逆流桨强化搅拌槽内流体混沌混合及流场结构失稳研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20210596

化工学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 73 ›› Issue (1): 222-231.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20210596

逆流桨强化搅拌槽内流体混沌混合及流场结构失稳研究

刘作华^1,³(),周毅林^1,³,熊黠^1,³,陶长元^1,³,王运东²

^1.重庆大学化学化工学院，重庆 400044
^2.化学工程联合国家重点实验室，清华大学，北京 100084
^3.煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室，重庆大学，重庆 400044

收稿日期:2021-06-29 修回日期:2021-08-08 出版日期:2022-01-05 发布日期:2022-01-18
通讯作者: 刘作华
作者简介:刘作华（1973—），男，博士，教授，liuzuohua@cqu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目面上项目(22078030);国家自然科学基金重点项目(21636004);重庆市研究生科研创新项目(CYS18031);国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFC1905802);重庆市技术创新与应用发展专项面上项目(cstc2020jscx-msxmX0163)

Chaotic mixing intensification and flow field structure instability in stirred reactor by counter-flow pitched-blade turbine

Zuohua LIU^1,³(),Yilin ZHOU^1,³,Xia XIONG^1,³,Changyuan TAO^1,³,Yundong WANG²

^1.School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
^2.State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
^3.State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

Received:2021-06-29 Revised:2021-08-08 Online:2022-01-05 Published:2022-01-18
Contact: Zuohua LIU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在传统三斜叶桨的基础上，结合逆流桨结构，提出三斜叶逆流桨，以破坏或者消除搅拌槽内稳定的对称性流场结构，提高流体传递效率及混沌混合程度。结合实验和模拟两种方法,主要研究了上推式三斜叶桨(PBTU)、外推内压式三斜叶逆流桨(PBTC-U)、外压内推式三斜叶逆流桨(PBTC-D)三种桨叶体系以及不同外层桨叶长度的PBTC-U桨体系内搅拌功耗、混合时间、混沌特性参数、流场结构以及流体速度分布。实验结果表明，N=130 r/min时，PBTC-U桨相对于PBTU桨和PBTC-D桨，体系混合时间分别从22.0、37.5 s缩短到16.5 s，功耗分别降低了5.6%和12.8%，LLE值分别提高了13.69%和37.01%。在确定PBTC-U桨适宜外层桨叶长度的研究中发现当外层桨叶长度D₂=0.375D时，搅拌功耗最低且混合时间最短。PBTC-U型逆流桨通过内外层桨叶的逆流作用，强化体系内流体的随机运动，使得流场的不稳定性得到增强，对称性被破坏，进而流场结构失稳，流体混合效率得到提高。另外，PBTC-U桨可以增强流体轴、径向速度分布的波动性，有利于提高体系的混合效率。

关键词: 逆流桨, 最大Lyapunov指数, 搅拌功耗, 数值模拟

Abstract:

On the basis of the traditional three-pitched-blade propeller, combined with the structure of the counter-current blade, a three-pitched-blade countercurrent blade is proposed to destroy or eliminate the stable symmetrical flow field structure in the stirring tank, and improve the fluid transfer efficiency and the degree of chaotic mixing. Power consumption, mixing time, chaotic characteristic parameters, flow field structure and fluid velocity distribution of up-flow pitched-blade turbine (PBTU), up-down counter-flow pitched-blade turbine (PBTC-U), down-up counter-flow pitched-blade turbine (PBTC-D) systems and the PBTC-U blade systems with different outer blades lengths were investigated through experiment and simulation research. The results showed that, the mixing time of the PBTC-U impeller was reduced from 22.0 s, 37.5 s to 16.5 s, and the power consumption was reduced by 5.6% and 12.8% at 130 r/min, compared with PBTU and PBTC-D impellers system, respectively. Largest Lyapunov exponent (LLE) value increased by 13.69% and 37.01%, respectively. Meanwhile, the results showed that the minimum power consumption and the minimum mixing time occurred with the outer blade length of 0.375D of the PBTC-U impeller. The PBTC-U impeller strengthened the random movement of the fluid through the counter-flow action of the inner and outer blades, enhanced the instability of the flow field and destroyed the symmetry fluid structure, resulting in much more unstable flow field and higher mixing efficiency. In addition, the PBTC-U impeller enhanced the fluctuation of axis velocity and radial velocity distribution, which was beneficial to improve the mixing efficiency of the system.

