基于能量守恒的鼓泡塔双尺度流体力学模型

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.06.009

化工学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (6): 2013-2020.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.06.009

基于能量守恒的鼓泡塔双尺度流体力学模型

管小平, 王丽军, 李兆奇, 赵远方, 成有为, 李希

浙江大学化学工程与生物工程学系, 浙江杭州 310027

收稿日期:2013-09-16 修回日期:2013-11-04 出版日期:2014-06-05 发布日期:2014-06-05
通讯作者: 王丽军
作者简介:管小平（1988- ），男，博士研究生
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划项目（2011AA05A205）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（2013QNA4035）。

New two-scale hydrodynamic model based on energy balance in bubble column

GUAN Xiaoping, WANG Lijun, LI Zhaoqi, ZHAO Yuanfang, CHENG Youwei, LI Xi

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, China

Received:2013-09-16 Revised:2013-11-04 Online:2014-06-05 Published:2014-06-05
Supported by:
supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2011AA05A205) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2013QNA4035).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 提出了同时描述鼓泡塔宏观流动及气泡尾涡小尺度湍动的双尺度流体力学模型，其中大尺度剪切流通过经典k-ε模型描述，而小尺度尾涡湍动则由“尾涡温度”传输方程确定。通过在运动方程添加“尾涡压力”源项，构建大小双尺度流体运动的相互作用，解释鼓泡塔内含率非均匀分布的机制。模型将鼓泡塔内的能量耗散分解3种作用机制：大尺度剪切流引起湍动耗散；小尺度尾涡湍动耗散；尾涡与壁面作用的能量耗散，较好地解决了现有鼓泡塔模型能量不守恒问题。模型计算稳定性高，模拟结果与实验结果吻合良好。

关键词: 流体力学, 模型, 双尺度, 鼓泡塔, 能量守恒

Abstract: A new two-scale hydrodynamic model was proposed to describe large-scale motion and small-scale bubble wake turbulence. The large-scale shear induced turbulence was resolved by classical k-ε turbulence model, while the small-scale bubble wake turbulence was quantitively described by wake temperature transport equation. A wake pressure gradient source term was added to the motion equation to reflect the mutual influence between small scale turbulence and large scale fluid motion and to explain the mechanism of holdup non-uniform distribution in the bubble column. The model classified the energy dissipation into three kinds of mechanism: large-scale shear induced turbulence dissipation, small-scale wake turbulence dissipation, energy dissipation due to interaction between bubble wake and solid wall. The model well resolved the issue about energy balance. Simulation results agreed well with experiment data

Key words: hydrodynamics, model, two-scale, bubble column, energy balance

中图分类号:

TQ021.1

管小平, 王丽军, 李兆奇, 赵远方, 成有为, 李希. 基于能量守恒的鼓泡塔双尺度流体力学模型[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(6): 2013-2020.

GUAN Xiaoping, WANG Lijun, LI Zhaoqi, ZHAO Yuanfang, CHENG Youwei, LI Xi. New two-scale hydrodynamic model based on energy balance in bubble column[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(6): 2013-2020.

