控制策略对贮箱热力排气系统性能的影响

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170679

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (12): 4702-4708.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170679

控制策略对贮箱热力排气系统性能的影响

黄永华¹, 陈忠灿¹, 汪彬¹, 李鹏², 孙培杰²

1 上海交通大学制冷与低温工程研究所, 上海 200240;
2 上海宇航系统工程研究所, 上海 201108

收稿日期:2017-05-25 修回日期:2017-07-28 出版日期:2017-12-05 发布日期:2017-12-05
通讯作者: 黄永华
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51676118）；上海市低温技术与测试应用平台项目（16DZ2291500）。

Effect of pressure control strategy on performance of thermodynamic vent system for storage tank

HUANG Yonghua¹, CHEN Zhongcan¹, WANG Bin¹, LI Peng², SUN Peijie²

1 Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;
2 Shanghai Aerospace System Engineering Institute, Shanghai 201108, China

Received:2017-05-25 Revised:2017-07-28 Online:2017-12-05 Published:2017-12-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51676118) and the Shanghai Cryogenic Technology Service Center (16DZ2291500).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

热力排气系统（TVS）是通过流体混合与节流换热排气双重作用实现低温推进剂在轨长期贮存的一种有效的压力控制技术。针对TVS的混合模式和排气模式提出了3种运行控制策略。在以R141b为气液相变贮存介质的室温温区TVS模拟装置上，研究了这3种控制策略对TVS作用下的贮箱内液体温度、热分层以及排气损失的影响。结果表明，当采用基于气枕压力运行混合模式，并且同时基于液体温度对应的饱和压力和气枕压力运行排气模式这一控制策略时，TVS不仅可以实现最小的排气损失，也可实现较低的液体贮存温度和较小的热分层。为今后低温TVS系统的控制设计和实际运行提供了指导。

关键词: 推进剂贮存, 相变, 热力排气, 控制策略, 压力控制

Abstract:

Thermodynamic vent system (TVS) is deemed as an efficient pressure control technique for long-term on-orbit storage of cryogenic propellants through fluid mixing and a combination of throttling and heat exchanging before venting. Three control strategies have been proposed to automate the mixing mode and venting mode of the TVS. The effects of these control strategies on liquid temperature, stratification and mass loss are investigated on a TVS simulator, which works at room temperature with R141b as the working fluid. The results show that the TVS can not only achieve a significant vent loss but also lower liquid temperatures and weaker stratification when one of the strategies is applied whose mixing mode operates based on ullage pressure and the vent mode is controlled based on both the ullage pressure and the bulk liquid temperature. This investigation provides guidance for the design and operation of cryogenic TVS.

Key words: propellant storage, phase change, thermodynamic vent, control strategy, pressure control

中图分类号:

V511.6

黄永华, 陈忠灿, 汪彬, 李鹏, 孙培杰. 控制策略对贮箱热力排气系统性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4702-4708.

HUANG Yonghua, CHEN Zhongcan, WANG Bin, LI Peng, SUN Peijie. Effect of pressure control strategy on performance of thermodynamic vent system for storage tank[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(12): 4702-4708.

