石墨烯纳米片-乙二醇纳米流体光热转化特性研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20191033

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

纳米流体应用于太阳能集热器是太阳能光热转化的重要突破，石墨烯纳米材料在可见光和近红外区域具有较好的吸收特性，实验基于Hummer法制备了石墨烯纳米片材料，对其进行表征。并配制了不同质量分数石墨烯纳米片-乙二醇纳米流体，将其在太阳能模拟器下进行闷晒实验，计算石墨烯纳米片的光热转化效率，并以基液作对比分析其光热转化特性。结果表明纳米流体溶液的光热转化效率随着其浓度的增加而提高，在达到临界值后光热转化效率不再提高反而降低。其中浓度为0.0007%(质量)时的石墨烯纳米片纳米流体溶液温度增加最高，为65.56℃，光热转化效率达到最高约为76.35%，较乙二醇效率升高49.65%。表明石墨烯纳米片具有良好的光学特性，在太阳能集热器中具有较好的应用前景。

关键词: 纳米流体, 石墨烯纳米片, 乙二醇, 光热转化

Abstract:

The application of nanofluids to solar collectors is an important breakthrough in solar thermal conversion. Graphene nanomaterials have good absorption properties in visible and near-infrared regions.The graphene nanosheet material was prepared by Hummer method and characterized. Different mass fractions of graphene nanosheets-ethylene glycol nanofluids were configured. The smouldering test was carried out under the solar simulator and the photothermal conversion efficiency of the graphene nanosheets was calculated, and the photothermal conversion characteristics were compared with the base liquid. The results show that the photothermal conversion efficiency of the nanofluid solution increases with the increase of its concentration. After reaching the critical value, the photothermal conversion efficiency no longer increases but decreases. Among them,the temperature increase of graphene nanosheet nanofluid solution at the concentration of 0.0007%(mass) is up to 65.56℃, the photothermal conversion efficiency is 76.35%, and the ethylene glycol efficiency is increased by 49.65%. It indicates that graphene nanosheets have good optical properties and have good application prospects in solar collectors.

Key words: nanofluids, graphene nanosheets, ethylene glycol, photothermal conversion

中图分类号:

TK 01

李富恒. 石墨烯纳米片-乙二醇纳米流体光热转化特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(S1): 479-485.

Fuheng LI. Investigation on photothermal conversion characteristics of graphene nanosheets-glycol nanofluids[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(S1): 479-485.

图/表 11

图1 太阳能模拟器系统图

Fig.1 Solar simulator system diagram

图2 石墨烯纳米片的扫描电镜图

Fig.2 SEM images of graphene nanosheets

图3 吸收光谱

Fig.3 Absorption spectrum of graphene nanosheets

图4 XRD图像

Fig.4 XRD patterns of graphene nanosheets

图5 光谱透过率

Fig.5 Spectral transmittance of nanofluids

图6 消光系数

Fig.6 Extinction coefficient of nanofluid

图7 光热测试图

Fig.7 Photothermal test chart

图8 散热率

Fig.8 Heat dissipation rate

图9 最大温度提升

Fig.9 Maximum temperature rise

图10 光热转化效率

Fig.10 Photothermal conversion efficiency

表1 不同浓度石墨烯纳米片纳米流体的光热转化效率

Table 1 Photothermal conversion efficiency of graphene nanosheet nanofluids with different concentrations

Concentration/%(mass)	PTC effectiveness/%	Improve/%
0	51.02	—
0.0001	54.56	6.94
0.0003	66.81	30.95
0.0005	70.83	38.83
0.0007	76.35	49.65
0.001	73.81	44.67

