bubble-based EMMS/PFB模型的建立及在加压流化床浓相段的应用

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170230

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (8): 2998-3005.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170230

bubble-based EMMS/PFB模型的建立及在加压流化床浓相段的应用

宋素芳^1,2,3, 郝振华¹, 董立波¹, 李俊国¹, 房倚天¹

1 中国科学院山西煤炭化学研究所, 煤转化国家重点实验室, 山西太原 030001;
2 太原科技大学化学与生物工程学院, 山西太原 030021;
3 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2017-03-09 修回日期:2017-05-17 出版日期:2017-08-05 发布日期:2017-05-18
通讯作者: 郝振华
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（21606250）；中国科学院青年创新促进会基金项目（2016162）。

Establishment of bubble-based EMMS/PFB model and its application on dense section of pressurized fluidized-bed

SONG Sufang^1,2,3, HAO Zhenhua¹, DONG Libo¹, LI Junguo¹, FANG Yitian¹

1 State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion, Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, China;
2 School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030021, Shanxi, China;
3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2017-03-09 Revised:2017-05-17 Online:2017-08-05 Published:2017-05-18
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21606250) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS(2016162).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于多尺度分解和能量消耗分析方法，结合压力下锥形分布板射流床气泡直径关联式，建立了一个适于加压流化床（PFB）的能量最小多尺度模型——bubble-based EMMS/PFB模型。应用此模型模拟一个二维加压射流床，分析了操作压力、位置高度、空隙率及剩余速度对非均匀因子的影响。通过模拟结果与实验数据的对比，发现该模型相比于Gidaspow模型，能够更准确地模拟加压射流床内颗粒浓度的分布状态及颗粒靠近壁面处的速度变化；将这种曳力模型应用到流化床浓相段的模拟，预测了床内颗粒浓度瞬时分布及沿轴向的时均值分布、颗粒的速度分布等流动行为，使流化床浓相段的气固流动行为可视化，对流化床的设计、放大有一定的指导作用。

关键词: 流化床, 多尺度, 数值模拟, 气泡, 两相流, 流体动力学

Abstract:

An energy minimization and multi-scale model, bubble-based EMMS/PFB, was established for pressurized fluidized-bed, based on methods of multi-scale decomposition and energy consumption analysis in combination with bubble diameter correlation to conical distributor. The model was used to simulate a 2D pressurized jetting fluidized-bed and to study influence of operating parameters such as operating pressure, bubble location, porosity and residual velocity on heterogeneous index. Comparison of simulation results to experimental data, it was showed that the new model provided better accuracy than the Gidaspow model in prediction of solid particle concentration distribution and change of particle velocity adjacent to wall above the distributor. Dense section simulation of a pressurized fluidized-bed by the new drag model yielded prediction of instantaneous and time-averaged axial distributions of particle concentration and particle velocity distribution. The simulation could make it available to visualize gas-solid flow behavior at dense section and provide guidance for design and industrial scale-up of pressurized fluidized-beds.

Key words: fluidized-bed, multi-scale, numerical simulation, bubble, two-phase flow, fluid dynamics

中图分类号:

O359
TQ545

宋素芳, 郝振华, 董立波, 李俊国, 房倚天. bubble-based EMMS/PFB模型的建立及在加压流化床浓相段的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(8): 2998-3005.

SONG Sufang, HAO Zhenhua, DONG Libo, LI Junguo, FANG Yitian. Establishment of bubble-based EMMS/PFB model and its application on dense section of pressurized fluidized-bed[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(8): 2998-3005.

