溶液除湿系统空气状态影响因素

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20201495

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究典型叉流式溶液除湿系统中，溶液循环流量（G_cir）、冷/热量（Q_c/Q_h）和系统流程对除湿/再生空气状态变化和除湿效果的影响机制。分析不同工况下空气在焓湿图中的过程曲线特征，比较各因素影响程度。结果表明，在设计条件下，当G_cir约为0.05 kg/s时，溶液除湿系统达到最佳除湿效果；当Q_c、Q_h比例接近，总量由29.4 kW增加至48.9 kW时，系统中除湿量由3.7 g/kg上升至5.7 g/kg；不同流程中，当冷却对象为溶液时，溶液除湿效果较好。相较于溶液除湿系统中G_cir和Q_c/Q_h，溶液除湿流程对空气状态变化和除湿效果的影响程度较大。空气过程曲线在各流程下具有显著特征，溶液除湿流程是影响空气状态变化和除湿效果的核心因素。

关键词: 溶液, 传质, 模型, 除湿效果, 再生

Abstract:

The influence mechanisms of circulation solution flow (G_cir), cold/heat capacity (Q_c/Q_h) and systemic process on the air state changes and dehumidification effect in typical cross-flow liquid desiccant dehumidification systems were researched. Through simulation and analysis, the air process lines in the enthalpy and humidity diagram under different working conditions were exhibited, and the influence degrees of various factors were compared. The results show that under design conditions, the liquid desiccant system achieves optimal dehumidification effect when G_cir is about 0.05 kg/s; as the total Q_c and Q_h increase from 29.4 kW to 48.9 kW with close ratio, the dehumidification amount increases from 3.7 g/kg to 5.7 g/kg; in the different processes, the liquid desiccant dehumidification amount is relatively large when the cooling object is solution. Compared with G_cir and Q_c/Q_h, the systemic process has greater influence on air state changes and dehumidification effect. The air process lines in each process have significant characteristics, and the liquid desiccant process is the core factor that influences the air state changes and the dehumidification effect.

Key words: solution, mass transfer, model, dehumidification effect, regeneration

中图分类号:

TU 834.9

曲泓硕, 张伦, 张小松, 纪文彬. 溶液除湿系统空气状态影响因素[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(S1): 210-217.

QU Hongshuo, ZHANG Lun, ZHANG Xiaosong, JI Wenbin. Influencing factors of air states in liquid desiccant dehumidification systems[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(S1): 210-217.

图/表 9

图1 叉流式气-液热质传递模型

Fig.1 Heat and mass transfer model between air and liquid desiccant with cross-flow path

图2 模拟结果与现有试验结果比较

Fig.2 Comparison of simulation results and data obtained in extant experiments

图3 典型溶液除湿装置原理

Fig.3 Systemic diagram of one typical liquid desiccant dehumidification device

表1 溶液除湿系统初始参数

Table 1 Initial parameters of liquid desiccant system.

项目	参数	数值
回风	温度	26℃
	含湿量	12.7 g/kg
	流量	1 kg/s
新风	温度	35℃
	含湿量	21.4 g/kg
	流量	1 kg/s
溶液	G_deh	1 kg/s
	G_reg	1 kg/s
除湿器/再生器	NTU_m	2
冷源	Q_c	10 kW
热源	Q_h	10 kW
溶液换热器	换热效率	55%

图4 溶液除湿系统中空气过程状态随Gcir变化情况

Fig.4 Variation of air process states with Gcir in liquid desiccant system

表2 除湿溶液S2和再生溶液S6状态随Gcir的变化情况

Table 2 Variation of dehumidification solution S2 and regeneration solution S6 status with Gcir

C_cir/(kg/s)	S₂		S₆
C_cir/(kg/s)	温度/℃	浓度/%	温度/℃	浓度/%
0.02	19.4	38.2	42.1	42.7
0.05	20.4	39.8	41.1	41.7
0.1	21	40.3	40.4	41.2
0.2	21.7	40.4	39.7	40.9
0.5	22.8	40.3	38.4	40.5
1	23.8	40.2	37.3	40.2
2	24.7	40.0	36.4	40.0

图5 不同Qc/Qh组合下空气和溶液状态变化情况

Fig.5 Variation of air and solution states under different combinations of Qc/Qh

图6 不同Qc/Qh组合下的溶液除湿效果

Fig.6 Liquid desiccant dehumidification effect with different combinations of Qc/Qh

