低温输运管道预冷过程的气液两相数值分析

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20201609

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

低温流体在输运管道中预冷时会出现复杂的气液两相流现象。本研究的数值仿真主要针对液氮在管道内沸腾过程中的传热特性、气泡的生成规律、临界热通量等进行分析。通过改变管道直径、入口液氮流量，讨论了不同时刻计算域内部的温度、热通量以及两相分布规律，最终得到研究范围内的临界热通量（CHF）特性。研究发现，流体温度突变时间随着管径的减小而提前，随着流量的增大而后延；壁面温度变化幅度随着管径的增大而增大；CHF值随着管径的减小而增加，随着入口流量的增加而减小。

关键词: 预冷, 沸腾, 汽化, 计算流体力学, 气液两相流

Abstract:

There are many applications about cryogenic multiphase flow in various industry situations. In this paper, the precooling flow of liquid nitrogen in a mini pipe was discussed with numerical simulation, some characteristics were displayed such as, bubbles formation, critical heat flux, and temperature profiles, etc. The employed mathematical and physical methods were verified with some experimental data in the previous literature. According to simulation results about precooling processes, the temperature drop of internal fluid happened early with the pipe diameter decreasing, and the temperature drop happened lately with the liquid nitrogen mass flow increasing. The amplitude of the wall temperature drop decreased with the pipe diameter decreasing. In the range of calculation conditions, the higher CHF values occurred with less inner diameter tubes and higher mass flow rate.

Key words: precooling, boiling, vaporization, CFD, gas-liquid flow

中图分类号:

TK 124

林恩承, 王文, 匡以武, 石玉美, 耑锐, 孙礼杰. 低温输运管道预冷过程的气液两相数值分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(S1): 153-160.

LIN Encheng, WANG Wen, KUANG Yiwu, SHI Yumei, ZHUAN Rui, SUN Lijie. Numerical analysis of cryogenic two-phase precooling flow in a mini pipe[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(S1): 153-160.

图/表 17

图1 管道几何模型

Fig.1 Geometric model

表1 计算工况

Table 1 Calculation condition

工况	质量流量/ (g/s)	管内径/ mm
1	1.6	12.7
2	1.6	11.7
3	1.6	10.7
4	3.2	12.7
5	4.8	12.7

图2 网格无关性曲线

Fig.2 Grid independent curves

图3 网格尺度分布模型

Fig.3 Grid distribution model

图4 监测点位置[9]

Fig.4 Location of monitoring points

表2 数值计算温度与文献［9］试验数据对比

Table 2 Comparison of calculated temperature with experimental data

时间/ s	监测点入口温度/ K	监测点流体温度/ K	监测点壁面温度/ K	质量流量/ (g/s)	过渡区时长/ s
0	77 /77	290 /290	295 /295	1.6	121 /149
100	77 /77	273 /285	278 /289
200	77 /77	200 /224	226 /242
300	77 /77	80 /86	145 /168
400	77 /77	80 /83	86 /113
500	77 /77	80 /82	85 /96
最大误差		0.12	0.31		0.23

表3 压降的计算结果与文献［9］试验数据对比

Table 3 Comparison of calculated pressure differences with experimental data

时间/ s	入口压力/ kPa
0	200 /200
40	186 /190
80	173 /177
120	160 /165
最大误差	0.03

图5 瞬态试验数据-数值分析数据对比

Fig.5 Comparison of transient experimental data and numerical analysis data

图6 不同时刻的流型

Fig.6 Flow pattern in precooling process

图7 预冷中气膜的演化过程

Fig.7 Evolution of nitrogen film

图8 不同时刻的壁温

Fig.8 Wall temperature at different times

图9 不同工况入口5.5 m处瞬态温度变化

Fig.9 Transient temperature change of 5.5 m under different working conditions

图10 不同工况瞬态压降变化

Fig.10 Transient pressure drop variation under different working conditions

图11 CHF值达到空泡份额82%的气相体积比云图

Fig.11 Volume fraction distribution when CHF occurs

图12 不同截面处氮气体积分布云图

Fig.12 Volume fraction nephogram of gas phase on different sections

图13 不同直径及不同质量流量时管道内部及壁面的沿程热通量变化

Fig.13 Variation of heat flux along pipe with different diameters and different mass flow rates