Key words: counter-flow impeller, largest Lyapunov exponents, mixing power consumption, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TQ 027.2

刘作华, 周毅林, 熊黠, 陶长元, 王运东. 逆流桨强化搅拌槽内流体混沌混合及流场结构失稳研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(1): 222-231.

Zuohua LIU, Yilin ZHOU, Xia XIONG, Changyuan TAO, Yundong WANG. Chaotic mixing intensification and flow field structure instability in stirred reactor by counter-flow pitched-blade turbine[J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(1): 222-231.

图/表 13

图1 搅拌实验装置1—motor; 2—frequency modulator; 3—stirring shaft; 4—impeller; 5—baffle; 6—mixing tank; 7—data acquisition card; 8—computer

Fig.1 Mixing experimental apparatus and mesh model

图2 实验所用桨叶类型及尺寸

Fig.2 Impellers used in experiment and impeller size

图4 搅拌桨类型对P的影响

Fig.4 Effect of impeller types on P

图5 外层叶片长度对P的影响

Fig.5 Effect of outer blade length on P

图3 网格无关性验证（PBTU）

Fig.3 Grid independence (PBTU)

图6 不同外层叶片长度下的PBTC-U桨

Fig.6 Different outer blade length of PBTC-U impeller

图7 搅拌桨类型对θm的影响

Fig.7 Effect of impeller types on θm

图8 外层叶片长度对θm的影响

Fig.8 Effect of outer blade length on θm

图9 搅拌桨类型对LLE的影响

Fig.9 Effect of impeller types on LLE

图10 外层叶片长度对LLE的影响

Fig.10 Effect of outer blade length on LLE

图11 搅拌桨类型对速度流场云图的影响

Fig.11 Effect of impeller types on contour plots of velocity magnitude

图12 搅拌桨类型对流场流线的影响

Fig.12 Effect of impeller types on streamline of flow distribution

图13 桨叶类型对轴径向速度的影响

Fig.13 Effect of impeller types on axial velocity and radial velocity

参考文献 33

13	Liu Z H, Sun R X, Wang Y D, et al. Chaotic mixing intensified by rigid-flexible coupling impeller[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(9): 3340-3349.
14	刘作华, 曾启琴, 杨鲜艳, 等. 刚柔组合搅拌桨与刚性桨调控流场结构的对比[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(6): 2078-2084.
	Liu Z H, Zeng Q Q, Yang X Y, et al. Flow field structure with rigid-flexible impeller and rigid impeller[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(6): 2078-2084.
15	刘作华, 陈超, 刘仁龙, 等. 刚柔组合搅拌桨强化搅拌槽中流体混沌混合[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(1): 61-70.
	Liu Z H, Chen C, Liu R L, et al. Chaotic mixing enhanced by rigid-flexible impeller in stirred vessel[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(1):61-70.
16	杨锋苓, 张翠勋, 苏腾龙. 柔性Rushton搅拌桨的功耗与流场特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(2): 614-625.
	Yang F L, Zhang C X, Su T L. Power and flow characteristics of flexible-blade Rushton impeller[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(2): 614-625.
17	杨锋苓, 张翠勋, 李美婷. 柔性Rushton搅拌桨混合性能的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(2): 626-632.
	Yang F L, Zhang C X, Li M T. Experimental study on mixing characteristics of flexible-blade Rushton impeller[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(2): 626-632.
18	张廷松,张超,王永才, 等. 一种分解槽搅拌装置的桨叶: 2848823 [P]. 2006-12-20.
	Zhang T S, Zhang C, Wang Y C, et al. The utility model relates to a paddle blade of a decomposing tank agitator: 2848823 [P]. 2006-12-20.
19	周勇军, 蒋宾伟, 卢源, 等. 内加热搅拌釜中改进型INTER-MIG桨的传热性能[J]. 过程工程学报, 2014, 14(3): 377-382.
1	Zhu Q, Xiao H, Chen A, et al. CFD study on double-to single-loop flow pattern transition and its influence on macro mixing efficiency in fully baffled tank stirred by a Rushton turbine[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019, 27(5): 993-1000.
2	Pukkella A K, Vysyaraju R, Tammishetti V, et al. Improved mixing of solid suspensions in stirred tanks with interface baffles: CFD simulation and experimental validation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 358: 621-633.
3	Gu D, Ye M, Wang X, et al. Numerical investigation on mixing characteristics of floating and sinking particles in a stirred tank with fractal impellers[J]. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2020, 116: 51-61.
4	Hoseini S S, Najafi G, Ghobadian B, et al. Impeller shape-optimization of stirred-tank reactor: CFD and fluid structure interaction analyses[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021,413: 127497.
5	Basavarajappa M, Miskovic S. CFD simulation of single-phase flow in flotation cells: effect of impeller blade shape, clearance, and Reynolds number[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2019, 29(5): 657-669.
6	Ameur H. Newly modified curved-bladed impellers for process intensification: energy saving in the agitation of Hershel-Bulkley fluids[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 2020, 154: 108009.
7	Li Z, Bao Y, Gao Z. PIV experiments and large eddy simulations of single-loop flow fields in Rushton turbine stirred tanks [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(6): 1219-1231.
