯硫类自由基以及苯胺类自由基会在初期产生，其次才是巯基、胺类自由基等侧链取代自由基脱落。C-S键的整体BDE值范围比其他类型化学键更低，各类化学键最低BDE值的高低顺序符合O-H > C-H > C-C > C-N > C-S > C-O的规律，其中，只有当有PhOx生成时，C-S > C-O，否则C-O > C-S。

关键词: 煤, 油母, 解离能, 焓, 热力学, 计算化学

Abstract:

The carbon,hydrogen,oxygen are the majornitrogen and sulfur atoms,mostly in the form of C-X (X=N,S),still play a nonnegligible role in the structure and application of coal and oil shale.The homolytic bond dissociation enthalpies (BDE) of C-X for model compounds that are representative of the functionalities present in coal and kerogen were computed by using a double-hybrid method mPW2PLYP.The studies will be helpful for people to construct the transfer model of N and S in pyrolysis,and enrich the knowledge of chemical reaction of typical bonds in coal and kerogen.The BDE for C-N and C-S cover a range from 154.1-55.7 kcal·mol^-1 and 83.0-56.6 kcal·mol^-1,respectively.The results suggest that the thiophenyl radical or phenylamino radical are the most favorable intermediates in the early pyrolytic stage.With the increase of temperature,the loss of sulfydryl and amidogen groups become feasible,and the ring cleavage reaction of five-membered ring (pyrrole and thiophene) through homolysis of C-N and C-S bond can also occur.The phenyl radical is the most difficult to form,and the directly bond dissociation of C-N bond in pyridine with six-membered ring is extremely unfavorable in the pyrolysis of coal and kerogen.Compared to other types of bonds,C-S bond has the lowest general BDE range.The order of the lowest BDE for various bonds is O-H > C-H > C-C > C-N > C-S > C-O.The bond dissociation of C-O to generate PhOx radical is easier than to generate PhSx radical through homolysis of C-S,otherwise the BDE of C-O is higher than C-S.

Key words: coal, kerogen, bond dissociation enthalpies, enthalpy, thermodynamics, computational chemistry

中图分类号:

TQ021.2

李璐, 樊红军, 胡浩权. 煤及油母中常见C-X(X=N,S)的解离能[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(10): 3900-3905.

LI Lu, FAN Hongjun, HU Haoquan. Bond dissociation enthalpies of C-X (X=N, S) in coal and kerogen[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(10): 3900-3905.

