基于低场核磁共振的煤粉动态吸附测量

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20200676

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

煤层气的开发是我国非常规天然气开发的重要环节，与常规天然气不同的是煤层气中甲烷主要以吸附形式赋存在煤的一系列纳米孔中。甲烷在煤粉颗粒孔隙中吸附行为的动态过程对煤层气的开发具有重要意义。实现了一种基于低场核磁共振技术在线测量煤粉吸附特性的实验方法，通过横向驰豫分布区别孔隙中含氢流体分布，定量表征游离气和吸附气含量。结果表明煤粉颗粒的甲烷吸附在核磁共振的横向弛豫图谱中呈现多峰分布，其中弛豫时间在0.1～1 ms的峰包含了纳米孔隙中甲烷含气量的信息。随着时间增加，甲烷气体逐渐转换为吸附态。通过不同压力下核磁共振的横向弛豫图谱，定量分析了甲烷在颗粒样品中随时间和压力变化的动态吸附过程，并得到了等温吸附曲线且符合Langmuir拟合模型。

关键词: 吸附, 甲烷, 核磁共振, 横向弛豫, 纳米孔隙

Abstract:

The development of coalbed methane is an important part of unconventional natural gas in China. Methane gas in coal mainly occurs in the form of adsorption in a series of nanopores. The dynamic process of adsorption is of great significance for the exploitation of coalbed methane. The low field nuclear magnetic resonance experimental system for measuring the dynamic adsorption characteristics is built, and the dynamic adsorption process of methane with time and pressure is quantitatively analyzed by NMR transverse relaxation map. The methane in coal samples in the transverse relaxation map of NMR presents the multi-peak distribution. The relaxation time peak of 0.1—1 ms contains the information of methane gas content in nanopores. With the increase of time, the gas is gradually converted to the adsorption state. The isothermal adsorption curve of the sample can be obtained from the equilibrium adsorption amount at each pressure, which conforms to the fitting of Langmuir model.

Key words: adsorption, methane, nuclear magnetic resonance, transverse relaxation, nanopores

中图分类号:

O 647.32

陆韬杰, 胥蕊娜, 姜培学. 基于低场核磁共振的煤粉动态吸附测量[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(S2): 195-200.

Taojie LU, Ruina XU, Peixue JIANG. Dynamic adsorption measurement of coal particles based on low field NMR[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(S2): 195-200.

图/表 8

图1 核磁共振实验系统

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of nuclear magnetic resonance experimental system

图2 甲烷信号标定的不同压力下体相甲烷T2峰

Fig.2 Methane T2 signal peak under different pressure

图3 体相甲烷的峰面积与甲烷物质的量的关系

Fig.3 Relationship between peak area of bulk methane and amount of methane

图4 煤粉颗粒2.7 MPa甲烷的横向弛豫图谱

Fig.4 Transverse relaxation atlas of 2.7 MPa methane in pulverized coal particles

图5 煤粉颗粒2.7 MPa甲烷的动态横向弛豫图谱

Fig.5 Dynamic transverse relaxation of 2.7 MPa methane in pulverized coal particles

图6 随时间变化的体相甲烷峰面积（a）及动态吸附量（b）

Fig.6 Time-varying peak area of bulk methane (a) and dynamic adsorption amount (b)

图7 不同压力下煤粉颗粒的甲烷动态吸附曲线

Fig.7 Dynamic methane adsorption curves of pulverized coal particles under different pressures

