桩基并联双螺旋型埋管换热器传热特性的数值仿真

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161741

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (7): 2730-2738.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161741

桩基并联双螺旋型埋管换热器传热特性的数值仿真

朱税平^1,2, 赵蕾^1,2, 杨柳³, 王振宇⁴

1 西安建筑科技大学环境与市政工程学院, 陕西西安 710055;
2 陕西省环境工程重点实验室, 陕西西安 710055;
3 西安建筑科技大学建筑学院, 陕西西安 710055;
4 同度可再生能源应用研究中心, 江苏昆山 215243

收稿日期:2016-12-12 修回日期:2017-04-06 出版日期:2017-07-05 发布日期:2017-07-05
通讯作者: 赵蕾
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划项目（2014BAJ01B01）。

Numerical studies on heat transfer characteristics of pile heat exchanger with double spiral pipes buried in parallel

ZHU Shuiping^1,2, ZHAO Lei^1,2, YANG Liu³, WANG Zhenyu⁴

1 School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, Shaanxi, China;
2 Key Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Xi'an 710055, Shaanxi, China;
3 School of Architecture, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, Shaanxi, China;
4 Tong Du Renewable Energy Application Research Center, Kunshan 215243, Jiangsu, China

Received:2016-12-12 Revised:2017-04-06 Online:2017-07-05 Published:2017-07-05
Contact: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161741
Supported by:
supported by the National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China (2014BAJ01B01).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

摸清桩基并联双螺旋型埋管换热器的传热特性是进行合理设计、确保其高效运行的前提。建立了包含回水立管在内的桩基并联双螺旋型埋管换热器三维动态传热的仿真模型，利用其对现场实验的仿真复现及实心圆柱源热源模型解析解的对比验证了模拟结果的正确性。对桩身和土壤温度的模拟结果进行了分析，给出了沿管程、桩基内部以及周围土壤的温度分布。对连续和3种间歇运行模式下桩基并联双螺旋型埋管换热器的运行情况进行了仿真，揭示了其出口水温和单位管长放热量等性能参数的动态变化规律以及桩壁和周围土壤温度沿桩深和桩径方向的分布特征，提出了桩壁温度恢复百分比指标，定量评价了其在间歇运行模式下的温度恢复程度。表明了运停比越小，桩壁温度恢复程度越显著，但随着间歇运行周期的增加，每一间歇期的温度恢复程度呈现下降趋势。

关键词: 计算流体力学, 热传导, 传热, 桩基并联双螺旋型埋管换热器, 实验验证, 数值模拟, 间歇运行

Abstract:

It is critical to understand the heat transfer characteristics of pile heat exchanger (PHE) with double spiral pipes buried in parallel so that it can be designed feasibly and operated efficiently. Therefore, a 3-D dynamic simulation model as established to study the heat transfer processes of a pile heat exchanger in which double spiral pipes and the return risers were buried in parallel. And the numerical simulation results were validated by the data obtained in an in-situ test and analytical solution of the solid cylindrical heat source model. The temperature distributions along the pipes, in the pile body and soil surrounding are illustrated and analyzed. A continuous and three intermittent heat transfer processes of this PHE were simulated dynamically. Such parameters as the dynamic outlet water temperatures of the buried parallel double spiral pipes and the heat transfer rate per unit pipe length are revealed. The temperature variations at different locations on the pile wall and in the soil surrounding along the pile depth and in radial directions are analyzed. The index of pile wall temperature recovery percentage is proposed to quantify the temperature recovery degree under different intermittent operational modes. It is found that the smaller the on-off ratio, the more significantly the temperature recovery degree along the pile wall can be achieved. But the recovery degree in each intermittent period tends to decrease as the operational cyclic increases.

Key words: computational fluid dynamics, heat conduction, heat transfer, pile heat exchanger with double spiral pipes buried in parallel, experimental validation, numerical simulation, intermittent mode

中图分类号:

TK521

朱税平, 赵蕾, 杨柳, 王振宇. 桩基并联双螺旋型埋管换热器传热特性的数值仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(7): 2730-2738.

