CO2气氛下煤与蓝藻共气化的行为演变特性

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180709

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

煤与蓝藻共气化是兼顾煤炭高效利用与蓝藻资源化利用的重要途径。采用TG-FTIR联用技术，探究不同掺混比混合物在CO₂气氛下的共气化特性，为其应用化学链燃烧技术提供理论基础。实验表明，蓝藻多糖解聚温度低，于100℃便可析出气相产物。在热解阶段中，DTG曲线有两个失重峰，其中峰值大、温度低的由蓝藻热解产生，主要气相产物为羟基和芳香族化合物；温度较高的失重峰对应煤炭的热解，气相产物以CO、CO₂和烃类为主。均相模型适用于热解、炭化阶段，且对蓝藻的拟合度高于煤炭，而缩核模型对气化阶段和高煤炭比例样品的拟合效果好。共气化的协同作用起始于热解阶段，主要作用区间为气化阶段，掺混蓝藻可有效提高煤焦的气化活性。

关键词: 生物质, 共气化, 反应动力学, 合成气, 演变行为

Abstract:

The co-gasification of coal and cyanobacteria is an important approach to achieve the resource utilization of cyanobacteria. The TG-FTIR combined technology was used to explore the co-gasification characteristics of different blending ratio mixtures under CO₂ atmosphere, which provided a theoretical basis for the application of chemical chain combustion technology. It is difficult to distinguish the drying stage and depolymerization stage in cyanobacteria, the polysaccharide of which was depolymerized in a low temperature of 100℃. During the pyrolysis stage, two weightlessness peaks were found in mixture samples corresponding to cyanobacteria and coal pyrolysis, respectively. The carbonyl and aromatics were the main gaseous products of cyanobacteria pyrolysis, and CO, CO₂ and hydrocarbons were mainly produced from coal pyrolysis. The pyrolysis and carbonization stages can be described by the homogeneous model. The kinetic parameters of gasification stage were fitted well by the shrinking core model. The influence of synergy effect was found limited in pyrolysis stage. However, a significant synergistic effect was observed in char gasification. The reactive activity of coal gasification was intensified by blending cyanobacteria.

Key words: biomass, co-gasification, reaction kinetics, syngas, evolution behavior

中图分类号:

沈天绪, 张将, 沈来宏. CO₂气氛下煤与蓝藻共气化的行为演变特性[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(12): 5256-5265.

SHEN Tianxu, ZHANG Jiang, SHEN Laihong. Evolution behavior on CO₂ co-gasification of coal and cyanobacteria[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(12): 5256-5265.

