催化基底表面亲水改性对氢气催化氧化效率影响的密度泛函研究

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180562

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (11): 4683-4692.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180562

• 催化、动力学与反应器 • 上一篇下一篇

催化基底表面亲水改性对氢气催化氧化效率影响的密度泛函研究

肖钧尹¹, 喻啸晨¹, 唐伟强¹, 陶佳波¹, 赵双良¹, 刘洪来²

1. 化学工程联合国家重点实验室, 华东理工大学化工学院, 上海 200237;
2. 化学工程联合国家重点实验室, 华东理工大学化学与分子工程学院, 上海 200237

收稿日期:2018-05-28 修回日期:2018-07-09 出版日期:2018-11-05 发布日期:2018-11-05
通讯作者: 赵双良
基金资助:
霍英东教育基金会高等院校青年教师基金项目（151069）。

DFT study on effect of hydrophilic modification of catalyst on oxidation efficiency of hydrogen gas

XIAO Junyin¹, YU Xiaochen¹, TANG Weiqiang¹, TAO Jiabo¹, ZHAO Shuangliang¹, LIU Honglai²

1. State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry & Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China

Received:2018-05-28 Revised:2018-07-09 Online:2018-11-05 Published:2018-11-05
Supported by:
supported by the Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation for Young Teachers in Higher Education Institutions of China (151069).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

催化剂表面亲疏水性改性是一种常见的调控手段，其对催化剂催化活性、选择性和稳定性有着重要的影响。以氢气催化氧化转化为水为研究对象，从分子水平出发，通过多尺度密度泛函理论（DFT）计算了催化剂在不同程度的表面亲水改性后对水和氢气的吸附作用，并研究了吸附对于反应效率的影响。结果表明，随着表面亲水性的增强，催化剂表面对水吸附越来越多，而受体积排斥效应影响，氢气的吸附量越来越少。而对于同一催化剂表面，增大水分子的均相密度量可促进氢气在表面的吸附。该理论结果不仅很好地解释了催化剂表面亲水性对于催化活性的影响，且为表界面反应的效率调控与强化提供了思路。

关键词: 亲水性, 密度泛函, 吸附, 表面反应

Abstract:

Hydrophilic surface modification of the catalyst surface is a common regulation method, which has an important influence on the catalytic activity, selectivity and stability of the catalyst. In this study, the hydrogen-oxygen catalytic system was used as the research object, and the adsorption of hydrogen and water on different hydrophilic surfaces was calculated by multiscale density function theory (DFT) under molecular level. Finally, the effect of adsorption on reactive rate was studied. The results showed that the adsorption amount of water increased with more hydrophilic surface while the adsorption amount of hydrogen decreased. In addition, increasing bulk water density enhanced the adsorption of hydrogen on the surface. The above results not only explained the influence of hydrophilicity on the catalytic activity of the catalyst, but also had helpful guiding for the adjustment and enhancement of the surface reaction process.

Key words: hydrophilicity, density function theory, adsorption, surface reaction

中图分类号:

TQ013.1

肖钧尹, 喻啸晨, 唐伟强, 陶佳波, 赵双良, 刘洪来. 催化基底表面亲水改性对氢气催化氧化效率影响的密度泛函研究[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(11): 4683-4692.

XIAO Junyin, YU Xiaochen, TANG Weiqiang, TAO Jiabo, ZHAO Shuangliang, LIU Honglai. DFT study on effect of hydrophilic modification of catalyst on oxidation efficiency of hydrogen gas[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(11): 4683-4692.