ZHU Shuiping, ZHAO Lei, YANG Liu, WANG Zhenyu. Numerical studies on heat transfer characteristics of pile heat exchanger with double spiral pipes buried in parallel[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(7): 2730-2738.

参考文献 30

[1]	SARBU I, SEBARCHIEVICI C. General review of ground -source heat pump systems for heating and cooling of buildings[J]. Energy & Buildings, 2014, 70(1): 441-454.
[2]	SELF S, REDDY B, ROSEN M. Geothermal heat pump systems: status review and comparison with other heating options[J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 101(1): 341-348.
[3]	FAIZAL M, BOUAZZA A, SINGH R M. Heat transfer enhancement of geothermal energy piles[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 57: 16-33.
[4]	BRANDL H. Energy foundations and other thermo-active ground structures[J]. Geotechnique, 2006, 56(2): 81-122.
[5]	桂树强, 程晓辉, 张志鹏. 地源热泵桩基与钻孔埋管换热器换热性能比较[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程, 2013, 35(3): 151-156.GUI S Q, CHENG X H, ZHANG Z P. Comparative analysis of heat exchange performance of energy piles and borehole heat exchangers in GSHP system[J]. Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, 2013, 35(3): 151-156.
[6]	CECINATO F, LOVERIDGE F A. Influences on the thermal efficiency of energy piles energy[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2015, 82: 1021-1033.
[7]	ZHAO Q, CHEN B M, LIU F. Study on the thermal performance of several types of energy pile ground heat exchangers: U-shaped, W-shaped and spiral-shaped[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2016, 133: 335-344.
[8]	ZARRELLA A, CARLI M D, GALGARO A. Thermal performance of two types of energy foundation pile: helical pipe and triple U-tube[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 61(2): 301-310.
[9]	PARK S, LEE D, CHOI H J, et al. Relative constructability and thermal performance of cast-in-place concrete energy pile: coil-type GHEX (ground heat exchanger)[J]. Energy, 2015, 81: 56-66.
[10]	CUI P, LI X, MAN Y, et al. Heat transfer analysis of pile geothermal heat exchangers with spiral coils[J]. Apply Energy, 2011, 88(11): 4113-4119.
[11]	茅靳丰, 李永, 张华, 等. 地埋管换热器热短路及其对热物性测试影响分析[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(11): 4015-4024.MAO J F, LI Y, ZHANG H, et al. Thermal short-circuiting and its influence on thermal response in borehole heat exchangers[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(11): 4015-4024.
[12]	陈超, 王永菲, 任艳, 等. 竖直U形地埋管换热器传热热阻计算方法比较[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 36(12): 58-62.CHEN C, WANG Y F, REN Y, et al. Comparison of vertical U-tube ground heat exchanger thermal resistance calculation methods[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2009, 36(12): 58-62.
[13]	SELAMAT S, MIYARA A, KARIYA K. Numerical study of horizontal ground heat exchangers for design optimization[J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 95: 561-573.
[14]	CANE R L D, FORGAS D A. Modeling of GSHP performance[J]. ASHRAE Trans., 1991, 97(1): 909-925.
[15]	刘俊红, 张文克, 方肇洪. 桩埋螺旋管式地热换热器的传热模型[J]. 山东建筑大学学报, 2010, 25(2): 95-100.LIU J H, ZHANG W K, FANG Z H. Solid cylindrical heat source model for pile ground heat exchangers with spiral coils[J]. Journal of Shandong Jianzhu University, 2010, 25(2): 95-100.
[16]	石磊, 张方方, 林芸, 等. 桩基螺旋埋管换热器的二维温度场分析[J]. 山东建筑大学学报, 2010, 25(2): 177-183.SHI L, ZHANG F F, LIN Y, et al. The 2-D thermal analysis of the coil ground heat exchanger inside piles[J]. Journal of Shandong Jianzhu University, 2010, 25(2): 177-183.
[17]	DIAO N R, CUI P, LIU J H, et a1. R&D of the ground-coupled heat pump technology in China[J]. Frontiers of Energy and Power Engineering in China, 2010, 4(1): 47-54.
[18]	ZHANG W K, YANG H X, LU L, et al. Investigation on heat transfer around buried coils of pile foundation heat exchangers for ground-coupled heat pump applications[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2012, 55(21/22): 6023-6031
