热负荷对R141b热力学排气系统自增压特性及排气损失的影响

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160613

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (10): 4047-4054.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160613

热负荷对R141b热力学排气系统自增压特性及排气损失的影响

陈忠灿¹, 黄永华¹, 汪彬¹, 李鹏², 孙培杰², 王天祥³, 崔佳勋¹

1 上海交通大学制冷与低温工程研究所, 上海 200240;
2 上海宇航系统工程研究所, 上海 201108;
3 航天低温推进剂技术国家重点实验室, 北京 100028

收稿日期:2016-05-09 修回日期:2016-06-01 出版日期:2016-10-05 发布日期:2016-10-05
通讯作者: 黄永华
基金资助:
航天低温推进剂技术国家重点实验室基金项目（SKLTSCP1206-W）。

Effect on self-pressurization characteristics and mass loss of thermodynamic vent system for refrigerant R141b by heat load

CHEN Zhongcan¹, HUANG Yonghua¹, WANG Bin¹, LI Peng², SUN Peijie², WANG Tianxiang³, CUI Jiaxun¹

1 Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;
2 Aerospace System Engineering Shanghai, Shanghai 201108, China;
3 State Key Laboratory of Technologies in Space Cryogenic Propellants, Beijing 100028, China

Received:2016-05-09 Revised:2016-06-01 Online:2016-10-05 Published:2016-10-05
Supported by:
supported by the Open Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Technologies in Space Cryogenic Propellants (SKLTSCP1206-W).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了研究低温推进剂在轨贮存技术所涉及的基本科学问题，在以R141b为气液相变储存介质的室温温区热力学排气系统（TVS）模拟装置上，进行了“漏热”功率分别为120、160和200 W的储箱压力控制实验研究。获得了TVS作用下的储箱增压特性，3种热负荷下自增压速率分别为6.43、12.92和18.05 kPa·h^-1。将采用TVS方法与定期直接放空法控制储箱压力产生的工质损失进行了对比，以其中热负荷120 W工况为例，采用TVS方法可减少工质损失79.3%。若是处于气液不分离的在轨微重力环境中，以直接放空时气体中夹带40%液体计，采用TVS方法可减少工质损失84.7%，验证了TVS方法在控制储箱压力方面的优越性。

关键词: R141b, 热力学, 压力控制, 传热, 相变

Abstract:

In order to study the fundamental problems involved in the storage of cryogens in space, the experimental investigation of tank pressure control was carried out on a simulator of thermodynamic vent system (TVS), which works at room temperature with refrigerant R141b as working fluid. The pressure control characteristics were obtained at heat load of 120, 160 and 200 W. The test results showed that the self-pressurization rate were 6.43, 12.92 and 18.05 kPa·h^-1 respectively at those three different heat load. Mass loss as a result of tank pressure control was compared between TVS method and direct gas vent method. Taking the heat load of 120 W as an example, the mass loss can be reduced by 79.3%. Assuming the mixture vented directly at zero-gravity containing 40% liquid, the TVS method can reduce the mass loss even by up to 84.7%. It was proved that the TVS method cannot only control the tank pressure but also significantly reduce the loss of the storage fluid.

Key words: R141b, thermodynamics, pressure control, heat transfer, phase change

中图分类号:

V511.6

陈忠灿, 黄永华, 汪彬, 李鹏, 孙培杰, 王天祥, 崔佳勋. 热负荷对R141b热力学排气系统自增压特性及排气损失的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(10): 4047-4054.

CHEN Zhongcan, HUANG Yonghua, WANG Bin, LI Peng, SUN Peijie, WANG Tianxiang, CUI Jiaxun. Effect on self-pressurization characteristics and mass loss of thermodynamic vent system for refrigerant R141b by heat load[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(10): 4047-4054.