8	Bouremel Y, Yianneskis M, Ducci A. Three-dimensional deformation dynamics of trailing vortex structures in a stirred vessel[J]. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2009, 48(17): 8148-8158.
9	Li Z, Hu M, Bao Y, et al. Particle image velocimetry experiments and large eddy simulations of merging flow characteristics in dual Rushton turbine stirred tanks[J]. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2012, 51(5): 2438-2450.
10	Mule G M, Kulkarni A A. Mixing of medium viscosity liquids in a stirred tank with fractal impeller[J]. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 50(6): 914-921.
11	Jia H, Wang F, Wu J, et al. CFD research on the influence of 45° disk turbine agitator blade diameter on the solid-liquid mixing characteristics of the cone-bottom stirred tank[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2020, 45(7): 5741-5749.
12	Ameur H. Some modifications in the Scaba 6SRGT impeller to enhance the mixing characteristics of Hershel-Bulkley fluids[J]. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 2019, 117: 302-309.
13	刘作华, 孙瑞祥, 王运东, 等. 刚-柔组合桨强化流体混沌混合[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(9): 3340-3349.
19	Zhou Y J, Jiang B W, Lu Y, et al. Heat transfer performance of improved INTER-MIG impeller in a stirred tank with inner-heating coil[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2014, 14(3): 377-382.
20	林伟振, 周勇军, 王璐璐, 等. 改进型INTER-MIG桨尾涡结构的PIV试验与模拟[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2021, 39(2): 158-164.
	Lin W Z, Zhou Y J, Wang L L, et al. PIV experiment and numerical simulation of trailing vortex structure of improved INTER-MIG impeller[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2021, 39(2): 158-164.
21	王璐璐, 周勇军, 鲍苏洋, 等.改进型INTER-MIG桨搅拌槽内流场的 PIV 实验[J]. 过程工程学报, 2017, 17(3): 447-452.
	Wang L L, Zhou Y J, Bao S Y, et al. PIV experiments on flow field of stirred tank with improved INTER-MIG impeller[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2017, 17(3): 447-452.
22	Li X, Zhao H, Zhang Z, et al. Numerical optimization for blades of intermig impeller in solid–liquid stirred tank[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2021, 29: 57-66.
23	Zhao H, Zhao X, Zhang L, et al. Experimental study on scale-up of solid-liquid stirred tank with an intermig impeller[J]. JOM, 2017, 69(2): 301-306.
24	徐昊鹏, 周勇军, 何华, 等.双层改进型Inter-Mig桨对带内盘管搅拌釜内流场性能影响[J]. 石油化工设备, 2019, 48(4): 15-21.
	Xu H P, Zhou Y J, He H, et al. Effect of double layer improved Inter-Mig impeller on flow field performance in stirred tank with inner coil[J]. Petro-Chemical Equipment, 2019, 48(4): 15-21.
25	Wang L, Zhou Y, Chen Z. Investigation of heat transfer efficiency of improved intermig impellers in a stirred tank equipped with vertical tubes[J]. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 2020, 18(3).
26	Szalai E S, Arratia P, Johnson K, et al. Mixing analysis in a tank stirred with Ekato Intermig^® impellers[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59(18): 3793-3805.
27	刘作华, 魏红军, 熊黠, 等. 错位刚柔桨强化搅拌槽内流体混合实验及数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(10): 4621-4631.
	Liu Z H, Wei H J, Xiong X, et al. Experiment and numerical simulation of chaotic mixing performance enhanced by perturbed rigid-flexible impeller in stirred tank[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(10): 4621-4631.
28	Ascanio G. Mixing time in stirred vessels: a review of experimental techniques[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015, 23(7): 1065-1076.
29	Versteeg H K, Malalasekera W. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: the Finite Volume Method[M]//England: Pearson Education Limited, 2007:503.
30	Feng Z, Sun Y, Liu X, et al. Design and application of new impeller-type wax-proof device based on speed-increasing wax-proof mechanism[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 200: 108392.
31	Rosenstein M T, Collins J J, Luca C J D, et al. A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets[J]. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 1993, 65(1):117-134.
32	白春江, 崔万照, 李军.基于混沌理论的无源互调功率预测研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2021, 43(1): 124-130.
	Bai C J, Cui W Z, Li J. Prediction of passive intermodulation level based on chaos method[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2021, 43(1): 124-130.
33	陈敏, 叶晓舟.时间序列的混沌识别方法研究[J]. 电脑与信息技术, 2008, 16(6): 17-19, 26.
	Chen M, Ye X C. Research on the chaotic time series identification method[J]. Computer and Information Technology, 2008, 16(6): 17-19, 26.

