光热-跨临界压缩二氧化碳储能循环动态特性研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20231153

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了改善新能源发电波动对电网的影响，提出了一种光热-跨临界压缩二氧化碳储能（transcritical compressed carbon dioxide energy storage，TC-CCES）循环集成热力系统，采用模块化机理建模方法，基于能质平衡关系分别建立TC-CCES系统与光热系统的动态数学模型，获取TC-CCES系统在储释能阶段关键参数的动态响应曲线。研究结果表明，系统的储能密度达到28.43 kW/m³，储能效率与循环效率分别为58.01%和60.85%，动态数学模型的最大误差均小于5%。此外，太阳直射辐射变化促使系统热源温度变化，而系统负荷对热源温度变化非常敏感，热源温度升高2.29%，换热器负荷升高3.36%，而且在某地区四季典型日冬季比秋季机组负荷低了23.9%。提出的动态数学模型可用于分析太阳能发电的动态特性，可为控制系统的设计提供理论参考。

关键词: 光热, T-CO₂储能循环, 模型, 动态特性, 建模仿真

Abstract:

In order to improve the impact of fluctuations in new energy generation on the power grid, this paper proposes an integrated thermal system called the photothermal coupled transcritical compressed carbon dioxide energy storage (TC-CCES) cycle. The dynamic mathematical models of TC-CCES system and photothermal system were established based on the energy and mass balance relationship, and the dynamic response curves of key parameters of TC-CCES system in energy storage and release stage were obtained. The research results show that the energy storage density of the system reaches 28.43 kW/m³, the energy storage efficiency and cycle efficiency are 58.01% and 60.85% respectively, and the maximum error of the dynamic mathematical model is less than 5%. In addition, changes in direct solar radiation cause the system heat source temperature to change, and the system load is very sensitive to changes in heat source temperature. The heat source temperature increases by 2.29%, and the heat exchanger load increases by 3.36%. In a typical day of four seasons in a certain area, the unit load in winter is 23.9% lower than that in autumn. The dynamic mathematical model presented in this paper can be used to analyze the dynamic characteristics of solar power generation, and lays a theoretical foundation for the design of the control system.

Key words: photothermal, T-CO₂ energy storage cycle, model, dynamic characteristic, modeling and simulation

中图分类号:

TK 227

王迪, 陈伟倩, 孙灵芳, 周云龙. 光热-跨临界压缩二氧化碳储能循环动态特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(5): 2047-2059.

Di WANG, Weiqian CHEN, Lingfang SUN, Yunlong ZHOU. Research of dynamic characteristics of photothermal coupled transcritical compressed carbon dioxide energy storage cycle[J]. CIESC Journal, 2024, 75(5): 2047-2059.

图/表 25

图1 系统结构图

Fig.1 System structure drawing

图2 光热耦合TC-CCES循环系统的T-s图

Fig.2 T-s diagram of photothermal coupled TC-CCES cycle system

图3 压缩机性能

Fig.3 Compressor performance

图4 径向透平理想效率与速比的关系

Fig.4 Efficiency of an ideal radial turbine as a function of velocity ratio

图5 泵的性能

Fig.5 Pump performance

表1 接收器系统参数

Table 1 Receiver system parameter

参数	数值
辐射峰值/（kW/m²）	800
平均辐射值/（kW/m²）	430
接收板数/块	24
每块接收板上的吸热管数/根	32
吸热管管道直径/cm	2.1
吸热管管壁厚度/mm	1.2
接收器高度/m	6.2
接收器直径/m	5.1
接收器离地面高度/m	76.2

表2 TC-CCES模型静态验证

Table 2 Steady-state verification of TC-CCES model

参数	仿真值	文献^[32]	相对误差
压缩机出口温度/℃	327.10	324	0.96%
压缩机出口压力/kPa	13827.90	13840	0.09%
透平出口温度/℃	740.20	750	1.31%
透平出口压力/kPa	7890.20	7890	0.003%
换热器冷端出口温度/℃	808.80	810	0.15%
换热器冷端出口压力/kPa	13498.40	13500	0.01%
预冷器热端出口温度/℃	305.10	305	0.03%
预冷器热端出口压力/kPa	7684	7690	0.08%