参考文献 39

[1]	PENG Y H, WANG L B, LUO Q Q, et al. Molecular-level insight into how hydroxyl groups boost catalytic activity in CO2 hydrogenation into methanol[J]. Chem, 2018, 4(3):613-625.
[2]	GOUNDER R. Hydrophobic microporous and mesoporous oxides as bronsted and lewis acid catalysts for biomass conversion in liquid water[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2014, 4:2877-2886.
[3]	CANIVET J, AGUADO S, DANIEL C, et al. Engineering the environment of a catalytic metal-organic framework by postsynthetic hydrophobization[J]. Chemcatchem., 2011, 3(4):675-678.
[4]	SHI J, WANG Y D, YANG W M, et al. Recent advances of pore system construction in zeolite-catalyzed chemical industry processes[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2015, 44(24):8877-903.
[5]	YANG F, WANG B B, ZHOU S J, et al. Micropore-enriched CuO-based silica catalyst directly prepared by anionic template-induced method and its boosting catalytic activity in olefins epoxidation[J]. Microporous & Mesoporous Materials, 2017, 246:215-224.
[6]	RYBKA J, H LTZEL A, MELNIKOV S M, et al. A new view on surface diffusion from molecular dynamics simulations of solute mobility at chromatographic interfaces[J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2016, 76(9):4364-4369.
[7]	YU W, TAO J B, YU X H, et al. A microreactor with superhydrophobic Pt-Al2O3 catalyst coating concerning oxidation of hydrogen off-gas from fuel cell[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 185:1233-1244.
[8]	OMOTA F, DIMIAN A C, BLIEK A. Partially hydrophobized silica supported Pd catalyst for hydrogenation reactions in aqueous media[J]. Applied Catalysis A:General, 2005, 294(2):121-130.
[9]	HUANG G, YANG Q H, XU Q, et al. Polydimethylsiloxane coating for a palladium/MOF composite:highly improved catalytic performance by surface hydrophobization[J]. Angewandte Chemie, 2016, 128(26):7505-7509.
[10]	YAMASHITA H, KAWASAKI S, YUAN S, et al. Efficient adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants diluted in water using the fluoride-modified hydrophobic titanium oxide photocatalysts:Ti-containing beta zeolite and TiO2 loaded on HMS mesoporous silica[J]. Catalysis Today, 2007, 126(3):375-381.
[11]	SILVESTRE-ALBERO J, DOMINE M E, JORD J L, et al. Spectroscopic, calorimetric, and catalytic evidences of hydrophobicity on Ti-MCM-41 silylated materials for olefin epoxidations[J]. Applied Catalysis A:General, 2015, 507:14-25.
[12]	LIU F J, KONG W P, QI C Z, et al. Design and synthesis of mesoporous polymer-based solid acid catalysts with excellent hydrophobicity and extraordinary catalytic activity[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2012, 2(4):565-572.
[13]	NAKATSUKA K, MORI K, OKADA S, et al. Hydrophobic modification of Pd/SiO2@single-site mesoporous silicas by triethoxyfluorosilane:enhanced catalytic activity and selectivity for one-pot oxidation[J]. Chemistry, 2014, 20(27):8348-8354.
[14]	CAO S L, CHEN G H, HU X J, et al. Catalytic wet air oxidation of wastewater containing ammonia and phenol over activated carbon supported Pt catalysts[J]. Catalysis Today, 2003, 88(1/2):37-47.
[15]	CHOI W, KWON S, SHIN H D. Combustion characteristics of hydrogen-air premixed gas in a sub-millimeter scale catalytic combustor[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(9):2400-2408.
[16]	CHUANG K T, QUAIATTINI R J, THATCHER D R P, et al. Development of a wetproofed catalyst recombiner for removal ofairborne tritium[J]. Applied Catalysis, 1987, 30(2):215-224.
[17]	LIU J, WANG C L, GUO P, et al. Linear relationship between water wetting behavior and microscopic interactions of super-hydrophilic surfaces[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2013, 139(23):4703-1-4703-8.
[18]	LAIDLER K J. A glossary of terms used in chemical kinetics, including reaction dynamics (IUPAC Recommendations 1996)[J]. Pure & Applied Chemistry, 1996, 68(1):149-192.
[19]	TRAUTZ M. Das gesetz der reaktionsgeschwindigkeit und der gleichgewichte in gasen. bestätigung der additivität von Cv-3/2R. neue bestimmung der integrationskonstanten und der moleküldurchmesser[J]. Zeitschrift Für Anorganische Und Allgemeine Chemie, 1916, 96(1):1-28.
[20]	HOHENBERG P, KOHN W. Inhomogeneous electron gas[J]. Physical Review, 1964, 136(3B):B864-B871.
[21]	CURTIN W A, ASHCROFT N W. Weighted-density-functional theory of inhomogeneous liquids and the freezing transition[J]. Physical Review A, 1985, 32(5):2909-2919.
[22]	ROSENFELD Y. Free-energy model for the inhomogeneous hard-sphere fluid mixture and density-functional theory of freezing[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1989, 63(9):980-983.
[23]	YU Y X, WU J Z. A fundamental-measure theory for inhomogeneous associating fluids[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2002, 116(16):7094-7103.
[24]	YU Y X, WU J Z. Structures of hard-sphere fluids from a modified fundamental-measure theory[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2002, 117(22):10156-10164.
[25]	TANG Y P. First-order mean spherical approximation for inhomogeneous fluids[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2004, 121(21):10605-10610.
[26]	ZHAO S L, LIU Y, CHEN X Q, et al. Unified framework of multiscale density functional theories and its recent applications[J]. Advances in Chemical Engineering, 2015, 47:1-83.
[27]	ZHAO S L, RAMIREZ R, VUILLEUMIER R, et al. Molecular density functional theory of solvation:from polar solvents to water[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2011, 134(19):4102-1-4102-13.
[28]	GENDRE L, RAMIREZ R, BORGIS D. Classical density functional theory of solvation in molecular solvents:Angular grid implementation[J]. Chemical Physics Letters, 2009, 474(4):366-370.
[29]	YU X C, ZHANG J, ZHAO S L, et al. An investigation into the effect of gas adsorption on safety valve set pressure variations[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2018, 188:170-178.
[30]	STEELE W A. The physical interaction of gases with crystalline solids(Ⅰ):Gas-solid energies and properties of isolated adsorbed atoms[J]. Surface Science, 1973, 36(1):317-352.
[31]	DUIN A C T V, DASGUPTA S, LORANT F, et al. ReaxFF:a reactive force field for hydrocarbons[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2001, 105(41):9396-9409.
[32]	CHENOWETH K, DUIN A C T V, GODDARD W A. ReaxFF reactive force field for molecular dynamics simulations of hydrocarbon oxidation[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2008, 112(5):1040-1053.
[33]	FANTAUZZI D, MUELLER J E, SABO L, et al. Surface buckling and subsurface oxygen:atomistic insights into the surface oxidation of Pt(111)[J]. ChemPhysChem, 2015, 16(13):2797-2802.
[34]	FANTAUZZI D, BANDLOW J, SABO L, et al. Development of a ReaxFF potential for Pt-O systems describing the energetics and dynamics of Pt-oxide formation[J]. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16:23118-23133.
[35]	MIACHON S, SYAKAEV V V, RAKHMATULLIN A, et al. Higher gas solubility in nanoliquids?[J]. ChemPhysChem, 2010, 9(1):78-82.
[36]	RAKOTOVAO V, AMMAR R, MIACHON S, et al. Influence of the mesoconfining solid on gas oversolubility in nanoliquids[J]. Chemical Physics Letters, 2010, 485(4):299-303.
[37]	RATAJSKA-GADOMSKA B, GADOMSKI W. Influence of confinement on solvation of ethanol in water studied by Raman spectroscopy[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2010, 133(23):1775-5.
[38]	HO L N, CLAUZIER S, SCHUURMAN Y, et al. Gas uptake in solvents confined in mesopores:adsorption versus enhanced solubility[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2013, 4(14):2274-2278.
[39]	HO L N, SCHUURMAN Y, FARRUSSENG D, et al. Solubility of gases in water confined in nanoporous materials:ZSM-5, MCM-41, and MIL-100[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015, 119(37):21547-21554.

