木质框架土壤渗滤系统处理养猪废水厌氧消化液的效能

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20150111

化工学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (6): 2248-2255.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20150111

木质框架土壤渗滤系统处理养猪废水厌氧消化液的效能

赵博玮, 李建政, 邓凯文, 孟佳

哈尔滨工业大学城市水资源与水环境国家重点实验室, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150090

收稿日期:2015-01-22 修回日期:2015-03-07 出版日期:2015-06-05 发布日期:2015-03-16
通讯作者: 李建政
基金资助:
黑龙江省应用技术研究与开发计划项目(GC13C303);国家水体污染控制与论理科技重大专项(2013ZX07201007)。

Efficiency of wood-chip-framework soil infiltration system in treating anaerobically digested swine wastewater

ZHAO Bowei, LI Jianzheng, DENG Kaiwen, MENG Jia

State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, China

Received:2015-01-22 Revised:2015-03-07 Online:2015-06-05 Published:2015-03-16
Supported by:
supported by the Science and Technology Department of Heilongjiang Province(GC13C303) and the Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Coutrol and Management (2013ZX07201007).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为处理高氨氮、低C/N比的养猪废水厌氧消化液, 构建了具有缓释碳源特性的木质框架土壤渗滤系统(WFSI), 并通过运行测试了进水浓度和表面水力负荷(SHL)对系统处理效能的影响。在SHL为0.2 m³·m^-2·d^-1条件下, 当进水COD和NH₄⁺-N平均浓度分别从152和175.5 mg·L^-1提高到421和788.7 mg·L^-1时, 系统对COD的去除率从52.3%提高到61.2%, NH₄⁺-N去除率从84.2%下降到61.5%, TN去除率从28.6%提高到了33.5%, NH₄⁺-N和TN去除负荷分别达到了75.5和41.7 g·m^-3·d^-1。当SHL提高为0.32 m³·m^-²·d^-1时, 系统仍能维持运行, 但处理效能受到显著影响。在进水COD 和NH₄⁺-N分别为265和465 mg·L^-1左右时, COD、NH₄⁺-N及TN的去除率分别平均为56.5%、53.3%和20.9%。木质填料及其附着层形成的NH₄⁺-N浓度梯度, 可使系统承受较高的SHL的同时获得缓释碳源, 并保护氨氧化细菌免受自由氨毒性。

关键词: 养猪废水, 厌氧消化液, 废物处理, 填充床, 渗透, 脱氮

Abstract:

A wood-chip-framework soil infiltrator (WFSI) with slow-release of carbon source was constructed and used to treat an anaerobically digested swine wastewater characterized with high NH₄⁺-N and low C/N ratio. Pollutant removal efficiency of the WFSI was investigated under various influent concentration and varying surface hydraulic load (SHL). Under SHL of 0.2 m³·m^-2·d^-1, influent averaged COD and NH₄⁺-N increased from 152 and 175.5 mg·L^-1 to 421 and 788.7 mg·L^-1, respectively. The resultant COD, NH₄⁺-N and TN removal by the system was 52.3% to 61.2%, 84.2% to 61.5% and 28.6% to 33.5%, respectively. Meanwhile, NH₄⁺-N and TN removal loading reached 75.5 and 41.7 g·m^-3·d^-1, respectively. Though SHL was as high as 0.32 m³·m^-2·d^-1, the system still performed but its efficiency was remarkably influenced. When influent COD and NH₄⁺-N was around 265 and 465 mg·L^-1, COD, NH₄⁺-N and TN removal was about 56.5%, 53.3% and 20.9%, respectively. The wood carrier observably worked as a slow-release carbon source, and protected the ammonia oxidizing bacteria from free ammonia toxicity due to the concentration gradient of NH₄⁺-N in the adhesive layers.

Key words: swine wastewater, anaerobically digested liquor, waste treatment, packed bed, permeation, nitrogen removal

中图分类号:

X703.1

赵博玮, 李建政, 邓凯文, 孟佳. 木质框架土壤渗滤系统处理养猪废水厌氧消化液的效能[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(6): 2248-2255.

ZHAO Bowei, LI Jianzheng, DENG Kaiwen, MENG Jia. Efficiency of wood-chip-framework soil infiltration system in treating anaerobically digested swine wastewater[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(6): 2248-2255.

