基于余热回收的电动客车喷射补气热泵的制热性能

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20201551

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

根据电动汽车热泵在低温下的制热需求并延长车辆行驶里程，开发了车外换热器支路和余热换热器支路并联的余热回收系统并进行了制热性能试验研究。试验结果显示，对于并联余热回收支路的喷射补气式热泵系统，补气支路压力和补气流量均随着余热量的增加而有明显的提升，而吸气主路流量受余热换热器出口过热度的影响。车外换热器支路和余热换热器支路的流量比也呈线性关系，流量比斜率与余热换热器出口相态有关。并联余热回收喷射补气热泵系统的制热性能随余热量的变化受压缩机吸气量和补气量这两个因素的共同影响。在7℃相对较高的环境工况下，余热量的增加有利于制热量的提升但COP没有优势；在-20℃较低的环境工况下，余热量的增加使得补气流量增长较大，但吸气流量衰减严重，对系统的制热性能提升不明显；在-10～0℃的环境工况下，制热量和COP都随余热量的增加而提升较大，-10℃时，1.8 kW余热量条件下的制热量比0.9 kW余热量条件下的制热量增加了11.6%，COP提升9.18%。

关键词: 热力学过程, 传热, 回收, 电动客车, 并联系统, 喷射补气

Abstract:

According to the heating requirements of electric vehicles (EVs) heat pumps in low ambient temperatures and extending the mileage of EVs, a waste heat recovery system in which the heat exchanger branch outside the vehicle and the branch of the waste heat exchanger are connected in parallel was developed and an experimental study on the heating performance was conducted. The experimental results show that, for the vapor injection heat pump system with parallel waste heat recovery branches, the pressure and mass flow of the vapor injection branch are significantly increased with the increase of the waste heat, while the mass flow of the main-branch is affected by the superheat at the outlet of the waste heat exchanger. The flow ratio of the out-door heat exchanger and the waste heat exchanger has a linear relationship, and the slope of the flow ratio is related to the outlet phase state of the waste heat exchanger. Under the relatively high ambient working conditions of 7℃, the increase of waste heat is beneficial to the increase of heating performance, but COP has no advantage; under the lower ambient working conditions of -20℃, the increase of waste heat increases the flow of injection mass large, but the suction mass flow is seriously attenuated, and the heating performance of the system is not significantly improved; under ambient working conditions of about -10—0℃, the heating performance and COP are greatly increased with the increase of waste heat, at -10℃, the heating performance with 1.8 kW waste heat increased by 11.6% compared to that with 0.9 kW waste heat, and the COP increased by 9.18%.

Key words: thermodynamics process, heat transfer, recovery, electric vehicle, parallel system, vapor injection

中图分类号:

U 469.72

顾潇, 邹慧明, 韩欣欣, 唐明生, 田长青. 基于余热回收的电动客车喷射补气热泵的制热性能[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(S1): 326-335.

GU Xiao, ZOU Huiming, HAN Xinxin, TANG Mingsheng, TIAN Changqing. Heating performance of vapor injection heat pump based on waste heat recovery[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(S1): 326-335.

