微型流化床反应分析仪中煤半焦水蒸气气化反应特性

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.09.019

化工学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (9): 3447-3456.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.09.019

• 催化、动力学与反应器 • 上一篇下一篇

微型流化床反应分析仪中煤半焦水蒸气气化反应特性

季颖^1,2, 曾玺¹, 余剑¹, 岳君容¹, 李奡明³, 许光文¹

1 中国科学院过程工程研究所多相复杂系统国家重点实验室, 北京 100190;
2 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3 美国阿美特克过程分析仪器部, 上海 200131

收稿日期:2013-12-30 修回日期:2014-04-14 出版日期:2014-09-05 发布日期:2014-09-05
通讯作者: 许光文
基金资助:
科技部重大仪器专项（2011YQ120039）；国家自然科学基金项目（21306209，21106156）；中国科学院战略性先导科技专项（XDA07050400）。

Steam gasification characteristics of coal char in micro-fluidized bed reaction analyzer

JI Ying^1,2, ZENG Xi¹, YU Jian¹, YUE Junrong¹, LI Aoming³, XU Guangwen¹

1 State Key Laboratory of Multi-phase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3 Process & Amp, Analytical Instruments Division, Shanghai 200131, China

Received:2013-12-30 Revised:2014-04-14 Online:2014-09-05 Published:2014-09-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Instrumentation Program (2011YQ120039), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21306209, 21106156) and the "Strategic Priority Research Program" of CAS (XDA07050400).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 制备了在液氮中急速冷却和在氩气中自然冷却的两种半焦，采用扫描电镜（SEM）、N₂吸附仪、红外光谱分析仪（FTIR）、X射线衍射仪（XRD）等方法系统比较了两种半焦的结构，并利用中国科学院过程工程研究所研发的微型流化床等温反应分析仪（MFBRA）研究包括动力学在内的水蒸气气化反应特性。研究发现：急速冷却半焦（Char-Q）具有更大的比表面积和更小的平均孔径，而自然冷却半焦（Char-S）的石墨化程度更高。在MFBRA中进行的气化反应结果揭示了Char-Q具有更快的反应速率。且比较通过等转化率法算出的活化能发现：Char-S水蒸气气化反应的活化能更大。利用MFBRA不仅求得了半焦水蒸气气化的总C转化的反应活化能（总体动力学），而且获得了生成各气体组分的反应（实际上为多个反应构成的体系）的活化能，实现了半焦水蒸气气化反应分析。因此，选择Char-Q作为分析试样更能反映真实热态半焦的气化行为，而MFBRA为深入研究涉及水蒸气参与的微分反应特性提供了有效的仪器与方法。

关键词: 水蒸气, 气化, 煤, 急冷, 制备, 微型流化床反应分析仪, 反应动力学

Abstract: Two types of char were made through rapid quenching in liquid nitrogen (Char-Q) and natural cooling in argon (Char-S). Systematic comparison was performed for the chars in terms of structure and gasification characteristics measured in the micro-fluidized bed reaction analyzer (MFBRA), a well-proven isothermal reaction analyzer developed by Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Char-Q had the higher surface area but smaller average size of pores, while Char-S from slow cooling showed higher degree of graphitization. Gasification tests in MFBRA demonstrated that Char-Q had obviously higher reaction rate, and activation energy determined according to the iso-conversion method was higher for Char-S. Particularly, MFBRA enabled the determination of activation energy not only for the overall C conversion but also for the formation reactions (a reaction system) of every individual gas component, thus allowing a rather comprehensive analysis of the reaction nature. Consequently, in order to get the gasification characteristics close to the hot char intrinsic nature, Char-Q should be used, while MFBRA provided as well a more effective instrument for measurement of the differential reaction characteristics involving steam agent.

Key words: steam, gasification, coal, quenching, preparation, MFBRA, reaction kinetics

中图分类号:

TQ546

季颖, 曾玺, 余剑, 岳君容, 李奡明, 许光文. 微型流化床反应分析仪中煤半焦水蒸气气化反应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(9): 3447-3456.

JI Ying, ZENG Xi, YU Jian, YUE Junrong, LI Aoming, XU Guangwen. Steam gasification characteristics of coal char in micro-fluidized bed reaction analyzer[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(9): 3447-3456.

