抗生素菌渣与煤混合燃烧特性及其动力学分析

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160789

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (1): 360-368.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160789

抗生素菌渣与煤混合燃烧特性及其动力学分析

洪晨^1,2, 杨强¹, 王志强¹, 邢奕^1,3, 沈茜¹, 李益飞¹, 贾蒙蒙¹, 冯丽慧¹

1 北京科技大学能源与环境工程学院, 北京 100083;
2 中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 北京 100085;
3 北京市工业典型污染物资源化处理重点实验室, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2016-06-08 修回日期:2016-07-14 出版日期:2017-01-05 发布日期:2017-01-05
通讯作者: 邢奕
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51508553）；科技北京百名领军人才培养工程资助项目（LJ201620）；中国博士后科学基金项目（2016M591266）。

Co-combustion characteristics and kinetic analysis of antibiotic bacterial residue and coal

HONG Chen^1,2, YANG Qiang¹, WANG Zhiqiang¹, XING Yi^1,3, SHEN Qian¹, LI Yifei¹, JIA Mengmeng¹, FENG Lihui¹

1 School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
2 Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;
3 Key Laboratory of Resource-Oriented Treatment of Industrial Pollutants, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2016-06-08 Revised:2016-07-14 Online:2017-01-05 Published:2017-01-05
Contact: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160789
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508553), Beijing Training Project for the Leading Talents in S & T (LJ201620) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (2016M591266).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以抗生素菌渣、煤为研究对象，利用热重-差示扫描量热仪（TG-DSC）研究两种物质单独以及混合燃烧的燃烧特性，并采用Coats-Redfern法确定混合燃烧的动力学参数。分析菌渣掺混比和粒径对燃烧过程的影响，阐明菌渣与煤混合燃烧的可能以及超细化燃烧的优势。结果表明：抗生素菌渣与煤混合燃烧主要包括3个阶段，添加菌渣能明显改善煤的燃烧特性。随着菌渣掺混比例的增加，着火温度、燃尽温度呈现降低的趋势。超细、非超细混合燃烧燃尽特性指数在菌渣掺混比为30%时最高，分别为5.82×10^-3、5.49×10^-3。超细混合燃烧活化能均低于非超细混合燃烧，说明超细化燃烧有利于降低活化能。超细、非超细混合燃烧活化能E和指前因子A之间均存在动力学补偿效应。

关键词: 菌渣, 煤, 混合燃烧, 动力学, 超细, 非超细

Abstract:

The combustion characteristics of antibiotics bacterial residue, coal and both blends were investigated using thermogravimetry-differential scanning calorimetry(TG-DSC), and the kinetic parameters of co-combustion was determined by Coats-Redfern method.The influence of bacterial residue blending ratio and particle size on combustion process was analyzed, and the possibility of co-combustion with coal and the advantages of superfine combustion were clarified.The results showed that co-combustion of antibiotic bacterial residue and coal mainly consisted of three stages, and adding bacterial residue can significantly improve the combustion characteristics of coal.With increasing bacterial residue blending ratio, the ignition temperature and burnout temperature decreased.Burnout characteristics index of superfine co-combustion and non-superfine co-combustion reached the maximum value at the bacterial residue blending ratio of 30%, which is 5.82×10^-3 and 5.49×10^-3, respectively.The activation energy of superfine co-combustion was lower than that of non-superfine co-combustion, indicating that the superfine combustion was beneficial to reduce the activation energy.There existed kinetic compensation effect on the activation energy E and the pre-exponential factor A of the superfine co-combustion and non-superfine co-combustion.

Key words: antibiotic residue, coal, co-combustion, kinetic, superfine, non-superfine

中图分类号:

X787

洪晨, 杨强, 王志强, 邢奕, 沈茜, 李益飞, 贾蒙蒙, 冯丽慧. 抗生素菌渣与煤混合燃烧特性及其动力学分析[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(1): 360-368.

HONG Chen, YANG Qiang, WANG Zhiqiang, XING Yi, SHEN Qian, LI Yifei, JIA Mengmeng, FENG Lihui. Co-combustion characteristics and kinetic analysis of antibiotic bacterial residue and coal[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(1): 360-368.

