竖直管气动物流传输系统管道压降和传送瓶输送特性

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20240373

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

气动物流传输系统在医疗、化工等行业得到广泛应用，管道压降和特征速度是竖直管气动物流传输系统设计的关键参数，但目前相关报道很少。基于实验室自主搭建的竖直管气动物流传输系统，开展压缩气流输送传送瓶实验，进行输送特性分析以及管道压降和特征速度的建模研究。首先借助压降信号分析、高速摄像与数据处理等方法，分析了传送瓶输送特性，提出了基于管道压降信号分析的传送瓶运动状态识别方法；其次综合考虑流道结构特征，建立了竖直管气动物流传输系统的管道压降模型，并通过数据回归获得了管道阻力系数；最后基于力平衡分析、机械能守恒定律建立了竖直管气动物流传输系统特征速度的预测模型，为传送瓶状态识别及追踪监测提供了一种新方法。

关键词: 气动物流传输, 管道压降, 特征速度, 多相流, 气力输送, 流体动力学

Abstract:

Pneumatic logistics transmission system is widely used in medical and chemical industries. Pipe pressure drop and characteristic velocity are key parameters for vertical pipe pneumatic logistics transmission system, but related reports are few. Based on the vertical pipe pneumatic logistics transmission system constructed in the laboratory, experiments of compressed air flow conveying transfer bottle were carried out. Conveying characteristics analysis as well as the modeling of the pipe pressure drop and characteristic velocity were conducted. First, with the help of pressure drop signal analysis, high-speed camera and data processing, transfer bottle conveying characteristics were analyzed. And a method to identify the transfer bottle motion states was proposed based on the analysis of the pipe pressure drop signal. Secondly, comprehensively considering the structural characteristics of the flow channel, a pipeline pressure drop model of the vertical pipe gas flow transmission system was established, and the pipeline resistance coefficient was obtained through data regression. Finally, on the basis of force balance analysis and conservation of mechanical energy, characteristic velocity prediction models were established, which provide a new method for the transfer bottle status identification and tracking monitoring.

Key words: pneumatic logistics transmission, pipe pressure drop, characteristic velocity, multiphase flow, pneumatic conveying, hydrodynamics

中图分类号:

TQ 022

吴邦汉, 林定标, 陆海峰, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 竖直管气动物流传输系统管道压降和传送瓶输送特性[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(7): 2465-2473.

Banghan WU, Dingbiao LIN, Haifeng LU, Xiaolei GUO, Haifeng LIU. Pipe pressure drop and transfer bottle conveying characteristics in vertical pipe pneumatic logistics transmission system[J]. CIESC Journal, 2024, 75(7): 2465-2473.

图/表 9

图1 气动物流传输系统实验图

Fig.1 Experimental diagram for pneumatic logistics transmission system

表1 实验工况

Table 1 Experimental conditions

传送瓶种类	U_g/(m/s)	ΔP/Pa	h/m	U_s/(m/s)	传送瓶状态
a	[0.04, 0.18]	[90.34, 492.63]	—	—	静止
a	(0.18 1.21)	[437.63, 529.89]	[0.015, 0.060]	—	悬浮
a	[1.21, 1.82]	[320.18, 522.07]	1.500	[0.50, 1.68]	运动
b	[0.11, 0.58]	[142.18, 783.81]	—	—	静止
b	(0.58, 2.40)	[669.79, 745.62]	[0.005, 0.066]	—	悬浮
b	[2.40, 2.68]	[301.23, 502.37]	1.500	[0.46, 1.20]	运动

图2 管道压降的时间序列曲线

Fig.2 Time series curve for pipe pressure drop

图3 管道压降与表观气速的关系

Fig.3 Relationship between pipe pressure drop and apparent gas velocity

图4 运动区管道阻力系数

Fig.4 Pipe resistance coefficients in motion zone

图5 管道压降的预测值与实验值

Fig.5 Predicted and experimental values of pipe pressure drop

表2 管道压降建模结果

Table 2 Pipe pressure drop modeling results

传送瓶种类	管道压降模型	适用分区	管道特征阻力系数	拟合相关系数R²	预测平均相对误差/%
a	式（1）	静止区	k=2793.49	0.99	9.36
b	式（1）	静止区	k=1435.10	0.99	5.26
a	式（2）	悬浮区	—	—	8.48
b	式（2）	悬浮区	—	—	13.99
a	式（3）	悬浮区	—	—	11.48
b	式（3）	悬浮区	—	—	6.25
a	式（4）	运动区	ε₃=2.06×10⁴Re^-2；228≤Re≤1171	0.99	5.77
b			ε₃=2.50×10⁹Re^-3.43；2152≤Re≤3156	0.99	1.80
b			ε₃=2.50×10⁹Re^-3.43；2152≤Re≤3156	0.96	1.80

