气固鼓泡床结构双流体传热模型及其模拟验证

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20231332

化工学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 75 ›› Issue (4): 1497-1507.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20231332

气固鼓泡床结构双流体传热模型及其模拟验证

赵金鹏¹^,²(), 张永民¹, 兰斌², 罗节文², 赵碧丹¹^,²^,³(), 王军武¹^,²^,³()

^1.中国石油大学（北京）重质油国家重点实验室，北京 102249
^2.中国科学院过程工程研究所多相复杂系统国家重点实验室，北京 100190
^3.中国科学院大学化学工程学院，北京 100049

收稿日期:2023-12-13 修回日期:2024-01-16 出版日期:2024-04-25 发布日期:2024-06-06
通讯作者: 赵碧丹,王军武
作者简介:赵金鹏（1997—），男，硕士研究生，jpzhao@ipe.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA29040200);中国科学技术协会青年人才托举工程(2022QNRC001);国家自然科学基金项目(22378399);国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFB1715500)

Model development and validation of structural two-fluid model for heat transfer in a gas-solid bubbling fluidized bed

Jinpeng ZHAO¹^,²(), Yongmin ZHANG¹, Bin LAN², Jiewen LUO², Bidan ZHAO¹^,²^,³(), Junwu WANG¹^,²^,³()

^1.State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
^2.State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
^3.School of Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2023-12-13 Revised:2024-01-16 Online:2024-04-25 Published:2024-06-06
Contact: Bidan ZHAO, Junwu WANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

介尺度结构显著影响非均匀气固复杂系统内的流动传递反应特性。构建了结构双流体传热模型用于模拟复杂气固系统内的流动传热过程，按照流动控制机制将鼓泡床系统划分成由气体主导的气泡相和颗粒主导的乳化相两个相互渗透的连续流体，进而确立考虑介尺度结构影响的控制方程及本构关系，其中相间曳力、乳化相黏度、相间传热系数及各相热导率均采用合理的经验关联式进行封闭。利用双流体传热模型与显式解析壁面流动和传热边界层方法相结合，对安装加热管的鼓泡床系统进行了模拟。结果表明：结构双流体传热模型可成功预测鼓泡床系统内固含率的轴向分布及床层壁面传热系数的变化规律；模拟结果与实验数据吻合较好，密相区壁面传热系数模拟值与实验值的相对误差小于10%，稀相区壁面传热系数的模拟值与实验值在同一量级，表明结构双流体传热模型可准确刻画鼓泡床系统内气固两相的流动传热特性。

关键词: 多相流, 鼓泡床, 介尺度结构, 连续介质模型, 传热

Abstract:

The mesoscale structures such as clusters and bubbles have a significant impact on the flow, transfer, and reaction process of heterogeneous gas-solid systems. This article proposes a structural two-fluid model for simulating the hydrodynamics and heat transfer in a complex gas-solid system. Based on the different flow control mechanisms, the bubbling fluidized bed system is treated as two interpenetrating fluids that are the fluids of gas-dominated bubble phase and the particle-dominated emulsion phase. With this fundamental idea, we establish the governing equations and constitutive relationships considering the influence of mesoscale structure. Reasonable empirical correlations are utilized to close the interphase drag force, the emulsion phase viscosity, the interphase heat transfer coefficient, and the thermal conductivity of each fluid. Present structural two-fluid model in conjunction with an explicit resolution of hydrodynamic and thermal boundary layer is employed to simulate a bubbling fluidized bed system with a vertical heating tube. The simulation results demonstrate that the structural two-fluid model accurately predicts the axial distribution of solid holdup as well as the bed-to-wall heat transfer coefficient, specifically, the relative error between the simulated and experimental values of the wall heat transfer coefficient in the dense phase regime is less than 10%, and the simulated wall heat transfer coefficient in the dilute phase regime is in the same order of magnitude as the experimental value. It shows that the structural two-fluid heat transfer model can accurately describe the flow heat transfer characteristics of the gas-solid two-phase in the bubbling bed system.

Key words: multiphase flow, bubbling fluidized bed, mesoscale structure, continuum model, heat transfer

中图分类号:

TQ 021.1

赵金鹏, 张永民, 兰斌, 罗节文, 赵碧丹, 王军武. 气固鼓泡床结构双流体传热模型及其模拟验证[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1497-1507.

Jinpeng ZHAO, Yongmin ZHANG, Bin LAN, Jiewen LUO, Bidan ZHAO, Junwu WANG. Model development and validation of structural two-fluid model for heat transfer in a gas-solid bubbling fluidized bed[J]. CIESC Journal, 2024, 75(4): 1497-1507.

