基于VFAs抑制系数的ABR基质降解与产甲烷预测模型

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160043

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (7): 2979-2986.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160043

基于VFAs抑制系数的ABR基质降解与产甲烷预测模型

施恩¹, 李建政¹, 马天楠²

1. 哈尔滨工业大学城市水资源与水环境国家重点实验室, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150090;
2. 中冶京诚工程技术有限公司, 北京 100176

收稿日期:2016-01-11 修回日期:2016-03-21 出版日期:2016-07-05 发布日期:2016-07-05
通讯作者: 李建政
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51478141）；国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项项目（2013ZX07201007）。

Modeling of substrate degradation and methane production in anaerobic baffled reactor based on inhibition parameter of volatile fatty acids

SHI En¹, LI Jianzheng¹, MA Tiannan²

1. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, China;
2. Capital Engineering &Research Incorporation Ltd., Beijing 100176, China

Received:2016-01-11 Revised:2016-03-21 Online:2016-07-05 Published:2016-07-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51478141) and the Water Pollution Control and Treatment of National Science and Technology Major Project (2013ZX07201007).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用Andrews模型构建了4格室厌氧折流板反应器（ABR）的基质降解动力学模型，并将其与甲烷发酵的化学计量学耦合，构建出有机废水产甲烷预测模型。在HRT 40 h、35℃和进水COD分阶段从2000提高到8000 mg·L^-1条件下，校准的Andrews模型能准确模拟COD在系统中的变化规律，通过拟合得出的最大比基质去除速率（k）和饱和常数（K_s）在不同进水COD浓度下均为2 d^-¹和100 mg COD·L^-1，而挥发性脂肪酸（VFAs）对甲烷发酵的抑制系数（K_i）随进水COD的提高而增大。VFAs的当量COD在第1格室接近或高于K_i，对甲烷发酵抑制明显；而在后3格室低于K_i且逐格降低，抑制甲烷发酵的作用越来越小。第1~第4格室的甲烷产量实测值分别为1.12~6.42, 2.54~8.96, 1.24~4.48和0.16~0.58 L·d^-¹，而构建的产甲烷预测模型能够准确预测这一变化趋势。校准的Andrew模型和甲烷预测模型可为ABR的设计与调控运行提供指导。

关键词: 厌氧折流板反应器, 废水, 基质降解, 甲烷, 反应动力学, 化学计量学, 模型预测控制

Abstract:

A 4-compartment anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) was operated for organic wastewater treatment at a constant hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 40 h and temperature of 35°C, with the influent COD increased from 2000 to 8000 mg·L^-1 stage by stage. Based on the reactor performance, Andrews model was constructed firstly for substrate degradation in the ABR. And then a prediction model for methane production was constructed by combining the stoichiometry of methane fermentation with the developed substrate degradation model. The results showed that the simulated COD of the calibrated Andrews model was well agreed with the measured data in the ABR. The experimental data were used to calibrate the dynamics parameters. k as the estimated maximum specific substrate degradation rate and K_s as the semi-saturation constant were kept at 2 d^-1 and 100 mg COD·L^-1, respectively, though the influent COD increased by stages. On the contrary, K_ias the inhibition parameter of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) rose following the increased influent COD. With a COD of 2000, 4000, 6000 and 8000 mg·L^{-1 in influent, K}_i was counted for 1500, 1700, 4000 and 6000 mg COD·L^-1, respectively. The equivalent COD of VFAs in the first compartment was close to or higher than the estimated K_i, indicating that a serious inhibition of VFAs to methane fermentation had occurred. Meanwhile, the equivalent COD in the last 3 compartments was lower than their K_i and showed a decreasing trend, suggesting that the inhibitory effect of VFAs on methane fermentation became weaker compartment by compartment. The methane production in the 4 compartments was ranged from 1.12—6.42, 2.54—8.96, 1.24—4.48 and 0.16—0.58 L·d^-¹, respectively, and the developed model could predict the measured data very well. The calibrated Andrew model and the prediction model for methane production would provide an approach to the design and operation control of ABRs.