图6 悬浮区传送瓶状态示意图

Fig.6 Schematic diagram of transfer bottle state in suspension zone

图7 特征速度的实验值与预测值

Fig.7 Experimental and predicted values of characteristic velocity

参考文献 32

1	周海军, 熊源泉. 补充风对水平管高压密相气力输送影响的模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(2): 602-613.
	Zhou H J, Xiong Y Q. Simulation study on influence of supplementary gas on dense-phase pneumatic conveying in horizontal pipe under high pressure[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(2): 602-613.
2	Shibani W M, Zulkafli M F, Basuno B. Methods of transport technologies: a review on using tube/tunnel systems[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2016, 160: 012042.
3	Hidalgo D, Martín-Marroquín J M, Corona F, et al. Sustainable vacuum waste collection systems in areas of difficult access[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81: 221-227.
4	Wandel S, Anderberg S, Larsson F E, et al. Underground capsule pipeline logistic system feasibility study of an urban application[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2023, 72: 3126-3133.
5	Turkowski M, Szudarek M. Pipeline system for transporting consumer goods, parcels and mail in capsules[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 93: 103057.
6	Jamwal A, Agrawal R, Sharma M. Deep learning for manufacturing sustainability: models, applications in Industry 4.0 and implications[J]. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2022, 2(2): 100107.
7	Wang S H, Wang X Q, Chen S S. Global value chains and carbon emission reduction in developing countries: does industrial upgrading matter?[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2022, 97: 106895.
8	Li Y Y, Gao Y, Sun X H, et al. Study on flow velocity during wheeled capsule hydraulic transportation in a horizontal pipe[J]. Water, 2020, 12(4): 1181.
9	Asim T, Mishra R. Computational fluid dynamics based optimal design of hydraulic capsule pipelines transporting cylindrical capsules[J]. Powder Technology, 2016, 295: 180-201.
10	Khalil M F, Kassab S Z, Adam I G, et al. Turbulent flow around single concentric long capsule in a pipe[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2010, 34(8): 2000-2017.
11	Asim T, Algadi A, Mishra R. Effect of capsule shape on hydrodynamic characteristics and optimal design of hydraulic capsule pipelines[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 161: 390-408.
12	Ulusarslan D. Effect of diameter ratio on loss coefficient of elbows in the flow of low-density spherical capsule trains[J]. Particulate Science and Technology, 2010, 28(4): 348-359.
13	Zhang C J, Sun X H, Li Y Y, et al. Effects of guide vane placement angle on hydraulic characteristics of flow field and optimal design of hydraulic capsule pipelines[J]. Water, 2018, 10(10): 1378.
14	Yang R X, Qiu S J, Song W J, et al. Effects of centrifugation prior to pneumatic tube system transport on routine biochemical and immunological tests of susceptibility to hemolysis[J]. Clinica Chimica Acta, 2023, 541: 117242.
15	付列武. “气动物流+智能机器人” 在医院物流传输系统中的应用趋势[J]. 工程建设, 2020, 52(6): 1-5.
	Fu L W. Trend of applying “pneumatic logistics+intelligent robot ” in hospital logistics transmission system[J]. Engineering Construction, 2020, 52(6): 1-5.
16	Kosugi S. Pneumatic capsule pipelines in Japan and future developments[M]//Handbook of Powder Technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001: 505-511.
17	Ohashi A, Yanaida K. The fluid mechanics of capsule pipelines (1st report): Analysis of the required pressure drop for hydraulic and pneumatic capsules[J]. Bulletin of JSME, 1986, 29(252): 1719-1725.
18	Tsuji Y, Morikawa Y, Chono S, et al. Fundamental investigation of the capsule transport (2nd Rep): Wake of a capsule and the effect of interaction between two capsules on the drag[J]. Bulletin of JSME, 1984, 27(225): 468-474.
19	Hane K, Okutsu K, Matsui N, et al. Applicability of pneumatic capsule pipeline system to radioactive waste disposal facility[C]// New Pipeline Technologies, Security, and Safety: Proceedings of the ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction. Baltimore, Maryland, 2003: 1615-1624.
20	Cao P L, Liu M M, Chen Z, et al. Theory calculation and testing of air injection parameters in ice core drilling with air reverse circulation[J]. Polar Science, 2018, 17: 23-32.
21	Cao P L, Cao H Y, Cao J E, et al. Studies on pneumatic transport of ice cores in reverse circulation air drilling[J]. Powder Technology, 2019, 356: 50-59.
22	Zhou X M, Fang F, Li Y D. Numerical method for system level simulation of long-distance pneumatic conveying pipelines[J]. Mathematics, 2022, 10(21): 4073.
23	Kosugi S. Effect of traveling resistance factor on pneumatic capsule pipeline system[J]. Powder Technology, 1999, 104(3): 227-232.
24	Kern R. Physical modelling of a long pneumatic transmission line: models of successively decreasing complexity and their experimental validation[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, 2017, 23(5): 536-553.
25	Lu H F, Ruan H, Guo X L, et al. Study on friction and conveying characteristics of the pneumatic logistics transmission system[J]. Powder Technology, 2023, 417: 118282.
26	Belova O V, Vulf M D. Pneumatic capsule transport[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 152: 276-280.
27	York K, Liu H. Predicting drag coefficient of pneumatic capsule[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2001, 127(5): 390-397.
28	王荘, 吕潇, 邵媛媛, 等. 流态化的往昔寻觅及未来启示[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(12): 5904-5927.
	Wang Z, Lyu X, Shao Y Y, et al. Early exploration of fluidization theory and its inspiration to the future[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(12): 5904-5927.
29	张峰, 张亚新, 马凤云, 等. 流化-输送床中煤的气力分级数值模拟分析[J]. 煤炭转化, 2017, 40(5): 13-19.
	Zhang F, Zhang Y X, Ma F Y, et al. Numerical simulation analysis of pneumatic classification of coal in coupling device for fluidized bed and conveying bed[J]. Coal Conversion, 2017, 40(5): 13-19.
30	阮琥. 粉体密相气力输送流量调控特性与气动物流传输特性研究[D]. 上海: 华东理工大学, 2023.
	Ruan H. Study on powder flow control characteristics of dense phase pneumatic conveying and pneumatic logistics transmission system[D]. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology, 2023.
31	Hager W H. Blasius: a life in research and education[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2003, 34(5): 566-571.
32	Tomita Y, Fujiwara Y. Capsule velocity in pipelines[J]. JSME International Journal. Ser. 2, Fluids Engineering, Heat Transfer, Power, Combustion, Thermophysical Properties, 1992, 35(4): 513-518.

