坑道限制条件下水平丙烷喷射火火焰行为研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20211425

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过搭建坑道限制条件下小尺寸喷射火实验装置，模拟研究埋地管道泄漏场景中引发的水平喷射火火焰特性。火焰受坑道侧壁的限制，先撞击坑道而后沿着侧壁向上发展形成垂直火焰。实验结果表明，随着泄漏质量流量的增加，火焰长度先增加后减小，而火焰宽度不断增加。同时发现，在一定条件下火焰两侧会出现涡旋对，形成一对反向旋转的火焰，为了探究其形成原因及产生条件，结合数值模拟手段进一步研究了火焰流场不稳定性。

关键词: 坑道, 喷射火, 火焰长度, 火焰宽度, 不稳定性, 安全

Abstract:

A small-scale experimental device of jet fire in a pit was built, and experimental simulation was conducted to study the flame characteristics of horizontal propane jet fire caused by the leakage of pipeline buried underground. The flame is restricted by the side wall of the pit, first hits the tunnel and then develops upward along the side wall to form a vertical flame. The experimental results show that the flame length first increases and then decreases as the leakage mass flow rate increases, while the flame width continuously increases. In addition, vortex pairs, indicated by a pair of counter-rotating flames, were observed to appear on both lateral sides of the flame under critical conditions. In order to explore the formation mechanism of vortex pairs, the instability of flame flow field is further studied by numerical simulation.

Key words: pit, jet flame, flame length, flame width, instability, safety

中图分类号:

X 931

周梦雅, 周魁斌, 王朝, 黄梦源, 王一凡, 蒋军成. 坑道限制条件下水平丙烷喷射火火焰行为研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(2): 960-971.

Mengya ZHOU, Kuibin ZHOU, Chao WANG, Mengyuan HUANG, Yifan WANG, Juncheng JIANG. Flame behavior of horizontal propane jet fire in a pit[J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(2): 960-971.

图/表 22

图1 实验装置示意图

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of experimental device

表1 实验工况

Table 1 Experimental test conditions

d/mm	m_c/(g/s)	V/(m/s)	U/d
2.0	0.03~0.37	5~63	29.00
2.3	0.03~0.37	3~48	25.22
3.2	0.03~0.37	2~25	18.125

图2 坑道限制条件下火焰几何形态

Fig.2 Flame geometry of jet fire in a pit

图3 坑道限制条件下喷射火实验重复对比(d=2 mm，mc=0.09 g/s)

Fig.3 Test repeatability of jet fire in a pit justified by the time profiles

图4 三维几何模型

Fig.4 3D geometric model of simulation

表2 三组网格系统的计算网格数量

Table 2 Number of computational grids for three different grid systems

Case	网格总数	网格平均质量	最大扭曲度
1	152451	0.83462	0.83
2	325001	0.83480	0.82
3	435349	0.83513	0.82

图5 不同网格数量模拟结果对比

Fig.5 Comparison of simulation results of different grid numbers

表3 模拟初始工况条件

Table 3 Initial conditions of simulation

工况	V/(m/s)	m_c/(g/s)	Re
1	8	0.12	2.2×10³
2	12	0.18	4.9×10³
3	16	0.24	8.7×10³
4	18	027	1.1×10⁴
5	20	0.31	1.4×10⁴

图6 同一工况下瞬时火焰形态对比（mc = 0.12 g/s）

Fig.6 Comparison of instantaneous flame shape between experiment and simulation (mc = 0.12 g/s)

图7 火焰长度和宽度数据对比（d=3.2 mm）

Fig.7 Comparison of flame length and flame width between experiment and simulation (d=3.2 mm)

图8 不同喷口直径下火焰长度随质量流量的变化

Fig.8 Variation of flame length with mass flow rate under different nozzle diameters

表4 流动状态的临界雷诺数

Table 4 Critical Reynolds number of flow state

d/mm	层流阶段-过渡阶段			过渡阶段-完全湍流阶段
d/mm	m_c/(g/s)	V/(m/s)	Re	m_c/(g/s)	V/(m/s)	Re
2.0	0.12	19.57	8544	0.20	34.36	14758
2.3	0.12	16.05	8443	0.20	25.98	14184
3.2	0.16	12.22	8389	0.28	21.38	14499

图9 无量纲火焰长度随喷口Froude数的变化

Fig.9 Variation of dimensionless flame length with Froude number at nozzle exit

图10 不同喷口直径下火焰宽度随质量流量的变化

Fig.10 Variation of flame width with mass flow rate under different nozzle diameters