图/表 11

参考文献 29

1	刘卓然, 陈健, 林凯, 等. 国内外电动汽车发展现状与趋势[J]. 电力建设, 2015, 36(7): 25-32.
	Liu Z R, Chen J, Lin K, et al. Domestic and foreign present situation and the tendency of electric vehicles [J]. Electric Power Construction, 2015, 36(7): 25-32.
2	Yuan X L, Liu X, Zuo J. The development of new energy vehicles for a sustainable future: a review [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 42: 298-305.
3	孙北方. PTC热敏陶瓷加热元件在汽车中的应用[J]. 电子制作, 2000, (11): 12.
	Sun B F. Application of PTC thermal ceramic heating element in automobile [J]. Electronics Practice, 2000, (11): 12.
4	王鹏程. PTC热敏元件的进展与发展趋势[J]. 电子元件与材料, 1995, 14(3): 1-8.
	Wang P C. Progress and development trends in PTC thermistors [J]. Electronic Components and Materials, 1995, 14(3): 1-8.
5	史保新, 马国远, 陈观生. 电动车用空调装置的研究[J]. 流体机械, 2002, 30(4): 48-50, 37.
	Shi B X, Ma G Y, Chen G S. Research on heat pump system for electric vehicle air conditioning [J]. Fluid Machinery, 2002, 30(4): 48-50, 37.
6	Peng Q H, Du Q G. Progress in heat pump air conditioning systems for electric vehicles — a review [J]. Energies, 2016, 9(4): 240.
7	Malik T N, Bullard C W. Air conditioning hybrid electric vehicles while stopped in traffic [R]. Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Center, University of Illinois, 2004.
8	Qi Z G. Advances on air conditioning and heat pump system in electric vehicles - a review [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 38: 754-764.
9	柴沁虎, 马国远. 空气源热泵低温适应性研究的现状及进展[J]. 能源工程, 2002, (5): 25-31.
	Chai Q H, Ma G Y. State of knowledge and current challenges in the ASHP developed for the cold areas [J]. Energy Engineering, 2002, (5): 25-31.
10	马国远, 邵双全. 寒冷地区空调用热泵的研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2002, 23(1): 17-21.
	Ma G Y, Shao S Q. Research on heat pump cycle for air conditioning in cold regions [J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2002, 23(1): 17-21.
11	陈浩. 大型电动客车热泵空调系统设计与试验研究[D]. 郑州: 中原工学院, 2016.
	Chen H. Performance evaluation and design of heat pump air conditioning for electric bus [D]. Zhengzhou: Zhongyuan University of Technology, 2016.
12	张东京. 纯电动客车超低温热泵型空调系统结融霜特性研究[D]. 郑州: 中原工学院, 2019.
	Zhang D J. Study on frosting characteristics of ultra-low temperature heat pump air conditioning system for pure electric bus [D]. Zhengzhou: Zhongyuan University of Technology, 2019.
13	周光辉, 禹佩利, 李海军, 等. 带经济器的热泵型纯电动客车空调系统结霜特性研究[J]. 低温与超导, 2019, 47(8): 75-79.
	Zhou G H, Yu P L, Li H J, et al. Study on frosting performance of heat pump air conditioning system with economizer for only electric-driven vehicle [J]. Cryogenics & Superconductivity, 2019, 47(8): 75-79.
14	Han X X, Zou H M, Xu H B, et al. Experimental study on vapor injection air source heat pump with internal heat exchanger for electric bus [J]. Energy Procedia, 2019, 158: 4147-4153.
15	Han X X, Zou H M, Tian C Q, et al. Numerical study on the heating performance of a novel integrated thermal management system for the electric bus [J]. Energy, 2019, 186: 115812.
16	Shams-Zahraei M, Kouzani A Z, Kutter S, et al. Integrated thermal and energy management of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2012, 216: 237-248.
17	Bennion K, Thornton M. Integrated vehicle thermal management for advanced vehicle propulsion technologies [C]// SAE Technical Paper Series. 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, United States: SAE International, 2010: 2010-01-0836.
18	Pesaran A A. Battery thermal models for hybrid vehicle simulations [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2002, 110(2): 377-382.
19	Kim S C, Kim M S, Hwang I C, et al. Heating performance enhancement of a CO₂ heat pump system recovering stack exhaust thermal energy in fuel cell vehicles [J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2007, 30(7): 1215-1226.
20	Kim S C, Kim M S, Hwang I C, et al. Performance evaluation of a CO₂ heat pump system for fuel cell vehicles considering the heat exchanger arrangements [J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2007, 30(7): 1195-1206.
21	Ahn J H, Kang H, Lee H S, et al. Heating performance characteristics of a dual source heat pump using air and waste heat in electric vehicles [J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 119: 1-9.
22	Cho C W, Lee H S, Won J P, et al. Measurement and evaluation of heating performance of heat pump systems using wasted heat from electric devices for an electric bus [J]. Energies, 2012, 5(3): 658-669.
23	Zou H M, Jiang B, Wang Q, et al. Performance analysis of a heat pump air conditioning system coupling with battery cooling for electric vehicles [J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 61: 891-894.
24	钱程, 谷波, 田镇, 等. 纯电动汽车双热源热泵系统性能分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2016, 50(4): 569-574.
	Qian C, Gu B, Tian Z, et al. Performance analysis of dual source heat pump in electric vehicles [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2016, 50(4): 569-574.
25	李萍, 谷波, 缪梦华. 废热回收型纯电动汽车热泵系统试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(4): 468-472.
	Li P, Gu B, Miao M H. Experimental research on waste-heat recovery heat pump system in electric vehicles [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2019, 53(4): 468-472.
26	张桂英. 纯电动汽车一体式热管理及节能技术研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2017.
	Zhang G Y. Research on integrated thermal management and energy saving technology for pure electric vehicles [D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017.
27	Zhang L, Hashimoto K, Hasegawa H, et al. Performance analysis of a heat pump system with integrated desiccant for electric vehicles [J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2018, 86: 154-162.
28	Tian Z, Gan W, Zhang X L, et al. Investigation on an integrated thermal management system with battery cooling and motor waste heat recovery for electric vehicle [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 136: 16-27.
29	Lee D Y, Cho C W, Won J P, et al. Performance characteristics of mobile heat pump for a large passenger electric vehicle [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 50(1): 660-669.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