Key words: anaerobic baffled reactor, waste water, substrate degradation, methane, reaction kinetics, stoichiometry, model-predictive control

中图分类号:

X703.1

施恩, 李建政, 马天楠. 基于VFAs抑制系数的ABR基质降解与产甲烷预测模型[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(7): 2979-2986.

SHI En, LI Jianzheng, MA Tiannan. Modeling of substrate degradation and methane production in anaerobic baffled reactor based on inhibition parameter of volatile fatty acids[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(7): 2979-2986.

参考文献 24

[1]	LETTINGA G, FIELED J, VAN LIER J. Advanced anaerobic wastewater treatment in the near future [J]. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 35 (10): 5-12.
[2]	BACHMANN A, BEARD V L, MCCARTY P L. Performance characteristics of the anaerobic baffled reactor [J]. Water Research, 1985, 19 (1): 99-106.
[3]	BARBER W P, STUCKEY D C. The use of the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for wastewater treatment: a review [J]. Water Research, 1999, 33 (7): 1559-1578.
[4]	郑国臣, 李建政, 昌盛, 等. ABR发酵系统运行特性及产氢效能研究 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, (1): 75-81. ZHENG G C, LI J Z, CHANG S, et al. Characteristics and hydrogen production efficiency in anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) system [J]. China Environmental Science, 2013, (1): 75-81.
[5]	NACHAIYASIT S, STUCKEY D C. The effect of shock loads on the performance of an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) (1): Step changes in feed concentration at constant retention time [J]. Water Research, 1997, 31 (11): 2737-2746.
[6]	FENG J, WANG Y, JI X, et al. Performance and bioparticle growth of anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) fed with low-strength domestic sewage [J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2015, 9 (2): 352-364.
[7]	李建政, 朱葛夫, 欧阳红, 等. 利用厌氧折流反应系统进行有机废水发酵制氢 [J]. 化工学报, 2004, 55 (S1): 70-74. LI J Z, ZHU G F, OUYANG H, et al. Hydrogen production by organic wastewater fermentation in anaerobic baffled reactor [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2004, 55 (S1): 70-74.
[8]	BACHMANN A, BEARS V L, MCCARTY P L. Performance characteristics of the anaerobic baffled reactor[J]. Water Research, 1985, 19 (1): 99-106.
[9]	NACHAIYASIT S. The effect of process parameters on reactor performance in an anaerobic baffled reactor [D]. London: Imperial College, 1995.
[10]	苏鸿洋, 夏雪芬, 张亚雷, 等. 常温下ABR反应器处理低浓度有机废水降解动力学 [J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60 (10): 2614-2620. SU H Y, XIA X F, ZHANG Y L, et al. Kinetics of dilute wastewater treatment with anaerobic baffled reactor at ambient temperature [J]. CIESC Journal, 2009, 60 (10): 2614-2620.
[11]	ANDREWS J F. Kinetics and characteristics of volatile acid production in anaerobic fermentation process[J]. Air and Water Pollution, 1965, 9 (6): 17-28.
[12]	ANDREWS J F. Dynamic modeling of anaerobic digestion process [J]. Journal of Sanitary Engineering, 1969, 5 (2): 95-102.
[13]	王存政, 李建萍, 黄继国, 等. ABR反应器基质降解动力学有关参数的试验研究 [J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2004, 34 (B10): 149-151. WANG C Z, LI J P, HUANG J G, et al. Experimental study on substrate degradation kinetics parameters in ABR [J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2004, 34 (B10): 149-151.
[14]	国家环境保护部. 水与废水检测分析方法 [M]. 4版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002. Ministry of Environmental Protection. Detection and Analysis Method of Water and Wastewater [M]. 4th ed. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2002.
[15]	FENG H, HU L, MAHMOOD Q, et al. Anaerobic domestic wastewater treatment with bamboo carrier anaerobic baffled reactor [J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2008, 62 (3): 232-238.
[16]	BORZACCONI L, LAPEZ I, ANIDO C. Hydrolysis constant and VFA inhibition in acidogenic phase of MSW anaerobic degradation [J]. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 36 (6/7): 479-484.
[17]	HALLENBECK P C. Microbial Technologies in Advanced Biofuels Production [M]. New York: Springer, 2012: 127-142.
[18]	张亚雷, 周雪飞, 赵建夫, 等. 厌氧消化数学模型 [M]. 上海: 同济大学出版社, 2004. ZHANG Y L, ZHOU X F, ZHAO J F, et al. Anaerobic Digestion Model No.1 [M]. Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 2004.
[19]	李建政, 叶菁菁, 王卫娜, 等. 制糖废水CSTR甲烷发酵系统的污泥驯化与运行特征 [J]. 科技导报, 2008, 26 (10): 55-60. LI J Z, YE J J, WANG W N, et al. Acclimation of methane-fermenting anaerobic flocs in a continuous flow stirred tank reactor for treating beet-sugar processing wastewater [J]. Science and Technology Review, 2008, 26 (10): 55-60.
[20]	吴美容, 张瑞, 周俊, 等. 温度对产甲烷菌代谢途径和优势菌群结构的影响 [J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65 (5): 1602-1606. WU M R, ZHANG R, ZHOU J, et al. Effect of temperature on methanogens metabolic pathway and structures of predominant bacteria [J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65 (5): 1602-1606.
[21]	王晋. 厌氧发酵产酸微生物种群生态及互营关系研究 [D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2013. WANG J. Research of microbial community ecology and the trophic link during acidogenic fermentation [D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2013.
[22]	KUSCU O S, SPONZA D T. Performance of anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) treating synthetic wastewater containing p-nitrophenol [J]. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2005, 36: 888-895.
[23]	OZDEMIR S, CIRIK K, AKMAN D, et al. Treatment of azo dye-containing synthetic textile dye effluent using sulfidogenic anaerobic baffled reactor [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 146: 135-143.
[24]	JI G D, SUN T H, HI J R, et al. Anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for treating heavy oil produced water with high concentrations of salt and poor nutrient [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100: 1108-1114.

