基于响应曲面法的三相泡沫灭火剂基础配方优化设计

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161692

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (7): 2886-2895.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161692

基于响应曲面法的三相泡沫灭火剂基础配方优化设计

蒋新生¹, 吕科宗¹, 魏树旺¹, 朱亮²

1 后勤工程学院军事供油工程系, 重庆 401311;
2 后勤工程学院国防建筑规划与环境工程系, 重庆 401311

收稿日期:2016-11-30 修回日期:2017-03-16 出版日期:2017-07-05 发布日期:2017-07-05
通讯作者: 吕科宗
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51574254）；重庆市科技计划项目（CSTC 2014yykfB90001）；火灾与爆炸安全防护重庆市重点实验室建设项目（CSTC 2010CA0005）。

Optimal design of three phase fire-fighting foam formulation based on response surface methodology

JIANG Xinsheng¹, LÜ Kezong¹, WEI Shuwang¹, ZHU Liang²

1 Department of Petroleum Supply Engineering, Logistical Engineering University, Chongqing 401311, China;
2 Department of National Defense Architecture Planning & Environmental Engineering, Logistical Engineering University, Chongqing 401311, China

Received:2016-11-30 Revised:2017-03-16 Online:2017-07-05 Published:2017-07-05
Contact: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161692
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51574254), Science and Technology Project of Chongqing (CSTC 2014 yykfB90001) and the Fire and Explosion Safety Protection Key Laboratory Construction Project of Chongqing (CSTC 2010CA0005).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为得到发泡及稳定性能优异的三相泡沫，响应曲面法优化设计三相泡沫灭火剂基础配方。通过单因素实验确定表面活性剂及固相粉体为SDS、Fc-134、6501、2000目（6.91 μm）合成云母粉，以发泡高度及稳定时间为响应值，研究其交互作用。利用Box-Behnken方法，建立的二次回归模型显著可靠，该模型预测SDS、Fc-134、6501浓度分别为2.64%，0.096%，3%，合成云母添加量为10 g时，为最优组合，预测发泡高度1533.86 ml，稳定时间12.8792 min，实验得到发泡高度为1550 ml，稳定时间为12 min，误差分别为1.05%，6.82%。与未优化三相泡沫比较在发泡高度及稳定时间分别提高14.8%、26.3%。结果表明，经优化设计三相泡沫发泡及稳定性能较未优化三相泡沫有明显提高且响应曲面法建立的预测模型误差较小，因此，该模型可用于提升三相泡沫灭火剂的发泡及稳定性能，为三相泡沫灭火剂配方设计提供参考。

关键词: 泡沫, 粉体, 表面活性剂, 响应曲面法, 优化设计

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to obtain three foam formulations of great foaming and stability based on response surface methodology. The factors of response were SDS, Fc-134, 6501 and mica powder #2000 through signal factor experiments. Foaming height and foam stability were the responses to study the interaction. According to Box-Benhken method, quadratic regression model was established which was significant and reliable. Using the model to predict concentration of these reagents, the optimum concentration of SDS, Fc-134 and 6501 was 2.64%, 0.096% and 3% respectively. The optimum dosage of mica #2000 was 10g. Under the optimum conditions, the predicted value of foaming height and stable time was 1550 ml and 12.8792 min respectively, meanwhile the experimental verification was 1550 ml and 12 min respectively. The error of these was 1.05% and 6.82%.Compared with un-optimized three phases foam, optimal design of three phase foam made improvement in foaming height and stable time which were increased by 14.8% and 26.3%, respectively. Results showed that optimal designed three phases foam has a greater performance of foaming and stability than the un-optimized one. The prediction error is small. It can be used for improving foaming and stability of the three phases fire-fighting foam, providing a reference for three phases foam formulation design.

Key words: foam, powder, surfactants, response surface methodology, optimal design

中图分类号:

TQ028.8

蒋新生, 吕科宗, 魏树旺, 朱亮. 基于响应曲面法的三相泡沫灭火剂基础配方优化设计[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(7): 2886-2895.

JIANG Xinsheng, LÜ Kezong, WEI Shuwang, ZHU Liang. Optimal design of three phase fire-fighting foam formulation based on response surface methodology[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(7): 2886-2895.