表4 不同工况下的CHF值

Table 4 CHF values under different working conditions

工况	热通量/(kW/m²)
1	32.5
2	35.7
3	38.9
4	30.2
5	28.3

参考文献 14

1	Kataoka I, Kodama S, Tomiyama A, et al. Study on analytical prediction of forced convective CHF based on multi-fluid model [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1997, 175(1/2): 107-117.
2	Ha S J, No H C. A dry-spot model of critical heat flux applicable to both pool boiling and subcooled forced convection boiling [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2000, 43(2): 241-250.
3	Kodama S, Kataoka I. Critical heat flux prediction method based on two-phase turbulence model [J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2003, 40(10): 725-733.
4	Weisman J, Ileslamlou S. A phenomenological model for prediction of critical heat flux under highly subcooled conditions [J]. Fusion Technology, 1988, 13(4): 654-659.
5	Kocamustafaogullari G, Ishii M. Interfacial area and nucleation site density in boiling systems [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1983, 26(9): 1377-1387.
6	Darr S R, Hartwig J W. Two-phase convection heat transfer correlations for liquid hydrogen pipe chilldown [J]. Cryogenics, 2020, 105: 102999.
7	Darr S R, Hu H, Shaeffer R, et al. Numerical simulation of the liquid nitrogen chilldown of a vertical tube [C]// 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2015.
8	Hahne E, Barthau G. Heat transfer and nucleation in pool-boiling [J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2006, 45(3): 209-216.
9	Jin L X, Park C, Cho H, et al. Experimental investigation on chill-down process of cryogenic flow line [J]. Cryogenics, 2016, 79: 96-105.
10	Liu X F, Chen X Y, Zhang Q Y, et al. Investigation on CHF of saturated liquid nitrogen flow boiling in a horizontal small channel [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 125: 1025-1036.
11	张翔, 彭敏俊, 丛腾龙, 等. 基于确定性抽样的过冷沸腾边界条件不确定性分析 [J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(11): 2054-2062.
	Zhang X, Peng M J, Cong T L, et al. Uncertainty analysis on boundary condition in subcooled boiling flow by deterministic sampling [J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2020, 54(11): 2054-2062.
12	董晓朦, 张志俭, 刘东, 等. 棒束通道定位格架沸腾临界特性数值研究 [J]. 核动力工程, 2018, 39(6): 5-10.
	Dong X M, Zhang Z J, Liu D, et al. Numerical study on boiling critical characteristics of rod beam channel positioning lattice [J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2018, 39(6): 5-10.
13	Zhang B C, Li Q L, Wang Y, et al. Experimental investigation of nitrogen flow boiling heat transfer in a single mini-channel [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 2020, 21(2): 147-166.
14	郑乐乐, 熊进标, 卢川. 基于CMFD模拟的圆管内DNB型CHF预测 [J]. 核科学与工程, 2018, 38(6): 935-943.
	Zheng L L, Xiong J B, Lu C. CMFD prediction of departure from nucleate boiling critical heat flux in a tube [J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2018, 38(6): 935-943.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

326

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	3	0	0	323

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	58	268
比例	18%	82%

摘要

388

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	388

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	277	111
比例	71%	29%

[1]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[2]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[3]	杨欣, 王文, 徐凯, 马凡华. 高压氢气加注过程中温度特征仿真分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 280-286.
[4]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[5]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[6]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[7]	温凯杰, 郭力, 夏诏杰, 陈建华. 一种耦合CFD与深度学习的气固快速模拟方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3775-3785.
[8]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[9]	袁佳琦, 刘政, 黄锐, 张乐福, 贺登辉. 泡状入流条件下旋流泵能量转换特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3807-3820.
[10]	高燕, 伍鹏, 尚超, 胡泽君, 陈晓东. 基于双流体喷嘴的磁性琼脂糖微球的制备及其蛋白吸附性能探究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3457-3471.
[11]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[12]	张佳怡, 何佳莉, 谢江鹏, 王健, 赵鹬, 张栋强. 渗透汽化技术用于锂电池生产中N-甲基吡咯烷酮回收的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3203-3215.
[13]	岳林静, 廖艺涵, 薛源, 李雪洁, 李玉星, 刘翠伟. 凹坑缺陷对厚孔板喉部空化流动特性影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3292-3308.
[14]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[15]	何晓崐, 刘锐, 薛园, 左然. MOCVD生长AlN单晶薄膜的气相和表面化学反应综述[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2800-2813.