Multi-objective reaction path synthesis based on fuzzy HSE evaluation

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.12.009

CIESC Journal ›› 2013, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (12): 4330-4334.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.12.009

Previous Articles Next Articles

Multi-objective reaction path synthesis based on fuzzy HSE evaluation

XIANG Shuguang, JIAO Wei, SUN Xiaoyan, XIA Li

The Hi-Tech Institute for Petroleum and Chemical Industry, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, Shandong, China

Received:2013-08-23 Revised:2013-08-30 Online:2013-12-05 Published:2013-12-05
Supported by:
supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2011BL011).

基于模糊HSE评价的多目标反应路径综合方法

项曙光, 焦巍, 孙晓岩, 夏力

青岛科技大学炼油化工高新技术研究所, 山东青岛 266042

通讯作者: 项曙光
作者简介:项曙光（1963- ），男，教授。
基金资助:
山东省自然科学基金项目（ZR2011BL011）。

Abstract

Abstract: Aimed to obtain reaction path with benign HSE performance during early phase of chemical process,the multi-objective reaction path synthesis method based on fuzzy HSE assessment is proposed. The HSE index framework is provided based on the information of HSE impact.Through setting membership function of each index,establishing fuzzy inference system,and determining the weighting vector by AHP,the fuzzy HSE assessment method is proposed.Based on the fuzzy assessment system,the benign reaction path will be obtained through multi-objective optimization treating HSE as objective functions.By analyzing the application of reaction path synthesis for carbaryl production,reaction paths with their HSE objective function values are obtained quantificationally,which provide data for decision making in early stage.

Key words: reaction path synthesis, fuzzy assessment, HSE, multi-objective, AHP

摘要： 为在过程早期获取HSE综合性质优良的反应路径，提出了基于模糊HSE评价的多目标反应路径综合方法。全面考虑HSE因素，形成了HSE指标结构，通过设定指标的隶属度函数，建立模糊推理系统，应用层次分析法（analytic hierarchy process，AHP）确定指标的权重因子，形成了模糊HSE评价方法。基于模糊HSE评价体系，建立以安全、环境和健康为目标函数的多目标优化模型，求解得到优良的反应路径组合。应用于萘甲胺反应路径综合实例，定量得到了反应路径及其HSE目标函数值，为过程早期的路径优选提供定量数据。

关键词: 反应路径综合, 模糊评价, HSE, 多目标, AHP

CLC Number:

X937

XIANG Shuguang, JIAO Wei, SUN Xiaoyan, XIA Li. Multi-objective reaction path synthesis based on fuzzy HSE evaluation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(12): 4330-4334.

项曙光, 焦巍, 孙晓岩, 夏力. 基于模糊HSE评价的多目标反应路径综合方法[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(12): 4330-4334.

References 16

[1]	Alexandre C D, Costin S B. Chemical Process Design:Computer-Aided Case Studies[M].Weinheim:WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.KGaA, 2008
[2]	Scott D B, Jeffrey J S.Process synthesis prospective[J].Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2004, 28:441-446
[3]	Al-Mutairi E M.An optimization approach to the integration of inherently-safer design and process scheduling[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2008, 21 (5):543-549
[4]	Crabtree E M, EI-Halwagi M M.Synthesis of environmentally acceptable reactions[J].AIChE Symposium Series, 1994, 90 (303):117-127
[5]	Rotstein E, Resasco D, Diana, Stephanopoulos G.Studies on the synthesis of chemical reaction paths (Ⅰ):Reaction characteristics in the (ΔG, T) space and a primitive synthesis procedure[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 1982, 37 (9):1337-1352
[6]	Fornari T, Rotstein E, Stephanopoulos G.Studies on the synthesis of chemical reaction paths (Ⅱ):Reaction schemes with two degrees of freedom[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 1989, 44 (7):1569-1579
[7]	Fornari T, Stephanopoulos G.Synthesis of chemical reaction paths:the scope of group contribution methods[J].Chemical Engineering Communications, 1994a, 129:135-137
[8]	Fornari T, Stephanopoulos G.Synthesis of chemical reaction paths:economic and specification constraints[J].Chemical Engineering Communications, 1994b, 129:159-182
[9]	Stefanis S K, Buxton A, Livingston A G, Pistikopoulos E N.A methodology for environmental impact minimization:solvent design and reaction path synthesis issues[J].Computers & Chemical Engineering, 1996, 20:1419-1424
[10]	Buxton A, Livingston A G, Pistikopoulos E N.Reaction path synthesis for environmental impact minimization[J].Computers & Chemical Engineering, 1997, 21:959-964
[11]	Hu Shanying (胡山鹰), Li Mingheng (李明恒), Li Yourun (李有润), Shen Jingzhu (沈静珠).Simple stoichiometric reaction[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering (过程工程学报), 2004, 4 (6):544-548
[12]	Heikkil A M, Hurme M, Jrvelinen M.Safety considerations in process synthesis[J].Computers & Chemical Engineering, 1996, 20:115-120
[13]	Koller G, Fischer U, Hungerbuhler K.Comparison of methods suitable for assessing the hazard potential of chemical processes during early design phases[J].IChemE, 2001, 79 (part B):157-166
[14]	Srinivasan R, Nhan N T.A statistical approach for evaluating inherent benign-ness of chemical process routes in early design stages[J].Process Safety and Environment Protection, 2008, 86:163-174
[15]	Heikkila A M.Inherent safety in process plant design, an index-based approach[D].Finland:Helsinki University of Technology, 1999
[16]	Gentile M.Development of a hierarchical fuzzy model for the evaluation of inherent safety[D].America:Texas A&M University, 2004