[19]	李新, 方亮, 赵强, 等. 螺旋埋管地热换热器的线圈热源模型及其解析解[J]. 热能动力工程, 2011, 26(4): 476-479.LI X, FANG L, ZHAO Q, et al. The 2-D thermal analysis of the coil ground heat exchanger inside piles[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2011, 26(4): 476-479.
[20]	MAN Y, YANG H X, DIAO N R, et al. Development of spiral heat source model for novel pile ground heat exchangers[J]. HVAC & R Research, 2011, 17(6): 1075-1088.
[21]	王蕊, 赵静野, 陈晓春. 桩埋螺旋管地热换热器的数值模拟[J]. 北京建筑工程学院学报, 2013, 29(1): 25-29.WANG R, ZHAO J Y, CHEN X C. Numerical simulation for pile ground heat exchangers with spiral coils[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2013, 29(1): 25-29.
[22]	吴华剑. 桩基螺旋埋管换热器性能研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2012.WU H J. Study on performance of pile spiral pipe heat exchanger[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2012.
[23]	WANG D Q, LU L, ZHANG W K, et al. Numerical and analytical analysis of groundwater influence on the pile geothermal heat exchanger with cast-in spiral coils[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 160: 705-714.
[24]	ZHANG W K, YANG H X, LU L, et al. The research on ring-coil heat transfer models of pile foundation ground heat exchangers in the case of groundwater seepage[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2014, 71: 115-128.
[25]	ZHANG W K, YANG H X, LU L, et al. The analysis on solid cylindrical heat source model of foundation pile ground heat exchangers with groundwater flow[J]. Energy, 2013, 55: 417-425.
[26]	BEZYAN B, PORKHIAl S, MEHRIZI A A. 3-D simulation of heat transfer rate in geothermal pile-foundation heat exchangers with spiral pipe configuration[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 87: 655-668.
[27]	FANG Z H, DIAO N N, CUI P. Discontinuous operation of geothermal heat exchangers[J]. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2002, 7(2): 194-197.
[28]	杨卫波, 施明恒. 基于线热源理论的垂直U型埋管换热器传热模型的研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2007, 28(5): 482-488.YANG W B, SHI M H. Study on heat transfer model of vertical U-tube ground heat exchangers based on line heat source theory[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2007, 28(5): 482-488.
[29]	PIECHOWSKI M. Heat and mass transfer model of a ground heat exchanger: validation and sensitivity analysis[J]. Int. J. Energy Res., 1998, 22(11): 965-979.
[30]	陶文铨. 数值传热学[M]. 2版. 西安: 西安交通大学出版社, 2001: 5.TAO W Q. Numerical Heat Transfer[M]. 2nd ed. Xi'an: Xi'an Jiaotong University Press, 2001: 5.

桩基并联双螺旋型埋管换热器传热特性的数值仿真

Numerical studies on heat transfer characteristics of pile heat exchanger with double spiral pipes buried in parallel

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	叶展羽, 山訸, 徐震原. 用于太阳能蒸发的折纸式蒸发器性能仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 132-140.
[2]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[3]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[4]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[5]	刘明栖, 吴延鹏. 导光管直径和长度对传热影响的模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 206-212.
[6]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[7]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[8]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[9]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[10]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[11]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[12]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[13]	温凯杰, 郭力, 夏诏杰, 陈建华. 一种耦合CFD与深度学习的气固快速模拟方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3775-3785.
[14]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[15]	刘远超, 关斌, 钟建斌, 徐一帆, 蒋旭浩, 李耑. 单层XSe₂（X=Zr/Hf）的热电输运特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3968-3978.