参考文献 32

[1]	韩郁翀, 秦俊. 泡沫灭火剂的发展与应用现状 [J]. 火灾科学, 2011, 20 (4): 235-240.HAN Y C, QIN J. Development and application status of foam extinguishing agent [J]. Fire Safety Science, 2011, 20 (4): 235-240.
[2]	郑迪莎, 唐宝华, 李本利, 等, 三相泡沫灭火剂性能及应用研究进展 [J]. 防灾科技学院学报, 2014, 16 (2): 14-18.ZHENG D S, TANG B H, LI B L, et al. Progress of performance and application of three phase foam [J]. Journal of Institute of Disaster Prevention, 2014, 16 (2): 14-18.
[3]	TAO D. Role of bubble size in flotation of coarse and fine particles [J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2005, 39 (4): 741-760.
[4]	蒋新生, 翟琰, 徐建楠, 等. 复配超细粉体三相泡沫的制备与稳定性研究 [J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12 (1): 122-126.JIANG X S, ZHAI Y, XU J N, et al. Research on the formation and stability of fire foam incorporated with mixed ultrafine powder [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2016, 12 (1): 122-126.
[5]	秦波涛, 王德明, 陈建华, 等. 高性能防灭火三相泡沫的实验研究 [J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2005, 34 (1): 11-15.QIN B T, WANG D M, CHEN J H, et al. Experimental investigation of high-performance three-phase foam for mine fire control [J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2005, 34 (1): 11-15.
[6]	陈伟红, 杜文锋, 安晓强, 等. 空心微珠疏油改性及其在抗烧蛋白泡沫中的应用 [J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2012, 18 (2): 139-143.CHEN W H, DU W F, AN X Q, et al. Fabrication of oleo phobic hollow microspheres and their application in anti-burning protein foam [J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2012, 18 (2): 139-143.
[7]	VINOGRADOV A V, KUPRIN D, ABDURAGIMOV I, et al. Silica foams for fire prevention and firefighting. [J]. Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 1 (8): 294-301.
[8]	李孜军, 陈阳, 林武清. 水泥灰三相泡沫的形成机理与稳定性试验研究 [J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2014, 10 (11): 54-59.LI Z J, CHEN Y, LIN W Q. Study on forming mechanism and stability of three phase foam with cement ash [J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2014, 10 (11): 54-59.
[9]	翟琰. 油料火灾三相泡沫灭火剂防复燃特性及综合灭火性能研究 [D]. 重庆: 后勤工程学院, 2016.ZHAI Y. Study on the reburn preventing and fire-extinguishing efficiency of three-phase foam extinguishing agent in oil fire [D]. Chongqing: Logistical Engineering University, 2016.
[10]	鲁义. 防治煤炭自燃的无机固化泡沫及特性研究 [D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2015.LU Y. Study on the inorganic solidified foam and its characteristics for preventing and controlling spontaneous combustion of coal [D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2015.
[11]	BEZERRA M A, SANTELLI R E, OLIVEIRA E P, et al. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry [J]. Talanta, 2008, 76 (5): 965-977.
[12]	TAN I A W, HAMEED B H, AHMAD A L. Optimization of preparation conditions for activated carbons from coconut husk using response surface methodology [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 137 (3): 462-470.
[13]	ABDUL W R, MAHIRAN B, BAKAR S A, et al. Enzymatic production of a solvent-free menthyl butyrate via response surface methodology catalyzed by a novel thermostable lipase from Geobacillus zalihae [J]. Biotechnology & Bioindustry, 2014, 28 (6): 1065-1072.
[14]	刘惠平, 王佳迪, 吴波, 等. 无氟非蛋白表面活性剂制备泡沫灭火剂 [J]. 消防科学与技术, 2014, 33 (7): 807-810.LIU H P, WANG J D, WU B, et al. Application study of non-fluorinated and non-protein surfactants in preparation of foam extinguishing agent [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2014, 33 (7): 807-810.
[15]	FARAJZADEH R, KRASTEV R, ZITHA P L. Foam film permeability: theory and experiment [J]. Advances in Colloid & Interface Science, 2008, 137 (1): 27-44.
[16]	QIN B T. LU Y, LI F L, et al. Preparation and stability of inorganic solidified foam for preventing coal fire [J]. Advances in Materials Science & Engineering, 2014, 2014 (2014): 1-10.
[17]	KRUGLYAKOV P M, ELANEVA S I, VILKOVA N G. About mechanism of foam stabilization by solid particles [J]. Advances in Colloid & Interface Science, 2011, 165 (2): 108-116.
[18]	HUNTER T N, PUGH R J, FRANKS G V, et al. The role of particles in stabilising foams and emulsions. [J]. Advances in Colloid & Interface Science, 2008, 137 (2): 57-81.
[19]	ZHANG S, SUN D, DONG X, et al. Aqueous foams stabilized with particles and nonionic surfactants [J]. Colloids & Surfaces A Physicochemical & Engineering Aspects, 2008, 324 (1/3): 1-8.
[20]	MURRAY B S, ETTELAIE R. Foam stability: proteins and nanoparticles [J]. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 2004, 9 (5): 314-320.
[21]	MASUTANI G. A review of surface tension measuring techniques, surfactants, and their implication for oxygen transfer in wastewater treatment plants [D]. US: University of California, 1984.
[22]	CHRISTIAN S D, SLAGLE A R, E E T, et al. Inverted vertical pull surface tension method [J]. Langmuir, 1998, 14 (11): 3126-3128.
[23]	YAO L. The dependency of the critical contact angle for flotation on particle size-modelling the limits of fine particle flotation [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2011, 24 (1): 50-57.
[24]	秦波涛. 防治煤炭自燃的三相泡沫理论与技术研究 [J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2008, 37 (4): 585-586.QIN B T. Research on theory and technology of three-phase-foam for preventing spontaneous combustion of coal [J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2008, 37 (4): 80-81.
[25]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 泡沫灭火剂: GB15308-2006 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2006.General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Foam extinguishing agent: GB15308-2006[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2006.
[26]	张娟. 碳氢/碳氟阴阳离子表面活性剂混合体系的聚集行为以及阴阳离子囊泡与聚合物的相互作用 [D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2013.ZHANG J. Aggregation behaviors of fluorocarbon/hydrocarbon cat anionic surfactant mixtures and the interaction between cat anionic vesicles and polymers [D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2013.
[27]	JULIA M, ALBERTO M, ANTONIO M, et al. Surface properties and foam stability of protein/surfactant mixtures: theory and experiment [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2007, 111 (6): 2715-2723.
[28]	QIAN C, GUI D Y. Surface activity and fire extinguishing performance of fluorocarbon-hydrocarbon surfactants [J]. Journal of Safety & Environment, 2005, 16 (05): 102-104.
[29]	端木亭亭, 王嘉, 梁路,等. 非PFOA型水成膜泡沫灭火剂 [J]. 消防科学与技术, 2011, 30 (9): 825-829.DUANMU T T, WANG J, LIANG L, et al. Preparation a new high-concentration of no-PFOA type of water film extinguisher and the performance tests [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2011, 30 (9): 825-829.
[30]	赵振国. 应用胶体与界面化学 [M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2008: 306-314.ZHAO Z G. Application of Colloid and Interface Chemistry [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2008: 306-314.
[31]	MOHAMAD N R, HUYO F, ABOULENEIN H Y, et al. Response surface methodological approach for optimizing production of geranyl propionate catalysed by carbon nanotubes nanobioconjugates [J]. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 2015, 29 (4): 1-8.
[32]	KIRAN B, KAUSHIK A, KAUSHIK C P. Response surface methodological approach for optimizing removal of Cr (Ⅵ) from aqueous solution using immobilized cyanobacterium [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2007, 126 (2/3): 147-153.