参考文献 20

[1]	CHATO D J. Cryogenic technology development for exploration missions[C]//AIAA, 2007:8-11.
[2]	HASAN M M, LIN C S, VAN DRESAR N T. Self-pressurization of a flight weight liquid hydrogen storage tank subjected to low heat flux:103804[R]. NASA/TM, 1991.
[3]	VAN DRESAR N T, HASAN M M, LIN C S. Self-pressurization of a flight weight liquid hydrogen tank:effects of fill level at low wall heat flux:105411[R]. NASA/TM, 1991.
[4]	TIBOR L, CHARLES W. Zero-G thermodynamic venting system final report:SSD 94M0038[R]. Rockwell Aerospace Report, 1994.
[5]	HASTINGS L J, TUCKER S P, FLACHBART R H. Marshall space flight center in-space cryogenic fluid management program overview[C]//AIAA, 2005:1-11.
[6]	VAN OVERBEKEO T J. Thermodynamic vent system test in a low earth orbit simulation[C]//AIAA, 2004:11-14.
[7]	HURLBERT E A, ROMING K A, JIMENEZ R, et al. Thermodynamic vent system for an on-orbit cryogenic reaction control engine:MSC-24543-1[R]. NASA Tech Briefs, 2012.
[8]	HEDAYAT A, BAILEY J W, HASTINGS L J, et al. Test data analysis of a spray bar zero-g liquid hydrogen vent system for upper stages[J]. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, 2004, 49:1171-1178.
[9]	FLACHBART R H, HASTINGS L J, MARTIN J J. Testing of a spray bar zero gravity cryogenic vent system for upper stages[C]//AIAA, 1999.
[10]	HASTINGS L J, FLACHBART R H, MARTIN J J, et al. Spray bar zero-gravity vent system for on-orbit liquid hydrogen:212926[R]. NASA/TM, 2003.
[11]	FLACHBART R H, HASTINGS L J, HEDAYAT A. Thermodynamic vent system performance testing with subcooled liquid methane and gaseous helium pressurant[J]. Cryogenics, 2008, 5:217-222
[12]	HASTINGS L J, BOLSHINSKIY L G, HEDAYAT A, et al. Liquid methane testing with a large-scale spray bar thermodynamic vent system:218197[R]. NASA/TP, 2014.
[13]	朱洪来, 孙沂昆, 张阿莉, 等. 低温推进剂在轨贮存与管理技术研究[J]. 载人航天, 2015, 21(1):13-18. ZHU H L, SUN Y K, ZHANG A L, et al. Research on on-orbit storage and management technology of crogenic propellant[J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2015, 21(1):13-18.
[14]	张天平. 空间低温流体贮存的压力控制技术进展[J]. 真空与低温, 2006, 12(3):125-131. ZHANG T P. The progress of pressure control technology of cryogenic liquid storage in space[J]. Vacuum & Cryogenics, 2006, 12(3):125-131.
[15]	颜露, 黄永华, 吴静怡, 等. 低温推进剂在轨储存热力学排气系统TVS研究进展[J]. 低温与超导, 2015, 43(2):5-13. YAN L, HUANG Y H, WU J Y, et al. Development of thermodynamic venting system technology for cryogenic propellant storage on orbit[J]. Cryogenics & Superconductivity, 2015, 43(2):5-13.
[16]	李鹏, 孙培杰, 包轶颖, 等. 低温推进剂长期在轨储存技术研究进展[J]. 载人航天, 2012, 18(1):30-36. LI P, SUN P J, BAO Y Y, et al. Cryogenic propellant long-term storage on orbit technology overview[J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2012, 18(1):30-36.
[17]	冶文莲, 王小军, 王丽红, 等. 微重力下低温贮箱压力控制技术进展[J]. 低温技术, 2012, 40(6):8-12. YE W L, WANG X J, WANG L H, et al. Progress of pressure control technology of cryogenic storage tanks in microgravity[J]. Crogenics, 2012, 40(6):8-12.
[18]	刘展, 厉彦忠, 王磊, 等. 低温推进剂长期在轨压力管理技术研究进展[J]. 宇航学报, 2014, 35(3):254-261. LIU Z, LI Y Z, WANG L, et al. Progress of study on long-term in-orbit pressure management technique for cryogenic propellant[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2014, 35(3):254-261.
[19]	胡伟峰, 申麟, 彭小波, 等. 低温推进剂长时间在轨的蒸发量控制关键技术分析[J]. 低温工程, 2011, (3):59-66. HU W F, SHEN L, PENG X B, et al. Key technology analysis of boil-foo control study on cryogenic propellant long-term application on orbit[J]. Crogenics, 2011, (3):59-66.
[20]	马原, 厉彦忠, 王磊, 等. 低温燃料贮箱热力学排气系统优化分析与性能研究[J]. 低温与超导, 2014, 42(7):10-15. MA Y, LI Y Z, WANG L, et al. Optimized analysis and performance study on thermodynamic vent system in cryogenic fuel tank[J]. Cryogenics & Superconductivity, 2014, 42(7):10-15.

热负荷对R141b热力学排气系统自增压特性及排气损失的影响

Effect on self-pressurization characteristics and mass loss of thermodynamic vent system for refrigerant R141b by heat load

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨欣, 王文, 徐凯, 马凡华. 高压氢气加注过程中温度特征仿真分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 280-286.
[2]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[3]	常明慧, 王林, 苑佳佳, 曹艺飞. 盐溶液蓄能型热泵循环特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 329-337.
[4]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[5]	张化福, 童莉葛, 张振涛, 杨俊玲, 王立, 张俊浩. 机械蒸汽压缩蒸发技术研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 8-24.
[6]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[7]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[8]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[9]	刘明栖, 吴延鹏. 导光管直径和长度对传热影响的模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 206-212.
[10]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[11]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[12]	吴延鹏, 刘乾隆, 田东民, 陈凤君. 相变材料与热管耦合的电子器件热管理研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 25-31.
[13]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[14]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[15]	胡建波, 刘洪超, 胡齐, 黄美英, 宋先雨, 赵双良. 有机笼跨细胞膜易位行为的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3756-3765.