[1]	叶展羽, 山訸, 徐震原. 用于太阳能蒸发的折纸式蒸发器性能仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 132-140.
[2]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[3]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[4]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[5]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[6]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[7]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[8]	程小松, 殷勇高, 车春文. 不同工质在溶液除湿真空再生系统中的性能对比[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3494-3501.
[9]	刘文竹, 云和明, 王宝雪, 胡明哲, 仲崇龙. 基于场协同和耗散的微通道拓扑优化研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3329-3341.
[10]	洪瑞, 袁宝强, 杜文静. 垂直上升管内超临界二氧化碳传热恶化机理分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3309-3319.
[11]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[12]	黄可欣, 李彤, 李桉琦, 林梅. 加装旋转叶轮T型通道流场的模态分解[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2848-2857.
[13]	史方哲, 甘云华. 超薄热管启动特性和传热性能数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2814-2823.
[14]	于源, 陈薇薇, 付俊杰, 刘家祥, 焦志伟. 几何相似涡流空气分级机环形区流场变化规律研究及预测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2363-2373.
[15]	张媛媛, 曲江源, 苏欣欣, 杨静, 张锴. 循环流化床燃煤机组SNCR脱硝过程气液传质和反应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2404-2415.

逆流桨强化搅拌槽内流体混沌混合及流场结构失稳研究

Chaotic mixing intensification and flow field structure instability in stirred reactor by counter-flow pitched-blade turbine

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价