燃煤电厂湿烟气的除湿特性

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170224

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (9): 3558-3564.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170224

燃煤电厂湿烟气的除湿特性

吕扬¹, 董勇¹, 田路泞², 韩哲楠², 申凯¹, 崔琳¹, 张立强¹, 李玉忠¹

1 燃煤污染物减排国家工程实验室(山东大学), 山东济南 250061;
2 武汉光谷环保科技股份有限公司, 湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2017-03-08 修回日期:2017-06-05 出版日期:2017-09-05 发布日期:2017-09-05
通讯作者: 董勇
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFF0209800）；山东省重点研发计划项目（2016GGX104009）。

Dehumidification performance of wet flue gas in coal-fired power plant

LÜ Yang¹, DONG Yong¹, TIAN Luning², HAN Zhenan², SHEN Kai¹, CUI Lin¹, ZHANG Liqiang¹, LI Yuzhong¹

1 National Engineering Laboratory for Coal-fired Pollutants Emission Reduction(Shandong University), Jinan 250061, Shandong, China;
2 Wuhan Optics Valley Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China

Received:2017-03-08 Revised:2017-06-05 Online:2017-09-05 Published:2017-09-05
Contact: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170224

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

燃煤电厂湿法脱硫后排放的烟气中含有大量水蒸气，造成大量水资源的浪费，溶液除湿工艺是水分回收技术之一。通过绝热型管式降膜除湿试验台，采用价格低廉的CaCl₂溶液为除湿剂，探究了湿烟气状态下溶液浓度、溶液温度、传质面积及进口温度对除湿性能的影响，试验得到了CaCl₂溶液除湿过程的传质系数，溶液除湿效率远高于清水冷凝除湿，为烟气除湿工艺的选择和性能预测提供了参考。

关键词: 烟道气, 吸收, 除湿, 水溶液, 管式降膜

Abstract:

The flue gas after FGD emitted in coal-fired power plant contains a large amount of water vapor,which means a great waste of water resources. The liquid desiccant-based dehumidification is a feasible technology to recover water from flue gas. To study the dehumidification performance of this technology, a laboratory scale adiabatic tube falling film dehumidifier was built with CaCl₂ solution as desiccant. The performance of this technology and the effect of solution temperature, concentration, mass transfer area and air inlet temperature was investigated. The mass transfer coefficient was given by 0.009-0.040 m·s^-1. Moreover, a comparison between condensation and liquid desiccant-based dehumidification was carried out. The data showed that the water recovery efficiency would be more than 50%, which was much better than condensation method and confirmed the feasibility of this technology applied in power plants.

Key words: flue gas, absorption, water recovery, solution, tube falling film

中图分类号:

X701

吕扬, 董勇, 田路泞, 韩哲楠, 申凯, 崔琳, 张立强, 李玉忠. 燃煤电厂湿烟气的除湿特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(9): 3558-3564.

LÜ Yang, DONG Yong, TIAN Luning, HAN Zhenan, SHEN Kai, CUI Lin, ZHANG Liqiang, LI Yuzhong. Dehumidification performance of wet flue gas in coal-fired power plant[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(9): 3558-3564.

