磁场作用下不同润湿性表面结霜实验研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20200621

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究了在冷面温度T_w=-10℃和-30℃，环境相对湿度RH=60%和80%，3种润湿性表面在不同磁场强度下的结霜规律。通过可视化观测和图像二值化处理计算，分析了磁场强度和表面接触角对霜晶形态、水珠粒径、结晶时间、液滴和霜晶覆盖率、霜层厚度和密度的影响。结果表明：磁场作用下，疏水性表面水珠粒径减小40%左右，结晶时间延长500 s以上，凝结水珠分布更加稀疏；结霜厚度和密度随着磁场强度和接触角的增大而减小；随着冷面温度的降低和相对湿度的增大，表面特性和外加磁场对结霜过程的影响降低。

关键词: 磁场, 亲水/疏水表面, 相变, 传热, 热力学, 抑霜

Abstract:

The frosting laws of three kinds of wettable surfaces under different magnetic field strengths were studied under cold surface temperature T_w=-10℃ and -30℃, environmental relative humidity RH=60% and 80%. Through visual observation method,image binarization is processed and calculated,the effect of frost morphology,water droplets diameter,water droplets crystallization time,water droplets coverage,frost crystal coverage,frost layer thickness and frost density under the different magnetic field intensity and surface contact angle are well explained. The results showed that adding magnetic field in combination with hydrophobic surface,the diameter of water droplets decreases by about 40%, and the crystallization time is prolonged by more than 500 s,the distribution of condensate droplets is more sparse. Frost thickness and frost density decrease as the increase of magnetic field strength and surface contact angle,providing possibility of restrain the frosting effectively. As the temperature of the cold surface decreases and the relative humidity increases, the influence of the surface properties and the external magnetic field on the frosting process decreases.

Key words: magnetic field, hydrophilic/hydrophobic surface, phase change, heat transfer, thermodynamics, restrain frosting

中图分类号:

TK 123

宋立超,秦妍,李维仲. 磁场作用下不同润湿性表面结霜实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(12): 5521-5529.

SONG Lichao,QIN Yan,LI Weizhong. Experimental study of frosting on different wettability surfaces under magnetic field[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(12): 5521-5529.

图/表 15

图1 实验系统示意图

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of experimental setup

图2 结霜图片二值化示意图

Fig.2 Schematic diagram of frost image binarization

图3 3种表面结霜过程(B=0 Gs)

Fig.3 Frosting processes of three surfaces（B=0 Gs，Tw=-10℃，RH=60%）

图4 3种表面覆盖率对比(B=0 Gs)

Fig.4 Coverage comparison of three surfaces （B=0 Gs，Tw=-10℃，RH=60%）

图5 不同工况3种表面覆盖率对比(B=0 Gs)

Fig.5 Coverage comparison of three surfaces（B=0 Gs）

图6 3种表面结霜过程(B=180 Gs)

Fig.6 Frosting processes of three surfaces（B=180 Gs，Tw=-10℃，RH=60%）

图7 3种表面覆盖率对比(B=180 Gs)

Fig.7 Coverage comparison of three surfaces（B=180 Gs， Tw=-10℃，RH=60%）

图8 不同工况3种表面覆盖率对比(B=180 Gs)

Fig.8 Coverage comparison of three surfaces（B=180 Gs）

图9 3种表面结霜过程(B=380 Gs)

Fig.9 Frosting processes of three surfaces（B=380 Gs，Tw=-10℃，RH=60%）

图10 3种表面覆盖率对比(B=380 Gs)

Fig.10 Coverage comparison of three surfaces（B=380 Gs，Tw=-10℃，RH=60%）

图11 不同工况3种表面覆盖率对比(B=180 Gs)

Fig.11 Coverage comparison of three surfaces（B=380 Gs）

图12 亲水表面在不同磁场不同工况霜层厚度对比

Fig.12 Frosting thicknesses of hydrophilic surface with different magnetic field

图13 裸铝表面在不同磁场不同工况霜层厚度对比

Fig.13 Frosting thicknesses of bare aluminum surface with different magnetic field

图14 疏水表面在不同磁场不同工况霜层厚度对比

Fig.14 Frosting thicknesses of hydrophobic surface with different magnetic field

图15 不同工况3种表面结霜密度对比

Fig.15 Frosting density of three surfaces

参考文献 27

1	Zhang Y, Klittich M R, Gao M, et al. Delaying frost formation by controlling surface chemistry of carbon nanotube-coated steel surfaces[J]. Applied Materials and Interfaces, 2017, 9(7): 6512-6519.
2	Liu Z L, Dong Y W, Li Y X. An experimental study of frost formation on cryogenic surfaces under natural convection conditions[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 97: 569-577.
3	李丽艳, 刘中良, 赵玲倩, 等. 结霜初期无液核形成时的抑霜研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2019, 40(1): 198-203.
	Li L Y, Liu Z L, Zhao L Q, et al. Study on anti-frosting performance of hydrophobic surface without the appearance of water nuclei at the initial stage of frost formation[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2019, 40(1): 198-203.
4	孙玉清, 吴桂涛, 刘慧枝, 等. 抑制换热器湿空气侧结霜的研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 1997, 18(1): 95-98.
	Sun Y Q, Wu G T, Liu H Z, et al. Study on inhibiting frosting on wet air side of heat exchanger[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 1997, 18(1): 95-98.
5	吴晓敏, 单小丰, 王维城, 等. 冷表面结霜的微细观可视化研究[J]. 清华大学学报, 2003, 43(10): 1437-1440.
	Wu X M, Shan X F, Wang W C, et al. Meso-scale visual observation of frost formation on cold surfaces[J].J. Tsinghua Univ., 2003, 43(10): 1437-1440.
6	Jung S, Dorrestijin M, Raps D, et al. Are superhydrophobic surfaces best for icephobicity[J]. Langmuir, 2011, 27(6): 3059-3066.
7	He M, Wang J X, Li H L, et al. Super-hydrophobic film retards frost formation[J]. Soft Matter, 2010, 6: 2396-2399.
8	Boreyko J B, Collier C P. Delayed frost growth on jumping-drop superhydrophobic surfaces[J]. ACS Nano, 2013, 7(2): 1618-1627.
9	季银炼. 结霜前期纳米结构超疏水表面的凝结-冻结特性[J]. 中国表面工程, 2017, 30(6): 18-25.
	Ji Y L. Condensation and freezing characteristics of nano-structured superhydrophobic surface in early frosting stage[J]. China Surface Engineering, 2017, 30(6): 18-25.
10	Zheng S L, Li C, et al. Development of stable superhydrophobic coatings on aluminum surface for corrosion-resistant, self-cleaning, and anti-icing applications[J]. Materials and Design, 2016, 93: 261-270.
11	Wang Y, Cheng Y. Early stage condensation frosting characteristics on plain and nano Al2O3-epoxy mixture-coated brass[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 160: 113971.
12	Kreder M J, Alvarenga J, Kim P, et al. Design of anti-icing surfaces: smooth, textured or slippery? [J]. Nature Reviews Materials, 2016, 1: 1-15.
13	Farhadi S, Farzaneh M, Kulinich S A. Anti-icing performance of superhydrophobic surfaces[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2011, 257: 6264-6269.
14	Mok J H, Choi W, Park S H, et al. Emerging pulsed electric field (PEF) and static magnetic field (SMF) combination technology for food freezing[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2015, 50: 137-145.
15	邓波. 磁处理水的物理特性及其生物效应的研究[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2009.
	Deng B. The research on physical properties and bio effects of magnetized water[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2009.
16	蔡然, 杨宏伟, 和劲松, 等. 磁场处理对CaCl2溶液中水分子结构的影响[J]. 清华大学学报, 2010, 50(9): 1404-1407.
	Cai R, Yang H W, He J S, et al. Effect of magnetic field treatment on water molecular structure in CaCl2 solution[J]. J. Tsinghua University, 2010, 50(9): 1404-1407.
17	和劲松, 杨宏伟, 蔡然, 等. β-乳球蛋白在磁化水中的水合作用: 磁化处理对水分子缔合构造及蛋白质水合特性的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2010, 26(2): 304-310.
	He J S, Yang H W, Cai R, et al. Hydration of β-lactoglobulin in magnetized water: effect of magnetic treatment on the cluste structure of water and hydration properties of proteins[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2010, 26(2): 304-310.
18	朱元保, 颜流水, 曹祉祥, 等. 磁化水的物理化学性能[J]. 湖南大学学报, 1999, 26(1): 21-25.
	Zhu Y B, Yan L S, Cao Z X, et al. Physical and chemical properties of magnetized water[J]. Journal of Hunan University, 1999, 26(1): 21-25.
19	安燕, 刘云. 磁化水及其溶液表面性质的研究[J]. 贵州工业大学学报, 1998, (4): 103-106.
	An Y, Liu Y. Study on the surface properties of magnetized water and solution[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Technology, 1998, (4): 103-106.
20	勾昱君, 刘中良, 刘耀民, 等. 磁场对冷表面上结霜过程影响的实验研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2009, 30(3): 465-467.Gou Y J, Liu Z L, Liu Y M, et al. The study of frost formation under magnetic field[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2009, 30(3): 465-467.
21	单亮亮. 弱直流磁场作用下结霜的可视化研究[D]. 天津: 天津商业大学, 2018.
	Shan L L. Research on visualization of frosting under weak DC magnetic field[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University of Commerce, 2018.
22	He M. Super-hydrophobic surfaces to condensed micro-droplets at temperatures below the freezing point retard ice/frost formation[J]. Soft Matter, 2011, 7(8): 3993-4000.
23	Fatica N, Katz D L. Dropwise condensation[J]. Chemical Engineering Progress, 1949, 45(11): 661-674.
24	Hoke J L, Georgiadis J G, Jacobi A M. Effect of substrate wettability on frost properties[J]. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 2004, 18(2): 228-235.
25	徐文骥, 宋金龙, 孙晶, 等. 铝基体超疏水表面的抗结冰结霜效果分析[J].低温工程, 2010, (6): 11-15.
	Xu W J, Song J L, Sun J, et al. Research in ice and frost repellency of superhydrophobic surfaces on aluminum[J]. Cryogenics, 2010, (6): 11-15.
26	Cassie A, Baxter S. Wettability of porous surfaces[J]. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 1994, 40: 546-551.
27	吴晓敏, 王维城. 冷面结霜初始形态的理论分析[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2003, 24(2): 286-288.
	Wu X M, Wang W C. Theoretical analysis of initial behavior of frost formed on a cold surface[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2003, 24(2): 286-288.

[1]	杨欣, 王文, 徐凯, 马凡华. 高压氢气加注过程中温度特征仿真分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 280-286.
[2]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[3]	常明慧, 王林, 苑佳佳, 曹艺飞. 盐溶液蓄能型热泵循环特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 329-337.
[4]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[5]	张化福, 童莉葛, 张振涛, 杨俊玲, 王立, 张俊浩. 机械蒸汽压缩蒸发技术研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 8-24.
[6]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[7]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[8]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[9]	刘明栖, 吴延鹏. 导光管直径和长度对传热影响的模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 206-212.
[10]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[11]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[12]	吴延鹏, 刘乾隆, 田东民, 陈凤君. 相变材料与热管耦合的电子器件热管理研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 25-31.
[13]	胡建波, 刘洪超, 胡齐, 黄美英, 宋先雨, 赵双良. 有机笼跨细胞膜易位行为的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3756-3765.
[14]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.
[15]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.