187

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	3	0	0	184

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	130	57
比例	70%	30%

摘要

392

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	392

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	250	143
比例	64%	36%

名称	主要参数
压缩机	R410a变频涡旋压缩机，排量80 cm³/r，频率30~90 Hz
车内换热器	车内换热器共两组，每组尺寸为1300 mm×200 mm×154 mm
车外换热器	车外换热器共一组，尺寸为1400 mm×840 mm×109 mm
中间换热器	中间换热器共两组，选用板式换热器，每组尺寸165 mm ×80 mm×80 mm
余热换热器	余热换热器共两组，选用板式换热器，每组尺寸153 mm ×75 mm×75 mm
主路电子膨胀阀	阀口径3.2 mm
补气支路电子膨胀阀	阀口径2.2 mm
水泵	流量25 L/min，扬程8 m，转速2900 r/min

名称	主要参数
压缩机	R410a变频涡旋压缩机，排量80 cm³/r，频率30~90 Hz
车内换热器	车内换热器共两组，每组尺寸为1300 mm×200 mm×154 mm
车外换热器	车外换热器共一组，尺寸为1400 mm×840 mm×109 mm
中间换热器	中间换热器共两组，选用板式换热器，每组尺寸165 mm ×80 mm×80 mm
余热换热器	余热换热器共两组，选用板式换热器，每组尺寸153 mm ×75 mm×75 mm
主路电子膨胀阀	阀口径3.2 mm
补气支路电子膨胀阀	阀口径2.2 mm
水泵	流量25 L/min，扬程8 m，转速2900 r/min

测量参数	控制范围	控制精度	测量参数	控制范围	控制精度
环境室温度/℃	-40~55	±0.1℃	环境室湿度	20%~90%	±0.1℃（WB）
最大制热量/kW	30	±1.5%	最大风量/(m³/h)	12000	±1%
温度/℃	-50~200	±0.5℃	质量流量/(kg/h)	0~150, 0~500	±0.2%
压力/MPa	0~3.0, 0~4.5	±0.5%	压缩机功率/kW	0~15	±0.2%

测量参数	控制范围	控制精度	测量参数	控制范围	控制精度
环境室温度/℃	-40~55	±0.1℃	环境室湿度	20%~90%	±0.1℃（WB）
最大制热量/kW	30	±1.5%	最大风量/(m³/h)	12000	±1%
温度/℃	-50~200	±0.5℃	质量流量/(kg/h)	0~150, 0~500	±0.2%
压力/MPa	0~3.0, 0~4.5	±0.5%	压缩机功率/kW	0~15	±0.2%

车外干球温度/℃	车内干球温度/℃	实际余热量/kW	车外侧风量/(m³/h)	车内侧风量/(m³/h)	压缩机频率/Hz
7	20	0.9，1.2，1.8	7000	5000	50
0	20	0.9，1.2，1.8	7000	5000	60
-10	20	0.9，1.2，1.8	7000	5000	60
-20	20	0.9，1.2，1.8	7000	4000	60