图6 换热设备出口温度动态验证

Fig.6 Dynamic verification of outlet temperature of heat exchange equipment

表3 光热模型静态验证

Table 3 Steady-state verification of photothermal model

参数	仿真值	文献^[34]	相对误差
熔盐入口温度/℃	302	302	—
熔盐流量/（kg/s）	70.90	70.90	—
DNI/（W/m²）	897.50	897.50	—
风速/（m/s）	1.2	1.2	—
定日镜场镜面总面积/m²	82980	82980	—
熔盐出口温度/℃	561.42	561.90	0.09%

图7 太阳辐射能阶跃扰动对太阳能接收器出口的影响

Fig.7 Variation in solar radiation energy step perturbation on solar receiver outlet

图8 流量阶跃扰动对太阳能接收器出口的影响

Fig.8 Effect of flow step perturbation on solar receiver outlet

表4 系统设计参数

Table 4 System design parameter

参数	数值
环境温度T_a/K	298.15
压缩机入口温度/K	304.1
透平入口温度/K	469.0
压缩机入口压力/MPa	7.39
压缩机出口压力/MPa	38.43
压缩机等熵效率/%	89
透平等熵效率/%	88
压缩机转子直径/mm	99
透平转子直径/mm	80
压缩机、透平转速/（r/min）	60000
压缩机耗功/MW	4.37
透平做功/MW	2.85
预冷器换热面积/m²	1833
加热器换热面积/m²	131.8
储能压力/MPa	38.43

表5 系统性能指标计算结果

Table 5 Calculation result of system performance indicators

参数	数值
储能效率/%	58.01
循环效率/%	60.85
储能密度/（kW/m³）	28.43

图9 单日太阳直接辐射量

Fig.9 Direct normal irradiance in single day

图10 接收器-换热器出口参数变化曲线

Fig.10 Receiver-heat exchanger outlet parameter change curve

图11 不同工况下DNI特性曲线

Fig.11 DNI characteristic curves under different working conditions

图12 不同工况下DNI变化

Fig.12 DNI changes under different working conditions

图13 不同工况下接收器-换热器出口参数变化曲线

Fig.13 Change curve of outlet parameters of receiver and heat exchanger under different working conditions

图14 DNI四季变化曲线

Fig.14 DNI variation curve in four seasons

图15 换热器负荷变化曲线

Fig.15 Heat exchanger load change curve

图16 不同DNI透平出口参数变化曲线

Fig.16 Variation curves of turbine outlet parameters of different DNI

表6 不同工况下（四季）系统性能指标

Table 6 System performance index under different working conditions （four seasons）

季节	储能效率/%	储能密度/（kW/m³）
春季	39.51	19.06
夏季	39.83	19.19
秋季	41.56	20.02
冬季	34.75	16.93