参考文献 31

1	Brini R, Amara M, Jemmali H. Renewable energy consumption, international trade, oil price and economic growth inter-linkages: the case of tunisia[J]. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2017, 76(9): 620-627.
2	Mussard M. Solar energy under cold climatic conditions: a review[J]. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2017, 74(7): 733-745.
3	Johansson T B, Patwardhan A P. Global energy assessment—toward a sustainable future [J]. Bibliogr., 2012, 3/4(31): 9-17.
4	Xiao C F, Luo H L, Tang R S, et al. Solar thermal utilization in China[J]. Renewable Energy, 2004, 29(9): 1549-1556.
5	Shafieian A, Khiadani M, Nosrati A. Strategies to improve the thermal performance of heat pipe solar collectors in solar systems: a review[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 183(3): 307-331.
6	Fu H D, Zhao X X, Ma L, et al. A comparative study on three types of solar utilization technologies for buildings: photovoltaic, solar thermal and hybrid photovoltaic/thermal systems[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 140(15): 1- 13.
7	Leite G N P, Weschenfelder F, Araújo A M, et al. An economic analysis of the integration between air-conditioning and solar photovoltaic systems [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019,185(4): 836-849.
8	Fang J, Liu Q B, Guo S P, et al. Spanning solar spectrum: a combined photochemical and thermochemical process for solar energy storage[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 247(8): 116-126.
9	Fang J, Liu Q B, Guo S P, et al. A full-spectrum solar chemical energy storage system with photochemical process and thermochemical process[J]. Energy Procedia, 2018, 152(10): 1063-1068.
10	Otanicar T P, Phelan P E, Patrick R S, et al. Nanofluid based direct absorption solar collector[J]. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2010, 2(3): 1063-1073.
11	Robert A T,Patrick E P, Todd P O, et al. Nanofluid opticalproperty characterization: towards efficient direct absorption solar collectors[J]. Nanoscale Res., 2011,225(6)：207-218.
12	Gorji T B, Ranjbar A A. A review on optical properties and application of nanofluids in direct absorption solar collectors(DASCs) [J]. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2017, 72(5): 10-32.
13	Minardi J E, Chuang H N. Performance of a “black” liquid flat-plate solar collector[J]. Sol. Energy, 1975, 17(3): 179-183.
14	Choi S U S, Eastman J A. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles[J]. ASME, 1995, 23(1): 99-105.
15	Bandarra E P, Mendoza O S H, Beicker C L L, et al. Experimental investigation of a silver nanoparticle-based direct absorption solar thermal system[J]. Energy Convers. Manag., 2014, 84(8): 261-267.
16	Amjad M, Yang Y, Raza G. Deposition pattern and tracer particle motion of evaporating multi-component sessile droplets[J]. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, 506(11): 83-92.
17	Zamzamian A, KeyanpourRad M, KianiNeyestani M Y, et al. An experimental study on the effect of Cu-synthesized/EG nanofluid on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors[J]. Renewable Energy, 2014, 74(11): 658-664.
18	Jamal-Abad M T, Zamzamian A, Imani E, et al. Experimental study of the performance of a flat-plate collector using Cu-water nanofluid[J]. Thermophys. Heat Transf., 2013, 27(4): 756-760.
19	Chen M J, He Y R, Zhu J Q, et al. Enhancement of photo-thermal conversion using gold nanofluids with different particle sizes [J]. Energy Convers. Manag., 2016, 112(3): 21-30.
20	Zhang H, Chen H J, Du X, et al. Photothermal conversion characteristics of gold nanoparticle dispersions [J]. Sol. Energy, 2014, 100(2): 141-147.
21	Gupta H K, Agrawal G D, Mathur J. An experimental investigation of a low temperature Al₂O₃-H₂O nanofluid based direct absorption solar collector[J]. Sol. Energy, 2015, 118(8): 390-396.
22	Mahian O, Kianifar A, Sahin A Z, et al. Entropy generation during Al₂O₃/water nanofluid flow in a solar collector: effects of tube roughness, nanoparticle size, and different thermophysical models[J]. Heat and Mass Transf., 2014, 78(11): 64-75.
23	Farajzadeh E, Movahed S, Hosseini R. Experimental and numerical investigations on the effect of Al₂O₃/TiO₂/H₂O nanofluids on thermal efficiency of the flat plate solar collector [J]. Renewable Energy, 2018, 118(8): 122-130.
24	Goudarzi K, Shojaeizadeh E, Nejati F. An experimental investigation on the simultaneous effect of CuO-H₂O nanofluid and receiver helical pipe on the thermal efficiency of a cylindrical solar collector[J]. Appl. Therm. Eng., 2014, 73(1): 1234-1241.
25	Karami M, Akhavan-Bahabadi M A, Delfani S, et al. Experimental investigation of CuO nanofluid based direct absorption solar collector for residential applications[J]. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2015, 52(12): 793-801.
26	Meibodi S S, Kianifar A, Niazmand H, et al. Experimental investigation on the thermal efficiency and performance characteristics of a flat plate solar collector using SiO₂/EG- water nanofluids[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, 65(7): 71-75.
27	Gupta H K, Agrawal G D, Mathur J. An experimental investigation of a low temperature Al₂O₃-H₂O nanofluid based direct absorption solar collector[J]. Sol. Energy, 2015, 118(8): 390-396.
28	Karami M, Akhavan-Bahabadi M A, Delfani S, et al. A new application of carbon nanotubes nanofluid as working fluid of low-temperature direct absorption solar collector[J]. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2014, 121(2): 114-118.
29	Khullar V, Tyagi H, Phelan P E, et al. Solar energy harvesting using nanofluids-based concentrating solar collector[J]. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med., 2013, 3(3): 310-319.
30	Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films[J]. Science, 2004, 30(6): 666-669.
31	郭晓琴, 王永凯, 余小霞, 等. 石墨烯纳米片的制备和表征[J]. 化工新型材料, 2013, (7): 128-130.
	Guo X Q, Wang Y K, Yu X X, et al. Preparation and characterization of graphene nanosheets[J]. New Chemical Materials, 2013, (7): 128-130.

