石油企业HP40Nb钢制氢转化炉炉管破裂分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.z1.024

化工学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (S1): 159-164.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.z1.024

石油企业HP40Nb钢制氢转化炉炉管破裂分析

孙长海¹, 郭林海², 马海涛², 吴彦¹

1. 大连理工大学电气工程学院, 辽宁大连 116024;
2. 大连理工大学材料科学与工程学院, 辽宁大连 116024

收稿日期:2013-12-02 修回日期:2013-12-07 出版日期:2013-12-30 发布日期:2013-12-30
通讯作者: 孙长海(1967—)，男，博士。
作者简介:孙长海(1967—)，男，博士。
基金资助:
中石油创新基金项目(2011D-5006-0402)。

Analyze on rupture HP40Nb steel tubes from hydrogen production reformer furnace of petroleum company

SUN Changhai¹, GUO Linhai², MA Haitao², WU Yan¹

1. School of Electrical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China;
2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China

Received:2013-12-02 Revised:2013-12-07 Online:2013-12-30 Published:2013-12-30
Supported by:
supported by the Petro China Innovation Fund (2011D-5006-0402).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用宏观检查、化学成分分析、金相组织、扫描电子显微镜、力学性能测试方法对某石油公司制氢车间试车运行仅18 h即发生破裂的HP40Nb钢制氢转化炉炉管进行了分析。结果表明：炉管破裂失效的主要原因是高温蠕变破裂，严重超温是导致蠕变发生的直接原因。

关键词: 制氢, 石油, 显微组织, 蠕变, 超温, 破裂

Abstract: Hydrogen production reformer furnace tubes made of cast austenitic alloy steels serve in the temperature range of 1073—1173 K and pressure around 3—4 MPa. Though the design life is about 100000 h, premature failures within 3—8 years are more common, mainly caused by premature creep induced by overheating. The cast tube material undergoes microstructural changes with service exposure and as a consequence, degradation in strength. The methods of macro inspection,chemical analysis, microstructure, scanning electron microscope and mechanical properties testing were used to analyze on the rupture HP40Nb steel tubes from a hydrogen production reformer furnace of one petroleum company when they were used only 18 h during the test run.The rupture life was very short and needed to find the reason, in case the similar incidents. The results show that the reason of failure for the furnace tubes is high temperature creep rupture and over temperature seriously is the direct reason.

Key words: hydrogen production, petroleum, microstructure, creep, over temperature, rupture

中图分类号:

孙长海, 郭林海, 马海涛, 吴彦. 石油企业HP40Nb钢制氢转化炉炉管破裂分析[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(S1): 159-164.

SUN Changhai, GUO Linhai, MA Haitao, WU Yan. Analyze on rupture HP40Nb steel tubes from hydrogen production reformer furnace of petroleum company[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(S1): 159-164.

参考文献 19

[1]	Du Zhongqiang(杜中强).Application of the new hydrogen reformer [J].Petro-chemical Equipment Technology(石油化工设备技术),2005, 26(2):40-41
[2]	Wang W Z, Xuan F Z, Wang Z D, Wang B, LiuJ C. Effect of overheating temperature on the microstructure and creep behavior of HP40Nb alloy[J].Mater.Des.,2011,32: 4010-4016
[3]	Chris M, Clement I, John D. Failure analysis and creep remaining life of hydrogen reformer outlet pigtail tubes [J].Eng.Fail.Anal., 2008, 15:1076-1087
[4]	Shipley D G. Creep damage in reformer tubes[J]. Int. J. Press. Ves. Piping., 1983, 14:21-34
[5]	Project report No. CIEP/2006/SSP9302[R].National Metallurgical Laboratory, Jamshedpur, India, 2006
[6]	Baldev Raj, et al. Pressure Vessels and Piping:Manufacturing and Performance [M]. Oxford: Alpha Science International Ltd., 2009
[7]	Dehmolaei R, Shamanian M, Kermanpur A. Improving weld ability of aged 25Cr-35Ni heat resistant steel/alloy 800 dissimilar welds [J]. Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining.,2007, 12:586-592
[8]	Project report No. CIEP/SSP/2001/0115[R]. National Metallurgical Laboratory, Jamshedpur, India, 2001
[9]	Project report No. CIEP/SSP/2003/0141[R].National Metallurgical Laboratory, Jamshedpur, India 2003
[10]	Report No.CIEP/SSP/1999/077[R].National Metallurgical Laboratory, Jamshedpur, India, 2000
[11]	Tawancy H M, Ul Hamid A, Mohammed A I, Abbas N M. Failure analysis of catalytic steam reformer tubes[J]. Anti. Corros. Method. Mater., 2005, 52:337-339
[12]	de Almeida L H, Ribeiro A F, May I L. Microstructural characterization of modified 25Cr-35Ni centrifugally cast steel furnace tubes [J].Mater. Charact., 2003, 49:219-229
[13]	Abdul W A, Kral M V. 3D analysis of creep voids in hydrogen reformer tubes [J].Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 412:222-229
[14]	Abdul W A, Hutchinsonb C R, Kral M V. A three-dimensional characterization of creep void formation in hydrogen reformer tubes [J]. Scripta. Mater.,2006,55:69-73
[15]	Ribeiro A F, de Almeida L H, Dos Santos D S, Fruchart D, Bobrovnitchii G S. Microstructural modifications induced by hydrogen in a heat resistant steel type HP-45 with Nb and Ti additions[J]. J. Alloys. Compd.,2003, 356-357:693-696
[16]	Aydin I, Buehler H E, Rahmel A. Precipitation in the heat resistant nickel-base cast alloys G-NiCr 28 W and G-NiCr 50Nb [J]. Arch. Eisenhuettenwes,1983, 54(11):461-466
[17]	Chen Nianjin(陈年金). Life prediction of interaction between creep and fatigue in high temperature[D].Hangzhou: Zhejiang University of Technology,2006
[18]	Kong Xiangjun(孔祥军),Tao Sida(陶思达).The safety assessment and residual life prediction of furnace tubes [J].Journal of Petrochemical Universities(石油化工高等学校学报),2011,24(4):88-90, 94
[19]	Wang Min(王敏).Cause analysis and control measures that affect the life of reformer tubes [J].Fertilizer Design(化肥设计),2008,46(4):48-49