图17 系统循环效率变化曲线

Fig.17 Variation curves of system cycle efficiency

图18 压缩机出口参数响应曲线

Fig.18 Response curve of compressor outlet parameters

图19 透平出口参数响应曲线

Fig.19 Response curve of turbine outlet parameters

参考文献 35

1	刘佳, 夏红德, 陈海生, 等. 新型液化空气储能技术及其在风电领域的应用[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2010, 31(12): 1993-1996.
	Liu J, Xia H D, Chen H S, et al. A novel energy storage technology based on liquid air and its application in wind power[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2010, 31(12): 1993-1996.
2	国家能源局. 国家能源局2021年二季度网上新闻发布会文字实录[EB/OL]. [2021-04-29]. .
	National Energy Administration. Transcript of the National Energy Administration’s online press conference in the second quarter of 2021[EB/OL]. [2021-04-29]. .
3	王世杰, 胡威, 高鑫, 等. 新能源并网发电对配电网电能质量的影响研究[J]. 计算技术与自动化, 2021, 40(2): 47-52.
	Wang S J, Hu W, Gao X, et al. Influence of new energy generation connected on power quality of distribution network[J]. Computing Technology and Automation, 2021, 40(2): 47-52.
4	Wang H R, Wang L Q, Wang X B, et al. A novel pumped hydro combined with compressed air energy storage system[J]. Energies, 2013, 6(3): 1554-1567.
5	Nayak D S, Shivarudraswamy R, Drossard F. The new control scheme for the PV and wind hybrid system connected to the single phase grid[J]. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 2020, 15(5): 1929-1936.
6	Ahn Y, Bae S J, Kim M, et al. Review of supercritical CO₂ power cycle technology and current status of research and development[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2015, 47(6): 647-661.
7	Ahmadi M H, Mehrpooya M, Pourfayaz F. Thermodynamic and exergy analysis and optimization of a transcritical CO₂ power cycle driven by geothermal energy with liquefied natural gas as its heat sink[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 109: 640-652.
8	Kim Y M, Shin D G, Lee S Y, et al. Isothermal transcritical CO₂ cycles with TES (thermal energy storage) for electricity storage[J]. Energy, 2013, 49: 484-501.
9	Hao Y P, He Q, Liu W Y, et al. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel fossil-fuel-free energy storage system with a trans-critical carbon dioxide cycle and heat pump[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2020, 44(10): 7924-7937.
10	Zhang X R, Wang G B. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel energy storage system based on compressed CO₂ fluid[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2017, 41: 1487-1503.
11	Liu H, He Q, Borgia A, et al. Thermodynamic analysis of a compressed carbon dioxide energy storage system using two saline aquifers at different depths as storage reservoirs[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 127: 149-159.
12	Zhang Y, Yang K, Hong H, et al. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel energy storage system with carbon dioxide as working fluid[J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 99: 682-697.
13	吴毅, 胡东帅, 王明坤, 等. 一种新型的跨临界CO₂储能系统[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2016, 50(3): 45-49, 100.
	Wu Y, Hu D S, Wang M K, et al. A novel transcritical CO₂ energy storage system[J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2016, 50(3): 45-49, 100.
14	Liu X, Yan X W, Liu X L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of a novel liquid carbon dioxide energy storage system with cold recuperator: energy, conventional exergy and advanced exergy analysis[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 250: 114909.
15	Manikumar R, Arasu A V. A feasibility study of carbon-dioxide based Rankine cycle powered by the linear Fresnel reflector solar concentrator system[J]. Distributed Generation & Alternative Energy Journal, 2018, 33(2): 58-80.
16	Yamaguchi H, Yamasaki H, Kizilkan O. Experimental investigation of solar-assisted transcritical CO₂ Rankine cycle for summer and winter conditions from exergetic point of view[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2020, 44(2): 1089-1102.
17	Alzahrani A A, Dincer I. Thermodynamic analysis of an integrated transcritical carbon dioxide power cycle for concentrated solar power systems[J]. Solar Energy, 2018, 170: 557-567.
18	Zhang Q, Jiang K J, Ge Z H, et al. Control strategy of molten salt solar power tower plant function as peak load regulation in grid[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 294: 116967.
19	Singh R, Miller S A, Rowlands A S, et al. Dynamic characteristics of a direct-heated supercritical carbon-dioxide Brayton cycle in a solar thermal power plant[J]. Energy, 2013, 50: 194-204.
20	Dyreby J J, Klein S A, Nellis G F, et al. Modeling off-design and part-load performance of supercritical carbon dioxide power cycles[C]//Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2013. Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. Texas, USA: San Antonio, 2013, 8: 95824.
21	Olumayegun O, Wang M H. Dynamic modelling and control of supercritical CO₂ power cycle using waste heat from industrial processes[J]. Fuel, 2019, 249: 89-102.
22	Hu H M, Guo C H, Cai H F, et al. Dynamic characteristics of the recuperator thermal performance in a S-CO₂ Brayton cycle[J]. Energy, 2021, 214: 119017.
23	Chu W, Li X H, Ma T, et al. Experimental investigation on SCO₂-water heat transfer characteristics in a printed circuit heat exchanger with straight channels[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 113: 184-194.
24	Ibarra M, Rovira A, Alarcón-Padilla D C, et al. Performance of a 5kWe Organic Rankine Cycle at part-load operation[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 120: 147-158.
25	刘春尧. 槽式太阳能低温热发电过程建模与控制[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2019.
	Liu C Y. Modeling and control of low temperature parabolic trough solar thermal power generation processes[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2019.
26	Guo H, Xu Y J, Zhang X H, et al. Dynamic characteristics and control of supercritical compressed air energy storage systems[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 283: 116294.
27	Wang K, He Y L, Zhu H H. Integration between supercritical CO₂ Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: a review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 195: 819-836.
28	Yang J Z, Yang Z, Duan Y Y. Off-design performance of a supercritical CO₂ Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system[J]. Energy, 2020, 201: 117676.
29	任涛.基于联立方程的塔式太阳能热电系统模拟与运行优化[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2015.
	Ren T. Simulation and operation optimization of solar tower power system based on simultaneous equations[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2015.
30	孙嘉. 超临界二氧化碳循环发电系统动态特性及控制应用分析[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2018.
	Sun J. Characteristic simulation and control of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle power generation system[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018.
31	何青, 郝银萍, 刘文毅. 一种新型跨临界压缩二氧化碳储能系统热力分析与改进[J]. 华北电力大学学报 (自然科学版), 2020, 47(5): 93-101.
	He Q, Hao Y P, Liu W Y. Thermodynamic analysis and improvement of novel trans-critical compressed carbon dioxide energy storage system[J]. Journal of North China Electric Power University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 47(5): 93-101.
32	Liu Z, Liu B, Guo J Z, et al. Conventional and advanced exergy analysis of a novel transcritical compressed carbon dioxide energy storage system[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 198: 111807.
33	Deng T R, Li X H, Wang Q W, et al. Dynamic modelling and transient characteristics of supercritical CO₂ recompression Brayton cycle[J]. Energy, 2019, 180: 292-302.
34	Bradshaw R W, Dawson D B, De La Rosa W, et al. Final test and evaluation results from the solar two project[R]. Livermore, CA (United States): Sandia National Lab, 2002.
35	李佳燕.太阳能热发电系统接收器的建模仿真及控制算法研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2015.
	Li J Y. Research on modeling, simulation and control algorithm of the receiver in a solar power station[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2015.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