图11 无量纲火焰宽度随喷口Froude数的变化

Fig.11 Variation of dimensionless flame width with Froude number at nozzle exit

图12 特殊火焰行为演变过程（d = 3.2 mm, mc = 0.12 g/s）

Fig.12 Flame evolution process of special fire behavior （d = 3.2 mm, mc = 0.12 g/s）

图13 不同喷口直径下火焰形态随质量流量的变化

Fig.13 Variation of flame shape with mass flow under different nozzle diameters

图14 特殊火焰行为演化频数（d =3.2 mm）

Fig.14 Evolution frequency of special fire behavior (d =3.2 mm)

图15 温度及速度在5 s内的瞬时变化（mc =0.12 g/s）

Fig.15 Variation of temperature and velocity within 5 seconds along the X direction when mc=0.12 g/s

图16 壁面中心线上温度与速度随距离的变化

Fig.16 Variation of temperature and velocity with distance along the centerline of wall (or Y axis)

图17 流场中的R-T不稳定性（mc= 0.12 g/s）

Fig.17 R-T instability in the flow field (mc = 0.12 g/s)

图18 浮力与理查森数随泄漏质量流量的变化

Fig.18 Variation of buoyancy and Richardson number with mass flow rate

参考文献 33

8	Huang Y B, Li Y F, Dong B Y, et al. Computational investigation of flame extension height for horizontally oriented rectangular source jet fires impinging on a vertical plate[J]. Fire and Materials, 2019, 43(7): 821-830.
9	Wang Z H, Zhou K B, Zhang L, et al. Flame extension area and temperature profile of horizontal jet fire impinging on a vertical plate[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 147: 547-558.
10	Shi X, Bellino P W, Simeoni A, et al. Experimental study of burning behavior of large-scale crude oil fires in ice cavities[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2016, 79: 91-99.
11	Shi X C, Ranellone R T, Sezer H, et al. Influence of ullage to cavity size ratio on in situ burning of oil spills in ice-infested water[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2017, 140: 5-13.
12	Shi X C, Sahu A K, Nair S, et al. Effect of ullage on burning behavior of small-scale pool fires in a cavity[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2): 3113-3120.
13	Liu C X, Ding L, Jangi M, et al. Experimental study of the effect of ullage height on flame characteristics of pool fires[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2020, 216: 245-255.
14	Artemenko E S, Blinov V I. Burning of liquids in vessels with change of level[J]. Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves, 1968, 4(1): 39-42.
15	Dlugogorski B Z, Wilson M. Effect of ullage on properties of small-scale pool fires[J]. Developments in Chemical Engineering and Mineral Processing, 2008, 8(1/2): 149-166.
16	Chen R Y, Li Q W, Xu X K, et al. Comparative pyrolysis characteristics of representative commercial thermosetting plastic waste in inert and oxygenous atmosphere[J]. Fuel, 2019, 246: 212-221.
17	Gullett B K, Lemieux P M, Lutes C C, et al. Emissions of PCDD/F from uncontrolled, domestic waste burning[J]. Chemosphere, 2001, 43(4/5/6/7): 721-725.
18	Gullett B K, Linak W P, Touati A, et al. Characterization of air emissions and residual ash from open burning of electronic wastes during simulated rudimentary recycling operations[J]. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2007, 9(1): 69-79.
19	Kimmerly V M, Rangwala A S. Laboratory-scale investigation of air entrainment in burn pits used for waste disposal[J]. Fuel, 2020, 276: 117941.
20	Armaly B F, Durst F, Pereira J C F, et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward-facing step flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1983, 127: 473.
1	Gómez-Mares M, Zárate L, Casal J. Jet fires and the domino effect[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2008, 43(8): 583-588.
2	Delichatsios M A. Transition from momentum to buoyancy-controlled turbulent jet diffusion flames and flame height relationships[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1993, 92(4): 349-364.
21	Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1979, 9(1): 62-66.
22	Huang Y Q, Wang W Y, Lu K, et al. Flow-field evolution and vortex structure characteristics of a high-temperature buoyant jet[J]. Building and Environment, 2021, 187: 107407.
3	Gómez-Mares M, Muñoz M, Casal J. Axial temperature distribution in vertical jet fires[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 172(1): 54-60.
4	Zhang B, Liu Y, Laboureur D, et al. Experimental study on propane jet fire hazards: thermal radiation[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(37): 9251-9256.
5	马子超, 吕淑然, 王春雪, 等. 高压天然气管道泄漏孔位置对喷射火的影响[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2017, 36(1): 13-15.
	Ma Z C, Lv S R, Wang C X, et al. Influence of leak hole position on jet fire of high pressure gas pipeline[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2017, 36(1): 13-15.
6	Schefer R W, Merilo E G, Groethe M A, et al. Experimental investigation of hydrogen jet fire mitigation by barrier walls[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(3): 2530-2537.
7	董炳燕, 黄有波, 孟江, 等. 障碍物对天然气喷射火影响的数值模拟研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(1): 111-116.
	Dong B Y, Huang Y B, Meng J, et al. Numerical simulation on influence of obstacle on jet fire of natural gas[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2016, 12(1): 111-116.
23	Howell J R, Menguc M P, Siegel R. Thermal radiation heat transfer[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2015: 1016.
24	Palacios A, Casal J. Assessment of the shape of vertical jet fires[J]. Fuel, 2011, 90(2): 824-833.
25	Hottel H C, Hawthorne W R. Diffusion in laminar flame jets[J]. Symposium on Combustion and Flame, and Explosion Phenomena, 1948, 3(1): 254-266.
26	Suris A L, Flankin E V, Shorin S N. Length of free diffusion flames[J]. Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves, 1977, 13(4): 459-462.
27	Gopalaswami N, Liu Y, Laboureur D M, et al. Experimental study on propane jet fire hazards: comparison of main geometrical features with empirical models[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 41: 365-375.
28	Sugawa O, Sakai K. Flame length and width produced by ejected propane gas fuel from a pipe[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 1997, 17(1): 55-63.
29	Yule A J, Chigier N A, Ralph S, et al. Combustion-transition interaction in a jet flame[J]. AIAA Journal, 1981, 19(6): 752-760.
30	Davis R W, Moore E F, Roquemore W M, et al. Preliminary results of a numerical-experimental study of the dynamic structure of a buoyant jet diffusion flame[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1991, 83(3/4): 263-270.
31	Albers B W, Agrawal A K. Schlieren analysis of an oscillating gas-jet diffusion flame[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1999, 119(1/2): 84-94.
32	Kimura I. Stability of laminar-jet flames[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1965, 10(1): 1295-1300.
33	Asendrych D, Drobniak S. Buoyancy-driven coherent structures in free round flame[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2001, 67(4): 325-353.