图8 煤粉颗粒样的等温吸附曲线

Fig.8 Isothermal adsorption curves of pulverized coal particles

参考文献 30

1	龚俊波, 陈明洋, 黄翠, 等. 面向清洁生产的制药结晶[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(9): 3271-3278.
	Gong J B, Chen M Y, Huang C, et al. Clean production of pharmaceutical crystallization [J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(9): 3271-3278.
2	陈永武, 胡爱梅. 中国煤层气产业形成和发展面临的机遇与挑战[J]. 天然气工业, 2000, 20(4): 19-23.
	Chen Y W, Hu A M. Opportunity and competition faced by forming and developing the coal-bed gas industry in China [J]. Nat. Gas Ind., 2000, 20(4): 19-23.
3	Fu X H, Qin Y, Zhang W H, et al. Fractal classification and natural classification of coal pore structure based on migration of coal bed methane [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2005, 50(1): 66-71.
4	Weishauptová Z, Medek J. Bound forms of methane in the porous system of coal [J]. Fuel, 1998, 77(1/2): 71-76.
5	Clarkson C R, Bustin R M. Binary gas adsorption/desorption isotherms: effect of moisture and coal composition upon carbon dioxide selectivity over methane [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2000, 42(4): 241-271.
6	Yu H G, Zhou L L, Guo W J, et al. Predictions of the adsorption equilibrium of methane/carbon dioxide binary gas on coals using Langmuir and ideal adsorbed solution theory under feed gas conditions [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2008, 73(2): 115-129.
7	Vasques G M, Grunwald S, Sickman J O. Comparison of multivariate methods for inferential modeling of soil carbon using visible/near-infrared spectra [J]. Geoderma, 2008, 146(1/2): 14-25.
8	Busch A, Gensterblum Y. CBM and CO₂-ECBM related sorption processes in coal: a review [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2011, 87(2): 49-71.
9	Busch A, Gensterblum Y, Krooss B M. Methane and CO₂ sorption and desorption measurements on dry Argonne premium coals: pure components and mixtures [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2003, 55(2/3/4): 205-224.
10	Gensterblum Y, van Hemert P, Billemont P, et al. European inter-laboratory comparison of high pressure CO₂ sorption isotherms (I): Activated carbon [J]. Carbon, 2009, 47(13): 2958-2969.
11	Busch A, Gensterblum Y, Krooss B M, et al. Methane and carbon dioxide adsorption-diffusion experiments on coal: upscaling and modeling [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2004, 60(2/3/4): 151-168.
12	Ross D J K, Bustin R M. Impact of mass balance calculations on adsorption capacities in microporous shale gas reservoirs [J]. Fuel, 2007, 86(17/18): 2696-2706.
13	张庆玲. 页岩容量法等温吸附实验中异常现象分析[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2015, 43(5): 31-33.
	Zhang Q L. The analysis of abnormal phenomena in shale isothermal absorption volumetric test [J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2015, 43(5): 31-33.
14	张庆玲, 曹利戈. 煤的等温吸附测试中数据处理问题研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2003, 28(2): 131-135.
	Zhang Q L, Cao L G. Study of data processing in coal sorption isotherm testing [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2003, 28(2): 131-135.
15	周尚文, 李奇, 薛华庆, 等. 页岩容量法和重量法等温吸附实验对比研究[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(5): 1690-1697.
	Zhou S W, Li Q, Xue H Q, et al. Comparative study on the volumetric and gravimetric method for isothermal adsorption experiment of shale [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(5): 1690-1697.
16	Belmabkhout Y, Frere M, de Weireld G. High-pressure adsorption measurements: a comparative study of the volumetric and gravimetric methods [J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2004, 15(5): 848.
17	Degance A E, Morgan W D, Yee D. High pressure adsorption of methane, nitrogen and carbon dioxide on coal substrates [J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 1993, 82(2): 215-224.
18	Chaback J J, Morgan W D, Yee D. Sorption of nitrogen, methane, carbon dioxide and their mixtures on bituminous coals at in-situ conditions [J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 1996, 117(1/2): 289-296.
19	Genetti D, Fletcher T H, Pugmire R J. Development and application of a correlation of ¹³C NMR chemical structural analyses of coal based on elemental composition and volatile matter content [J]. Energy & Fuels, 1999, 13(1): 60-68.
20	Coates G R, Xiao L Z, Prammer M G. NMR Logging: Principles and Applications [M]. Houston: Haliburton Energy Services, 1999.
21	Yao Y B, Liu D M, Che Y, et al. Petrophysical characterization of coals by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [J]. Fuel, 2010, 89(7): 1371-1380.
22	Alexeev A D, Vasylenko T A, Ul'Yanova E V. Phase states of methane in fossil coals [J]. Solid State Communications, 2004, 130(10): 669-673.
23	Gerritsma C J, Trappeniers N J. Proton-spin-lattice relaxation and self-diffusion in methanes (I): Spin-echo spectrometer and preparation of the methane samples [J]. Physica, 1971, 51(3): 365-380.
24	Akkurt R, Vinegar H J, Tutunjian P N, et al. NMR logging of natural gas reservoirs [C]// SPWLA 36th Annual Logging Symposium. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts, 1995.
25	Guo R, Mannhardt K, Kantzas A. Characterizing moisture and gas content of coal by low-field NMR [C]// Canadian International Petroleum Conference. Petroleum Society of Canada, 2006.
26	Yao Y B, Liu D M, Xie S B. Quantitative characterization of methane adsorption on coal using a low-field NMR relaxation method [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2014, 131: 32-40.
27	Glueckauf E. Theory of chromatography (10): Formula for diffusion into spheres and their application to chromatography [J]. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 1955, 51: 1540-1551.
28	Hari P, Chang C T P, Kulkarni R, et al. NMR characterization of hydrocarbon gas in porous media [J]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1998, 16(5/6): 545-547.
29	Godefroy S, Korb J P, Fleury M, et al. Surface nuclear magnetic relaxation and dynamics of water and oil in microporous media [J]. Physical Review E, 2001, 64(2): 021605.
30	Le Doussal P, Sen P N. Decay of nuclear magnetization by diffusion in a parabolic magnetic field: an exactly solvable model [J]. Physical Review B, 1992, 46(6): 3465.