基于VFAs抑制系数的ABR基质降解与产甲烷预测模型

Modeling of substrate degradation and methane production in anaerobic baffled reactor based on inhibition parameter of volatile fatty acids

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 24

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[2]	杨百玉, 寇悦, 姜峻韬, 詹亚力, 王庆宏, 陈春茂. 炼化碱渣湿式氧化预处理过程DOM的化学转化特征[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3912-3920.
[3]	杨欣, 彭啸, 薛凯茹, 苏梦威, 吴燕. 分子印迹-TiO₂光电催化降解增溶PHE废水性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3564-3571.
[4]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[5]	张蒙蒙, 颜冬, 沈永峰, 李文翠. 电解液类型对双离子电池阴阳离子储存行为的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3116-3126.
[6]	刘晓洋, 喻健良, 侯玉洁, 闫兴清, 张振华, 吕先舒. 螺旋微通道对掺氢甲烷爆轰传播的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3139-3148.
[7]	牛超, 沈胜强, 杨艳, 潘泊年, 李熠桥. 甲烷BOG喷射器流动过程计算与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2858-2868.
[8]	周小文, 杜杰, 张战国, 许光文. 基于甲烷脉冲法的Fe₂O₃-Al₂O₃载氧体还原特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2611-2623.
[9]	张艳梅, 袁涛, 李江, 刘亚洁, 孙占学. 高效SRB混合菌群构建及其在酸胁迫条件下的性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2599-2610.
[10]	张兰河, 赖青燚, 王铁铮, 关潇卓, 张明爽, 程欣, 徐小惠, 贾艳萍. H₂O₂对SBR脱氮效率和污泥性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2186-2196.
[11]	胡晗, 杨亮, 李春晓, 刘道平. 天然烟浸滤液水合物法储甲烷动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1313-1321.
[12]	禹进, 余彬彬, 蒋新生. 一种基于虚拟组分的燃烧调控化学作用量化及分析方法研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1303-1312.
[13]	闫新龙, 黄志刚, 胡清勋, 张新, 胡晓燕. Cu/Co掺杂多孔炭活化过硫酸盐降解水中硝基酚研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1102-1112.
[14]	彭晓婉, 郭笑楠, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8浆液法分离CH₄/N₂的双吸收-吸附塔工艺流程建模与模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 784-795.
[15]	陈晨, 杨倩, 陈云, 张睿, 刘冬. 不同氧浓度下煤挥发分燃烧的化学动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4133-4146.