燃烧前CO2捕集技术在IGCC发电中的应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.08.047

化工学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (8): 3193-3201.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.08.047

燃烧前CO₂捕集技术在IGCC发电中的应用

陈新明^1,2,3, 史绍平^1,2, 闫姝^1,2, 方芳^1,2, 许世森^1,2, 段立强³

1 中国华能集团清洁能源技术研究院有限公司, 北京 102209;
2 煤基清洁能源国家重点实验室, 北京 102209;
3 华北电力大学能源动力与机械工程学院, 北京 102206

收稿日期:2013-10-28 修回日期:2013-12-09 出版日期:2014-08-05 发布日期:2014-08-05
通讯作者: 闫姝
基金资助:
北京市科技计划项目（Z131100002413012）；国家高技术研究发展计划项目（2011AA050602）；国家自然科学基金项目（51276063）。

Application of CO₂ capture technology before burning in IGCC power generation system

CHEN Xinming^1,2,3, SHI Shaoping^1,2, YAN Shu^1,2, FANG Fang^1,2, XU Shisen^1,2, DUAN Liqiang³

1 Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute, Beijing 102209, China;
2 State Key Laboratory of Coal-Based Clean Energy, Beijing 102209, China;
3 School of Energy, Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China

Received:2013-10-28 Revised:2013-12-09 Online:2014-08-05 Published:2014-08-05
Supported by:
supported by the Beijing Plan of Science and Technology (Z131100002413012), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2011AA050602) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51276063).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 由于整体煤气化联合循环（IGCC）发电本身的技术特点，使得其非常适合于进行燃烧前CO₂捕集。针对IGCC特点，提出了一种MDEA脱酸气结合湿法氧化法硫回收的燃烧前CO₂捕集流程。通过模拟计算，验证了流程的可行性。将其与IGCC发电系统集成，对比计算了有无燃烧前CO₂捕集的IGCC系统供电效率等相关参数，燃烧前CO₂捕集使IGCC供电效率降低约10个百分点。分析指出了导致包含燃烧前CO₂捕集的IGCC供电效率降低的3个因素：蒸汽消耗、燃料化学能损失和新增动力设备电耗，并据此确定了今后的优化方向。

关键词: IGCC, 合成气, 燃烧前, 二氧化碳捕集, MDEA, 湿法氧化硫回收, 模拟

Abstract: Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power generation is an advanced and next generation coal-fired power generation technology, can provide clean and low-cost electricity for the users, and will play an important role in the future development of high-efficiency and zero-emissions power plants. CO₂ capture technology before burning should be very suitable for IGCC system. Based on IGCC technical features, a CO₂ capture process before burning, consisting of MDEA acid gas removal and wet oxidation sulfur recovery steps, is proposed in this paper. The feasibility study of application in IGCC system is verified by process simulation calculation. The results show that this process works well for acid gas removal, and the efficiency for separating CO₂ and H₂S from syngas can reach 99% and 98.5% respectively. However, the overall efficiency of power supply by IGCC, obtained by calculation, declines about 10 percent from 45.35% to 35.16%, when the CO₂ capture process before burning is introduced into IGCC system. The three main factors of decrease of total efficiency are steam consumption, fuel chemical energy loss and new auxiliary power increase, and they could be used for determining optimization direction.

Key words: IGCC, syngas, pre-combustion, CO₂ capture, MDEA, wet oxidation sulfur recovery, simulation

中图分类号:

TK123

陈新明, 史绍平, 闫姝, 方芳, 许世森, 段立强. 燃烧前CO₂捕集技术在IGCC发电中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(8): 3193-3201.

CHEN Xinming, SHI Shaoping, YAN Shu, FANG Fang, XU Shisen, DUAN Liqiang. Application of CO₂ capture technology before burning in IGCC power generation system[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(8): 3193-3201.

