自泵送机械密封与螺旋槽机械密封的性能比较

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160419

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (10): 4370-4377.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160419

自泵送机械密封与螺旋槽机械密封的性能比较

陆建花¹, 孙见君¹, 陈卫², 马晨波¹, 严彦¹

1 南京林业大学机械电子工程学院, 江苏南京 210037;
2 扬州秋源压力容器制造有限公司, 江苏扬州 225115

收稿日期:2016-04-05 修回日期:2016-05-10 出版日期:2016-10-05 发布日期:2016-10-05
通讯作者: 孙见君
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51375245，51505230）；江苏省自然科学基金项目（BK20130976）；扬州市工业前瞻性研究计划项目（YZ2014092）。

Performance comparison of self-pumping and spiral groove mechanical seals

LU Jianhua¹, SUN Jianjun¹, CHEN Wei², MA Chenbo¹, YAN Yan¹

1 School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China;
2 Yangzhou Qiu Yuan Pressure Vessel Manufacturing Limited Company, Yangzhou 225115, Jiangsu, China

Received:2016-04-05 Revised:2016-05-10 Online:2016-10-05 Published:2016-10-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51375245, 51505230), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20130976) and the Yangzhou City Industrial Prospective Study Program (YZ2014092).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

运用Fluent软件对泵入式自泵送机械密封与螺旋槽流体动压型机械密封进行三维流场动力学仿真分析，比较研究了两种流体动压型机械密封在不同几何参数和操作条件下的端面开启力和泄漏率。结果表明：在相同的结构和操作条件下，螺旋槽机械密封的动压效应和泄漏率均大于自泵送机械密封的相应值，其开启力与泄漏率的比值小于自泵送机械密封的相应值的比值；端面结构参数和转速对螺旋槽机械密封的开启力和泄漏率影响显著，对自泵送机械密封影响不明显。螺旋槽机械密封比自泵送机械密封在性能上具有更高的尺寸依赖性。

关键词: 机械密封, 模型, 数值模拟, 计算流体力学, 开启力, 泄漏率

Abstract:

3D flow field dynamics of two hydrodynamic mechanical seals of self-pumping and spiral groove, which were based on "pumping in" principle, were simulated by Fluent software. Sealing properties of opening force and leakage rate were compared on these two seals at various structural and operating parameters. The numerical simulation results showed that, at the same structure and operating condition, the spiral groove mechanical seal had higher hydrodynamic effect and leakage rate but lower ratio of opening force over leakage rate than self-pumping mechanical seal. In terms of seal performance of opening force and leakage rate, the impact of both transverse structure parameters and rotating speed were significant to spiral groove mechanical seal but insignificant to self-pumping mechanical seal. The performance of hydrodynamic mechanical seals is more dependent on dimensions for spiral groove mechanical seal than for self-pumping mechanical seal.

Key words: mechanical seals, model, numerical simulation, CFD, opening force, leakage rate

中图分类号:

TH136

陆建花, 孙见君, 陈卫, 马晨波, 严彦. 自泵送机械密封与螺旋槽机械密封的性能比较[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(10): 4370-4377.

LU Jianhua, SUN Jianjun, CHEN Wei, MA Chenbo, YAN Yan. Performance comparison of self-pumping and spiral groove mechanical seals[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(10): 4370-4377.