参考文献 22

[1]	Lee H, Shoda M. Removal of COD and color from livestock wastewater by the Fenton method [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008, 153: 1314-1319.
[2]	Daverey A, Hung N T, Dutta K, Lin J G. Ambient temperature SNAD process treating anaerobic digester liquor of swine wastewater [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 141: 191-198.
[3]	Wang F, Wang H Y, Zhou Y X, Xu J X, Yang L W, Zhang N. Research progress on the processing technology of piggery wastewater [J]. Journal of Agricultural Catastrophology, 2012, 2(1): 25-29.
[4]	Van C S, Siegrist R, Logan A, Masson S, Fischer E, Figueroa L. Hydraulic and purification behaviors and their interactions during wastewater treatment in soil infiltration systems [J]. Water Research, 2001, 35(4): 953-964.
[5]	Van C S, Siegrist R L. Virus removal within a soil infiltration zone as affected by effluent composition, application rate and soil type [J]. Water Research, 2007, 41: 699-709.
[6]	Murakami M, Sato N, Anegawa A, Nakada N, Harada A, Komatsu T, Takada H, Tanaka H, Ono Y, Furumai H. Multiple evaluations of the removal of pollutants in road runoff by soil infiltration [J]. Water Research, 2008, 42: 2745-2755.
[7]	Cheng X Z, Wu T B, Chen T Z, Yang T Z. Soil aquifer treatment technology: state of the art and perspective [J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 1999, 12(4): 33-36.
[8]	Lei Z F, Wu T, Zhang Y, Liu X, Wan C L, Lee D J, Tay J H. Two-stage soil infiltration treatment system for treating ammonium wastewaters of low COD/TN ratios [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 128: 774-778.
[9]	Zhao B W, Li J Z, Leu S Y. An innovative wood-chip-framework soil infiltrator for treating anaerobic digested swine wastewater and analysis of the microbial community [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 143: 384-391.
[10]	Ministry of Environmental Protection(国家环境保护部). Detection and Analysis Method of Water and Wastewater(DSM-Ⅳ) (水与废水检测分析方法)[M]. 4th ed. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2002: 12.
[11]	Buelna G, DubéR, Turgeon N. Pig manure treatment by organic bed biofiltration [J]. Desalination, 2008, 231: 297-304.
[12]	Fux C, Boehler M, Huber P, Brunner I, Siegrist H. Biological treatment of ammonium-rich wastewater by partial nitritation and subsequent anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) in a pilot plant [J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2002, 99: 295-306.
[13]	Rajagopal R, Rousseau P, Bernet N, Béline F. Combined anaerobic and activated sludge anoxic/oxic treatment for piggery wastewater [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102: 2185-2192.
[14]	Ministry of Environmental Protection(国家环境保护部). Discharge standard of pollutants forlivestock and poultry breeding(畜禽养殖业污染物排放标准)[S]. GB 18596—2001.
[15]	Eichorst S A, Kuske C R. Identification of cellulose-responsive bacterial and fungal communities in geographically and edaphically different soils by using stable isotope probing [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 78(7): 2316-2327.
[16]	Figueroa M, Vázquez-Padín J R, Mosquera-Corral A, Campos J L, Mendez R. Is the CANON reactor an alternative for nitrogen removal from pretreated swine slurry? [J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 65: 23-29.
[17]	GarzóN-Zúniga M, Lessard P, Aubry G, Buelna G. Nitrogen elimination mechanisms in an organic media aerated biofilter treating pig manure [J]. Environmental Technology, 2004,26: 361-371.
[18]	Poth M, Focht D D. 15N kinetic analysis of N2O production by nitrosomonaseuropeae: an examination of nitrifierdenitrification [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1985, 49: 1134-1141.
[19]	Yamamoto T, Takaki K, Koyama T, Furukawa K. Long-term stability of partial nitritation of piggery wastewater digester liquor and its subsequent treatment by Anammox [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 99: 6419-6425.
[20]	Yuan Z G. Effect of free ammonia on the respiration and growth process of anenriched nitrobacterculture [J]. Water Research, 2007, 4(1):826-834.
[21]	Dosta J, Palau-S L P, Lvarez-J M A. Study of the biological N removal over nitrite in aphysico-chemical-biological treatment of digestedpig manure in a SBR [J]. Water Science & Technology, 2008, 58(1): 119-125.
[22]	Bernet N, Delgenes N, Akunna J C, Delgenes J P, Moletta R. Combined anaerobic and aerobic SBR for the treatment of piggery wastewater [J]. Water Research, 2000, 34(2): 611-619.

木质框架土壤渗滤系统处理养猪废水厌氧消化液的效能

Efficiency of wood-chip-framework soil infiltration system in treating anaerobically digested swine wastewater

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张佳怡, 何佳莉, 谢江鹏, 王健, 赵鹬, 张栋强. 渗透汽化技术用于锂电池生产中N-甲基吡咯烷酮回收的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3203-3215.
[2]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[3]	张曼铮, 肖猛, 闫沛伟, 苗政, 徐进良, 纪献兵. 危废焚烧处理耦合有机朗肯循环系统工质筛选与热力学优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3502-3512.
[4]	屈园浩, 邓文义, 谢晓丹, 苏亚欣. 活性炭/石墨辅助污泥电渗脱水研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3038-3050.
[5]	陈朝光, 贾玉香, 汪锰. 以低浓度废酸驱动中和渗析脱盐的模拟与验证[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2486-2494.
[6]	刘道银, 陈柄岐, 张祖扬, 吴琰. 颗粒聚团结构对曳力特性影响的数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2351-2362.
[7]	贾晓宇, 杨剑, 王博, 林梅, 王秋旺. 金属丝网毛细特性的孔隙尺度数值分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1928-1938.
[8]	张建华, 陈萌萌, 孙雅雯, 彭永臻. 部分短程硝化同步除磷耦合Anammox实现生活污水高效脱氮除磷[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2147-2156.
[9]	刘定平, 陈爱桦, 张向阳, 何文浩, 王海. 铝灰半干法水解脱氮研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1294-1302.
[10]	罗欣宜, 冯超, 刘晶, 乔瑜. 污泥不同热处理工艺产物磷的浸出回收实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4034-4044.
[11]	张童, 杨扬, 叶丁丁, 陈蓉, 朱恂, 廖强. 催化剂分布对可渗透阳极微流体燃料电池性能特性影响的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4156-4162.
[12]	王佳铭, 阮雪华, 贺高红. 面向不同工业二氧化碳分离体系的膜材料研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3417-3432.
[13]	杨光, 程鑫, 王峥, 王晔, 张良俊, 吴静怡. 微纳多孔结构中稀薄气体流动渗透率的解析型预测模型[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2895-2901.
[14]	刘鑫, 潘阳, 刘公平, 方静, 李春利, 李浩. 渗透汽化-隔壁塔精馏耦合初步分离费托合成水的过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 2020-2030.
[15]	郭志强, 燕可洲, 张吉元, 柳丹丹, 高阳艳, 郭彦霞. 煤矸石/粉煤灰对赤泥钠化还原焙烧反应的影响机制[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 2194-2205.