参考文献 25

[1]	石鹏, 艾晗, 王辉, 等. 抗生素制药菌渣的处理处置技术进展与分析[J]. 中国抗生素杂志, 2015, 40(7):486-494. SHI P, AI H, WANG H, et al. Progress and analysis of antibiotics bacterial residue disposal[J]. Chinese Journal of Antibiotics, 2015, 40(7):486-494.
[2]	贡丽鹏, 郭斌, 任爱玲, 等. 抗生素菌渣理化特性[J]. 河北科技大学学报, 2012, 33(2):190-196. GONG L P, GUO B, REN A L, et al. Physical and chemical properties of antibiotics bacterial residue[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology, 2012, 33(2):190-196.
[3]	DU Y Y, JIANG X G, MA X J, et al. Cogasification of biofermenting residue in a coal-water slurry gasifier[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(3):2054-2058.
[4]	DU Y Y, JIANG X G, MA X J, et al. Evaluation of cofiring bioferment residue with coal at different proportions:combustion characteristics and kinetics[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(10):6295-6303.
[5]	JIANG X G, FENG Y H, LV G J, et al. Bioferment residue:TG-FTIR study and cocombustion in a MSW incineration plant[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(24):13539-13544.
[6]	LIU X, CHEN M Q, WEI Y H. Assessment on oxygen enriched air co-combustion performance of biomass/bituminous coal[J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 92:428-436.
[7]	姜秀民, 刘辉, 闫澈, 等. 超细煤粉NOx和SO2排放特性与燃烧特性[J]. 化工学报, 2004, 55(5):783-787. JIANG X M, LIU H, YAN C, et al. NOx and SO2 emission and combustion characteristics of super fine pulverized coal particle[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2004, 55(5):783-787.
[8]	KASTANAKI E, VAMVUKA D. A comparative reactivity and kinetic study on the combustion of coal-biomass char blends[J]. Fuel, 2006, 85(9):1186-1193.
[9]	MUTHURAMAN M, NAMIOKA T, YOSHIKAWA K. Characteristics of co-combustion and kinetic study on hydrothermally treated municipal solid waste with different rank coals:a thermogravimetric analysis[J]. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(1):141-148.
[10]	MOON C, SUNG Y, AHN S, et al. Thermochemical and combustion behaviors of coals of different ranks and their blends for pulverized-coal combustion[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 54(1):111-119.
[11]	LIN Y S, MA X Q, NING X X, et al. TGA FTIR analysis of co-combustion characteristics of paper sludge and oil-palm solid wastes[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 89:727-734.
[12]	王玉召, 李江鹏. 生物质与煤混燃的燃烧特性实验研究[J]. 锅炉技术, 2010, 41(5):72-74. WANG Y Z, LI J P. Experiment to co-combustion characteristics of of biomass and coal[J]. Boiler Technology, 2010, 41(5):72-74.
[13]	聂其红, 孙绍增, 李争起, 等. 褐煤混煤燃烧特性的热重分析法研究[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2001, 7(1):72-76. NIE Q H, SUN S Z, LI Z Q, et al. Thermogravimetric analysis on the combustion characteristics of brown coal blends[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2001, 7(1):72-76.
[14]	BURATTI C, MOUSAVI S, BARBANERA M, et al. Thermal behaviour and kinetic study of the olive oil production chain residues and their mixtures during co-combustion[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 214:266-275.
[15]	ALVAREZ A, PIZARRO C, GARCIA R, et al. Determination of kinetic parameters for biomass combustion[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 216:36-43.
[16]	司耀辉, 陈汉平, 王贤华, 等. 农业秸秆燃烧特性及动力学分析[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(1):128-132. SI Y H, CHEN H P, WANG X H, et al. Combustion characteristic and kinetic analysis of agriculture straw[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2012, 40(1):128-132.
[17]	郭斌, 贡丽鹏, 刘仁平, 等. 土霉素菌渣的热解特性及动力学研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2013, 34(9):1504-1508. GUO B, GONG L P, LIU R P, et al. Study on pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of terramycin bacterial residue[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2013, 34(9):1504-1508.
[18]	武宏香, 赵增立, 李海滨, 等. 污泥与煤、木屑的混合燃烧特性及动力学研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2011, 34(7):73-77. WU H X, ZHAO Z L, LI H B, et al. Co-combustion of sewage sludge,coal and sawdust[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 34(7):73-77.
[19]	ZHOU C, LIU G, CHENG S, et al. Thermochemical and trace element behavior of coal gangue, agricultural biomass and their blends during co-combustion[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 166:243-251.
[20]	LI X G, MA B G, XU L, et al. Thermogravimetric analysis of the co-combustion of the blends with high ash coal and waste tyres[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 2006, 441(1):79-83.
[21]	LIU J, JIANG X, SHEN J, et al. Chemical properties of superfine pulverized coal particles (1):Electron paramagnetic resonance analysis of free radical characteristics[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2014, 25(3):916-925.
[22]	位爱竹, 李增华, 杨永良. 破碎、氧化和光照对煤中自由基的影响分析[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 21(4):19-22. WEI A Z, LI Z H, YANG Y L. Influence from fragmentation, oxidation and ultraviolet to free radical of coal[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2006, 21(4):19-22.
[23]	LIU J X, JIANG X M, HUANG X Y, et al. Morphological characterization of super fine pulverized coal particle (2):AFM investigation of single coal particle[J]. Fuel, 2010, 89(12):3884-3891.
[24]	马仑, 汪涂维, 方庆艳, 等. 混煤燃烧过程中的交互作用:机理实验研究与数值模拟[J]. 煤炭学报, 2015, 40(11):2647-2653. MA L, WANG T W, FANG Q Y, et al. Interaction of blended-coal combustion process:experimental study and numerical simulation of mechanism[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2015, 40(11):2647-2653.
[25]	ESSENHIGH R H, MISRA M K. Autocorrelations of kinetic parameters in coal and char reactions[J]. Energy and Fuels, 1990, 4(2):171-177.