参考文献 32

[1]	Wen Fang (文芳). Study on reaction kinetic of steam-coal chars gasification with TGA [J]. Journal of China Coal Society (煤炭学报), 2004, 29 (3): 350-353
[2]	Wang Peng (王鹏), Wen Fang (文芳), Bu Xuepeng (步学朋). Study on gasification reaction of coal char with CO2 and water vapour [J]. Gas &Heat (煤气与热力), 2005, 25 (3): 1-6
[3]	Xu Zhengang (徐振刚), Bu Xuepeng (步学鹏). Coal Gasification (煤炭气化) [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2008: 24-26
[4]	Zeng Xi (曾玺), Wang Fang (王芳), Han Jiangze (韩江则). Micro fluidized bed reaction analysis and its application to coal char gasification kinetics [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2013, 64 (1): 289-296
[5]	Everson R C, Neomagus H W J P, Kasaini H, et al. Reaction kinetics of pulverized coal-chars derived from inertinite-rich coal discards: gasification with carbon dioxide and steam [J]. Fuel, 2006, 85 (7): 1076-1082
[6]	Roberts D G, Harris D J. Char gasification with O2, CO2, and H2O: effects of pressure on intrinsic reaction kinetics[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2000, 14 (2): 483-489
[7]	Messenböck R C, Dugwell D R, Kandiyoti R. Coal gasification in CO2 and steam: development of a steam injection facility for high-pressure wire-mesh reactors [J]. Energy &Fuels, 1999, 13 (1): 122-129
[8]	Nakamura M, Toyoda M, Uemiya S, et al. Influence of heating rate during pyrolysis on gasification reactivity of coal chars at high temperatures [J]. Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy, 2000, 79 (11): 1078-1087
[9]	Senneca O, Salatino P, Masi S. Heat treatment-induced loss of combustion reactivity of acoal char: the effect of exposure to oxygen[J]. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 2004, 28 (7): 735-741
[10]	Lü Xuezhen (吕学珍), Huang Yinghua (黄瀛华). Technological properties of flash pyrolyzed chars [J]. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (华东理工大学学报: 自然科学版), 1996, 22 (2): 136-141
[11]	Xiang Yinhua (向银花), Wang Yang (王洋), Zhang Jianmin (张建民), Zhang Shouyu (张守玉), Fang Yitian (房倚天), Dong Zhongbing (董众兵). Kinetic on steam gasification of partially gasified char [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China) (化工学报), 2003, 54 (3): 368-373
[12]	Yang Xiaofeng (杨小风), Zhou Jing (周静), Gong Xin (龚欣), Yu Zunhong (于遵宏). Kinetic and characteristic study of char-H2O gasification by isothermal thermogravimetry [J]. Coal Conversion (煤炭转化), 2003, 26 (4): 46-50
[13]	Zhang Linxian (张林仙), Huang Jiejie (黄戒介),Fang Yitian (房倚天), Wang Yang (王洋). Study on reactivity of Chinese anthracite chars gasification: comparison of reactivity between steam and CO2 gasification [J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology (燃料化学学报), 2006, 34 (3): 265-269
[14]	Yu Jian (余剑), Zhu Jianhong (朱剑虹), Yue Junrong (岳君容), Sun Lixin (孙立鑫), Liu Xinhua (刘新华), Xu Guangwen (许光文).Development and application of micro kinetic analyzer for fluidized bed gas-solid reactions [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2009, 60: 2669-2674
[15]	Liu Xinhua (刘新华), Xu Guangwen (许光文), Gao Shiqiu (高士秋).Parameter analyzer of gas-solid reaction kinetics [P]: CN, 200610171515. 3. 2006-12-30
[16]	Yu Jian, Yue Junrong, Xu Guangwen, Sun Lixin.Kinetics and mechanism of solid reactions in a micro fluidized bed reactor [J]. AIChE J., 2010, 56 (11): 2905-2912
[17]	Sheng C. Char structure characterised by Raman spectroscopy and its correlations with combustion reactivity [J]. Fuel, 2007, 86 (15): 2316-2324
[18]	Scotto M V, Bassham E A, Wendt J O L, et al. Quench-induced nucleation of ash constituents during combustion of pulverized coal in a laboratory furnace//Symposium (International) on Combustion [C]. Elsevier, 1989: 239-247
[19]	Molina A, Murphy J J, Winter F, et al. Pathways for conversion of char nitrogen to nitric oxide during pulverized coal combustion [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2009, 156 (3): 574-587
[20]	Wang J, Lu X, Yao J, et al. Experimental study of coal topping process in a downer reactor [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2005, 44 (3): 463-470
[21]	Cui L, Lin W, Yao J. Influences of temperature and coal particle size on the flash pyrolysis of coal in a fast-entrained bed [J]. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2006, 22 (1): 103-110
[22]	Liu Shuyuan (刘殊远), Wang Yin (汪印), Wu Rongcheng (武荣成). Research on coal tar catalytic cracking over hot in-situ chars [J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology (燃料化学学报), 2013, 41 (9): 1041-1049
[23]	Sonibare O O, Haeger T, Foley S F. Structural characterization of Nigerian coals by X-ray diffraction, Raman and FTIR spectroscopy [J]. Energy, 2010, 35 (12): 5347-5353
[24]	van Niekerk D, Pugmire R J, Solum M S, Painter P C, Mathews J P. Structural characterization of vitrinite-rich and inertinite-rich Permian-aged South African bituminous coals [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2008, 76 (4): 290-300
[25]	Takagi H, Maruyama K, Yoshizawa N, Yamada Y, Sato Y. XRD analysis of carbon stacking structure in coal during heat treatment [J]. Fuel, 2004, 83 (17/18): 2427-2433
[26]	Yu Jian (余剑), Li Qiang (李强), Duan Zhengkang (段正康),Zhu Jianhong (朱剑虹), Yue Junrong (岳君容), Li Aoming (李奡明), Xu Guangwen (许光文). Isothermal differential characteristics of the reaction in micro fluidized bed [J]. Science China (中国科学), 2011, 41 (1): 152-160
[27]	Yu Jian (余剑), Zhu Jianhong (朱剑虹), Guo Feng (郭凤), Duan Zhengkang (段正康), Liu Yunyi (刘云义), Xu Guangwen (许光文). Reaction kinetics and mechanism of biomass pyrolysis in a micro fluidized bed reactor [J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology (燃料化学学报), 2010, 38 (6): 666-672
[28]	Wang Yin (汪印), Cui Xin (崔鑫), Zhou Qi (周琦), et al. A fast heating method to pressurized thermogravimetric analyzer (PTGA) [J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering (应用基础与工程科学学报), 2012, 19 (6): 938-946
[29]	Burnham A, Robert L. Global kinetic analysis of complex materials [J]. Energy Fuels, 1999, 13 (1): 1-22
[30]	Alonso M, Alvarez D, Borrego A, Menédez R, Marban G. Systematic effects of coal rank and type on the kinetic of coal pyrolysis [J]. Energy Fuels, 2001, 15 (2): 413-428
[31]	Jing Xuliang (景旭亮), Wang Zhiqing (王志青), Fang Yitian (房倚天). Steam re-gasification properties and kineticsof coal char fines derived from fluidized bed gasifier[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology (燃料化学学报), 2013, 41 (4): 400-406
[32]	Fermoso J, Gil M V, Garcia S, et al. Kinetic parameters and reactivity for the steam gasification of coal chars obtained under different pyrolysis temperatures and pressures [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2011, 25 (8): 3574-3580