图/表 5

表1 模拟流化床所使用的主要参数总结

Table 1 Summary of the used parameters

参数	数值
颗粒粒径 $d p / m$	$76 × 10 - 6$
颗粒密度 $ρ s / (k g ∙ m - 3)$	$1500$
气体密度 $ρ g / (k g ∙ m - 3)$	$1.17285$
气体黏度 $μ g / (P a ∙ s)$	$1.84 × 10 - 5$
时间步长 Δ $t$ /s	$1.0 × 10 - 4$
起始流化空隙率 $ε m f$	$0.45$
进口表观气速 u $/ (m ∙ s - 1)$	$0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4$
初始堆料高度 $H s / m$	$0.76$
整体模拟时间/s	20
统计时长/s	15~20

表1 模拟流化床所使用的主要参数总结

Table 1 Summary of the used parameters

参数	数值
颗粒粒径 $d p / m$	$76 × 10 - 6$
颗粒密度 $ρ s / (k g ∙ m - 3)$	$1500$
气体密度 $ρ g / (k g ∙ m - 3)$	$1.17285$
气体黏度 $μ g / (P a ∙ s)$	$1.84 × 10 - 5$
时间步长 Δ $t$ /s	$1.0 × 10 - 4$
起始流化空隙率 $ε m f$	$0.45$
进口表观气速 u $/ (m ∙ s - 1)$	$0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4$
初始堆料高度 $H s / m$	$0.76$
整体模拟时间/s	20
统计时长/s	15~20

图1 鼓泡流化床模拟示意图[37]

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of the bubbling fluidized bed[37]

图2 不同边壁最小网格尺寸下周向壁面传热系数分布

Fig.2 The circumferentially bed-to-wall heat transfer coefficient with different mesh sizes in the thermal boundary layer

图3 不同进口气速时模拟结果与实验结果关于平均固含率轴向分布的对比

Fig.3 Comparison of the axial distribution of solid concentration between the simulated and experimental results at different inlet gas velocities

图4 不同进口气速下实验、结构双流体模型、CPFD[38]方法下不同高度处平均壁面传热系数的对比

Fig.4 Comparison of the average wall-to-bed heat transfer coefficients at different heights predicted by experimental, structural two-fluid model, CPFD (Wei’s simulation[38]) with different inlet gas velocities