参考文献 31

[1]	BARREIRO D L, PRINS W, RONSSE F, et al. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of microalgae for biofuel production:state of the art review and future prospects[J]. Biomass & Bioenergy, 2013, 53(16):113-127.
[2]	CHAKINALA A G, BRILMAN D W, SWAAIJ W P, et al. Catalytic and non-catalytic supercritical water gasification of microalgae and glycerol[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(3):1113-1122.
[3]	PARMAR A, SINGH N K, PANDEY A, et al. Cyanobacteria and microalgae:a positive prospect for biofuels[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(22):10163-72.
[4]	ALBA L G, TORRI C, FABBRI D, et al. Microalgae growth on the aqueous phase from hydrothermal liquefaction of the same microalgae[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 228(14):214-223.
[5]	GNANSOUNOU E, RAMAN J K. Life cycle assessment of algae biodiesel and its co-products[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 161(3):300-308.
[6]	ZHAO X, ZHOU H, VINEET S S, et al. Biomass-based chemical looping technologies:the good, the bad and the future[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2017, 10(9):1865-2046.
[7]	MURPHY F, DEVLIN G, DEVERELL R, et al. Biofuel production in Ireland-an approach to 2020 targets with a focus on algal biomass[J]. Energies, 2013, 6(12):6391-6412.
[8]	AZIZ M, ODA T, KASHIWAGI T. Advanced energy harvesting from macroalgae-innovative integration of drying, gasification and combined cycle[J]. Energies, 2014, 7(12):8217-8235.
[9]	THIRUVENKADAM S, IZHAR S, YOSHIDA H, et al. Process application of Subcritical Water Extraction (SWE) for algal bio-products and biofuels production[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 154(15):815-828.
[10]	ADANEZ J, ABAD A, GARCIA F, et al. Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies[J]. Progress in Energy & Combustion Science, 2013, 38(2):215-282.
[11]	KOBAYASHI N, FAN L S. Biomass direct chemical looping process:a perspective[J]. Biomass & Bioenergy, 2011, 35(3):1252-1262.
[12]	ELLIOTT D C. Catalytic hydrothermal gasification of biomass[J]. Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining, 2010, 2(3):254-265.
[13]	LI K, RONG Z, BI J. Experimental study on syngas production by co-gasification of coal and biomass in a fluidized bed[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry & Technology, 2010, 35(7):2722-2726.
[14]	LEION H, MATTISSON T, LYNGFELT A. Solid fuels in chemical-looping combustion[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2008, 2(2):180-193.
[15]	李伟东, 李伟锋, 刘海峰, 等. 蓝藻与神府煤共成浆性的研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2010, 37(5):534-538. LI W D, LI W F, LIU H F, et al. Co-slurry ability of blue-green algae and Shenfu coal[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2010, 37(5):534-538.
[16]	钱亚平, 李伟锋, 陈雪莉, 等. 煤和蓝藻的共热解特性研究[J]. 华东理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 39(1):35-41. QIAN Y P, LI W F, CHEN X L, et al. Co-pyrolysis of coal and algae[J]. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 39(1):35-41.
[17]	叶英, 武建军, 周国莉, 等. 提质褐煤煤粉粘结剂成型特性研究[J]. 选煤技术, 2014, 10(5):14-18. YE Y, WU J J, ZHOU G L, et al. Study on molding characteristic of binder of upgraded fine lignite[J]. Coal Preparation Technology, 2014, 10(5):14-18.
[18]	罗苏鹏. 滇池蓝藻的热化学转化试验研究[D]. 昆明:昆明理工大学, 2011. LUO S P. Experimental study on thermochemical transformation of Dianchi cyanobacteria[D]. Kunming:Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2011.
[19]	ROSS A B, JONES J M, KUBACKI M L, et al. Classification of macroalgae as fuel and its thermochemical behaviour[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(14):6494-6504.
[20]	黄永福. 普通小球藻和盐生杜氏藻的快速热解特性研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2013. HUANG Y F. Research on fast pyrolysis characteristics of Chlorella vulgaris and Dunaliella salina[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science & Technology, 2013.
[21]	杨瑞丽, 陈宇, 吴玉龙, 等. 煤与杜氏盐藻共热解过程分析及动力学研究[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2013, 19(3):281-286. YANG R L, CHEN Y, WU Y L, et al. Study on the process analysis and kinetics during the co-pyrolysis of coal and Dunaliella tertiolecta[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2013, 19(3):281-286.
[22]	DAVIS T A, VOLESKY B, MUCCI A. A review of the biochemistry of heavy metal biosorption by brown algae[J]. Water Research, 2003, 37(18):4311-30.
[23]	LIU Q, WANG S, ZHENG Y, et al. Mechanism study of wood lignin pyrolysis by using TG-FTIR analysis[J]. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis, 2008, 82(1):170-177.
[24]	HEEK K H, HODEK W. Structure and pyrolysis behaviour of different coals and relevant model substances[J]. Fuel, 1994, 73(6):886-896.
[25]	WANG Q, ZHAO W, LIU H, et al. Interactions and kinetic analysis of oil shale semi-coke with cornstalk during co-combustion[J]. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(6):2080-2087.
[26]	IDRIS S S, RAHMAN N A, ISMAIL K, et al. Investigation on thermochemical behaviour of low rank Malaysian coal, oil palm biomass and their blends during pyrolysis via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(12):4584-4592.
[27]	BIAGINI E, LIPPI F, PETARCA L, et al. Devolatilisation rate of biomasses and coal-biomass blends:an experimental investigation[J]. Fuel, 2002, 81(8):1041-1050.
[28]	Molina A, MONDRAGON F. Reactivity of coal gasification with steam and CO2[J]. Fuel, 1998, 77(15):1831-1839.
[29]	林荣英, 张济宇. 低活性无烟煤二氧化碳催化气化动力学——热天平等温热重法[J]. 化工学报, 2005, 56(12):2332-2341. Lin R Y, Zhang J Y. Catalytic gasification kinetics of low activity anthracites with carbon dioxide-Isothermal thermo-gravimetric analysis[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2005, 56(12):2332-2341.
[30]	Marcilla A, Gomez A, Gomis C, et al. Characterization of microalgal species through TGA/FTIR analysis:application to Nannochloropsis sp.[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 2009, 484(1/2):41-47.
[31]	付鹏, 胡松, 孙路石, 等. 稻草和玉米秆热解气体产物的释放特性及形成机理[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2009, 29(2):113-118. FU P, HU S, SUN L S, et al. Release characteristics and formation mechanism of gas products during rice straw and maize stalk pyrolysis[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2009, 29(2):113-118.