催化基底表面亲水改性对氢气催化氧化效率影响的密度泛函研究

DFT study on effect of hydrophilic modification of catalyst on oxidation efficiency of hydrogen gas

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[2]	杨学金, 杨金涛, 宁平, 王访, 宋晓双, 贾丽娟, 冯嘉予. 剧毒气体PH₃的干法净化技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3742-3755.
[3]	盛冰纯, 于建国, 林森. 铝基锂吸附剂分离高钠型地下卤水锂资源过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3375-3385.
[4]	张瑞航, 曹潘, 杨锋, 李昆, 肖朋, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8纳米流体天然气乙烷回收工艺的产品纯度关键影响因素分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[5]	高燕, 伍鹏, 尚超, 胡泽君, 陈晓东. 基于双流体喷嘴的磁性琼脂糖微球的制备及其蛋白吸附性能探究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3457-3471.
[6]	陈吉, 洪泽, 雷昭, 凌强, 赵志刚, 彭陈辉, 崔平. 基于分子动力学的焦炭溶损反应及其机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2935-2946.
[7]	王杰, 丘晓琳, 赵烨, 刘鑫洋, 韩忠强, 许雍, 蒋文瀚. 聚电解质静电沉积改性PHBV抗氧化膜的制备与性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3068-3078.
[8]	王新悦, 王俊杰, 曹思贤, 王翠, 李灵坤, 吴宏宇, 韩静, 吴昊. 玻璃内包材界面修饰对机械应力诱导的单克隆抗体聚集体形成的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2580-2588.
[9]	王蕾, 王磊, 白云龙, 何柳柳. SA膜状锂离子筛的制备及其锂吸附性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2046-2056.
[10]	陈韶云, 徐东, 陈龙, 张禹, 张远方, 尤庆亮, 胡成龙, 陈建. 单层聚苯胺微球阵列结构的制备及其吸附性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2228-2238.
[11]	蔺彩虹, 王丽, 吴瑜, 刘鹏, 杨江峰, 李晋平. 沸石中碱金属阳离子对CO₂/N₂O吸附分离性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2013-2021.
[12]	李辰鑫, 潘艳秋, 何流, 牛亚宾, 俞路. 基于碳微晶结构的炭膜模型及其气体分离模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2057-2066.
[13]	肖川宝, 李林洋, 刘武锋, 钟年丙, 解泉华, 钟登杰, 常海星. 光催化与离子交换吸附耦合有效去除2，4，6-三氯苯酚[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1587-1597.
[14]	潘煜, 王子航, 王佳韵, 王如竹, 张华. 基于可得然-氯化锂复合吸附剂的除湿换热器热湿性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1352-1359.
[15]	吴选军, 王超, 曹子健, 蔡卫权. 数据与物理信息混合驱动的固定床吸附穿透深度学习模型[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1145-1160.