抗生素菌渣与煤混合燃烧特性及其动力学分析

Co-combustion characteristics and kinetic analysis of antibiotic bacterial residue and coal

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	毕丽森, 刘斌, 胡恒祥, 曾涛, 李卓睿, 宋健飞, 吴翰铭. 粗糙界面上纳米液滴蒸发模式的分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 172-178.
[2]	于宏鑫, 邵双全. 水结晶过程的分子动力学模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 250-258.
[3]	金正浩, 封立杰, 李舒宏. 氨水溶液交叉型再吸收式热泵的能量及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 53-63.
[4]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[5]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[6]	范孝雄, 郝丽芳, 范垂钢, 李松庚. LaMnO₃/生物炭催化剂低温NH₃-SCR催化脱硝性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3821-3830.
[7]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[8]	赵佳佳, 田世祥, 李鹏, 谢洪高. SiO₂-H₂O纳米流体强化煤尘润湿性的微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3931-3945.
[9]	吴雷, 刘姣, 李长聪, 周军, 叶干, 刘田田, 朱瑞玉, 张秋利, 宋永辉. 低阶粉煤催化微波热解制备含碳纳米管的高附加值改性兰炭末[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3956-3967.
[10]	郑佳丽, 李志会, 赵新强, 王延吉. 离子液体催化合成2-氰基呋喃反应动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3708-3715.
[11]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[12]	曾如宾, 沈中杰, 梁钦锋, 许建良, 代正华, 刘海峰. 基于分子动力学模拟的Fe₂O₃纳米颗粒烧结机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3353-3365.
[13]	李锦潼, 邱顺, 孙文寿. 煤浆法烟气脱硫中草酸和紫外线强化煤砷浸出过程[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3522-3532.
[14]	倪文翔, 赵京, 李博, 魏小林, 吴东垠, 刘迪, 王强. 转炉煤气全干法显热回收工艺中余热锅炉积灰特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3485-3493.
[15]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.