[1]	赵金鹏, 张永民, 兰斌, 罗节文, 赵碧丹, 王军武. 气固鼓泡床结构双流体传热模型及其模拟验证[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1497-1507.
[2]	徐百平, 梁瑞凤, 喻慧文, 吴桂群, 肖书平. 双螺杆挤出机强化三角形转子作用下的腔内分布混合模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(3): 858-866.
[3]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[4]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[5]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[6]	董明, 徐进良, 刘广林. 超临界水非均质特性分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2836-2847.
[7]	何宣志, 何永清, 闻桂叶, 焦凤. 磁液液滴颈部自相似破裂行为[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2889-2897.
[8]	郑志航, 马郡男, 闫子涵, 卢春喜. 提升管射流影响区内压力脉动特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2335-2350.
[9]	张伟政, 赵吉军, 马学忠, 张琦璇, 庞益祥, 张俊涛. 湍流效应对高速机械密封端面型槽冷却性能影响分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1228-1238.
[10]	李新亚, 邢雷, 蒋明虎, 赵立新. 倒锥注气强化井下油水分离水力旋流器性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1134-1144.
[11]	颜少航, 赖天伟, 王彦武, 侯予, 陈双涛. 微间隙内R134a空化可视化实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1054-1061.
[12]	章承浩, 罗京, 张吉松. 微反应器内基于氮氧自由基催化剂连续氧气/空气氧化反应的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 511-524.
[13]	卜治丞, 李思卓, 焦波, 王博, 甘智华. 不同冷凝段温度下液氮脉动热管可视化实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(12): 4892-4903.
[14]	熊昊, 梁潇予, 张晨曦, 白浩隆, 范晓宇, 魏飞. 重质油直接制化工品：多级逆流下行催化裂解技术[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 86-104.
[15]	罗佳, 吴双应, 肖兰, 周世耀, 陈志莉. 撞击速度对连续液滴撞击热圆柱壁面局部传热特性影响的实验[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2944-2951.