参考文献 30

[1]	LI J, KUIPERS J A M. Effect of pressure on gas-solid flow behavior in dense gas-fluidized beds:a discrete particle simulation study[J]. Powder Technology, 2002, 127:173-184.
[2]	OLOWSON P A, ALMSTEDT A E. Influence of pressure and fluidization velocity on the bubble behaviour and gas flow distribution in a fluidized bed[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1990, 45(7):1733-1741.
[3]	LI Z, ANNALAND M V S, KUIPERS J A M, et al. Effect of operating pressure on particle temperature distribution in a fluidized bed with heat production[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2016, 140:279-290.
[4]	NYOMAN S, WINAYA P B. Effect of pressure and carbon dioxide concentration on heat transfer at high temperature in a pressurized circulating fluidized bed (PCFB) combustor[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2001, 44:2965-2971.
[5]	CAO J T, CHENG Z H, FANG Y T. Simulation and experimental studies on fluidization properties in a pressurized jetting fluidized bed[J]. Powder Technology, 2008, 183(1):127-132.
[6]	VALIN S, RAVEL S, GUILLAUDEAU J. Comprehensive study of the influence of total pressure on products yields in fluidized bed gasification of wood sawdust[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2010, 91(10):1222-1228.
[7]	李俊国. 压力下射流流化床气固流动特性的研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学, 2013. LI J G. Hydrodynamic characteristics in jetting fluidized bed under pressure[D]. Beijing:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2013.
[8]	WANG J W, ZHOU Q, HONG K. An EMMS-based multi-fluid model (EFM) for heterogeneous gas-solid riser flows(Ⅱ):An alternative formulation from dominant mechanisms[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2012, 75:349-358.
[9]	WANG W, LI J H. Simulation of gas-solid two-phase flow by a multi-scale CFD approach of the EMMS model to the sub-grid level[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62(1/2):208-231.
[10]	ZHOU Q, WANG J W. Coarse grid simulation of heterogeneous gas-solid flow in a CFB riser with EMMS drag model:effect of inputting drag correlations[J]. Powder Technology, 2014, 253:486-495.
[11]	LI J H, KWAUK M. Particle-Fluid Two Phase Flow:Energy-minimization Multi-scale Method[M]. Beijing:Metallurgical Industry Press, 1994.
[12]	YANG N, WANG W, GE W. Choosing structure-dependent drag coefficient in modeling gas-solid two-phase flow[J]. China Particuology, 2003, 1(1):38-41.
[13]	YANG N, WANG W, GE W. CFD simulation of concurrent-up gas-solid flow in circulating fluidized beds with structure-dependent drag coefficient[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2003, 96(1/2/3):71-80.
[14]	ZENELI M, NIKOLOPOULOS A, NIKOLOPOULOS N. Application of an advanced coupled EMMS-TFM model to a pilot scale CFB carbonator[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015, 138:482-498.
[15]	ZHAO M, ZHANG N, LIU X H. Numerical simulation of loop seal for a circulating fluidized bed based on an improved EMMS bubbling model[J]. Powder Technology, 2015, 284:443-451.
[16]	ZHOU Q, WANG J W. CFD study of mixing and segregation in CFB risers:extension of EMMS drag model to binary gas-solid flow[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015, 122:637-651.
[17]	陈程, 祁海鹰. EMMS曳力模型及其颗粒团模型的构建和检验[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(6):2003-2012. CHEN C, QI H Y. Development and validation of cluster and EMMS drag model[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(6):2003-2012.
[18]	鲁波娜, 程从礼, 鲁维民. 基于多尺度模型的MIP提升管反应历程数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(6):1983-1992. LU B N, CHENG C L, LU W M. Numerical simulation of reaction process in MIP riser[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(6):1983-1992.
[19]	王维, 洪坤, 鲁波娜. 流态化模拟:基于介尺度结构的多尺度CFD[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(1):95-106. WANG W, HONG K, LU B N. Fluidized bed simulation:structure-dependent multiscale CFD[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(1):95-106.
[20]	王雪瑶, 姜凡, 徐祥. 基于EMMS方法的曳力修正模型及实验验证[C]//中国工程热物理学会多项流2009年学术会议. 乌鲁木齐:中国工程热物理学会, 2009:1-7. WANG X Y, JIANG F, XU X. Modified drag model and experimental verification based on the EMMS method[C]//Proceedings of the Chinese Academy of Engineering Thermophysics 2009. Urumchi:CSET, 2009:1-7.
[21]	周泉, 王军武, 李静海, 基于EMMS的双流体模型及其在高密度循环流化床中的应用[C]//第七届全国流态化会议. 北京:流态化专业委员会, 2013:83-85. ZHOU Q, WANG J W, LI J H. EMMS-based two fluid model and its application to high-density circulating fluidized bed[C]//Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Fluidization. Beijing:Fluidization Specialized Committee, 2013:83-85.
[22]	SHI Z S, WANG W, LI J H. A bubble-based EMMS model for gas-solid bubbling fluidization[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(22):5541-5555.
[23]	CAI P, SCHIAVETTI M, MICHELE G D. Quantitative estimation of bubble size in PFBC[J]. Powder Technology, 1994, 80:99-109.
[24]	HORIO M, NONAKA A. A generalized bubble diameter correlation for gas-solid fluidized beds[J]. AIChE Journal, 1987, 33(11):1865-1872.
[25]	MORI S, WEN C Y. Estimation of bubble diameter in gaseous fluidized beds[J]. AIChE Journal, 1975, 21(1):109-115.
[26]	SONG S F, HAO Z H, DONG L B. A bubble-based EMMS model for pressurized fluidization and its validations with data of a jetting fluidized bed[J]. RSC Advances, 2016, 6:111041-111051.
[27]	THOMAS D G. Transport characteristics of suspension(Ⅷ):A note on the viscosity of Newtonian suspensions of uniform spherical particles[J]. Journal of Collioid Science, 1965, 20:267-277.
[28]	石战胜. 基于气泡的EMMS模型及其在煤气化炉CFD模拟中的应用[D]. 北京:中国科学院研究生院, 2011. SHI Z S. A bubble-based EMMS model for gas-solid fluidized beds and its application in CFD simulation of a coal gasifier[D]. Beijing:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2011.
[29]	刘哲语, 李俊国, 李春玉. 多段分级转化流化床煤气化技术研发与进展[J]. 煤化工, 2016, (1):3-6. LIU Z Y, LI J G, LI C Y. Research and development of multi-stage conversion fluidized bed coal gasification technology[J]. Coal Chemical Industry, 2016, (1):3-6.
[30]	JOHNSON P C, JACKSON R. Frictional-collisional constitutive relations for granular materials, with application to plane shearing[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1987, 176:67-93.

bubble-based EMMS/PFB模型的建立及在加压流化床浓相段的应用

Establishment of bubble-based EMMS/PFB model and its application on dense section of pressurized fluidized-bed

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周绍华, 詹飞龙, 丁国良, 张浩, 邵艳坡, 刘艳涛, 郜哲明. 短管节流阀内流动噪声的实验研究及降噪措施[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 113-121.
[2]	叶展羽, 山訸, 徐震原. 用于太阳能蒸发的折纸式蒸发器性能仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 132-140.
[3]	邵苛苛, 宋孟杰, 江正勇, 张旋, 张龙, 高润淼, 甄泽康. 水平方向上冰中受陷气泡形成和分布实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 161-164.
[4]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[5]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[6]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[7]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[8]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[9]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[10]	温凯杰, 郭力, 夏诏杰, 陈建华. 一种耦合CFD与深度学习的气固快速模拟方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3775-3785.
[11]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[12]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[13]	袁佳琦, 刘政, 黄锐, 张乐福, 贺登辉. 泡状入流条件下旋流泵能量转换特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3807-3820.
[14]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[15]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.