气升式陶瓷膜过滤过程的气液两相流模拟

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151560

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (6): 2246-2254.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151560

气升式陶瓷膜过滤过程的气液两相流模拟

林进, 沈浩, 景文珩

南京工业大学材料化学工程国家重点实验室, 江苏南京 210009

收稿日期:2015-10-15 修回日期:2016-02-24 出版日期:2016-06-05 发布日期:2016-06-05
通讯作者: 景文珩
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(21176116);江苏省高校自然科学基金重大项目(15KJA530001);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目。

Simulation of gas-liquid two-phase flow for airlift ceramic membrane filtration process

LIN Jin, SHEN Hao, JING Wenheng

State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China

Received:2015-10-15 Revised:2016-02-24 Online:2016-06-05 Published:2016-06-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21176116), the Higher Education Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (15KJA530001) and the Project of Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用VOF双流体模型对19通道气升式陶瓷膜过滤装置进行气液两相流的流体动力学模拟,研究了曝气孔直径和曝气量对气升式陶瓷膜过滤装置的气含率、环流液速、膜面剪切力及膜管内湍流强度的影响,模拟结果与实验结果的误差在5%~10%之间。结果表明,气升管与降液管的气含率都随曝气量增大而增大,随曝气孔直径减小而增大;环流液速、膜面剪切力及膜管内的湍流强度都随曝气量增大先增大,当曝气量达到400L·h^-1时其增大趋势变缓。通过实验和模拟比较了3种不同孔径的曝气头,环流液速与曝气孔的直径关系不大,仅与曝气量相关,但曝气孔直径越小,其膜面剪切力越大,越有利于过滤过程的进行。

关键词: 气升式, 陶瓷膜, 计算流体力学, VOF方法, 两相流, 模拟

Abstract:

The influences of aerator aperture size and aeration rate on the gas hold-up, liquid circulation velocity, wall shear stress and turbulence intensity in a novel airlift ceramic membrane filtration equipment containing a 19-channel ceramic membrane was investigated by the CFD simulation. Further, the VOF model was adopted to simulate the flow state of the gas-liquid two-phase fluid and the mean error between experiment date and simulation date was 5%-10%. The results demonstrated that the gas hold-up increased with increasing aeration rate and decreasing aerator aperture size. The liquid circulation velocity, wall shear stress and turbulence intensity increased with increasing aeration rate, and the increasing trend became slow after the aeration rate reached 400 L·h^-1. For the three aperture aerator with different size, the comparison of experiment and simulation results have indicated that the liquid circulation velocity was only related to the aeration rate, and had little to do with aerator aperture size. Decreasing of the aerator aperture size was conductive to the increasing of the wall shear stress and the filtration process.

Key words: airlift, ceramic membrane, computational fluid dynamics, VOF, two-phase flow, simulation

中图分类号:

TQ052

林进, 沈浩, 景文珩. 气升式陶瓷膜过滤过程的气液两相流模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(6): 2246-2254.

LIN Jin, SHEN Hao, JING Wenheng. Simulation of gas-liquid two-phase flow for airlift ceramic membrane filtration process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(6): 2246-2254.