参考文献 20

[1]	GABRIEL R P. Fundamentals of spiral groove non-contacting face seals[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 1994, 50(3):215-224.
[2]	彭旭东, 王玉明, 黄兴, 等. 密封技术的现状与发展趋势[J]. 液压气动与密封, 2009, 29(4):4-11. PENG X D, WANG Y M, HUANG X, et al. State-of-the-art and future development of sealing technology[J]. Hydraulics Pneumatics & Seals, 2009, 29(4):4-11.
[3]	于新奇, 王振辉, 蔡仁良. 动压型机械密封技术的应用和发展[J]. 流体机械, 2005, 33(8):28-32. YU X Q, WANG Z H, CAI R L. Application and development of hydrodynamic mechanical seal[J]. Fluid Machinery, 2005, 33(8):28-32.
[4]	IBRAHIM S, MOHAMED G, MOHAMED A, et al. Three dimensional computational study for spiral dry gas seal with constant groove depth and different tapered grooves[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 68:205-212.
[5]	陈汇龙, 王强, 李雯瑜, 等. 基于Fluent的螺旋槽上游泵送机械密封三维微间隙流场数值模拟[J]. 润滑与密封, 2012, 37(2):16-19. CHEN H L, WANG Q, LI W Y, et al. Numerical simulation of 3-D flow in upstream pumping mechanical seals with spiral grooves based on Fluent[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2012, 37(2):16-19.
[6]	SEDY J. Self aligning spiral groove face seal:US4212475A[P]. 1979-01-15.
[7]	张鹏高, 冯秀, 魏龙, 等. 内、外螺旋槽型机械密封润滑液膜特性研究[J]. 机床与液压, 2012, 40(18):91-93. ZHANG P G, FENG X, WEI L, et al. Study on lubricant liquid film characteristics for mechanical seals with inward and outward spiral groove[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics, 2012, 40(18):91-93.
[8]	LAI W T. Face seal with double spiral grooves:US5201531A[P]. 1992-04-02.
[9]	郝木明, 胡丹梅, 葛京鹏,等. 双列流体动压槽自润滑非接触式机械密封:00239202.X[P]. 2000-06-13. HAO M M, HU D M, GE J P, et al. Self-lubricating non-contact mechanical seal with double rows of fluid dynamic pressure groove:00239202.X[P]. 2000-06-13.
[10]	李英, 宋鹏云. 单双列螺旋槽干气密封端面气膜刚度比较[J]. 润滑与密封, 2013, 38(10):39-43. LI Y, SONG P Y. Comparison of the gas film stiffness between the spiral groove dry gas with single-row grooves and double-row grooves[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2013, 38(10):39-43.
[11]	孙见君, 王敏, 周敏, 等. 自泵送流体动压型机械密封:201310201473.3[P]. 2013-05-28. SUN J J, WANG M, ZHOU M, et al. Self-pumping mechanical seal based on fluid dynamic pressure principle:201310201473.3[P]. 2013-05-28.
[12]	周敏, 孙见君, 马晨波, 等. 自泵送流体动压型机械密封性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(2):687-694. ZHOU M, SUN J J, MA C B, et al. Performance analysis of hydrodynamic mechanical seals based on self-pumping principle[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(2):687-694.
[13]	顾东升, 孙见君, 马晨波, 等. 基于数值模拟的自泵送机械密封正交试验[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(7):2464-2473. GU D S, SUN J J, MA C B, et al. Orthogonal test of self-pumping mechanical seals based on numerical simulation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(7):2464-2473.
[14]	产文, 宋鹏云, 毛文元, 等. 螺旋槽干气密封端面气膜温度场的数值分析[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2015, 33(5):422-428. CAHN W, SONG P Y, MAO W Y, et al. Numerical analysis of temperature field of gas film in spiral groove dry gas seal[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2015, 33(5):422-428.
[15]	WANG Q, CHEN H L, LIU T, et al. Research on performance of upstream pumping mechanical seal with different deep spiral groove[C]//IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, 2012, 15(7):072019-072027.
[16]	BASU P. Analysis of a radial groove gas face seal[J]. Tribology Transactions, 1992, 35(1):11-20.
[17]	NICOLESCU B N, PETRESCU T C. Homogenization of the Reynolds equation in the radial face seals case[J]. Asymptotic Analysis, 2013, 81(1):35-52.
[18]	RUAN B. Finite element analysis of the spiral groove gas face seal at the slow speed and the low pressure conditions-slip flow consideration[J]. Tribology Transactions, 2000, 43(3):411-418.
[19]	HU X P, SONG P Y. Theoretic analysis of the effect of real gas on the performance of the T-groove and radial groove dry gas seal[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2012, 271:1218-1223.
[20]	王衍, 孙见君, 马晨波, 等. 液膜及气膜非接触式机械密封的对比分析[J]. 润滑与密封, 2013, 38(3):112-116. WANG Y, SUN J J, MA C B, et al. Comparative analysis of non-contact mechanical seals with liquid and gas film[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2013, 38(3):112-116.

自泵送机械密封与螺旋槽机械密封的性能比较

Performance comparison of self-pumping and spiral groove mechanical seals

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[2]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[3]	连梦雅, 谈莹莹, 王林, 陈枫, 曹艺飞. 地下水预热新风一体化热泵空调系统制热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 311-319.
[4]	金正浩, 封立杰, 李舒宏. 氨水溶液交叉型再吸收式热泵的能量及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 53-63.
[5]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[6]	叶展羽, 山訸, 徐震原. 用于太阳能蒸发的折纸式蒸发器性能仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 132-140.
[7]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[8]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[9]	温凯杰, 郭力, 夏诏杰, 陈建华. 一种耦合CFD与深度学习的气固快速模拟方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3775-3785.
[10]	王浩, 王振雷. 基于自适应谱方法的裂解炉烧焦模型化简策略[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3855-3864.
[11]	李科, 文键, 忻碧平. 耦合蒸气冷却屏的真空多层绝热结构对液氢储罐自增压过程的影响机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3786-3796.
[12]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[13]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[14]	李锦潼, 邱顺, 孙文寿. 煤浆法烟气脱硫中草酸和紫外线强化煤砷浸出过程[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3522-3532.
[15]	程小松, 殷勇高, 车春文. 不同工质在溶液除湿真空再生系统中的性能对比[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3494-3501.