神华上湾煤恒温阶段直接液化反应动力学

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160829

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为考察神华上湾煤的直接液化性能及反应动力学，以加氢蒽油-洗油混合油作为溶剂、负载型FeOOH作为催化剂，在0.01 t·d^-1煤直接液化连续实验装置上考察了不同反应温度（435~465℃）、不同停留时间（7~110 min）下液化产品组成的演变规律。研究发现，随着煤的裂解及加氢反应的进行，煤及沥青类物质（PAA）收率不断减小，重质液化产物逐步向轻质液化产物转化。当反应温度为455℃、停留时间为90 min时，煤转化率为90.41%（质量分数（，油收率为61.28%（质量分数（。随着反应条件进一步苛刻，油收率下降。基于上湾煤直接液化反应特性及其产物收率变化规律建立了11集总煤直接液化反应动力学候选模型，以BFGS优化算法对实验数据搜索、选优，确定了动力学模型参数。检验结果表明所建立的动力学模型可用于恒温阶段直接液化行为的模拟计算。

关键词: 煤直接液化, 反应动力学, 集总, 模拟, 模型

Abstract:

To study the performance and reaction kinetics of direct coal liquefaction for Shenhua Shangwan coal bituminous coal, experiments were carried out in a 0.01 t·d^-1 continuous tubular facility using the hydrogenated anthracene and wash oil as solvent and FeOOH as catalyst in the range of residence time 7-110 min, reaction temperature 435-465℃. The results showed that, as the coal pyrolysis and a series of hydrogenation proceed, coal and PAA yields continue to decrease, heavy liquefied product gradually transformed to light liquefied product. When the reaction temperature is 455℃, residence time of 90 min, the coal conversion reached 90.41% (mass) and oil yield 61.28% (mass) respectively, and with the reaction conditions were further harsh, the oil yield will decrease. Based on the reaction characteristics of Shenhua Shangwan coal and its data from experiments, 11 lumps reaction kinetics model was build and BFGS optimization algorithm was adopted to get reaction kinetics parameters. The kinetics model better predicted the reaction behavior of direct coal liquefaction of Shangwan coal in isothermal stage.

Key words: direct coal liquefaction, reaction kinetics, lump, simulation, model

中图分类号:

TQ028.8

单贤根, 李克健, 章序文, 王洪学, 曹雪萍, 江洪波, 翁惠新. 神华上湾煤恒温阶段直接液化反应动力学[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(4): 1398-1406.

SHAN Xiangen, LI Kejian, ZHANG Xuwen, WANG Hongxue, CAO Xueping, JIANG Hongbo, WENG Huixin. Isothermal kinetics of direct coal liquefaction for Shenhua Shangwan coal[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(4): 1398-1406.