参考文献 33

[1]	杨宝红. 新形势下火电厂节水减排工作特点及关键[J]. 热力发电, 2016, 45(9):95-99. YANG B H. Features and key process of water saving and wastewater discharge reduction in thermal power plants at current situation[J].Thermal Power Generation, 2016, 45(9):95-99.
[2]	陈莲芳, 徐夕仁, 马春元, 等. 湿式烟气脱硫过程中白烟的产生及防治[J]. 发电设备, 2005, 19(5):326-328. CHEN L F, XU X R, MA C Y, et al. Formation of white smoke in wet flue gas desulfurization processes and ways of prevention[J]. Power Equipment, 2005, 19(5):326-328.
[3]	欧阳丽华, 庄烨, 刘科伟, 等. 燃煤电厂湿烟囱降雨成因分析[J]. 环境科学, 2015, (6):1975-1982. OUYANG L H, ZHUANG Y, LIU K W, et al. Analysis on mechanism of rainout carried by wet stack of thermal power plant[J]. Environmental Science, 2015, (6):1975-1982.
[4]	李文艳, 王冀星, 车建炜. 湿法脱硫烟气湿排问题分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2007, 27(14):36-40. LI W Y, WANG J X, CHE J W. Analysis on corresponding problems of WFGD flue gas wet emission[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2007, 27(14):36-40.
[5]	杨杰. 湿法烟气脱硫烟囱防腐技术探讨[J]. 电力科技与环保, 2005, 21(3):9-10. YANG J. Research on stack anticorrosion technologies for the wet FGD system[J]. Electric Power Environmental Protection, 2005, 21(3):9-10.
[6]	陈文理. MGGH技术在1000MW机组中应用的技术、经济性分析[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(5):103-107. CHEN W L. Technical and economic analysis of MGGH technology application in 1000 MW unit[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2014, 35(5):103-107.
[7]	李春萱, 黄淑芳, 杨征, 等. 气-气换热器在湿法烟气脱硫中的新应用[J]. 热力发电, 2006, 35(7):60-62. LI C X, HUANG S F, YANG Z, et al. The application of MGGH in WFGD[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2006, 35(7):60-62.
[8]	CHEN Q, FINNEY K, LI H, et al. Condensing boiler applications in the process industry[J]. Applied Energy, 2012, 89(1):30-36.
[9]	LEVY E, BILIRGEN H, DUPOINT J. Recovery of water from boiler flue gas using condensing heat exchangers[R]. Bethlehem:Lehigh University, 2011.
[10]	刘华, 周贤, 付林. 烟气与水冷凝换热影响因素实验研究[J]. 暖通空调, 2015, 45(7):90-95. LIU H, ZHOU X, FU L. Experimental research on influence factors of direct-contact flue-gas-water condensation heat exchange[J]. Heating Ventilating & Air Conditioning, 2015, 45(7):90-95.
[11]	熊英莹. 火电厂烟气潜热和凝结水回收的试验研究[J]. 热力发电, 2015, (6):77-81. XIONG Y Y. Experimental study on latent heat and condensate recovery from flue gas in coal-fired power plants[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2015, (6):77-81.
[12]	MACEDONIO F, BRUNETTI A, BARBIERI G, et al. Membrane condenser as a new technology for water recovery from humidified "waste" gaseous streams[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(3):1160-1167.
[13]	SIJBESMA H, NYMEIJER K, MARWIJK R V, et al. Flue gas dehydration using polymer membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 313(1/2):263-276.
[14]	WANG D X. Transport membrane condenser for water and energy recovery from power plant flue gas[R]. Des Plaines:Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports, 2012.
[15]	ZHAO S, YAN S, WANG D K, et al. Simultaneous heat and water recovery from flue gas by membrane condensation:experimental investigation[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 113:843-850.
[16]	陈海平, 刘彦达, 周亚男. 中空纤维膜法回收火电厂烟气中水蒸气[J]. 热力发电, 2017, 46(1):100-105. CHEN H P, LIU Y D, ZHOU Y N. Experimental study on recycling water vapor from flue gas of thermal power plants using hollow fiber membrane[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2017, 46(1):100-105.
[17]	刘晓华, 李震, 张涛. 溶液除湿[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2014. LIU X H, LI Z, ZHANG T. Liquid Desiccant Dehumidification[M]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2014.
[18]	魏璠, 肖云汉, 张士杰, 等. 喷淋吸收过程模型及实验研究[J].工程热物理学报, 2008, 29(10):1621-1624. WEI F, XIAO Y H, ZHANG S J, et al. The model and experiment of heat and mass transfer in spraying absorption[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2008, 29(10):1621-1624.
[19]	路源. 高湿度烟气中水及潜热的开式吸收式热泵回收技术研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院工程热物理研究所, 2010. LU Y. Study of heat and water recovery in humid flue gas[D]. Beijing:Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, 2010.
[20]	LARS W, ROGER H, JONATHAN F. Flue gas purification and heat recovery:a biomass fired boiler supplied with an open absorption system[J]. Applied Energy, 2012, 96(3):444-450.
[21]	FOLKEDAHL B C, WEBER G F, COLLINGS M E. Water extraction from coal-fired power plant flue gas[R]. Grand Forks:University of North Dakota, 2006.
[22]	杜谦. 并流有序降膜组脱除烟气中SO2过程的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2004. DU Q. Study on process of SO2 removal by orderly falling films with cocurrent gas-liquid contacting[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2004.
[23]	易晓勤. 常用溶液除湿剂的性质研究[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2009. YI X Q. Study on the characteristics of conventional liquid desiccants[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2009.
[24]	ERTAS A, ANDERSON E E, KIRIS I. Properties of a new liquid desiccant solution-lithium chloride and calcium chloride mixture[J]. Solar Energy, 1992, 49(3):205-212.
[25]	LI X W, ZHANG X S, WANG G, et al. Research on ratio selection of a mixed liquid desiccant:mixed LiCl-CaCl2 solution[J]. Solar Energy, 2008, 82(12):1161-1171.
[26]	李秀伟, 张小松, 王庚, 等. 溶液除湿能力强化[J]. 化工学报, 2008, 59(10):2442-2447. LI X W, ZHANG X S, WANG G, et al. Enhancement of liquid dehumidification ability[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2008, 59(10):2442-2447.
[27]	STUDAK J W, PETERSON J L. A preliminary evaluation of alternative liquid desiccants for a hybrid desiccant air conditioner[C]//Symposium on Improving Building Systems in Hot and Humid Climates. Austin, 1988:155-159.
[28]	KIEVIET F G, RAAIJ J V, KERKHOF P J A M. A device for measuring temperature and humidity in a spray dryer chamber[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 1997, 75(3):329-333.
[29]	田龙舟. 吸收式除湿工艺研究[D]. 北京:北京化工大学, 2008. TIAN L Z. Research on absorption dehumidification system[D]. Beijing:Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2008.
[30]	裘立春. 大型燃煤电站锅炉冒白烟的研究[J]. 锅炉技术, 2015, 46(3):26-29. QIU L C. The research on stack white fume in large utility boiler burning coal[J]. Boiler Technology, 2015, 46(3):26-29.
[31]	张寅平, 张立志, 刘晓华, 等. 建筑环境传质学[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2006. ZHANG Y P, ZHANG L Z, LIU X H, et al. Mass Transfer in Built Environment[M]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2006.
[32]	RAHAMAH A, ELSAYED M M, AL-NAJEM N M. A numerical solution for cooling and dehumidification of air by a falling desiccant film in parallel flow[J]. Renewable Energy, 1998, 13(3):305-322.
[33]	陆耀庆. 实用供热空调设计手册[M]. 2版. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2008. LU Y Q. Practical Handbook for HVAC Design[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2008.

