柴油车DOC催化剂Pt/CeZrO2载体的制备及影响

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161535

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

分别用氢氧化钠（NaOH）、草酸（H₂C₂O₄）和碳酸钠（Na₂CO₃）为沉淀剂制备CeZrO₂固溶体，并以此为载体制备了Pt/CeZrO₂柴油车DOC催化剂，通过XRD、BET、H₂-TPR和催化氧化反应等手段对催化剂物理化学特性进行研究。结果发现，以NaOH作为沉淀剂制备的CeZrO₂固溶体比表面积大（68.8 m²·g^-1）、氧活动性强[表面氧耗氢量达1143 μmol·（g cat（^-1]，同时贵金属Pt在其表面高度分散，因此制得的Pt/CeZrO₂柴油车DOC催化剂催化效果好，特别是催化氧化碳氢化合物（C₃H₆），T₉₀比H₂C₂O₄和Na₂CO₃为沉淀剂制备的Pt/CeZrO₂催化剂降低了将近40℃。另外载体制备方式对催化剂抗硫性影响也十分显著。故选择一种合适的载体沉淀剂可使制得的DOC催化剂具备良好的活性及抗硫性。

关键词: 沉淀剂, 催化剂载体, CeZrO₂固溶体, 催化剂, Pt/CeZrO₂, 活性

Abstract:

CeZrO₂ solid solutions were prepared by co-precipitation method through adopting different precipitators (NaOH, H₂C₂O₄, Na₂CO₃), and as the support, a series of Pt/CeZrO₂ diesel oxidation catalysts was prepared. The physical and chemical properties were studied using the means of XRD, BET, H₂-TPR and catalytic oxidation reaction. The results showed that the CeZrO₂ solid solutions using NaOH as precipitant had the largest surface area(68.8 m²·g^-1), the most active oxygen[the H₂ consumption of the surface oxygen is 1143 μmol·(g cat)^-1] and the highest Pt dispersion on the surface, so the Pt/CeZrO₂-NaOH exhibited excellent catalytic activity. In particular, catalytic oxidation hydrocarbons (C₃H₆), the T₉₀ decreased about 40℃ than the Pt/CeZrO₂ catalyst prepared with H₂C₂O₄ or Na₂CO₃. Besides, the preparation methods also influenced tolerance to sulfur of the catalysts. So selecting a suitable carrier precipitant could make the DOC catalyst has good activity and sulfur-resistance.

Key words: precipitant, catalyst support, CeZrO₂ solid solutions, catalyst, Pt/CeZrO₂, reactivity

中图分类号:

O643.3
X511

黄海凤, 陈晓, 顾蕾, 徐琴琪, 占林军, 卢晗锋. 柴油车DOC催化剂Pt/CeZrO₂载体的制备及影响[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(4): 1390-1397.

HUANG Haifeng, CHEN Xiao, GU Lei, XU Qinqi, ZHAN Linjun, LU Hanfeng. Preparation and effect of Pt/CeZrO₂ diesel oxidation catalysts support[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(4): 1390-1397.