参考文献 29

[1]	吴春来. 煤炭直接液化[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2010:14-18.WU C L. Direct Coal Liquefaction[M]. Beijing:Chemical Industry Press, 2010:14-18.
[2]	LIU Z Y, SHI S D, LI Y W. Coal liquefaction technologies-development in China and challenges in chemical reaction engineering[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65:12-17.
[3]	吴秀章. 煤炭直接液化工艺与工程[M]. 北京:科学技术出版社, 2014:98-105.WU X Z. Technology and Engineering of Direct Coal Liquefaction Process[M]. Beijing:Science and Technology Press, 2014:98-105.
[4]	MOHAN G, SILLA H.Kinetics of donor solvent liquefaction of bituminous coals in nonisothermal experiments[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 1981, 20:349-354.
[5]	PRADHAN V R, HOLDER G D, WENDER I, et al. Kinetic modeling of direct liquefaction of Wyodak coal catalyzed by sulfated iron oxides[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 1992, 31(8):2051-2056.
[6]	李显. 神华煤直接液化动力学及机理研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2008.LI X. Kinetic and mechanism of Shenhua coal direct liquefaction[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Science and Technology, 2008.
[7]	郭治, 史士东, 王勇, 等. 神华煤高压釜加氢液化等温反应的动力学研究[J]. 煤炭转化, 2007, 30(3):34-36.GUO Z, SHI S D, WANG Y, et al. Kinetics of isothermal hydroliquefaction of Shenhua coal in autoclaves[J]. Coal Conversion, 2007, 30(3):34-36.
[8]	蔺华林, 徐熠, 黄珏, 等. 神华煤加氢液化动力学研究[J]. 华东理工大学学报, 2009, 35(6):825-828.LIN H L, XU Y, HUANG J, et al. Kinetics of Shenhua coal hydroliquefaction[J]. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology, 2009, 35(6):825-828.
[9]	YOSHIDA R, MAEKAWA Y, ISHⅡ T, et al. Mechanism of high-pressure hydrogenolysis of Hokkaido coals (Japan) (2):Chemical structure of products[J]. Fuel, 1976, 55(4):341-345.
[10]	XU B, KANDIYOTI R. Two-stage kinetic model of primary coal liquefaction[J]. Energy & Fuels, 1996, 10(5):1115-1127.
[11]	SHUI H, CHEN Z, WAND Z, et al. Kinetics of Shenhua coal liquefaction catalyzed by SO42-/ZrO2 solid acid[J]. Fuel, 2010, 89(1):67-72.
[12]	朱晓苏, 史士东, 李文博, 等. 0.01 t·d-1煤炭直接液化连续试验装置及动力学试验[J]. 煤炭转化, 2008, 31(4):45-52.ZHU X S, SHI S D, LI W B, et al. A 0.01 t·d-1 direct coal facility and the liquefaction continuous kinetic experiments[J]. Coal Conversion, 2008, 31(4):45-52.
[13]	DENNIS D G, ROBERT M B, RICHARD L B. Modeling of bench-scale coal liquefaction systems[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 1982, 21:490-500.
[14]	高山松, 李克健, 李永伦, 等. 煤焦油馏分油用作煤直接液化起始溶剂的加氢稳定研究[J].石油学报(石油加工), 2012, 28(4):636-641.GAO S S, LI K J, LI Y L, et a1. Study on the hydrotreatment of fractions from coal tar used as coal liquefaction starting solvent[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 2012, 28(4):636-641.
[15]	谢晶, 卢晗锋, 陈银飞, 等. 助剂改性FeOOH及其煤直接液化催化活性[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(5):1892-1899.XIE J, LU H F, CHEN Y F, et al. Promoters modified FeOOH and their catalytic performances for direct coal liquefaction[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(5):1892-1899.
[16]	SHAN X G, LI K J, ZHANG X W, et al.Reaction kinetic study on the heating stage of the Shenhua direct coal liquefaction process[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(3):2244-2249.
[17]	JIANG H B, WANG X H, SHAN X G, et al. Isothermal stage kinetics of direct coal liquefaction for Shenhua Shendong bituminous coal[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(11):7526-7531.
[18]	GAO S, ZHANG D, LI K. Effect of recycle solvent hydrotreatment on oil yield of direct coal liquefaction[J]. Energies, 2015, 8(7):6795-6805.
[19]	ITOH H, MASATAKE, KIDOGUCHI A, et al. Simulator for coal liquefaction based on the NEDOL process[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2001, 40(1):210-217.
[20]	KIDOGUCHI A, ITOH H, HIRAIDE M, et al. Simulator of initial stage reactions in the direct coal liquefaction of sub-bituminous coals[J]. Fuel, 2001, 80(9):1325-1331.
[21]	WISER W H. Some chemical aspects of the conversion of coal to liquid and gaseous fuels[C]//Proceedings of the Electric Power Research Institute Conference on Coal Catalysis. California:Santa Monica, 1973.
[22]	VAHRMAN M. Smaller molecules derived from coal and their significance[J]. Fuel, 1970, 49(1):5-16.
[23]	RAMDOSS PRAKASH K, TARRER A R. Kinetic model development for single-stage coal coprocessing with petroleum waste[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 1997, 51(1/2):83-100.
[24]	李文华, 霍卫东, 舒歌平, 等. 马家塔煤及其显微组分的加氢液化特征[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2001, 29(2):104-107.LI W H, HUO W D, SHU G P, et al. Hydroliquefaction characteristics of Majiata coal and its macerals components[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2001, 29(2):104-107.
[25]	IKEDA K, SAKAWAKI K, NOGAMI Y, et al. Kinetic evaluation of progress in coal liquefaction in the 1 t·d-1 PSU for the NEDOL process[J]. Fuel, 2000, 79(3/4):373-378.
[26]	王建平, 许先焜, 翁惠新, 等. 加氢渣油催化裂化14集总动力学模型的建立[J]. 化工学报, 2007, 58(1):86-94.WANG J P, XU X K, WENG H X, et al. Establishment of 14 lumps model for fluid catalytic cracking of hydro treated residuum[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2007, 58(1):86-94.
[27]	张红梅, 尹云华, 徐春明, 等. 大庆重石脑油蒸汽热裂解集总动力学模型[J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60(11):2743-2748.ZHANG H M, YIN Y H, XU C M, et al. Establishment of 10 lumps kinetic mode l for Daqing heavy naphtha pyrolysis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2009, 60(11):2743-2748.
[28]	徐士良. FORTRAN常用算法程序集[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 1997:317-321.XU S L. FORTRAN Algorithms Procedures Set[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 1997:317-321.
[29]	蒋金山, 何春雄, 潘少华. 最优化计算方法[M]. 广州:华南理工大学出版社, 2007:10-20.JIANG J S, HE C X, PAN S H. Optimization Computation Method[M]. Guangzhou:South China University of Technology Press, 2007:10-20.