鼓泡床中基于气泡结构的多相反应模型

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180020

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (5): 2057-2062.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180020

鼓泡床中基于气泡结构的多相反应模型

刘岑凡^1,2, 张楠², 王维²

1. 中国特种设备检测研究院质检总局特种设备安全与节能重点实验室, 北京 100029;
2. 中国科学院过程工程研究所多相复杂系统国家重点实验室, 北京 100190

收稿日期:2018-01-08 修回日期:2018-01-22 出版日期:2018-05-05 发布日期:2018-05-05
通讯作者: 刘岑凡
基金资助:
国家质量监督检验检疫总局科技计划项目（2016QK196）；国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0801906）。

Multiphase reaction model based on bubble structures in bubbling bed

LIU Cenfan^1,2, ZHANG Nan², WANG Wei²

1. Special Equipment Safety and Energy Conservation Key Laboratory of AQSIQ, China Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute, Beijing 100029, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2018-01-08 Revised:2018-01-22 Online:2018-05-05 Published:2018-05-05
Supported by:
supported by the Science and Technology Program of AQSIQ (2016QK196) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0801906).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

气固鼓泡床是一个流动、传热/传质和反应多尺度时空耦合的复杂系统。其中介尺度流动结构（如气泡）对于气固相间传递起着关键性的作用。为了准确描述气固流态化系统中的“三传一反”行为，需要在合理物理简化的基础上建立介尺度模型。提出了基于气泡结构的多流体反应模型，考虑了介尺度非均匀结构对于鼓泡床内气固相间反应的影响；定义了基于气泡的反应非均匀因子修正双流体（TFM）传质反应模型，从而使模型更加易用。通过鼓泡床内的臭氧催化分解反应模拟，对模型进行了初步验证，模拟结果与文献结果相符。

关键词: 多相流, 介尺度, EMMS, 流化床, 臭氧分解

Abstract:

Gas-solid bubbling beds embrace complexity coupled by flow, heat/mass transfer and reactions over a wide range of spatial-temporal scales, which meso-scale flow structure, e.g., bubble, plays a critical role on gas-solid transfer. It is necessary to build meso-scale model on the basis of reasonable physical simplification of real processes, for accurate interpretation of heat/mass/momentum transfer and reaction in gas-solid flow systems. A multi-fluid reaction model from bubble structures was proposed with a consideration of effects of non-uniform meso-scale structure on gas-solid reaction in bubbling bed. Further, the mass transfer and reaction model in the two fluid model (TFM) was modified by a defined heterogeneity reaction index, which made the model easier to use. Model was validated through simulation of ozone catalytic decomposition in bubbling bed, showing good agreement with literature data.

Key words: multiphase flow, meso-scale, EMMS, fluidized-bed, ozone decomposition

中图分类号:

TQ032.4

刘岑凡, 张楠, 王维. 鼓泡床中基于气泡结构的多相反应模型[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(5): 2057-2062.

LIU Cenfan, ZHANG Nan, WANG Wei. Multiphase reaction model based on bubble structures in bubbling bed[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(5): 2057-2062.