参考文献 39

1	Capecelatro J, Desjardins O, Fox R O. Numerical study of collisional particle dynamics in cluster induced turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 747: R2.
2	Agrawal K, Loezos P N, Syamlal M, et al. The role of meso-scale structures in rapid gas solid flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 445(1): 151-185.
3	Wang S, Luo K, Hu C S, et al. CFD-DEM simulation of heat transfer in fluidized beds: model verification, validation, and application[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2019, 197: 280-295.
4	Kim S W, Ahn J Y, Kim S D, et al. Heat transfer and bubble characteristics in a fluidized bed with immersed horizontal tube bundle[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2003, 46(3): 399-409.
5	Blaszczuk A, Pogorzelec M, Shimizu T. Heat transfer characteristics in a large-scale bubbling fluidized bed with immersed horizontal tube bundles[J]. Energy, 2018, 162: 10-19.
6	Qiu K Z, Wu F, Yang S L, et al. Heat transfer and erosion mechanisms of an immersed tube in a bubbling fluidized bed: a LES-DEM approach[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2016, 100: 357-371.
7	Wu C C, Yang H T, He X H, et al. Principle, development, application design and prospect of fluidized bed heat exchange technology: comprehensive review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 157: 112023.
8	Lichtenegger T, Peters E A J F, Kuipers J A M, et al. A recurrence CFD study of heat transfer in a fluidized bed[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 172: 310-322.
9	Pan H, Chen X Z, Liang X F, et al. CFD simulations of gas-liquid-solid flow in fluidized bed reactors—a review[J]. Powder Technology, 2016, 299: 235-258.
10	Armstrong L M, Gu S, Luo K H. Study of wall-to-bed heat transfer in a bubbling fluidised bed using the kinetic theory of granular flow[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2010, 53(21/22): 4949-4959.
11	Patil D J, Smit J, van Sint Annaland M, et al. Wall-to-bed heat transfer in gas-solid bubbling fluidized beds[J]. AIChE Journal, 2006, 52(1): 58-74.
12	Abdelmotalib H M, Ko D G, Im I T. A study on wall-to-bed heat transfer in a conical fluidized bed combustor[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 99: 928-937.
13	Abdelmotalib H M, Im I T. Three dimensional modeling of heat transfer and bed flow in a conical fluidized bed reactor[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 106: 1335-1344.
14	Alnaimat F, AlHamad I M, Mathew B. Heat transfer intensification in MEMS two-fluid parallel flow heat exchangers by embedding pin fins in microchannels[J]. International Journal of Thermofluids, 2021, 9: 100048.
15	Rauchenzauner S, Schneiderbauer S. Validation study of a spatially-averaged two-fluid model for heat transport in gas-particle flows[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 198: 123382.
16	Nagrani P P, Municchi F, Marconnet A M, et al. Two-fluid modeling of heat transfer in flows of dense suspensions[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 183: 122068.
17	Hou B L, Li H Z. Relationship between flow structure and transfer coefficients in fast fluidized beds[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 157(2/3): 509-519.
18	鲁波娜, 程从礼, 鲁维民, 等. 基于多尺度模型的MIP提升管反应历程数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(6): 1983-1992.
	Lu B N, Cheng C L, Lu W M, et al. Numerical simulation of reaction process in MIP riser based on multi-scale model[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(6): 1983-1992.
19	Wang J W. Continuum theory for dense gas-solid flow: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2020, 215: 115428.
20	Gao X, Wang L J, Wu C, et al. Novel bubble-emulsion hydrodynamic model for gas-solid bubbling fluidized beds[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(31): 10835-10844.
21	Krishna R, van Baten J M. Using CFD for scaling up gas-solid bubbling fluidised bed reactors with Geldart A powders[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2001, 82(1/2/3): 247-257.
22	Zhao B D, Wang J W. Statistical foundation of EMMS-based two-fluid models for heterogeneous gas-solid flow[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2021, 241: 116678.
23	Wang J W, Zhou Q, Hong K, et al. An EMMS-based multi-fluid model (EFM) for heterogeneous gas-solid riser flows(part Ⅱ): An alternative formulation from dominant mechanisms[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2012, 75: 349-358.
24	周泉. 提升管内气固两相流模拟: 基于EMMS理论的连续介质模型[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2015.
	Zhou Q. Simulation of gas-solid two-phase flow in riser:continuum model based on EMMS theory[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015.
25	Zhao B D, Zhou Q, Wang J W, et al. CFD study of exit effect of high-density CFB risers with EMMS-based two-fluid model[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015, 134: 477-488.
26	罗节文, 王雅彬, 李稳, 等. 气固鼓泡床结构双流体模型及其模拟验证[J]. 过程工程学报, 2024, 24(4): 435-444.
	Luo J W, Wang Y B, Li W, et al. Model development and validation of a structural two-fluid model for gas-solid bubbling fluidized beds[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2024, 24(4): 435-444.
27	Wang Y B, Liu Y G, Luo J W, et al. Validation of mesoscience-based structural model for simulating gas-solid flows in circulating-turbulent fluidized beds[J]. Powder Technology, 2024, 432: 119136.
28	Li W, Liu Y G, Luo J W, et al. Rapid simulation of industrial scale gas-solid BFB with bubble structure based two-fluid method[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2024, 288: 119770.
29	Wang J. A review of Eulerian simulation of Geldart A particles in gas-fluidized beds[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(12): 67-77.
30	Gidaspow D. Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions[M]. Boston: Academic Press, 1994.
31	Karamanev D G, Nikolov L N. Free rising spheres do not obey Newton's law for free settling[J]. AIChE Journal, 1992, 38(11): 1843-1846.
32	Cai P, Schiavetti M, de Michele G, et al. Quantitative estimation of bubble size in PFBC[J]. Powder Technology, 1994, 80(2): 99-109.
33	Thomas D G. Transport characteristics of suspension(Ⅷ): A note on the viscosity of Newtonian suspensions of uniform spherical particles[J]. Journal of Colloid Science, 1965, 20(3): 267-277.
34	Abrahamsen A R, Geldart D. Behaviour of gas-fluidized beds of fine powders (part Ⅱ): Voidage of the dense phase in bubbling beds[J]. Powder Technology, 1980, 26(1): 47-55.
35	Kunii D, Levenspiel O. Bubbling bed model. Model for flow of gas through a fluidized bed[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 1968, 7(3): 446-452
36	Chandran R, Chen J C. A heat transfer model for tubes immersed in gas fluidized beds[J]. AIChE Journal, 1985, 31(2): 244-252.
37	Yao X Y, Zhang Y M, Lu C X, et al. Systematic study on heat transfer and surface hydrodynamics of a vertical heat tube in a fluidized bed of FCC particles[J]. AIChE Journal, 2015, 61(1): 68-83.
38	魏庆, 姚秀颖, 张永民. 竖直管气固鼓泡流化床传热机理的CPFD模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(5): 1732-1740.
	Wei Q, Yao X Y, Zhang Y M. CPFD simulation on heat transfer mechanism of vertical tube in bubbling fluidized bed[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(5): 1732-1740.
39	Lan B, Zhao P, Xu J, et al. The critical role of scale resolution in CFD simulation of gas-solid flows: a heat transfer study using CFD-DEM-IBM method[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2023, 266: 118268.

[1]	邓志诚, 许世峰, 王淇冬, 王家瑞, 王斯民. 浸没燃烧处理高盐高化学需氧量废水过程与能耗分析[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(3): 1000-1008.
[2]	周尧, 杨小平, 倪一程, 刘继平, 魏进家, 严俊杰. 应用于新型环路热管的两相引射器数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 268-278.
[3]	李晓阳, 李东, 陶明磊, 周致富, 张灵怡, 苏力争, 张天宁, 李智, 陈斌. 多喷嘴喷雾冷却表面传热特性实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 231-241.
[4]	王义江, 孙莉, 刘梦涵, 杨金宏, 王国元. 基于响应面法的矿用翅片管空冷器参数优化[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 279-291.
[5]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[6]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[7]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[8]	刘明栖, 吴延鹏. 导光管直径和长度对传热影响的模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 206-212.
[9]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[10]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[11]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[12]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[13]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[14]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[15]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.

气固鼓泡床结构双流体传热模型及其模拟验证

Model development and validation of structural two-fluid model for heat transfer in a gas-solid bubbling fluidized bed

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价