燃煤电厂湿烟气的除湿特性

Dehumidification performance of wet flue gas in coal-fired power plant

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邹启宏, 李乾, 葛天舒. 基于多目标下的两级并联除湿热泵系统实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 265-271.
[2]	黄琮琪, 吴一梅, 陈建业, 邵双全. 碱性电解水制氢装置热管理系统仿真研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 320-328.
[3]	金正浩, 封立杰, 李舒宏. 氨水溶液交叉型再吸收式热泵的能量及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 53-63.
[4]	米泽豪, 花儿. 基于DFT和COSMO-RS理论研究多元胺型离子液体吸收SO₂气体[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3681-3696.
[5]	程小松, 殷勇高, 车春文. 不同工质在溶液除湿真空再生系统中的性能对比[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3494-3501.
[6]	张瑞航, 曹潘, 杨锋, 李昆, 肖朋, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8纳米流体天然气乙烷回收工艺的产品纯度关键影响因素分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[7]	胡兴枝, 张皓焱, 庄境坤, 范雨晴, 张开银, 向军. 嵌有超小CeO₂纳米粒子的碳纳米纤维的制备及其吸波性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3584-3596.
[8]	陈科, 杜理, 曾英, 任思颖, 于旭东. 四元体系LiCl+MgCl₂+CaCl₂+H₂O 323.2 K相平衡研究及计算[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1896-1903.
[9]	杨灿, 孙雪琦, 尚明华, 张建, 张香平, 曾少娟. 相变离子液体体系吸收分离CO₂的研究现状及展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1419-1432.
[10]	时国华, 何林珅, 赵玺灵, 张世钢. 余热回收喷淋塔的烟气颗粒物脱除特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1735-1745.
[11]	李木金, 胡松, 施德磐, 赵鹏, 高瑞, 李进龙. 环氧丁烷尾气溶剂吸收及精制工艺[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1607-1618.
[12]	潘煜, 王子航, 王佳韵, 王如竹, 张华. 基于可得然-氯化锂复合吸附剂的除湿换热器热湿性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1352-1359.
[13]	何洋, 高森虎, 吴青云, 张明理, 龙涛, 牛佩, 高景辉, 孟颖琪. 析湿工况下平直开缝翅片传热传质特性的数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1073-1081.
[14]	何万媛, 陈一宇, 朱春英, 付涛涛, 高习群, 马友光. 阵列凸起微通道内气液两相传质特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 690-697.
[15]	王煦清, 严圣林, 朱礼涛, 张希宝, 罗正鸿. 填料塔中有机胺吸收CO₂气液传质的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 237-256.