进风角度对椭圆管翅式换热器传热性能影响

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20190527

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对两排椭圆管翅式换热器实验元件在不同进风角度下（30°、45°、60°和90°）的换热性能进行了实验研究，结果表明，在测试的迎风速度范围内随着进风角度的减小换热器换热性能减弱，并给出了测试工况范围内的换热性能经验关联式；对不同进风角度下空气侧换热性能进行了数值计算，与实验结果进行对比，符合良好；最后对不同进风角度下换热器内不同通道内空气平均速度的分布进行了研究，解释了换热性能差异的原因，为相应的工程应用提供理论参考。

关键词: 椭圆管翅式换热器, 进风角度, 传热, 实验验证, CFD

Abstract:

Heat transfer performance of a finned oval tube heat exchanger with various air inlet angles (30°,45°,60° and 90°, respectively) were experimentally investigated in this study. Experimental results showed that heat transfer performance decreased with decreasing air inlet angle, and the experimental correlation of the air-side Nusselt number was obtained in the studied range of Reynolds numbers and air inlet angles. Heat transfer performance of various air inlet angles was simulated by using CFD software Ansys Fluent, and the simulated results agreed well with the experimental results. The numerical results indicated that with the decrease of air inlet angle, the uniformity of air velocity distribution in z-direction became worse, therefore, the comprehensive heat transfer performance was worse than that of the case with uniform flow distribution.

Key words: finned oval tube heat exchanger, air inlet angle, heat transfer, experimental validation, CFD

中图分类号:

TK 124

唐凌虹, 杜雪平, 曾敏. 进风角度对椭圆管翅式换热器传热性能影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(S2): 138-145.

Linghong TANG, Xueping DU, Min ZENG. Investigation of air inlet angle influence on air-side heat transfer performance of finned oval tube heat exchanger[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(S2): 138-145.

图/表 14

图1 实验装置系统示意图1—风洞入口；2,9—过渡段；3,7—收缩段；4,6—稳定段；5—实验段；8—测速段；10—风机；11—加热棒；12—水箱；13—阀门；14—水泵；15—涡轮流量计；16—数据采集系统；17—热电偶网；18—U形管差压计

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of experimental system

图2 换热器实验元件

Fig.2 Test heat exchanger unit

图3 进风角度示意图

Fig.3 Four different air inlet angles

图4 两排实验元件示意图

Fig.4 2-row finned oval-tube heat exchanger

表1 实验元件结构参数

Table 1 Geometric dimension of heat exchanger

参数	数值
横向管间距P_t/mm	26.7
纵向管间距P_l/mm	60
管壁厚度δ_t/mm	1.5
翅片厚度δ_f/mm	0.35
翅片间距F_s/mm	2.5
椭圆管短轴2b/mm	14
椭圆管长轴2a/mm	36
迎风面宽度W/mm	600
迎风面高度H/mm	320

图5 不同进风角度下空气侧ho实验值比较

Fig.5 Heat transfer coefficient comparisons with different air inlet angles

图6 不同进风角度下空气侧Nu实验值比较

Fig.6 Nu comparisons with different air inlet angles

图7 Nu实验值与计算值对比

Fig.7 Nu comparison of experimental data and numerical data

图8 换热器部分计算模型

Fig.8 Schematic diagram of physical model

图9 进风角度45°时Nu实验结果与计算结果比较

Fig.9 Nu comparison of experimental data and numerical data for air inlet angle of 45°

图10 不同进风角度下空气侧Nu计算结果比较

Fig.10 Nu comparison for various air inlet angles

图11 不同进风角度时y方向上的速度分布（ufr=1.8 m/s）

Fig.11 Velocity distribution in y-direction for various inlet angles

图12 不同进风角度时z方向第一排管中间速度分布（ufr=1.8 m/s）

Fig.12 Velocity distribution in z-direction at central position of the first row for various inlet angles

图13 不同进风角度时z方向第二排管中间速度分布（ufr=1.8 m/s）

Fig.13 Velocity distribution in z-direction at central position of the second row for various inlet angles