参考文献 22

[1]	Campbell P E, McMullan J T, Williams B C. Concept for a competitive coal fired integrated gasification combined cycle power plant[J]. Fuel, 2000, 79(9): 1031-1040
[2]	John Davison. Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2[J].Energy, 2007, 32(7):1163-1176
[3]	IEA GHG. Improvement in power generation with post-combustion capture of carbon dioxide[R].IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham, UK, 2004
[4]	Liu Fang(刘芳), Wang Shujuan(王淑娟), Chen Changhe(陈昌和), Xu Xuchang(徐旭常). Research progress of CO2 capture by using ammonia from flue gas of power plant[J]. CIESC Journal(化工学报), 2009, 60(2): 269-278
[5]	Yuso Oki, Jun Inumaru, Saburo Hara, Makoto Kobayashi, Hiroaki Watanabe, atoshi Umemoto, Hisao Makino. Development of oxy-fuel IGCC system with CO2 recirculation for CO2 capture[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011,4: 1066-1073
[6]	IEA GHG. Oxy-combustion processes for CO2 capture from power plant[R]. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham, GL52 7RZ, UK, 2005
[7]	IEA GHG. Potential improvements in IGCC with CO2 capture[R]. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham, GL52 7RZ, UK, 2003
[8]	Duan Liqiang (段立强), Lin Rumou (林汝谋), Cai Ruixian(蔡睿贤), Jin Hongguang (金红光). Research progress of zero CO2 emission IGCC systems[J]. Gas Turbine Technology (燃气轮机技术), 2002, 15(3):31-35
[9]	Duan Liqiang(段立强), Yang Yongping(杨勇平), Lin Rumou(林汝谋). Study on novel quasi-zero CO2 emission IGCC system integrated with SOFC system[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics (工程热物理学报), 2006, 27(5): 725-728
[10]	Wang Baoqun (王宝群). Process principle and system synthesis for CO2 capture in IGCC system[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2004
[11]	Kunze Christian, De Sudipta, Spliethoff Hartmut. A novel IGCC plant with membrane oxygen separation and carbon capture by carbonation-calcinations loop[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2011, 5(5): 1176-1183
[12]	Anna Skorek-Osikowska, Katarzyna Janusz-Szyma_nska, Janusz Kotowicz. Modeling and analysis of selected carbon dioxide capture methods in IGCC systems[J]. Energy,2012,45: 92-100
[13]	Xu Shisen (许世森), Li Chunhu (李春虎), Gao Shiwang (郜时旺). Gas Purification Technology (煤气净化技术)[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2005: 363-391
[14]	Maurstad O. An overview of coal based integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) technology[R]. Massachusetts: MIT, 2005
[15]	Davison J, Bressan L. Coal power plants with CO2 capture: the IGCC option//Gasification Tech 2003[C]. San Francisco: CA, 2003:1-7
[16]	Ordorica-Garcia Guillermo, Douglas Peter, Croiset Eric, Zheng Ligang. Technoeconomic evaluation of IGCC power plants for CO2 avoidance[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006, 47(15/16): 2250-2259
[17]	Liu Keyou (刘克友), Du Ping (杜平).Refinery gas desulfuration by MDEA[J]. Petroleum Refinery (炼油设计),1995, 25(3): 20-24
[18]	Li Chunxi, Fürst W. Representation of CO2 and H2S solubility in aqueous MDEA solutions using an electrolyte equation of state[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2000, 55(15): 2975-2988
[19]	Gao Ming (高明). Application and prospect of domestic MDEA solution[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry & Engineering (化学工业与工程技术), 2007, 28(4): 27-29
[20]	Li Xiaofei(李小飞), Wang Shujuan(王淑娟), Chen Changhe(陈昌和). Heat requirement for regeneration of a CO2 capture system using amine solutions[J]. CIESC Journal(化工学报), 2013, 64(9): 3348-3355
[21]	Xu Yue (徐越), Wu Yining (吴一宁), Wei Shirang (危师让). Simulation and analysis on gasification technology of a two-stage dry feed entrained flow bed[J]. Proceeding of the CSEE (中国电机工程学报), 2003, 23(10): 186-190
[22]	Ren Yongqiang (任永强), Xu Shisen (许世森), Xia Juncang (夏军仓), Li Xiaoyu (李小宇). Experimental study of dry pulverized coal pressurized flow gasification of entrained bed [J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power (热能动力工程), 2007, 22(4): 431-434

燃烧前CO₂捕集技术在IGCC发电中的应用

Application of CO₂ capture technology before burning in IGCC power generation system

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	叶展羽, 山訸, 徐震原. 用于太阳能蒸发的折纸式蒸发器性能仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 132-140.
[2]	张龙, 宋孟杰, 邵苛苛, 张旋, 沈俊, 高润淼, 甄泽康, 江正勇. 管翅式换热器迎风侧翅片末端霜层生长模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 179-182.
[3]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[4]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[5]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[6]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[7]	刘远超, 关斌, 钟建斌, 徐一帆, 蒋旭浩, 李耑. 单层XSe₂（X=Zr/Hf）的热电输运特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3968-3978.
[8]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[9]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[10]	宋明昊, 赵霏, 刘淑晴, 李国选, 杨声, 雷志刚. 离子液体脱除模拟油中挥发酚的多尺度模拟与研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3654-3664.
[11]	胡建波, 刘洪超, 胡齐, 黄美英, 宋先雨, 赵双良. 有机笼跨细胞膜易位行为的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3756-3765.
[12]	赵佳佳, 田世祥, 李鹏, 谢洪高. SiO₂-H₂O纳米流体强化煤尘润湿性的微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3931-3945.
[13]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[14]	曾如宾, 沈中杰, 梁钦锋, 许建良, 代正华, 刘海峰. 基于分子动力学模拟的Fe₂O₃纳米颗粒烧结机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3353-3365.
[15]	程小松, 殷勇高, 车春文. 不同工质在溶液除湿真空再生系统中的性能对比[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3494-3501.