石油企业HP40Nb钢制氢转化炉炉管破裂分析

Analyze on rupture HP40Nb steel tubes from hydrogen production reformer furnace of petroleum company

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	黄琮琪, 吴一梅, 陈建业, 邵双全. 碱性电解水制氢装置热管理系统仿真研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 320-328.
[2]	林典, 江国梅, 徐秀彬, 赵波, 刘冬梅, 吴旭. 硅基类液防原油黏附涂层的研制及其减阻性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3438-3445.
[3]	刘爽, 张霖宙, 许志明, 赵锁奇. 渣油及其组分黏度的分子层次组成关联研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3226-3241.
[4]	周小文, 杜杰, 张战国, 许光文. 基于甲烷脉冲法的Fe₂O₃-Al₂O₃载氧体还原特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2611-2623.
[5]	李勇, 高佳琦, 杜超, 赵亚丽, 李伯琼, 申倩倩, 贾虎生, 薛晋波. Ni@C@TiO₂核壳双重异质结的构筑及光热催化分解水产氢[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2458-2467.
[6]	张生安, 刘桂莲. 高效太阳能电解水制氢系统及其性能的多目标优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1260-1274.
[7]	张家庆, 蒋榕培, 史伟康, 武博翔, 杨超, 刘朝晖. 煤基/石油基火箭煤油高参数黏温特性与组分特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 653-665.
[8]	宋悦, 张启成, 彭文朝, 李阳, 张凤宝, 范晓彬. MoS₂基单原子催化剂的合成及其在电催化中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 535-545.
[9]	黄宽, 马永德, 蔡镇平, 曹彦宁, 江莉龙. 油脂催化加氢转化制备第二代生物柴油研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 380-396.
[10]	李彩风, 王晓, 李岗建, 林军章, 汪卫东, 束青林, 曹嫣镔, 肖盟. 嗜烃乳化菌SL-1与内源菌协同驱油的菌群作用关系研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4095-4102.
[11]	戚新刚, 路利波, 陈渝楠, 葛志伟, 郭烈锦. 造纸黑液超临界水气化制氢与高附加值化学品回收研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3338-3354.
[12]	徐振和, 李泓江, 高雨, 礼峥, 张含烟, 徐宝彤, 丁茯, 孙亚光. In₂O₃/Ag：ZnIn₂S₄“Type Ⅱ”型异质结构材料的制备及可见光催化性能[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3625-3635.
[13]	王沛, 魏荣阔. 光热驱动多孔氧化铈热化学循环解水制氢非热质平衡模型[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2885-2894.
[14]	刘晓涯, 王金超, 刘莹, 马敬环. 水合肼制氢纳米催化剂改性制备及机理研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2819-2834.
[15]	钱宇, 陈耀熙, 史晓斐, 杨思宇. 太阳能波动特性大数据分析与风光互补耦合制氢系统集成[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 2101-2110.