参考文献 32

[1]	柏静儒, 林卫生, 潘朔, 等. 油页岩低温热解过程中轻质气体的析出特性[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(3):1104-1110. BAI J R, LIN W S, PAN S, et al. Characteristics of light gases evolution during oil shale pyrolysis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(3):1104-1110.
[2]	DYNI J R. Geology and resources of some world oil shale oil deposits[J]. Shale, 2003, 20(3):193-252.
[3]	GAFFNEY J S, STREIT G E, SPALL W D, et al. Beyond acid rain. Do soluble oxidants and organic toxins interact with SO2 and NOx to increase ecosystem effects[J]. Environmental Science Technology, 1987, 21(6):519-524.
[4]	余岳溪, 高正阳, 季鹏, 等. 煤焦异相还原N2O的反应机理[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(1):369-374. YU Y X, GAO Z Y, JI P, et al. Heterogeneous reduction reaction of N2O by char[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(1):369-374.
[5]	谢建军, 杨学民, 吕雪松, 等. 煤热解过程中硫氮及迁移规律研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2004, 23(11):1214-1218. XIE J J, YANG X M, LÜ X S, et al. Progress on transformation behavior of sulfur and nitrogen during coal pyrolysis[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2004, 23(11):1214-1218.
[6]	LING L, ZHANG R G, WANG B J, et al. Pyrolysis mechanisms of quinoline and isoquinoline with density functional theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2009, 17(5):805-813.
[7]	LING L, ZHANG R G, WANG B J, et al. Density functional theory study on the pyrolysis mechanism of thiophene in coal[J]. Journal of Molecular Structure (THEOCHEM), 2009, 905(1/2/3):8-12.
[8]	LING L, ZHANG R G, WANG B J, et al. DFT study on the sulfur migration during benzenethiol pyrolysis in coal[J]. Journal of Molecular Structure (THEOCHEM), 2009, 952(1/2/3):31-35.
[9]	DUBNIKOVA F, TAMBURU C, LIFSHITZ A. A deep insight into the details of the interisomerization and decomposition mechanism of o-quinolyl and o-isoquinolyl radicals. Quantum chemical calculations and computer modeling[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2016, 120(38):7538-7547.
[10]	LI G Y, WANG F, WANG J P, et al. ReaxFF and DFT study on the sulfur transformation mechanism during the oxidation process of lignite[J]. Fuel, 2016, 181:238-247.
[11]	KHRAPKOVSKⅡ G M, SHARIPOV D D, SHAMOV A G, et al. Theoretical study of substituents effect on C-NO2 bond strength in mono substituted nitrobenzenes[J]. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, 2013, 1017:7-13.
[12]	YU H Z, FU F, ZHANG L, et al. Accurate predictions of C-SO2R bond dissociation enthalpies using density functional theory methods[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014, 16:20964-20970.
[13]	YAO X Q, HOU X J, JIAO H J, et al. Accurate calculations of bond dissociation enthalpies with density functional methods[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2003, 107(46):9991-9996.
[14]	DEL GIACCO T, LANZALUNGA O, LAPI A, et al. Photosensitized oxidation of aryl benzyl sulfoxides. Evidence for nucleophilic assistance to the C-S bond cleavage of aryl benzyl sulfoxide radical cations[J]. Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2015, 80(4):2310-2318.
[15]	KHRAPKOVSKⅡ G M, SHARIPOV D D, SHAMOV A G, et al. Enthalpies of formation of mono substituted nitrobenzenes:a quantum chemistry study[J]. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, 2013, 1011:37-43.
[16]	FAYET G, ROUTUREAU P, MINISINI B. Decomposition mechanisms of trinitroalkyl compounds:a theoretical study from aliphatic to aromatic nitro compounds[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014, 16(14):6614-6622.
[17]	MAROCHKIN I I, DOROFEEVA O V. Amide bond dissociation enthalpies:effect of substitution on N-C bond strength[J]. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, 2012, 991:182-191.
[18]	JOHNSON E R, CLARKIN O J, DILABIO G A. Density functional theory based model calculations for accurate bond dissociation enthalpies(3):A single approach for X-H, X-X, and X-Y (X, Y=C, N, O, S, halogen) bonds[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2003, 107(46):9953-9963.
[19]	SONG X L, PARISH C A. Pyrolysis mechanisms of thiophene and methylthiophene in asphaltenes[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2011, 115(13):2882-2891.
[20]	ZHENG W R, FU Y, GUO Q X. G3//BMK and its application to calculation of bond dissociation enthalpies[J]. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2008, 4(8):1324-1331.
[21]	TAO X X, TANG L F, XIE M H, et al. Dielectric properties analysis of sulfur-containing models in coal and energy evaluation of their sulfur-containing bond dissociation in microwave field[J]. Fuel, 2016, 181:1027-1033.
[22]	TANG L F, WANG S W, GUO J F, et al. Exploration on the removal mechanism of sulfur ether model compounds for coal by microwave irradiation with peroxyacetic acid[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2017, 159:442-447.
[23]	BARCKHOLTZ C, BARCKHOLTZ T A, HADAD C M. C-H and N-H bond dissociation energies of small aromatic hydrocarbons[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1999, 121(3):491-500.
[24]	LI L, FAN H J, HU H Q. Assessment of contemporary theoretical methods for bond dissociation enthalpies[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics, 2016, 29(4):453-461.
[25]	SCHWABE T, GRIMME S. Towards chemical accuracy for the thermodynamics of large molecules:new hybrid density functionals including non-local correlation effects[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2006, 8(38):4398-4401.
[26]	DUNNING J T H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations(Ⅰ):The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1989, 90(2):1007-1023.
[27]	KENDALL R A, DUNNING J T H, HARRISON R J. Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1992, 96(9):6796-6806.
[28]	BOYS S F, BERNARDI F. Calculation of small molecular interactions by differences of separate total energies-some procedures with reduced errors[J]. Molecular Physics, 1970, 19(4):553.
[29]	SIMON S, DURAN M, DANNENBERG J J. How does basis set superposition error change the potential surfaces for hydrogen bonded dimers[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1996, 105(24):11024-11031.
[30]	LI L, FAN H J, HU H Q. A theoretical study on bond dissociation enthalpies of coal based model compounds[J]. Fuel, 2015, 153:70-77.
[31]	HAYES C J, HADAD C M. Combustion pathways of the alkylated heteroaromatics:bond dissociation enthalpies and alkyl group fragmentations[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2009, 1133(45):12370-12379.
[32]	SHI J, HU X R, LIANG S. A computational study of C-S bond dissociation enthalpies in petroleum chemistry[J]. Heteroatom Chemistry, 2011, 22(2):97-105.

煤及油母中常见C-X(X=N,S)的解离能

Bond dissociation enthalpies of C-X (X=N, S) in coal and kerogen

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨欣, 王文, 徐凯, 马凡华. 高压氢气加注过程中温度特征仿真分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 280-286.
[2]	常明慧, 王林, 苑佳佳, 曹艺飞. 盐溶液蓄能型热泵循环特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 329-337.
[3]	张化福, 童莉葛, 张振涛, 杨俊玲, 王立, 张俊浩. 机械蒸汽压缩蒸发技术研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 8-24.
[4]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[5]	胡建波, 刘洪超, 胡齐, 黄美英, 宋先雨, 赵双良. 有机笼跨细胞膜易位行为的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3756-3765.
[6]	赵佳佳, 田世祥, 李鹏, 谢洪高. SiO₂-H₂O纳米流体强化煤尘润湿性的微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3931-3945.
[7]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[8]	吴雷, 刘姣, 李长聪, 周军, 叶干, 刘田田, 朱瑞玉, 张秋利, 宋永辉. 低阶粉煤催化微波热解制备含碳纳米管的高附加值改性兰炭末[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3956-3967.
[9]	倪文翔, 赵京, 李博, 魏小林, 吴东垠, 刘迪, 王强. 转炉煤气全干法显热回收工艺中余热锅炉积灰特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3485-3493.
[10]	张曼铮, 肖猛, 闫沛伟, 苗政, 徐进良, 纪献兵. 危废焚烧处理耦合有机朗肯循环系统工质筛选与热力学优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3502-3512.
[11]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[12]	何晓崐, 刘锐, 薛园, 左然. MOCVD生长AlN单晶薄膜的气相和表面化学反应综述[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2800-2813.
[13]	康超, 乔金鹏, 杨胜超, 彭超, 付元鹏, 刘斌, 刘建荣, Aleksandrova Tatiana, 段晨龙. 煤矸石中有价关键金属活化提取研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2783-2799.
[14]	卫雪岩, 钱勇. 微米级铁粉燃料中低温氧化反应特性及其动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2624-2638.
[15]	王光宇, 张锴, 张凯华, 张东柯. 微波加热干燥煤泥热质传递及其能耗特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2382-2390.