参考文献 23

[1]	CABASSUD C, LABORIE S, LAINE J M. How slug flow can improve ultrafiltration flux in organic hollow fibres [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 1997, 128(1): 93-101.
[2]	张文晖, 李鑫钢. 气升式内环流反应器内局部气含率径向分布 [J]. 化工学报, 2010, 61(5): 1118-1122. ZHANG W H, LI X G. Local gas holdup profiles in an internal-loop airlift reactor [J]. CIESC Journal, 2010, 61(5): 1118-1122.
[3]	ROY S, DHOTRE M T, JOSHI J B. CFD simulation of flow and axial dispersion in external loop airlift reactor [J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2006, 84(8): 677-690.
[4]	贺萧, 车德福. 垂直及倾斜上升管内气液两相弹状流壁面剪切力的模拟 [J]. 化工学报, 2008, 59(6): 1391-1395. HE X, CHE D F. CFD simulation of wall shear stress in gas-liquid vertical and inclined upward slug flow [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China), 2008, 59(6): 1391-1395.
[5]	VAN SINT A M, DEEN N G, KUIPERS J. Numerical simulation of gas bubbles behavior using a three dimensional volume of fluid method [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(11): 2999-3011.
[6]	ABID A, VISHNU P. CFD simulations for continuous flow of bubbles through gas-liquid columns: application of VOF method [J]. Chemical Product and Process Modeling, 2007, 9(1): 1-19.
[7]	LIN J, HAN M H, WANG T F, et al. Influence of the gas distributor on the local hydrodynamic behavior of an external loop airlift reactor [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2004, 102(1): 51-59.
[8]	AURO A S, SUSHANTA K M. Effect of dynamic contact angle in a volume of fluid (VOF) model for a microfluidic capillary flow [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2009, 339: 461-480.
[9]	谷芳, 刘春江, 袁希钢, 等. 倾斜波纹板上液膜流动的CFD模拟 [J]. 化工学报, 2005, 56(3): 462-467. GU F, LIU C J, YUAN X G, et al. CFD simulation of liquid film flow on inclined wavy plates surface [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China), 2005, 56(3): 462-467.
[10]	BRACKBILL J U, KOTHE D B, ZEMACH C A. Continuum method for modeling surface tension [J]. Computational Physics, 1992, 100: 335-354.
[11]	MEHENDALE S S, JACOBI A M, AHAH R K. Fluid flow and heat transfer at micro and meso-scales with application to heat exchanger design [J]. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2000, 53(7): 175-193.
[12]	YOUNGBAE H, NAOKI S, NOBUHIDE K. Measurement of liquid film thickness in a micro parallel channel with interferometer and laser focus displacement meter [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2011, 37: 36-45.
[13]	TAHA T, CUI Z F. CFD modelling of gas-sparged ultrafiltration in tubular membrane [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2002, 210(1): 13-27.
[14]	CHAFAA B, CATHERINE X, JEAN P R. Effect of gas liquid separator and liquid height on the global hydrodynamic parameters of an external loop airlift contactor [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 1997, 66(2): 91-95.
[15]	宋庆唐, 金家琪, 吴桂英, 等. 二维鼓泡床内气泡尺寸分布的实验与CFD模拟 [J]. 化工学报, 2008, 59(2): 336-340. SONG Q T, JIN J Q, WU G Y, et al. Experiment and CFD simulation of bubble size distribution in 2D gas-liquid bubble column [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China), 2008, 59(2): 336-340.
[16]	RENZO D F. Liquid circulation rates in two and three-phase external airlift reactors [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2005, 109(1/2/3): 49-55.
[17]	RICE G, BARBER A, STEVENS G, et al. Fouling of NF membranes by dairy ultrafiltration permeates [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 330(1/2): 117-126.
[18]	MERCIER B, MARANGES M, LAFFORGUE M, et al. Hydrodynamics of slug flow applied to cross-flow filtration in narrow tubes [J]. AIChE Journal, 2000, 46: 476-488.
[19]	WIBISONO Y, CORNELISSEN E R, KEMPERMAN A J B, et al. Two-phase flow in membrane processes: a technology with a future [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 453: 566-602.
[20]	LI Q Y, CUI Z F, PEPPER D S. Effect of bubble size and frequency on the permeate flux of gas sparged ultrafiltration with tubular membranes [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 1997, 67(1): 71-75.
[21]	MEI H W, XU H, JING W H, et al. Application of airlift ceramic ultrafiltration membrane ozonation reactor in the degradation of humic acids [J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2015, 56: 285-294.
[22]	石风强, 景文珩, 邢卫红. 陶瓷膜气升式纳滤装置过滤杆菌肽水溶液的研究 [J].高校化学工程学报, 2012, 26(2):189-195. SHI F Q, JING W H, XING W H. Study on filtration of bacitracin aqueous by ceramic membrane airlift nanofiltration equipment [J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2012, 26(2): 189-195.
[23]	张峰, 景文珩, 邢卫红. 弹状流对陶瓷膜超滤葡聚糖水溶液的影响 [J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60(11): 2792-2797. ZHANG F, JING W H, XING W H. Effect of slug flow on dextran ultrafiltration in ceramic membrane process [J]. CIESC Journal, 2009, 60(11): 2792-2797.

气升式陶瓷膜过滤过程的气液两相流模拟

Simulation of gas-liquid two-phase flow for airlift ceramic membrane filtration process

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周绍华, 詹飞龙, 丁国良, 张浩, 邵艳坡, 刘艳涛, 郜哲明. 短管节流阀内流动噪声的实验研究及降噪措施[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 113-121.
[2]	叶展羽, 山訸, 徐震原. 用于太阳能蒸发的折纸式蒸发器性能仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 132-140.
[3]	张龙, 宋孟杰, 邵苛苛, 张旋, 沈俊, 高润淼, 甄泽康, 江正勇. 管翅式换热器迎风侧翅片末端霜层生长模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 179-182.
[4]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[5]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[6]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[7]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[8]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[9]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[10]	温凯杰, 郭力, 夏诏杰, 陈建华. 一种耦合CFD与深度学习的气固快速模拟方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3775-3785.
[11]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[12]	刘远超, 关斌, 钟建斌, 徐一帆, 蒋旭浩, 李耑. 单层XSe₂（X=Zr/Hf）的热电输运特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3968-3978.
[13]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[14]	宋明昊, 赵霏, 刘淑晴, 李国选, 杨声, 雷志刚. 离子液体脱除模拟油中挥发酚的多尺度模拟与研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3654-3664.
[15]	袁佳琦, 刘政, 黄锐, 张乐福, 贺登辉. 泡状入流条件下旋流泵能量转换特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3807-3820.