[1]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[2]	杨学金, 杨金涛, 宁平, 王访, 宋晓双, 贾丽娟, 冯嘉予. 剧毒气体PH₃的干法净化技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3742-3755.
[3]	盛冰纯, 于建国, 林森. 铝基锂吸附剂分离高钠型地下卤水锂资源过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3375-3385.
[4]	张瑞航, 曹潘, 杨锋, 李昆, 肖朋, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8纳米流体天然气乙烷回收工艺的产品纯度关键影响因素分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[5]	高燕, 伍鹏, 尚超, 胡泽君, 陈晓东. 基于双流体喷嘴的磁性琼脂糖微球的制备及其蛋白吸附性能探究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3457-3471.
[6]	陈吉, 洪泽, 雷昭, 凌强, 赵志刚, 彭陈辉, 崔平. 基于分子动力学的焦炭溶损反应及其机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2935-2946.
[7]	刘晓洋, 喻健良, 侯玉洁, 闫兴清, 张振华, 吕先舒. 螺旋微通道对掺氢甲烷爆轰传播的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3139-3148.
[8]	王杰, 丘晓琳, 赵烨, 刘鑫洋, 韩忠强, 许雍, 蒋文瀚. 聚电解质静电沉积改性PHBV抗氧化膜的制备与性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3068-3078.
[9]	牛超, 沈胜强, 杨艳, 潘泊年, 李熠桥. 甲烷BOG喷射器流动过程计算与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2858-2868.
[10]	王新悦, 王俊杰, 曹思贤, 王翠, 李灵坤, 吴宏宇, 韩静, 吴昊. 玻璃内包材界面修饰对机械应力诱导的单克隆抗体聚集体形成的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2580-2588.
[11]	周小文, 杜杰, 张战国, 许光文. 基于甲烷脉冲法的Fe₂O₃-Al₂O₃载氧体还原特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2611-2623.
[12]	陈韶云, 徐东, 陈龙, 张禹, 张远方, 尤庆亮, 胡成龙, 陈建. 单层聚苯胺微球阵列结构的制备及其吸附性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2228-2238.
[13]	王蕾, 王磊, 白云龙, 何柳柳. SA膜状锂离子筛的制备及其锂吸附性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2046-2056.
[14]	蔺彩虹, 王丽, 吴瑜, 刘鹏, 杨江峰, 李晋平. 沸石中碱金属阳离子对CO₂/N₂O吸附分离性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2013-2021.
[15]	李辰鑫, 潘艳秋, 何流, 牛亚宾, 俞路. 基于碳微晶结构的炭膜模型及其气体分离模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2057-2066.