[1]	赵佳佳, 田世祥, 李鹏, 谢洪高. SiO₂-H₂O纳米流体强化煤尘润湿性的微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3931-3945.
[2]	李振, 张博, 王丽伟. PEG-EG固-固相变材料的制备和性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2680-2688.
[3]	闫帅, 杨海平, 陈应泉, 王贤华, 曾阔, 陈汉平. CO₂光热催化还原研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(10): 4298-4310.
[4]	高帅涛, 刘雪珂, 张丽, 刘芬, 余江, 商剑锋, 欧天雄, 周政, 陈平文. Aspen Plus模拟高浓度H₂S/CO₂酸性气的选择性分离[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(S1): 413-420.
[5]	齐聪, 李可傲, 李春阳. 微肋结构对纳米流体绕流圆柱热性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(4): 2006-2017.
[6]	刘昌会, 刘红莉, 张天键, 饶中浩. 基于尿素/氯化胆碱低共熔溶剂体系纳米流体制备及其热物性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1333-1341.
[7]	张矿生, 唐梅荣, 薛小佳, 李楷, 邵炎, 周健, 岳冲冲, 李壮壮, 潘鹏举. 聚乳酸/聚乙二醇共混物的结晶与降解行为[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(2): 1181-1190.
[8]	刘昌会,张海悦,李业美,张天键,顾彦龙. 低共熔溶剂在储能与传热方面的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(10): 4973-4986.
[9]	田东民, 吴延鹏, 陈凤君. 基于纳米增强相变材料的铜-水热管传热性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(S1): 220-226.
[10]	何莉, 邹雄, 叶昊天, 李香琴, 董宏光. 邻甲酚-间二甲苯-乙二醇液液平衡数据的测定与关联[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(7): 2993-2999.
[11]	杨庆, 许思敏, 张大伟, 杨庆春. 石油与煤路线制乙二醇过程的技术经济分析[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(5): 2164-2172.
[12]	郎中敏, 吴刚强, 赫文秀, 韩晓星, 苟延梦, 李双莹. 二氧化铈/水基纳米流体核沸腾传热特性[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(5): 2061-2068.
[13]	赵佳腾,王增鹏,戴宇成,刘昌会,饶中浩. 两亲性纳米流体太阳能重力热管传热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(12): 5461-5469.
[14]	杨小青,廖泉飞,易芸,杨春亮,赵天翔,胡兴邦,刘飞. 三乙二醇二甲醚吸收低浓度SO₂性能及机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(11): 5052-5058.
[15]	刘雪珂,张丽,刘芬,高帅涛,余江,商剑锋,欧天雄,周政,陈平文. NHD/MDEA/H₂O复合脱硫液催化水解羰基硫[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(11): 5286-5293.