化工学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 75 ›› Issue (9): 3103-3112.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20240347

• 流体力学与传递现象 • 上一篇    下一篇

欧拉-欧拉双流体模型中颗粒黏性对液固散式流态化的影响

祝赫(), 张仪, 齐娜娜(), 张锴   

  1. 华北电力大学热电生产过程污染物监测与控制北京市重点实验室,北京 102206
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-28 修回日期:2024-04-30 出版日期:2024-09-25 发布日期:2024-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 齐娜娜
  • 作者简介:祝赫(1997—),男,博士研究生,zhuhe@ncepu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFB0606402)

Effect of particle viscosity in two-fluid model on homogeneous liquid-solid fluidization under Euler-Euler framework

He ZHU(), Yi ZHANG, Nana QI(), Kai ZHANG   

  1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Emission Surveillance and Control for Thermal Power Generation, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
  • Received:2024-03-28 Revised:2024-04-30 Online:2024-09-25 Published:2024-10-10
  • Contact: Nana QI

摘要:

采用无黏性双流体模型、基于颗粒动理学的双流体模型以及Brandani和Zhang简化双流体模型探究了颗粒黏性对液固散式流化特性的影响规律。经与文献中实验数据和Gibilaro公式计算值对比后发现:3种双流体模型均能较好地预测整体固含率,与实验值相对偏差在3%以内,其中无黏性双流体模型和简化双流体模型对固含率预测更符合散式流态化特点;3种双流体模型对时均颗粒轴向速度预测均呈现整体环核结构的固有属性,其中简化双流体模型在较低和较高两组液速工况下预测的相对偏差平均值分别为0.277和1.028;当入口液速突然变化后,收缩过程中简化双流体模型对响应时间预测准确度略高,而膨胀过程中因低浓度区界面不稳定以及膨胀过程中床内颗粒形成的由浓到稀过渡段延长了稳定时间,3种模型预测均与理想过程存在一定偏差,其中液速较低时三者差异不明显,但液速较高时简化双流体模型准确性略高。基于颗粒动理学的双流体模型对动态过程模拟的计算耗时最长。

关键词: 流态化, 计算流体力学, 流体动力学, 双流体模型, 液固两相流, 颗粒黏性

Abstract:

In order to probe into the effect of particle viscosity on homogeneous liquid-solid fluidization, three types of two-fluid models including inviscid TFM Gidaspow A (ITFM), TFM based on KTGF (KTFM) and Brandani and Zhang simplified TFM (STFM) are used for CFD simulations in this study. The numerical results are compared with the typical experimental data from the literature and calculated values by Gibilaro formula, which shows that all three two-fluid models can reasonable predict the overall solid holdup together with all relative deviations between each two-fluid model and the experimental data are less than 3%. The solid holdup obtained by ITFM or STFM is more consistent with the characteristics of homogeneous fluidization. The three two-fluid models all show the inherent properties of the overall ring-core structure for the prediction of the time-averaged particle axial velocity. Among them, the average relative deviations of the simplified two-fluid model under the two groups of low and high liquid velocity conditions are 0.277 and 1.028 respectively. STFM is slightly closer to calculated value by Gibilaro formula than the other two models in predicting the response time of contraction process. However, the predictions of all three models deviate from the ideal process, mainly due to the extended stability time caused by the instability of the low concentration interface and the transitional stage from dense to dilute regions of particles in expansion process. In expansion process, the differences among the three models are not obvious at low operating velocity, while the result of STFM is slightly closer to calculated value by Gibilaro formula at high operating velocity. KTFM takes the longest elapsed time for simulating dynamic processes in this study.

Key words: fluidization, CFD, hydrodynamics, two-fluid model, liquid-solid two-phase flow, particle viscosity

中图分类号: