刚柔组合搅拌桨强化流体混合的流固耦合行为

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20141571

化工学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (10): 3849-3856.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20141571

刚柔组合搅拌桨强化流体混合的流固耦合行为

朱俊¹, 周政霖¹, 刘作华^1,2, 郑雄攀¹, 刘仁龙¹, 陶长元¹, 王运东²

1 重庆大学化学化工学院, 重庆 400044;
2 清华大学化学工程系, 北京 100084

收稿日期:2014-10-22 修回日期:2015-04-20 出版日期:2015-10-05 发布日期:2015-10-05
通讯作者: 刘作华
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2012CBA01203);清华大学化学工程联合国家重点实验室开放课题(SKL-ChE-12A02);重庆市自然科学基金重点项目(CSTC2012JJB0006)。

Fluid-structure interaction in liquid mixing intensified by flexible-rigid impeller

ZHU Jun¹, ZHOU Zhenglin¹, LIU Zuohua^1,2, ZHENG Xiongpan¹, LIU Renlong¹, TAO Changyuan¹, WANG Yundong²

1 School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;
2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2014-10-22 Revised:2015-04-20 Online:2015-10-05 Published:2015-10-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2012CBA01203), the State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering (SKL-ChE-12A02) and the Key Natural Science Fund of Chongqing (CSTC2012JJB0006).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

传统刚性搅拌桨通过对流体的剪切作用实现能量的传递,而刚柔组合搅拌桨可通过其多体运动行为强化能量传递。基于搅拌桨桨叶与流体之间的耦合运动作用,结合ANSYS Workbench仿真平台,采用双向流固耦合方法,模拟计算了刚性搅拌桨与刚柔组合搅拌桨桨叶的等效应力和总变形量,研究了流场的宏观结构;并通过测定混合时间和计算搅拌桨功耗对比分析了两种不同搅拌体系的混合行为。结果表明:刚柔组合搅拌桨使体系的混合时间缩短了近32%,搅拌桨功耗下降了7%,其桨叶尖端的变形量是刚性搅拌桨的10⁵倍,其应力比刚性搅拌桨增加了83%;与刚性搅拌桨相比,刚柔组合搅拌桨在流固耦合作用下对流体的作用力更大,能够更好地传递能量,增强流体运动,强化流体混合。

关键词: 混合, 流体, 传递, 刚柔组合搅拌桨, ANSYS Workbench, 流固耦合

Abstract:

Traditional rigid impeller transfers energy by shearing action, while flexible-rigid impeller can intensify energy transfer by multiple-body movement. Based on the interaction between impeller and fluid, the equivalent stress and total deformation are computationally simulated for flexible-rigid and rigid impellers. Macroscopic flow structure is obtained by two-way fluid-structure interaction technique with simulation platform ANSYS Workbench, and the mixing effect in two stirred systems are discussed with measured mixing time and calculated impeller power dissipation. Compared with rigid impeller, the mixing time of flexible-rigid impeller system is decreased by 32%, its power dissipation is declined by 7%, its total deformation of blade tip is 10⁵ times larger, and its equivalent stress of blade tip is 83% greater, so that flexible-rigid impeller exerts greater force to fluid with the fluid-structure interaction, which contributes to energy transmission, liquid flow and mixing intensification.

Key words: mixing, fluid, transfer, flexible-rigid impeller, ANSYS Workbench, fluid-structure interaction

中图分类号:

TQ027.2

朱俊, 周政霖, 刘作华, 郑雄攀, 刘仁龙, 陶长元, 王运东. 刚柔组合搅拌桨强化流体混合的流固耦合行为[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(10): 3849-3856.

ZHU Jun, ZHOU Zhenglin, LIU Zuohua, ZHENG Xiongpan, LIU Renlong, TAO Changyuan, WANG Yundong. Fluid-structure interaction in liquid mixing intensified by flexible-rigid impeller[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(10): 3849-3856.