参考文献 22

[1]	Deckwer W D. Bubble Column Reactors [M]. New York: Wiley, 1992
[2]	Joshi J. Computational flow modelling and design of bubble column reactors [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56 (21): 5893-5933
[3]	Lucas D, Krepper E, Prasser H M. Prediction of radial gas profiles in vertical pipe flow on the basis of bubble size distribution [J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2001, 40 (3): 217-226
[4]	Zhang Yu (张煜), Li Hongbo (李红波), Li Zhaoqi (李兆奇), Wang Lijun (王丽军), Li Xi (李希). Studies on hydrodynamics of turbulent slurry bubble column(Ⅳ): Modelling and simulation of the bubble column with vertical tube bundles [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2011, 62 (12): 3373-3380
[5]	Zhang Yu (张煜), Li Zhaoqi (李兆奇), Li Hongbo (李红波), Wang Lijun (王丽军), Li Xi (李希). Studies on hydrodynamics of turbulent slurry bubble column(Ⅳ): Modelling of the bubble column with multilayer-layer screens [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2012, 63 (2): 387-392
[6]	Xiao Q, Yang N, Li J, Stability-constrained multi-fluid CFD models for gas-liquid flow in bubble columns [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 100: 279-292
[7]	Yang N, Wu Z, Chen J, Wang Y, Li J. Multi-scale analysis of gas-liquid interaction and CFD simulation of gas-liquid flow in bubble columns [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66 (14): 3212-3222
[8]	Gidaspow D. Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions [M]. New York: Academic Press, 1994
[9]	Ding J, Gidaspow D. A bubbling fluidization model using kinetic theory of granular flow [J]. AIChE Journal, 1990, 36 (4): 523-538
[10]	Jiradilok V, Gidaspow D, Damronglerd S, Koves W J, Mostofi R. Kinetic theory based CFD simulation of turbulent fluidization of FCC particles in a riser [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2006, 61 (17): 5544-5559
[11]	Huilin L, Gidaspow D, Bouillard J, Wentie L. Hydrodynamic simulation of gas-solid flow in a riser using kinetic theory of granular flow [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2003, 95 (1): 1-13
[12]	Cheng Y, Guo Y, Wei F, Jin Y, Lin W. Modeling the hydrodynamics of downer reactors based on kinetic theory [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1999, 54 (13): 2019-2027.
[13]	Zheng Y, Wan X, Qian Z, Wei F, Jin Y. Numerical simulation of the gas-particle turbulent flow in riser reactor based on k-ε-kp-ep-Q two-fluid model [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56 (24): 6813-6822
[14]	Zeng Z X, Zhou L X. A two-scale second-order moment particle turbulence model and simulation of dense gas-particle flows in a riser [J]. Powder Technology, 2006, 162 (1): 27-32
[15]	Chen P, Dudukovic M P, Sanyal J. Three-dimensional simulation of bubble column flows with bubble coalescence and breakup[J]. AIChE Journal, 2005, 51 (3): 696-712.
[16]	Chen P, Sanyal J, Dudukovi? M P. Numerical simulation of bubble columns flows: effect of different breakup and coalescence closures [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60 (4): 1085-1101.
[17]	Rampure M R, Kulkarni A A, Ranade V V. Hydrodynamics of bubble column reactors at high gas velocity: experiments and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46 (25): 8431-8447
[18]	van Baten J M, Krishna R. Eulerian simulation strategy for scaling up a bubble column slurry reactor for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43 (16): 4483-4493
[19]	Wang Lijun (王丽军), Zhang Yu (张煜), Li Xi (李希). Studies on hydrodynamics of turbulent slurry bubble column (Ⅰ): Gas holdup and it's radial distribution [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China) (化工学报), 2008, 59 (12): 2996-3002
[20]	Zhang Yu (张煜), Wang Lijun(王丽军), Li Xi(李希). Studies on hydrodynamics of turbulent slurry bubble column (Ⅱ): Axial liquid and slurry velocity distribution [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China) (化工学报), 2008, 59 (12): 3003-3008
[21]	Cui Z, Fan L S. Turbulence energy distributions in bubbling gas-liquid and gas-liquid-solid flow systems [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59 (8): 1755-1766
[22]	Cui Z, Fan L S. Energy spectra for interactive turbulence fields in a bubble column [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2005, 44 (5): 1150-1159

基于能量守恒的鼓泡塔双尺度流体力学模型

New two-scale hydrodynamic model based on energy balance in bubble column

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[2]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[3]	连梦雅, 谈莹莹, 王林, 陈枫, 曹艺飞. 地下水预热新风一体化热泵空调系统制热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 311-319.
[4]	金正浩, 封立杰, 李舒宏. 氨水溶液交叉型再吸收式热泵的能量及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 53-63.
[5]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[6]	温凯杰, 郭力, 夏诏杰, 陈建华. 一种耦合CFD与深度学习的气固快速模拟方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3775-3785.
[7]	李科, 文键, 忻碧平. 耦合蒸气冷却屏的真空多层绝热结构对液氢储罐自增压过程的影响机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3786-3796.
[8]	王浩, 王振雷. 基于自适应谱方法的裂解炉烧焦模型化简策略[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3855-3864.
[9]	于旭东, 李琪, 陈念粗, 杜理, 任思颖, 曾英. 三元体系KCl + CaCl₂ + H₂O 298.2、323.2及348.2 K相平衡研究及计算[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3256-3265.
[10]	诸程瑛, 王振雷. 基于改进深度强化学习的乙烯裂解炉操作优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3429-3437.
[11]	闫琳琦, 王振雷. 基于STA-BiLSTM-LightGBM组合模型的多步预测软测量建模[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3407-3418.
[12]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[13]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[14]	李锦潼, 邱顺, 孙文寿. 煤浆法烟气脱硫中草酸和紫外线强化煤砷浸出过程[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3522-3532.
[15]	岳林静, 廖艺涵, 薛源, 李雪洁, 李玉星, 刘翠伟. 凹坑缺陷对厚孔板喉部空化流动特性影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3292-3308.