图7 空气过程曲线随冷却/加热模式的变化情况

Fig.7 Variation of air process lines with cooling/heating modes

参考文献 31

1	李震, 江亿, 陈晓阳, 等. 溶液除湿空调及热湿独立处理空调系统[J]. 暖通空调, 2003, 33(6): 26-29, 33.
	Li Z, Jiang Y, Chen X Y, et al. Liquid desiccant air conditioning and independent humidity control air conditioning systems [J]. HV & AC, 2003, 33(6): 26-29, 33.
2	高文忠, 时亚茹, 韩笑生, 等. 混合除湿盐溶液液滴闪蒸机理[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(11): 3453-3459.
	Gao W Z, Shi Y R, Han X S, et al. Droplet flash evaporation of mixed dehumidification solutions [J]. CIESC Journal, 2012, 63(11): 3453-3459.
3	Yin Y G, Qian J F, Zhang X S. Recent advancements in liquid desiccant dehumidification technology [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 31: 38-52.
4	涂敏, 汤广发, 任承钦, 等. 溶液除湿系统中除湿塔的参数分析[J]. 化工学报, 2010, 61(10): 2546-2551.
	Tu M, Tang G F, Ren C Q, et al. Analysis on parameters of dehumidification tower in liquid desiccant dehumidification systems [J]. CIESC Journal, 2010, 61(10): 2546-2551.
5	Ge G M, Abdel-Salam A H, Abdel-Salam M R H, et al. Heat and mass transfer performance comparison between a direct-contact liquid desiccant packed bed and a liquid-to-air membrane energy exchanger for air dehumidification [J]. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 2017, 23(1): 2-15.
6	Ahmed S Y, Gandhidasan P, Al-Farayedhi A A. Thermodynamic analysis of liquid desiccants [J]. Solar Energy, 1998, 62(1): 11-18.
7	Gao W Z, Liu J H, Cheng Y P, et al. Experimental investigation on the heat and mass transfer between air and liquid desiccant in a cross-flow dehumidifier [J]. Renewable Energy, 2012, 37(1): 117-123.
8	Bassuoni M M. An experimental study of structured packing dehumidifier/regenerator operating with liquid desiccant [J]. Energy, 2011, 36(5): 2628-2638.
9	王凌士, 肖赋, 陆韬. 3种填料型溶液除湿器性能对比分析[J]. 暖通空调, 2019, 49(7): 128-131.
	Wang L S, Xiao F, Lu T. Performance comparison and analysis of three packed-type liquid desiccant dehumidifiers [J]. HV & AC, 2019, 49(7): 128-131.
10	黄志甲, 鲁月红, 雷博, 等. 溴化锂溶液除湿器性能的试验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2010, 61(S2): 81-85.
	Huang Z J, Lu Y H, Lei B, et al. Experiment on performance of LiBr-liquid desiccant dehumidification [J]. CIESC Journal, 2010, 61(S2): 81-85.
11	周君明, 张小松, 孙博. 太阳能溶液除湿空调系统再生技术的研究进展与能耗分析[J]. 制冷学报, 2019, 40(2): 154-160, 166.
	Zhou J M, Zhang X S, Sun B. Research progress on regenerative technology and energy analysis of solar liquid desiccant air-conditioning system [J]. Journal of Refrigeration, 2019, 40(2): 154-160, 166.
12	Zhang N, Chen X J, Su Y H, et al. Numerical investigations and performance comparisons of a novel cross-flow hollow fiber integrated liquid desiccant dehumidification system [J]. Energy, 2019, 182: 1115-1131.
13	Liu X H, Jiang Y. Coupled heat and mass transfer characteristic in packed bed dehumidifier/regenerator using liquid desiccant [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2008, 49(6): 1357-1366.
14	Liu Y L, Jin L W, Li Y, et al. Experimental and numerical study on heat and mass transfer of cross-flow liquid desiccant dehumidifier/regenerator [J]. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2020, 41(9/10): 867-881.
15	Alizadeh S, Saman W Y. An experimental study of a forced flow solar collector/regenerator using liquid desiccant [J]. Solar Energy, 2002, 73(5): 345-362.
16	Qi R H, Lu L, Huang Y. Parameter analysis and optimization of the energy and economic performance of solar-assisted liquid desiccant cooling system under different climate conditions [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 106: 1387-1395.
17	钱俊飞, 殷勇高, 张小松. 叉流除湿器热质传递性能试验研究[J]. 制冷学报, 2014, 35(1): 46-52.
	Qian J F, Yin Y G, Zhang X S. Experimental investigation on the performance of heat and mass transfer of cross-flow dehumidifier [J]. Journal of Refrigeration, 2014, 35(1): 46-52.
18	熊珍琴, 代彦军, 王如竹, 等. 溶液除湿冷却系统的㶲分析[J]. 化工学报, 2008, 59(S2): 37-42.
	Xiong Z Q, Dai Y J, Wang R Z, et al. Exergy analysis of liquid desiccant dehumidification and cooling system [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China), 2008, 59(S2): 37-42.
19	陈瑶, 殷勇高, 张小松. 非常温溶液除湿自主再生空调系统性能分析[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2014, 35(9): 1682-1687.
	Chen Y, Yin Y G, Zhang X S. Performance analysis of the non-normal temperature liquid desiccant self-regenerating air-conditioning system [J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2014, 35(9): 1682-1687.
20	杨自力, 郜彩云, 龚斐然, 等. 运行压力对超声雾化溶液除湿系统性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(S1): 129-135.
	Yang Z L, Gao C Y, Gong F R, et al. Working pressures on performance of ultrasonic atomization liquid desiccant dehumidification system [J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(S1): 129-135.
21	Liu X H, Jiang Y, Yi X Q. Effect of regeneration mode on the performance of liquid desiccant packed bed regenerator [J]. Renewable Energy, 2009, 34(1): 209-216.
22	Xiong Z Q, Dai Y J, Wang R Z. Development of a novel two-stage liquid desiccant dehumidification system assisted by CaCl₂ solution using exergy analysis method [J]. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(5): 1495-1504.
23	Guan B W, Liu X H, Zhang T, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of a novel hybrid deep-dehumidification system using liquid desiccant [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 192: 396-411.
24	Liu X H, Jiang Y, Xia J J, et al. Analytical solutions of coupled heat and mass transfer processes in liquid desiccant air dehumidifier/regenerator [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2007, 48(7): 2221-2232.
25	Liu X H, Zhang Y, Qu K Y, et al. Experimental study on mass transfer performances of cross flow dehumidifier using liquid desiccant [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006, 47(15/16): 2682-2692.
26	Liu X H, Jiang Y, Chang X M, et al. Experimental investigation of the heat and mass transfer between air and liquid desiccant in a cross-flow regenerator [J]. Renewable Energy, 2007, 32(10): 1623-1636.
27	张凡, 殷勇高. 一种低位热驱动除湿冷却空调系统的热性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(S2): 275-283.
	Zhang F, Yin Y G. Thermal performance analysis of liquid desiccant evaporative cooling air-conditioning system driven by low-grade heat [J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(S2): 275-283.
28	Song X, Zhang L, Zhang X S. Analysis of the temperatures of heating and cooling sources and the air states in liquid desiccant dehumidification systems regenerated by return air [J]. Energy, 2019, 168: 651-661.
29	黄志甲, 李耀国, 尹琰琰. 溶液再生器传热传质过程的数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2008, 59(S2): 159-162.
	Huang Z J, Li Y G, Yin Y Y. Numerical simulation of heat and mass transfer process in liquid regenerator [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China), 2008, 59(S2): 159-162.
30	Ren C Q, Jiang Y, Yianpin Z. Simplified analysis of coupled heat and mass transfer processes in packed bed liquid desiccant-air contact system [J]. Solar Energy, 2006, 80(1): 121-131.
31	Liu X H, Jiang Y, Qu K Y. Heat and mass transfer model of cross flow liquid desiccant air dehumidifier/regenerator [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2007, 48(2): 546-554.