参考文献 25

[1]	张天平. 空间低温流体贮存的压力控制技术进展[J]. 真空与低温, 2006, 12(3):125-131. ZHANG T P. The progress of pressure control technology of cryogenic liquid storage in space[J]. Vacuum & Cryogenics, 2006, 12(3):125-131.
[2]	KUMAR S, PRASAD B, VENKATARATHNAM G. Influence of surface evaporation on stratification in liquid hydrogen tanks of different aspect ratios[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(12):1954-1960.
[3]	HASTINGS L, TUCKER S, FLACHBART R. Marshall space flight center in-space cryogenic fluid management program overview[C]//American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Tucson, Arizona, 2005.
[4]	HEDAYAT A, HASTINGS L, FLACHBART R. Test data analysis of a spray bar zero-gravity liquid hydrogen vent system for upper stages[C]//AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP, 2004, 710:1171-1178.
[5]	HEDAYAT A, BAILEY J, HASTINGS L, et al. Thermodynamic venting system (TVS) modeling and comparison with liquid hydrogen test data[C]//American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Hunsville, Alabama, 2003.
[6]	FLACHBART R, HASTINGS L, MARTIN J. Testing of a spray bar zero gravity cryogenic vent system for upper stages[C]//American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Los Angeles, California, 1999.
[7]	HEDAYAT A, NELSON S, HASTING L, et al. Liquid nitrogen (oxygen simulant) thermodynamic vent system test data analysis[C]//AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP, 2006, 823:232-239.
[8]	FLACHBART R, HASTINGS L, HEDAYAT A, et al. Testing of a spray-bar thermodynamic vent system in liquid nitrogen[C]//AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP, 2006, 823:240-247.
[9]	FLACHBART R, HASTINGS L, HEDAYAT A, et al. Testing the effects of helium pressurant on thermodynamic vent system performance with liquid hydrogen[J]. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, 2008, 985(1):1483-1490.
[10]	HASTINGS L, BOLSHINSKIY L, HEDAYAT A, et al. Liquid methane testing with a large-scale spray bar thermodynamic vent system[R]. NASA/TP-2014-218197, 2014.
[11]	FLACHBART R, HASTINGS L, HEDAYAT A, et al. Thermodynamic vent system performance testing with subcooled liquid methane and gaseous helium pressurant[J]. Cryogenics, 2008, 48(5/6):217-222.
[12]	MORAN M. Cryogenic fluid storage technology development:recent and planned efforts at NASA[R]. NASA/TM-215514, 2009.
[13]	VANOVERBEKE T. Thermodynamic vent system test in low earth orbit simulation[C]//40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 2004.
[14]	THIBAULT J, CORRE C, DEMEURE L, et al. Thermodynamic control systems for cryogenic propellant storage during long missions[C]//Proceedings of the ASME 20144th Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting. Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2014.
[15]	MER S, THIBAULT J, CORRE C. Active insulation technique applied to the experimental analysis of a thermodynamic control system for cryogenic propellant storage[J]. Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications, 2016, 8(2):021024.
[16]	胡伟峰, 申麟, 彭小波, 等. 低温推进剂长时间在轨的蒸发量控制关键技术分析[J]. 低温工程, 2011, (3):59-66. HU W F, SHEN L, PENG X B, et al. Key technology analysis of boil-off control study on cryogenic propellant long-term application on orbit[J]. Cryogenics, 2011, (3):59-66.
[17]	李鹏, 孙培杰, 包轶颖, 等. 低温推进剂长期在轨储存技术研究概述[J]. 载人航天, 2012, 18(1):30-36. LI P, SUN P J, BAO Y Y, et al. Cryogenic propellant long-term storage on orbit technology overview[J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2012, 18(1):30-36.
[18]	朱洪来, 孙沂昆, 张阿莉, 等. 低温推进剂在轨贮存与管理技术研究[J]. 载人航天, 2015, 21(1):13-18. ZHU H L, SUN Y K, ZHANG A L, et al. Research on on-orbit storage and management technology of cryogenic propellant[J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2015, 21(1):13-18.
[19]	颜露, 黄永华, 吴静怡, 等. 低温推进剂在轨储存热力学排气系统TVS研究进展[J]. 低温与超导, 2015, 43(2):5-13. YAN L, HUANG Y H, WU J Y, et al. Development of thermodynamic venting system technology for cryogenic propellant storage on orbit[J]. Cryogenics & Superconductivity, 2015, 43(2):5-13.
[20]	刘展, 厉彦忠, 王磊, 等. 低温推进剂长期在轨压力管理技术研究进展[J]. 宇航学报, 2014, 35(3):254-261. LIU Z, LI Y Z, WANG L, et al. Progress of study on longterm in-orbit pressure management technique for cryogenic propellant[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2014, 35(3):254-261.
[21]	马原, 厉彦忠, 王磊, 等. 低温燃料贮箱热力学排气系统优化分析与性能研究[J]. 低温与超导, 2014, 42(7):10-15. MA Y, LI Y Z, WANG L, et al. Optimized analysis and performance study on thermodynamic vent system in cryogenic fuel tank[J]. Cryogenics & Superconductivity, 2014, 42(7):10-15.
[22]	LIU Z, LI Y Z, ZHOU K. Thermal analysis of double-pipe heat exchanger in thermodynamic vent system[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 126:837-849.
[23]	汪彬, 黄永华, 吴静怡, 等. 液氢储箱热力学排气系统建模及控压特性[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(S2):20-25. WANG B, HUANG Y H, WU J Y, et al. Modeling and pressure control characteristics of thermodynamic venting system in a liquid hydrogen storage tank[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(S2):20-25.
[24]	陈忠灿, 李鹏, 孙培杰, 等. 工作于室温温区的热力学排气模拟与增压测试[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(7):8-15. CHEN Z C, LI P, SUN P J, et al. Simulation of a thermodynamic vent system working at room temperature and its preliminary pressurization testing[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2017, 51(7):8-15.
[25]	陈忠灿, 黄永华, 汪彬, 等. 热负荷对R141b热力学排气系统自增压特性及排气损失的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(10):4047-4054. CHEN Z C, HUANG Y H, WANG B, et al. Effect on self-pressurization characteristics and mass loss of thermodynamic vent system for refrigeration R141b by heat load[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(10):4047-4054.