参考文献 17

1	卜永东, 杨立军, 杜小泽, 等. 电站空冷技术[J]. 现代电力, 2013, 30(3): 69-79.
	BuY D, YangL J, DuX Z, et al. Review of dry cooling technologies in power plants[J]. Modern Electric Power, 2013, 30(3): 69-79.
2	KimN H, LeeK J, JeongY B. Airside performance of oval tube heat exchangers having sine wave fins under wet condition[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 66(1/2): 580-589.
3	GholamiA, WahidM A, MohammedH A. Thermal–hydraulic performance of fin-and-oval tube compact heat exchangers with innovative design of corrugated fin patterns[J]. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer, 2017, 106: 573-592.
4	DiazD, ValenciaA. Heat transfer in an oval tube heat exchanger with different kinds of longitudinal vortex generators[J]. Heat Transfer Research, 2017, 48(18): 1707-1725.
5	ZhaoX, TangG, ShiY, et al. Experimental study of heat transfer and pressure drop for H-type finned oval tube with longitudinal vortex generators and dimples under flue gas[J]. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2018, 39(7/8): 608-616.
6	GanL, LuX, WangQ. Experimental and theoretical study on hydrodynamic characteristics of tapered fluidized beds[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2014, 25(3): 824-831.
7	杨涛, 袁益超. 管束结构对开缝翅片椭圆管换热器性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(4): 1365-1373.
	YangT, YuanY C. Effects of tube bundle structure on heat transfer and resistance characteristics of slit finned elliptical tube heat exchangers[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(4): 1365-1373.
8	赵兰萍, 杨志刚. 管间距对矩形翅片椭圆管换热管束性能的影响[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(1): 150-154.
	ZhaoL P, YangZ G. Effect of tube pitches on performance of rectangular finned elliptical tube bundles[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2016, 44(1): 150-154.
9	郭永红, 杜小泽, 杨晓茹, 等. 间接空冷机组空冷塔塔群内空气流动及传热性能研究[J]. 热能动力工程, 2018, (1): 33-41.
	GuoY H, DuX Z, YangX R, et al. Study of the air flow and heat transfer performance inside an air cooling tower group of an indirect air cooling unit[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2018, (1): 33-41.
10	陈学宏, 赵元宾, 孙奉仲. 翅片散热管束流动传热性能对进风角度敏感性的研究[J]. 电站系统工程, 2017, (4): 13-16.
	ChenX H, ZhaoY B, SunF Z. Study on sensitivity of flow and heat transfer performance of finned tubes bundles to air intake[J]. Power System Engineering, 2017, (4): 13-16.
11	王为术, 张雨飞, 常娜娜. 600 MW火电机组间接空冷塔流动换热特性数值研究[J]. 郑州大学学报(工学版), 2014, 35(1): 51-54.
	WangW S, ZhangY F, ChangN N. Numerical simulation on the flow field and heat transfer characteristics of indirect air-cooling tower in 600MW supercritical thermal power unit[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science), 2014, 35(1):51-54.
12	LiuZ, LiH, ShiL, et al. Numerical study of the air inlet angle influence on the air-side performance of plate-fin heat exchangers[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 89: 356-364.
13	唐凌虹, 杜雪平, 曾敏. 进风角度对椭圆管翅式换热器流动性能的影响[J]. 动力工程学报, 2017, 37(8): 649-654.
	TangL H, DuX P, ZengM. Influence of air inlet angle on flow characteristics of a finned oval-tube heat exchanger[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2017, 37(8): 649-654.
14	史美中, 王中铮. 热交换器原理与设计[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2009.
	ShiM Z, WangZ Z. Principle of Heat Exchangers and Design[M]. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2009.
15	杨世铭, 陶文铨. 传热学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
	YangS M, TaoW Q. Heat Transfer[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006.
16	GnielinskiV. New equations for heat and mass transfer in turbulent pipe and channel flow[J]. International Chemical Engineering, 1976, 16(2): 359-368.
17	VersteegH K, MalalasekeraW. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method[M]. Pearson Education, 2007.

[1]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[2]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[3]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[4]	刘明栖, 吴延鹏. 导光管直径和长度对传热影响的模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 206-212.
[5]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[6]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[7]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[8]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[9]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[10]	李科, 文键, 忻碧平. 耦合蒸气冷却屏的真空多层绝热结构对液氢储罐自增压过程的影响机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3786-3796.
[11]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.
[12]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[13]	闫琳琦, 王振雷. 基于STA-BiLSTM-LightGBM组合模型的多步预测软测量建模[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3407-3418.
[14]	陈天华, 刘兆轩, 韩群, 张程宾, 李文明. 喷雾冷却换热强化研究进展及影响因素[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3149-3170.
[15]	洪瑞, 袁宝强, 杜文静. 垂直上升管内超临界二氧化碳传热恶化机理分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3309-3319.