参考文献 31

[1]	郭慕孙, 李洪钟. 流态化手册[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2007. KWAUK M, LI H Z. Handbook of Fluidization[M]. Beijing:Chemical Industry Press, 2007.
[2]	金涌, 祝京旭, 俞芷青. 流态化工程原理[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2001. JIN Y, ZHU J X, YU Z Q. Fluidization Engineering Principles[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2001.
[3]	VERMA V, PADDING J T, DEEN N G. Effect of bed size on hydrodynamics in 3D gas-solid fluidized beds[J]. AIChE Journal, 2015, 61(5):1492-1506.
[4]	EVGENDIS S P, KARAPANTSIOS T D. Effects of bubble size on void fraction fluctuations in dispersed bubble flows[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2015, 75:163-173.
[5]	吴迎亚, 彭丽, 高金森, 等. 基于EMMS模型的气固鼓泡床的模拟及气泡特性的分析[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(8):3259-3267. WU Y Y, PENG L, GAO J S, et al. Numerical simulation of gas-solid bubbling bed and bubble characteristics based on EMMS drag model[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(8):3259-3267.
[6]	LU Y, HUANG J, ZHENG P. Flow structure and bubble dynamics in supercritical water fluidized bed and gas fluidized bed:a comparative study[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2015, 73:130-141.
[7]	ASEGEHEGN T W, SCHERIBER M, KRAUTZ H. J. Investigation of bubble behavior in fluidized beds with and without immersed horizontal tubes using a digital image analysis technique[J]. Powder Technology, 2011, 210(3):248-260.
[8]	LI J H, KWAUK M. Exploring complex systems in chemical engineering-the multi-scale methodology[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2003, 58(3):521-535.
[9]	WANG W, LI J H. Simulation of gas-solid two-phase flow by a multi-scale CFD approach-extension of the EMMS model to the sub-grid level[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62(1/2):208-231.
[10]	DONG W G, WANG W, LI J H. A multiscale mass transfer model for gas-solid riser flows (Ⅱ):Sub-grid simulation of ozone decomposition[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, 63(10):2811-2823.
[11]	DONG W G, WANG W, LI J H. A multiscale mass transfer model for gas-solid riser flows (Ⅰ):Sub-grid model and simple tests[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, 63(10):2798-2810.
[12]	LI J H, GE W, WANG W, et al. From Multiscale Modeling to Meso-science[M]. Berlin:Springer, 2013.
[13]	AGRAWAL K, LOEZOS P N, SYAMLAL M, et al. The role of meso-scale structures in rapid gas-solid flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 445:151-185.
[14]	IGCI Y, ANDREWS A T, SUNDARESAN S, et al. Filtered two-fluid models for fluidized gas-particle suspensions[J]. AIChE Journal, 2008, 54(6):1431-1448.
[15]	LI J H, KWAUK M. Particle-Fluid Two-Phase Flow-the Energy-Minimization Multi-Scale Method[M]. Beijing:Metallurgical Industry Press, 1994.
[16]	YANG N, WANG W, GE W, et al. Simulation of heterogeneous structure in a circulating fluidized-bed riser by combining the two-fluid model with the EMMS approach[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43(18):5548-5561.
[17]	LU B N, WANG W, LI J H. Searching for a mesh-independent sub-grid model for CFD simulation of gas-solid riser flows[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2009, 64(15):3437-3447.
[18]	HOU B L, LI H Z, ZHU Q S. Relationship between flow structure and mass transfer in fast fluidized bed[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 163(1/2):108-118.
[19]	HONG K, WANG W, ZHOU Q, et al. An EMMS-based multi-fluid model (EFM) for heterogeneous gas-solid riser flows(Ⅰ):Formulation of structure-dependent conservation equations[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2012, 75:376-389.
[20]	WANG J, GE W, LI J H. Eulerian simulation of heterogeneous gas-solid flows in CFB risers:EMMS-based sub-grid scale model with a revised cluster description[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, 63(6):1553-1571.
[21]	王维, 洪坤, 鲁波娜, 等. 流态化模拟:基于介尺度结构的多尺度CFD[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(1):95-106. WANG W, HONG K, LU B N, et al. Fluidized bed simulation:structure-dependent multiscale CFD[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(1):95-106.
[22]	SHI Z S, WANG W, LI J H. A bubble-based EMMS model for gas-solid bubbling fluidization[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(22):5541-5555.
[23]	HONG K, SHI Z S, WANG W, et al. A structure-dependent multi-fluid model (SFM) for heterogeneous gas-solid flow[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 99:191-202.
[24]	董卫刚. 循环流化床多尺度传质模型和CFD模拟[D]. 北京:中国科学院过程工程研究所, 2008. DONG W G. A multiscale mass transfer model and CFD simulation for circulating fluidized beds[D]. Beijing:Institute of Process Engineering, CAS, 2008.
[25]	LIU C, WANG W, ZHANG N, et al. Structure-dependent multi-fluid model for mass transfer and reactions in gas-solid fluidized beds[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015, 122:114-129.
[26]	JIANG P, BI H, JEAN R H, et al. Baffle effects on performance of catalytic circulating fluidized bed reactor[J]. AIChE Journal, 1991, 37(9):1392-1400.
[27]	FRYE C, LAKE W, ECKSTROM H. Gas-solid contacting with ozone decomposition reaction[J]. AIChE Journal, 1958, 4(4):403-408.
[28]	FRYER C, POTTER O E. Experimental investigation of models for fluidized bed catalytic reactors[J]. AIChE Journal, 1976, 22(1):38-47.
[29]	SUN G. Influence of particle size distribution and the performance of fluidized bed reactors[D]. Canada:The University of British Columbia, 1991.
[30]	OUYANG S, LIN J, POTTER O E. Ozone decomposition in a 0.254 m diameter circulating fluidized bed reactor[J]. Powder Technology, 1993, 74(1):73-78.
[31]	LI D, RAY A K, RAY M B, et al. Rotational asymmetry of reactant concentration and its evolution in a circulating fluidized bed riser[J]. Particuology, 2012, 10(5):573-581.

鼓泡床中基于气泡结构的多相反应模型

Multiphase reaction model based on bubble structures in bubbling bed

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[2]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[3]	董明, 徐进良, 刘广林. 超临界水非均质特性分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2836-2847.
[4]	杨峥豪, 何臻, 常玉龙, 靳紫恒, 江霞. 生物质快速热解下行式流化床反应器研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2249-2263.
[5]	郑志航, 马郡男, 闫子涵, 卢春喜. 提升管射流影响区内压力脉动特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2335-2350.
[6]	陈巨辉, 张谦, 舒崚峰, 李丹, 徐鑫, 刘晓刚, 赵晨希, 曹希峰. 基于DEM方法的旋转流化床纳米颗粒流动特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2374-2381.
[7]	张媛媛, 曲江源, 苏欣欣, 杨静, 张锴. 循环流化床燃煤机组SNCR脱硝过程气液传质和反应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2404-2415.
[8]	袁子涵, 王淑彦, 邵宝力, 谢磊, 陈曦, 马一玫. 基于幂律液固曳力模型流化床内湿颗粒流动特性的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2000-2012.
[9]	李新亚, 邢雷, 蒋明虎, 赵立新. 倒锥注气强化井下油水分离水力旋流器性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1134-1144.
[10]	颜少航, 赖天伟, 王彦武, 侯予, 陈双涛. 微间隙内R134a空化可视化实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1054-1061.
[11]	章承浩, 罗京, 张吉松. 微反应器内基于氮氧自由基催化剂连续氧气/空气氧化反应的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 511-524.
[12]	熊昊, 梁潇予, 张晨曦, 白浩隆, 范晓宇, 魏飞. 重质油直接制化工品：多级逆流下行催化裂解技术[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 86-104.
[13]	张东旺, 杨海瑞, 周托, 黄中, 李诗媛, 张缦. 生物质锅炉对流受热面积灰冷态模拟实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3731-3738.
[14]	刘新华, 韩振南, 韩健, 梁斌, 张楠, 胡善伟, 白丁荣, 许光文. 基于热解与燃烧反应重构的低NO _x 解耦燃烧原理与技术[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3355-3368.
[15]	王刚, 夏志豪, 李希艳, 张虹, 韩振南, 宋兴飞, 许光文. 不同气氛下流化床菱镁矿轻烧产物特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3699-3707.