控制策略对贮箱热力排气系统性能的影响

Effect of pressure control strategy on performance of thermodynamic vent system for storage tank

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[2]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[3]	吴延鹏, 刘乾隆, 田东民, 陈凤君. 相变材料与热管耦合的电子器件热管理研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 25-31.
[4]	史昊鹏, 钟达文, 廉学新, 张君峰. 朝下多尺度沟槽翅片结构表面沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2880-2888.
[5]	史方哲, 甘云华. 超薄热管启动特性和传热性能数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2814-2823.
[6]	邢美波, 张中天, 景栋梁, 张洪发. 磁调控水基碳纳米管协同多孔材料强化相变储/释能特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3093-3102.
[7]	张贲, 王松柏, 魏子亚, 郝婷婷, 马学虎, 温荣福. 超亲水多孔金属结构驱动的毛细液膜冷凝及传热强化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2824-2835.
[8]	李振, 张博, 王丽伟. PEG-EG固-固相变材料的制备和性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2680-2688.
[9]	代佳琳, 毕唯东, 雍玉梅, 陈文强, 莫晗旸, 孙兵, 杨超. 热物性对混合型CPCMs固液相变特性影响模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1914-1927.
[10]	吴学红, 栾林林, 陈亚南, 赵敏, 吕财, 刘勇. 可降解柔性相变薄膜的制备及其热性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1818-1826.
[11]	李明川, 樊栓狮, 徐赋海, 卢惠东, 李晓军. 水合物热分解Stefan相变模型解的存在性及Laplace变换求解[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1746-1754.
[12]	尹驰, 张正国, 凌子夜, 方晓明. 含石蜡@二氧化硅纳米胶囊和碳纤维的相变热界面材料及其散热性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1795-1804.
[13]	杨灿, 孙雪琦, 尚明华, 张建, 张香平, 曾少娟. 相变离子液体体系吸收分离CO₂的研究现状及展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1419-1432.
[14]	颜少航, 赖天伟, 王彦武, 侯予, 陈双涛. 微间隙内R134a空化可视化实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1054-1061.
[15]	杜江龙, 杨雯棋, 黄凯, 练成, 刘洪来. 复合相变材料/空冷复合式锂离子电池模块散热性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 674-689.