Multi-objective reaction path synthesis based on fuzzy HSE evaluation

基于模糊HSE评价的多目标反应路径综合方法

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 16

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Yurong DANG, Chunlan MO, Kerui SHI, Yingcong FANG, Ziyang ZHANG, Zuoshun LI. Comprehensive evaluation model combined with genetic algorithm for the study on the performance of ORC system with zeotropic mixture [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(5): 1884-1895.
[2]	Sheng’an ZHANG, Guilian LIU. Multi-objective optimization of high-efficiency solar water electrolysis hydrogen production system and its performance [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(3): 1260-1274.
[3]	Shujun ZHANG, Shihui WANG, Xin ZHANG, Xu JI, Yiyang DAI, Yagu DANG, Li ZHOU. Surrogate-assisted multi-objective optimization of hydrogen networks with light hydrocarbon recovery unit [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(4): 1658-1672.
[4]	Xiaoqing SHI, Weixuan ZHU, Haotian YE, Zhizhong HAN, Hongguang DONG. Pretreatment process simulation and multi-objective optimization of C5 by reactive dividing wall column [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(3): 1246-1255.
[5]	Qucheng LIN, Zuwei LIAO. Multi-objective optimization of work and heat exchange networks based on a decomposition algorithm [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(11): 5047-5055.
[6]	Xu LIU, Songlin XU, Yanfei WANG. Global multi-objective optimization of trimethyl orthoformate-acetic acid extractive distillation [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(10): 4518-4526.
[7]	WEI Bin, ZHOU Xin, WANG Yaowei, GUO Zhenlian, CHEN Xiaobo, LIU Yibin, YANG Chaohe. Multi-objective optimization of FCC separation system based on improved NSGA-Ⅱ [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(5): 2735-2744.
[8]	ZHAO Yang, XIONG Weili. Multi-objective optimization control of wastewater treatment process based on multi-strategy adaptive differential evolution algorithm [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(4): 2167-2177.
[9]	LI Jingyi, KUANG Zhuoxian. Exploration and reference of PHSER method covering entire project lifecycle [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(3): 1634-1642.
[10]	ZHU Pengfei, GUO Leilei, YAO Jing, YANG Fusheng, ZHANG Zaoxiao, WU Zhen. Parameter analysis and optimization of power and heat cogeneration system with biomass fueled SOFC and engine [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(2): 1089-1099.
[11]	Le WU, Jing WANG, Yuqi WANG, Lan ZHENG. Multi-objective optimization of co-processing of bio-oil and vacuum gas oil in FCC [J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(5): 2182-2189.
[12]	Lei WANG, Yuting CHEN, Yanyan XU, Shuang YE, Weiguang HUANG. Multi-objective constrained optimization method for heat exchanger network considering comprehensive economy and entransy [J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(3): 1189-1201.
[13]	Defeng HE, Yongda ZHANG, Lianming LI, Xiang QIU. Lexicographic economic predictive control without terminal constraints for CFBB combustion systems [J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(3): 1210-1216.
[14]	Lu YANG, Shuoshi LIU, Xiaoyan LUO, Siyu YANG, Yu QIAN. Multi-objective operation optimization of olefin separation process for MTO plant [J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(10): 4720-4732.
[15]	Simin WANG, Lijuan SUN, Chen SONG, Zaoxiao ZHANG, Jian WEN. Multi-objective optimization on shell-side performance of rod-baffle heat exchangers with twisted oval tubes [J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(9): 3353-3362.