193

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	5	13	0	175

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	84	109
比例	44%	56%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

24	0	146

[1]	许茹枫, 陈煜成, 高丹, 焦静雨, 高栋, 王海彬, 姚善泾, 林东强. 离子交换层析分离单抗电荷异质体的模型辅助过程优化[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(5): 1903-1911.
[2]	师毓辉, 邢继远, 姜雪晗, 叶爽, 黄伟光. 基于PBM的离心式叶轮内气泡破碎合并数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(5): 1816-1829.
[3]	刘梦绮, 王凯, 骆广生. 基于人工智能的微分散基础研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1096-1104.
[4]	赵金鹏, 张永民, 兰斌, 罗节文, 赵碧丹, 王军武. 气固鼓泡床结构双流体传热模型及其模拟验证[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1497-1507.
[5]	曾玉娇, 肖炘, 杨刚, 张意博, 郑光明, 李防, 汪凤玲. 基于机理与数据混合驱动的湿法磷酸生产过程代理建模与优化[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(3): 936-944.
[6]	王娟, 李秀明, 邵炜涛, 丁续, 霍莹, 付连超, 白云宇, 李迪. 多孔板鼓泡塔流动与传质特性数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(3): 801-814.
[7]	李宁, 朱朋飞, 张立峰, 卢栋臣. 基于非凸与不可分离正则化算法的电容层析成像图像重建[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(3): 836-846.
[8]	董益斌, 熊敬超, 王敬宇, 汪守康, 王亚飞, 黄群星. 融合激光雷达料位测算的锅炉燃烧优化模型预测控制[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(3): 924-935.
[9]	张昕锐, 陈雪梅. CNT/PVA@碳布膜的光电联合驱动界面蒸发性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(3): 1028-1039.
[10]	王林, 江荣鼎, 张春晓, 李修真, 谈莹莹. 含R1234yf混合工质汽液相平衡的混合规则评估与预测研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(2): 475-483.
[11]	孙瑞, 田华, 吴子睿, 孙孝存, 舒歌群. 二氧化碳混合工质临界参数计算模型对比研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(2): 439-449.
[12]	屠楠, 刘晓群, 王驰宇, 方嘉宾. 连续进出料鼓泡流化床停留时间分布的相似准则研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(2): 543-552.
[13]	钟东霖, 介素云, 杜淼, 潘鹏举, 单国荣. 聚苯基甲基硅氧烷分子量-折射率模型研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 190-196.
[14]	麻雪怡, 刘克勤, 胡激江, 姚臻. POE溶液聚合反应器内混合与反应过程的CFD研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 322-337.
[15]	谈莹莹, 刘晓庆, 王林, 黄鲤生, 李修真, 王占伟. R1150/R600a自复叠制冷循环开机动态特性实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 213-222.