参考文献 30

[1]	LIU S, WU X, DUAN W, et al. Sulfation of Pt/Al2O3, catalyst for soot oxidation:high utilization of NO2, and oxidation of surface oxygenated complexes[J]. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 2013, s138/139(28):199-211.
[2]	黄海凤, 王庐云, 漆仲华, 等. 柴油尾气DOC催化剂Pt-Pd/CeO2的活性和抗硫性[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2013, 41(11):1401-1408.HUANG H F, WANG L Y, QI Z H, et al. Activity and sulfur resistance of Pt-Pd/CeO2 catalysts for the oxidation of diesel exhaust[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2013, 41(11):1401-1408.
[3]	代振宇, 李阳, 贺振富, 等. SO2对三效催化剂载体的毒化作用研究[J]. 石油学报(石油加工), 2006, 22(4):1-5. DAI Z Y, LI Y, HE Z F, et al. Study on the poisoning effects of SO2 on the support of three way catalyst[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 2006, 22(4):1-5.
[4]	KRÖCHER O, WIDMER M, Elsener M, et al. Adsorption and desorption of SOx on diesel oxidation catalysts[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(22):9847-9857.
[5]	黎维彬, 林缨, 张雨, 等. 含铂汽车尾气三效催化剂的研究[J]. 宁夏大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 22(2):199-200.LI W B, LIN Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Catalytic emission removal on the Pt only three-way catalysts[J]. Journal of Ningxia University (Natural Science Edition), 2001, 22(2):199-200.
[6]	FLOUTY R, ABI-AAD E, SIFFERT S, et al. Role of molybdenum against ceria sulphur poisoning in the combustion of soot particles and the oxidation of propene[J]. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 2003, 46(1):145-153.
[7]	计伟荣, 曾玉龙, 谭冶斌, 等. 载体酸碱性对镍基催化剂催化甘油水蒸汽重整制氢影响[J]. 浙江工业大学学报, 2013, 41(1):6-9.JI W R, ZENG Y L, TAN Y B, et al. Effect of acid-base properties of supports on catalytic performance of nickel catalysts for glycerol steam reforming[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology, 2013, 41(1):6-9.
[8]	刘迎新, 方艳艳, 李喜英, 等. 碳基固体酸负载铂双功能催化剂的制备及其对硝基苯加氢制对氨基苯酚催化性能的研究[J]. 浙江工业大学学报, 2013, 41(1):48-52.LIU Y X, FANG Y Y, LI X Y, et al. Preparation of carbon-based solid acid supported Pt bifunctional catalyst and its performance for nitrobenzene hydrogenation to p-aminophenol[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology, 2013, 41(1):48-52.
[9]	王建强, 王远, 刘双喜, 等. 柴油车氧化催化技术研究进展[J]. 科技导报, 2012, 30(25):68-73.WANG J Q, WANG Y, LIU S X, et al. Progress in diesel oxidation catalysts[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2012, 30(25):68-73.
[10]	LIU L C, URBANO D, RAUL A, et al. Generation of subnanometric platinum with high stability during transformation of a 2D zeolite into 3D[J]. Nature Materials, 2017, 16(1):132-138.
[11]	NAKATANI T, WAKITA T, OTA R, et al. Preparation of mixed oxide powders in the system CeO2-ZrO2-MOx (M=transition and rare earth metals) by coprecipitation method for the purification catalysts of automotive emission[J]. Journal of the Society of Japan, 2003, 111(2):3137-3141.
[12]	FORNASIERO P, KAŠPAR J, GRAZIANI M. On the rate determining step in the reduction of CeO2-ZrO2 mixed oxides[J]. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 1999, 22(1):L11-L14.
[13]	VLAIC G, MONTE R D, FORNASIERO P, et al. Redox property-local structure relationships in the Rh-loaded CeO2-ZrO2 mixed oxides[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1999, 182(2):378-389.
[14]	MUROYAMA H, ASAJIMA H, HANO S, et al. Effect of an additive in a CeO2-based oxide on catalytic soot combustion[J]. Applied Catalysis A:General, 2014, 489:235-240.
[15]	郑婷婷, 卢军, 赵云昆. 铈基氧化物储氧材料研究进展[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2013, 23(6):1575-1585.ZHENG T T, LU J, ZHAO Y K. Review on cerium-based composite oxides as oxygen storage materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2013, 23(6):1575-1585.
[16]	KAŠPAR J, FORNASIERO P. Structural properties and thermal stability of ceria-zirconia and related materials[J]. Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, 2002:217-241.
[17]	聂晓涛, 葛庆杰, 马现刚, 等. 铈锆固溶体的制备及其负载金催化剂的CO氧化性能[J]. 天然气化工(C1化学与化工), 2013, 38(3):6-11.NIE X T, GE Q J, MA X G, et al. Preparation of ceria-zirconia solid solution and CO oxidation performance Au/CexZr1-xO2 catalyst[J]. Natural Gas Chemical Industry, 2013, 38(3):6-11.
[18]	KIRICHENKO O A, GRAHAM G W, CHUN W, et al. Effect of coprecipitation conditions on the surface area, phase composition, and reducibility of CeO2-ZrO2-Y2O3, materials for automotive three-way catalysts[J]. Studies in Surface Science & Catalysis, 1998, 118(98):411-420.
[19]	ROSSIGNOL S, MADIER Y, DUPREZ D. Preparation of zirconia-ceria materials by soft chemistry[J]. Catalysis Today, 1999, 50(2):261-270.
[20]	谬文浩, 赵明, 陈耀强, 等. 不同沉淀剂对Ce0.65Zr0.35O2复合氧化物性能的影响[J]. 化学研究与应用, 2007, 19(6):657-659.MIU W H, ZHAO M, CH Y Q, et al. Capability of Ce0.65Zr0.35O2 complex oxides influenced by different precipitator[J]. Chemical Research and Application, 2007, 19(6):657-659.
[21]	王新平, 唐新硕. 沉淀剂对SO42-/ZrO2-NiO催化性能的影响[J]. 石油化工, 1996, 25(1):20-27.WANG X P, TANG X S. Effects of precipitants on the performance of SO42-/ZrO2-NiO catalysts[J]. Petrochemical Technology, 1996, 25(1):20-27.
[22]	阎忠君, 王京刚, 文明芬, 等. 不同沉淀剂对铈锆复合稀土氧化物性能的影响[J]. 北京化工大学学报, 2005, 32(3):9-12.YAN Z J, WANG J G, WENG M F, et al. The capability of CeO2-ZrO2 rare earth complex oxides influenced by different precipitators[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2005, 32(3):9-12.
[23]	卢晗锋, 黄金星, 周瑛, 等. 沉淀剂对Cu-Mn-Ce复合氧化物催化剂结构和性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(6):2105-2111.LU H F, HUAGN J X, ZHOU Y, et al. Effect of precipitants on structure and performance of Cu-Mn-Ce mixed oxide catalysts[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(6):2105-2111.
[24]	FORNASIERO P, DIMONTE R, RAO G R, et al. Rh-loaded CeO2-ZrO2 solid-solutions as highly efficient oxygen exchangers:dependence of the reduction behavior and the oxygen storage capacity on the structural-properties[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1995, 151(1):168-177.
[25]	KOZLOV A I, KIM D H, YEZERETS A, et al. Effect of preparation method and redox treatment on the reducibility and structure of supported ceria-zirconia mixed oxide[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2002, 209(2):417-426.
[26]	TENG M, LUO L, YANG X. Synthesis of mesoporous Ce1-xZrxO2(x=0.2-0.5) and catalytic properties of CuO based catalysts[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2009, 119(1):158-164.
[27]	张顺海, 蒋平平, 郭耘, 等. 氧化共沉淀法制备纳米级铈锆固溶体[J]. 中国稀土学报, 2003, 21(s2):64-66.ZHANG S H, JIANG P P, GUO Y, et al. Nanocrystal ceria-zirconia solid solution prepared by oxidation-coprecipitation method[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Rare Earths, 2003, 21(s2):64-66.
[28]	FAN J, WU X D, LIANG Q, et al. Thermal ageing of Pt on low surface-area CeO2-ZrO2-La2O3 mixed oxides:effect on the OSC performance[J]. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 2008, 81(1):38-48.
[29]	TANG X L, ZHANG B C, SHEN W J. Structural features and catalytic properties of Pt/CeO2 catalysts prepared by modified reduction-deposition techniques[J]. Catalysis Letters, 2004, 97(3):163-169.
[30]	YU J, YIN F, WANG S, et al. Sulfur removal property of activated-char-supported Fe-Mo sorbents for integrated cleaning of hot coal gases[J]. Fuel, 2013, 108:91-98.