微型流化床反应分析仪中煤半焦水蒸气气化反应特性

Steam gasification characteristics of coal char in micro-fluidized bed reaction analyzer

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[2]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[3]	赵佳佳, 田世祥, 李鹏, 谢洪高. SiO₂-H₂O纳米流体强化煤尘润湿性的微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3931-3945.
[4]	吴雷, 刘姣, 李长聪, 周军, 叶干, 刘田田, 朱瑞玉, 张秋利, 宋永辉. 低阶粉煤催化微波热解制备含碳纳米管的高附加值改性兰炭末[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3956-3967.
[5]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[6]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[7]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[8]	倪文翔, 赵京, 李博, 魏小林, 吴东垠, 刘迪, 王强. 转炉煤气全干法显热回收工艺中余热锅炉积灰特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3485-3493.
[9]	张蒙蒙, 颜冬, 沈永峰, 李文翠. 电解液类型对双离子电池阴阳离子储存行为的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3116-3126.
[10]	吴文涛, 褚良永, 张玲洁, 谭伟民, 沈丽明, 暴宁钟. 腰果酚生物基自愈合微胶囊的高效制备工艺研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3103-3115.
[11]	王志龙, 杨烨, 赵真真, 田涛, 赵桐, 崔亚辉. 搅拌时间和混合顺序对锂离子电池正极浆料分散特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3127-3138.
[12]	康超, 乔金鹏, 杨胜超, 彭超, 付元鹏, 刘斌, 刘建荣, Aleksandrova Tatiana, 段晨龙. 煤矸石中有价关键金属活化提取研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2783-2799.
[13]	朱风, 陈凯琳, 黄小凤, 鲍银珠, 李文斌, 刘嘉鑫, 吴玮强, 高王伟. KOH改性电石渣脱除羰基硫的性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2668-2679.
[14]	王光宇, 张锴, 张凯华, 张东柯. 微波加热干燥煤泥热质传递及其能耗特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2382-2390.
[15]	黄磊, 孔令学, 白进, 李怀柱, 郭振兴, 白宗庆, 李平, 李文. 油页岩添加对准东高钠煤灰熔融行为影响的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2123-2135.