基于响应曲面法的三相泡沫灭火剂基础配方优化设计

Optimal design of three phase fire-fighting foam formulation based on response surface methodology

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[2]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.
[3]	杨欣, 彭啸, 薛凯茹, 苏梦威, 吴燕. 分子印迹-TiO₂光电催化降解增溶PHE废水性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3564-3571.
[4]	李珍宝, 李超, 王虎, 王绍瑞, 黎泉. MPP抑制铝镁合金粉尘爆炸微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3608-3614.
[5]	邢美波, 张中天, 景栋梁, 张洪发. 磁调控水基碳纳米管协同多孔材料强化相变储/释能特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3093-3102.
[6]	文兆伦, 李沛睿, 张忠林, 杜晓, 侯起旺, 刘叶刚, 郝晓刚, 官国清. 基于自热再生的隔壁塔深冷空分工艺设计及优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2988-2998.
[7]	江锦波, 彭新, 许文烜, 门日秀, 刘畅, 彭旭东. 泵出型螺旋槽油气密封泄漏特性及参数影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2538-2554.
[8]	徐文超, 孙志高, 李翠敏, 李娟, 黄海峰. 静态条件下表面活性剂E-1310对HCFC-141b水合物生成的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2179-2185.
[9]	孙永尧, 高秋英, 曾文广, 王佳铭, 陈艺飞, 周永哲, 贺高红, 阮雪华. 面向含氮油田伴生气提质利用的膜耦合分离工艺设计优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2034-2045.
[10]	刘尚豪, 贾胜坤, 罗祎青, 袁希钢. 基于梯度提升决策树的三组元精馏流程结构最优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2075-2087.
[11]	周必茂, 许世森, 王肖肖, 刘刚, 李小宇, 任永强, 谭厚章. 烧嘴偏转角度对气化炉渣层分布特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1939-1949.
[12]	王泽栋, 石至平, 刘丽艳. 考虑气泡非均匀耗散的矩形反应器声流场数值模拟及结构优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1965-1973.
[13]	何汉兵, 刘真, 陈勇, 王小锋, 曾婧. 直写成型电极锰氧化物粉末的合成与浆料调控[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2239-2247.
[14]	葛运通, 王玮, 李楷, 肖帆, 于志鹏, 宫敬. 多相分散体系中微油滴与改性二氧化硅表面间作用力的AFM研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1651-1659.
[15]	许文烜, 江锦波, 彭新, 门日秀, 刘畅, 彭旭东. 宽速域三种典型型槽油气密封泄漏与成膜特性对比研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1660-1679.