柴油车DOC催化剂Pt/CeZrO₂载体的制备及影响

Preparation and effect of Pt/CeZrO₂ diesel oxidation catalysts support

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[2]	陈杰, 林永胜, 肖恺, 杨臣, 邱挺. 胆碱基碱性离子液体催化合成仲丁醇性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3716-3730.
[3]	杨学金, 杨金涛, 宁平, 王访, 宋晓双, 贾丽娟, 冯嘉予. 剧毒气体PH₃的干法净化技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3742-3755.
[4]	杨菲菲, 赵世熙, 周维, 倪中海. Sn掺杂的In₂O₃催化CO₂选择性加氢制甲醇[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3366-3374.
[5]	李凯旋, 谭伟, 张曼玉, 徐志豪, 王旭裕, 纪红兵. 富含零价钴活性位点的钴氮碳/活性炭设计及甲醛催化氧化应用研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3342-3352.
[6]	杨欣, 彭啸, 薛凯茹, 苏梦威, 吴燕. 分子印迹-TiO₂光电催化降解增溶PHE废水性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3564-3571.
[7]	吕龙义, 及文博, 韩沐达, 李伟光, 高文芳, 刘晓阳, 孙丽, 王鹏飞, 任芝军, 张光明. 铁基导电材料强化厌氧去除卤代有机污染物：研究进展及未来展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3193-3202.
[8]	余娅洁, 李静茹, 周树锋, 李清彪, 詹国武. 基于天然生物模板构建纳米材料及集成催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2735-2752.
[9]	屈园浩, 邓文义, 谢晓丹, 苏亚欣. 活性炭/石墨辅助污泥电渗脱水研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3038-3050.
[10]	王杰, 丘晓琳, 赵烨, 刘鑫洋, 韩忠强, 许雍, 蒋文瀚. 聚电解质静电沉积改性PHBV抗氧化膜的制备与性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3068-3078.
[11]	李盼, 马俊洋, 陈志豪, 王丽, 郭耘. Ru/α-MnO₂催化剂形貌对NH₃-SCO反应性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2908-2918.
[12]	涂玉明, 邵高燕, 陈健杰, 刘凤, 田世超, 周智勇, 任钟旗. 钙基催化剂的设计合成及应用研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2717-2734.
[13]	张琦钰, 高利军, 苏宇航, 马晓博, 王翊丞, 张亚婷, 胡超. 碳基催化材料在电化学还原二氧化碳中的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2753-2772.
[14]	张谭, 刘光, 李晋平, 孙予罕. Ru基氮还原电催化剂性能调控策略[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2264-2280.
[15]	王辰, 史秀锋, 武鲜凤, 魏方佳, 张昊虹, 车寅, 吴旭. 氧化还原法制备Mn₃O₄催化剂及其甲苯催化氧化性能与机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2447-2457.