CO₂气氛下煤与蓝藻共气化的行为演变特性

Evolution behavior on CO₂ co-gasification of coal and cyanobacteria

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[2]	郑佳丽, 李志会, 赵新强, 王延吉. 离子液体催化合成2-氰基呋喃反应动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3708-3715.
[3]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[4]	陈佳起, 赵万玉, 姚睿充, 侯道林, 董社英. 开心果壳基碳点的合成及其对Q235碳钢的缓蚀行为研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3446-3456.
[5]	张蒙蒙, 颜冬, 沈永峰, 李文翠. 电解液类型对双离子电池阴阳离子储存行为的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3116-3126.
[6]	吴文涛, 褚良永, 张玲洁, 谭伟民, 沈丽明, 暴宁钟. 腰果酚生物基自愈合微胶囊的高效制备工艺研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3103-3115.
[7]	杨峥豪, 何臻, 常玉龙, 靳紫恒, 江霞. 生物质快速热解下行式流化床反应器研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2249-2263.
[8]	董茂林, 陈李栋, 黄六莲, 吴伟兵, 戴红旗, 卞辉洋. 酸性助水溶剂制备木质纳米纤维素及功能应用研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2281-2295.
[9]	葛泽峰, 吴雨青, 曾名迅, 查振婷, 马宇娜, 侯增辉, 张会岩. 灰化学成分对生物质气化特性的影响规律[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2136-2146.
[10]	祖凌鑫, 胡荣庭, 李鑫, 陈余道, 陈广林. 木质生物质化学组分的碳释放产物特征和反硝化利用程度[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1332-1342.
[11]	禹进, 余彬彬, 蒋新生. 一种基于虚拟组分的燃烧调控化学作用量化及分析方法研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1303-1312.
[12]	刘海芹, 李博文, 凌喆, 刘亮, 俞娟, 范一民, 勇强. 羟基-炔点击化学改性半乳甘露聚糖薄膜的制备及性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1370-1378.
[13]	郑杰元, 张先伟, 万金涛, 范宏. 丁香酚环氧有机硅树脂的制备及其固化动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 924-932.
[14]	李鑫, 曾少娟, 彭奎霖, 袁磊, 张香平. CO₂电催化还原制合成气研究进展及趋势[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 313-329.
[15]	陈晨, 杨倩, 陈云, 张睿, 刘冬. 不同氧浓度下煤挥发分燃烧的化学动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4133-4146.