[1]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[2]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[3]	连梦雅, 谈莹莹, 王林, 陈枫, 曹艺飞. 地下水预热新风一体化热泵空调系统制热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 311-319.
[4]	常明慧, 王林, 苑佳佳, 曹艺飞. 盐溶液蓄能型热泵循环特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 329-337.
[5]	金正浩, 封立杰, 李舒宏. 氨水溶液交叉型再吸收式热泵的能量及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 53-63.
[6]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[7]	李科, 文键, 忻碧平. 耦合蒸气冷却屏的真空多层绝热结构对液氢储罐自增压过程的影响机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3786-3796.
[8]	王浩, 王振雷. 基于自适应谱方法的裂解炉烧焦模型化简策略[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3855-3864.
[9]	车睿敏, 郑文秋, 王小宇, 李鑫, 许凤. 基于离子液体的纤维素均相加工研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3615-3627.
[10]	李锦潼, 邱顺, 孙文寿. 煤浆法烟气脱硫中草酸和紫外线强化煤砷浸出过程[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3522-3532.
[11]	程小松, 殷勇高, 车春文. 不同工质在溶液除湿真空再生系统中的性能对比[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3494-3501.
[12]	于旭东, 李琪, 陈念粗, 杜理, 任思颖, 曾英. 三元体系KCl + CaCl₂ + H₂O 298.2、323.2及348.2 K相平衡研究及计算[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3256-3265.
[13]	诸程瑛, 王振雷. 基于改进深度强化学习的乙烯裂解炉操作优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3429-3437.
[14]	闫琳琦, 王振雷. 基于STA-BiLSTM-LightGBM组合模型的多步预测软测量建模[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3407-3418.
[15]	郭雨莹, 敬加强, 黄婉妮, 张平, 孙杰, 朱宇, 冯君炫, 陆洪江. 稠油管道水润滑减阻及压降预测模型修正[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2898-2907.