基于多种状态方程模型的冷凝法油气回收对比

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.03.003

CIESC Journal ›› 2014, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (3): 785-791.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.03.003

基于多种状态方程模型的冷凝法油气回收对比

李应林^1,2, 谭来仔³, 张小松¹

1 东南大学能源与环境工程学院, 江苏南京 210096;
2 南京师范大学能源与机械工程学院, 江苏南京 210042;
3 南京五洲制冷集团有限公司, 江苏南京 211100

收稿日期:2013-06-19 修回日期:2013-09-03 出版日期:2014-03-05 发布日期:2014-03-05
通讯作者: 李应林
作者简介:李应林（1979—），男，博士，副教授。
基金资助:
国家十二五科技支撑项目（2011BAJ03B05）；中国博士后面上项目（2012M520970）。

Simulation of oil-vapor condensing recovery process based on several state equation models

LI Yinglin^1,2, TAN Laizai³, ZHANG Xiaosong¹

1 Energy and Environment Engineering School, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, China;
2 Energy and Mechanics Engineering School, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210042, Jiangsu, China;
3 Nanjing Wuzhou Refrigeration Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing 211100, Jiangsu, China

Received:2013-06-19 Revised:2013-09-03 Online:2014-03-05 Published:2014-03-05
Supported by:
supported by the 12th Five-year National Science Project (2011BAJ03B05) and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2012M520970).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 冷凝法回收油气过程的模拟计算采用何种状态方程尚无定论，建立油气混合物相平衡模型和组分热物理参数模型，进行油气回收过程模拟的对比。相平衡模型主要由状态方程、物质的量平衡方程、热力学平衡条件方程和模型迭代步骤组成，状态方程包括SRK方程、PR方程、TJS方程和理想气体方程。模拟结果表明：状态方程选用SRK、PR和TJS方程，经实验数据验证，满足精度要求；将油气视为理想气体时，计算结果与实际气体状态方程的模拟结果相差较大，冷凝温度越高，偏差越大，油气混合物在冷凝过程中不能视为理想气体；SRK、PR、TJS和Aspen Plus的模拟结果比较一致，相平衡计算应优先选用SRK或TJS方程。

关键词: 相平衡, 状态方程, 凝结, 回收率, 浓度

Abstract: The selection of state equation for simulation of condensing oil-gas recovery is still questionable. In this study, by establishing the phase equilibrium model and thermodynamic parameter models, simulation results of condensing oil-vapor recovery process are compared. The phase equilibrium model is composed of state equations, substance balance equation, and thermodynamic equilibrium equation, with model iteration steps. State equations include SRK, PR, TJS and ideal-gas state equation. The simulations present following results. (1) The simulation results are verified by existing test data. For TJS equation, average deviations of gas and liquid mole fractions are 4.03% and 3.54%, respectively, meeting the precision requirement. For SRK equation, at mole fractions of component higher than 5%, average deviations of CH₄ and C₂H₆ are 2.8% and 3.5%, respectively, while at mole fractions less than 5%, average deviation of C₃H₈ is 18.5%, meeting the precision requirement. (2) When the oil-gas mixture is considered as ideal gas, the simulation results differ greatly from those with the real-gas state equations, such as SRK, PR or TJS equation, so for the oil-vapor mixture can not be treated as ideal gas, and SRK and TJS equations are preferred. (3) The simulation results of SRK, PR, TJS and Aspen Plus software are equivalent, while the simulation result of PR model is slightly worse. The mathematical model and simulation analysis on condensing oil-vapor recovery process provide theoretical references for future experiment.

Key words: phase equilibrium, state equation, condensation, recovery ratio, concentration

中图分类号:

TE81

李应林, 谭来仔, 张小松. 基于多种状态方程模型的冷凝法油气回收对比[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(3): 785-791.

LI Yinglin, TAN Laizai, ZHANG Xiaosong. Simulation of oil-vapor condensing recovery process based on several state equation models[J]. , 2014, 65(3): 785-791.