参考文献 23

[1]	Jin Zhaowen (靳兆文), Pan Jiazhen (潘家祯). New mixing impeller research [J]. Chemical Equipment and Technology (化工设备技术), 2004, 25(4): 10-13.
[2]	Liu Baoqing (刘宝庆), Zhang Yikun (张义堃), Liu Jingliang (刘景亮), Qin Fulei (秦福磊), Lin Xinghua (林兴华), Jin Zhijiang (金志江). Numerical simulation of power consumption and mixing characteristic in stirred vessel with novel coaxial mixer [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2013, 64(4): 1135-1144.
[3]	Wiggins S. Coherent structures and chaotic advection in three dimensions coherent structures and chaotic advection in three dimensions [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 654(10): 1-4.
[4]	Shekhar C, Nishino K, Yamane Y, Huang J. Stereo-PIV measurement of turbulence characteristics in a flow mixer [J]. Journal of Visualization, 2012, 15(4): 293-308.
[5]	Liu Fangfang (刘芳芳), Yang Canjun (杨灿军), Su Qi (苏琦), Wang Donghai (王东海), Zhang Yizhong (张译中). Simulation analysis and experimental research on the movements of biomimetic fin [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering (机械工程学报), 2010, 46(19): 24-29.
[6]	Zhang Chengbin (张程宾), Zhao Muwen (赵沐雯), Chen Yongping (陈永平), Shi Mingheng (施明恒). Effects of fluid density on velocity slip in nanochannels [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2012, 63(S1): 12-16.
[7]	Lee J, Lee S. Fluid-structure interaction for the propulsive velocity of a flapping flexible plate at low Reynolds number [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2013, 71(1): 348-374.
[8]	Gomes J P, Yight S, Lienhart H, Schafer M. Experimental and numerical study on a laminar fluid-structure interaction reference test case [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2011, 27(1): 43-61.
[9]	Antoci C, Gallati M, Sibilla S. Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction by SPH [J]. Computers and Structures, 2007, 85(1): 879-890.
[10]	Martino E S, Guadagni G, Fumero A, Ballerini G, Spirto R, Biglioli P, Redaelli A. Fluid-structure interaction within realastic three-dimensional models of the aneurysmatic aorta as a guidance to assess the risk of rupture of the aneurysm [J]. Med. Eng. Phys., 2001, 23(9): 647-655.
[11]	Munch C, Ausoni P, Braun O, Farhat M, Avellan F. Fluid-structure coupling for an oscillating hydrofoil [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2010, 26(6): 1018-1033.
[12]	Gao F, Guo Z, Sakamoto M, Matsuzawa T. Fluid-structure interaction within a layered aortic arch model [J]. J. Biol. Phys., 2006, 32(5): 435-454.
[13]	Young Y L. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of flexible composite marine propellers [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2008, 24(1): 799-818.
[14]	Young Y L. Time-dependent hydroelastic analysis of cavitating propulsors [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2003, 23(2): 269-295.
[15]	Bucchignani E, Stella F, Paglia F. A partition method for the solution of a coupled liquid-structure interaction problem [J]. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 2004, 51(4): 463-475.
[16]	Karry S, Driss Z, Kchaou H, Abid S. Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction in a stirred vessel equipped with an anchor impeller [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2011, 25(7): 1749-1760.
[17]	Huang Tiancheng (黄天成), Wang Deguo (王德国), Zhou Sizhu (周思柱), Wu Hanchuan (吴汉川), Zhu Keqiang (祝克强). Modal research of fluid-solid coupling for the blender truck mixing impeller [J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University: Science & Technology Edition (西南石油大学学报:自然科学版), 2012, 34(1): 165-170.
[18]	Liu Zuohua (刘作华), Zeng Qiqin (曾启琴), Wang Yundong (王运东), Liu Renlong (刘仁龙), Tao Changyuan (陶长元). Energy efficiency analysis for high-viscosity fluid mixing enhanced by flexible impeller [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2013, 64(10): 3620-3625.
[19]	Liu Zuohua (刘作华), Chen Chao (陈超), Liu Renlong (刘仁龙), Tao Changyuan (陶长元), Wang Yundong (王运东). Chaotic mixing enhanced by rigid-flexible impeller in stirred vessel [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2014, 65(1): 61-70.
[20]	Liu Zuohua (刘作华), Zeng Qiqin (曾启琴), Yang Xianyan (杨鲜艳), Liu Renlong (刘仁龙), Wang Yundong (王运东), Tao Changyuan (陶长元). Comparative study on flow field structure controlling between rigid-flexible combination impeller and rigid impeller [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2014, 65(6): 2078-2084.
[21]	Huang Nannan(黄男男). Analysis on flow field and structural optimization of fermentation stirred tank [D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2009.
[22]	Shi Litian (施力田), Gao Zhengming (高正明), Min Jian (闵健). Large eddy simulation for mixing time in stirred tank with dual Rushton turbines [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2010, 61(7): 1747-1752.
[23]	Zhou Guozhong (周国忠), Wang Yingchen (王英琛), Shi Litian (施力田). CFD study of mixing process in stirred tank [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2003, 54(7): 886-890.

刚柔组合搅拌桨强化流体混合的流固耦合行为

Fluid-structure interaction in liquid mixing intensified by flexible-rigid impeller

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[2]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[3]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[4]	谈莹莹, 刘晓庆, 王林, 黄鲤生, 李修真, 王占伟. R1150/R600a自复叠制冷循环开机动态特性实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 213-222.
[5]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[6]	赵佳佳, 田世祥, 李鹏, 谢洪高. SiO₂-H₂O纳米流体强化煤尘润湿性的微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3931-3945.
[7]	温凯杰, 郭力, 夏诏杰, 陈建华. 一种耦合CFD与深度学习的气固快速模拟方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3775-3785.
[8]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[9]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[10]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[11]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[12]	程小松, 殷勇高, 车春文. 不同工质在溶液除湿真空再生系统中的性能对比[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3494-3501.
[13]	汪尔奇, 彭书舟, 杨震, 段远源. 含HFO混合体系气液相平衡的理论模型评价[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3216-3225.
[14]	岳林静, 廖艺涵, 薛源, 李雪洁, 李玉星, 刘翠伟. 凹坑缺陷对厚孔板喉部空化流动特性影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3292-3308.
[15]	黄可欣, 李彤, 李桉琦, 林梅. 加装旋转叶轮T型通道流场的模态分解[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2848-2857.