[1]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[2]	李珍宝, 李超, 王虎, 王绍瑞, 黎泉. MPP抑制铝镁合金粉尘爆炸微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3608-3614.
[3]	刘晓洋, 喻健良, 侯玉洁, 闫兴清, 张振华, 吕先舒. 螺旋微通道对掺氢甲烷爆轰传播的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3139-3148.
[4]	李晨曦, 刘永峰, 张璐, 刘海峰, 宋金瓯, 何旭. O₂/CO₂氛围下正庚烷的燃烧机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2157-2169.
[5]	肖忠良, 尹碧露, 宋刘斌, 匡尹杰, 赵亭亭, 刘成, 袁荣耀. 废旧锂离子电池回收工艺研究进展及其安全风险分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1446-1456.
[6]	贠程, 王倩琳, 陈锋, 张鑫, 窦站, 颜廷俊. 基于社团结构的化工过程风险演化路径深度挖掘[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1639-1650.
[7]	武子超, 汪志雷, 李荣业, 李可昕, 华敏, 潘旭海, 王三明, 蒋军成. 点火方式对欠膨胀氢气射流爆炸超压影响规律研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1409-1418.
[8]	杜江龙, 杨雯棋, 黄凯, 练成, 刘洪来. 复合相变材料/空冷复合式锂离子电池模块散热性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 674-689.
[9]	杨克, 王辰升, 纪虹, 郑凯, 邢志祥, 毕海普, 蒋军成. 聚多巴胺包覆混合粉体抑制甲烷爆炸的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4245-4254.
[10]	廖珊珊, 张少刚, 陶骏骏, 刘家豪, 汪金辉. 竖直射流火撞击障碍管道数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4226-4234.
[11]	王燕, 何佳, 杨晶晶, 林晨迪, 纪文涛. 草酸盐和碳酸氢盐抑制聚乙烯粉尘爆炸特性[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4207-4216.
[12]	张经纬, 周弋惟, 陈卓, 徐建鸿. 微反应器内的有机合成前沿进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3472-3482.
[13]	宋健斐, 孙立强, 解明, 魏耀东. 旋风分离器内气相旋转流不稳定性的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2858-2864.
[14]	张凤丽, 潘辉, 王金江. 基于多元状态估计的热交换器多参数关联预警方法[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(2): 814-826.
[15]	刘伯峥, 王静波, 曾涛, 殷雅侠, 郭玉国. 磷酸铁锂电池寿命初期与末期安全性差异[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(12): 5555-5563.