参考文献 18

[1]	Li Cheng(李成), Li Junming(李俊明), Wang Buxuan(王补宣). Characteristics of condensing oil vapor recovery and structure analysis of heat exchangers[J]. Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals(石油炼制与化工), 2010, 41(12): 38-44
[2]	Guo Lanlan(郭兰兰), Kong Xiangqiang(孔祥强), Wang Mohan(王默晗). Phase equilibrium calculation of condensate oil and gas recovery process simulation[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation(油气储运), 2013, 32(1): 12-17
[3]	Wang Lisheng(王利生). The development concerning equations of state and their applications in phase equilibrium calculation for oil and natural gas[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas (石油与天然气化工), 1996, 25(3): 137-142
[4]	Redlich O, Kwong J N S. An equation of state: fugacities of gaseous solutions[J]. Chemical Reviews, 1949, 44(1): 233-244
[5]	Soave G. Equilibrium constants from a modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,1972, 27(6): 1197-1203
[6]	Peng D Y, Robinson D B. A new two-constant equation of state[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 1976, 15(1): 59-64
[7]	Schmidt G,Wenzel H. A modified van der Waals type equation of state[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1980, 35(7): 1503-1512
[8]	Tong Jingshan(童景山), Liu Yupin(刘裕品). A modified van der Waals type equation of state and its extension to large molecule substances[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica: Petroleum Processing Section (石油学报), 1986, 2(1): 51-56
[9]	Cheng Wenlong(程文龙), Xie Kun(谢鲲), Zhao Rui(赵锐). Research of biomass-oil vapor-liquid phase equilibrium and specific heat-capacity[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics (工程热物理学报), 2010, 31(1): 24-27
[10]	Li Jun(李军), Wu Hongsong(吴洪松). Phase equilibrium calculation of LNG[J]. Gas & Heat(煤气与热力), 2007, 27(10): 18-21
[11]	Peng D Y,Robinson D B. A new two-constant equation of state[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 1976, 15(1): 59-64
[12]	Wang Songhan(王松汉). Petrochemical Design Handbook, volume 1: Petrochemical Basic Data(石油化工设计手册,第1卷:石油化工基础数据)[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2002: 704-705
[13]	Yang Guohong(杨国红), Jiang Yingjun(江迎军), Zhou Xia(周霞). Research of light oil low temperature oxidation oil and gas two-phase equilibrium calculation model[J]. Computers and Applied Chemistry(计算机与应用化学), 2012, 29(12): 1511-1516
[14]	Fang Wenjun(方文军), Lei Qunfang(雷群芳), Lin Ruisen(林瑞森). Measurement and correlation of vapor-liquid phase equilibrium constant for fuel fractions[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology(燃料化学学报), 2013, 31(3): 271-275
[15]	Mei Haiyan(梅海燕), Kong Xiangyan(孔祥言), Zhang Maolin(张茂林). Phase equilibrium calculation of the gas-liquid-solid three-phase in oil-gas system[J]. Natural Gas Industry(天然气工业), 2000, 20(3): 75-78
[16]	Bai Jingru(柏静儒), Bai Zhang(白章), Wang Qing(王擎), Wang Zhifeng(王志奉), Sun Kai(孙凯). Process simulation for Huadian-type oil shale retorting system by Aspen Plus[J]. CIESC Journal(化工学报), 2012, 63(12): 4075-4082
[17]	Rihani D N, Doraiswarmy L K. Estimation of heat capacity of organic compounds from group contributions[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 1965, 4(1): 17-21
[18]	Lee B I, Kesler M G. A generalized thermodynamic correlation based on three-parameter corresponding states[J]. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1975, 21(3): 510-512

基于多种状态方程模型的冷凝法油气回收对比

Simulation of oil-vapor condensing recovery process based on several state equation models

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 18

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	苏伟, 马东旭, 金旭, 刘忠彦, 张小松. 表面润湿性对霜层传递特性影响可视化实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 122-131.
[2]	于旭东, 李琪, 陈念粗, 杜理, 任思颖, 曾英. 三元体系KCl + CaCl₂ + H₂O 298.2、323.2及348.2 K相平衡研究及计算[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3256-3265.
[3]	张希庆, 王琰婷, 徐彦红, 常淑玲, 孙婷婷, 薛定, 张立红. Mg量影响的纳米片负载Pt-In催化异丁烷脱氢性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2427-2435.
[4]	陈科, 杜理, 曾英, 任思颖, 于旭东. 四元体系LiCl+MgCl₂+CaCl₂+H₂O 323.2 K相平衡研究及计算[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1896-1903.
[5]	时国华, 何林珅, 赵玺灵, 张世钢. 余热回收喷淋塔的烟气颗粒物脱除特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1735-1745.
[6]	毛元敬, 杨智, 莫松平, 郭浩, 陈颖, 罗向龙, 陈健勇, 梁颖宗. C₆~C₁₀烷醇的SAFT-VR Mie状态方程参数回归及其热物性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1033-1041.
[7]	高靖博, 孙强, 李青, 王逸伟, 郭绪强. 考虑水合物结构转变的含氢气体水合物相平衡模型[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 666-673.
[8]	程文婷, 李杰, 徐丽, 程芳琴, 刘国际. AlCl₃·6H₂O在FeCl₃、CaCl₂、KCl及KCl–FeCl₃溶液中溶解度的实验及预测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 642-652.
[9]	蔡进, 王晓辉, 汤涵, 陈光进, 孙长宇. TBAB水溶液体系中半笼型水合物的相平衡预测模型[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 408-415.
[10]	周桓, 张梦丽, 郝晴, 吴思, 李杰, 徐存兵. 硫酸镁型光卤石转化钾盐镁矾的过程机制与动态规律[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3841-3850.
[11]	刘潜, 张香兰, 李志平, 李玉龙, 韩梦醒. 油酚分离过程低共熔溶剂的筛选及萃取性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3915-3928.
[12]	鲁军辉, 李俊明. H₂O-CO₂、H₂O-N₂、H₂O-He水平管外自然对流凝结换热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3870-3879.
[13]	陈晨, 杨倩, 陈云, 张睿, 刘冬. 不同氧浓度下煤挥发分燃烧的化学动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4133-4146.
[14]	席国君, 刘子涵, 雷广平. FeTPPs-CuBTC协同强化低浓度煤层气吸附分离[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3940-3949.
[15]	赵庆杰, 胡晓红, 张超, 凡凤仙. 蒸汽在含有不可溶核和可溶无机盐的细颗粒物表面的核化特性[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3251-3261.