膜曝气生物膜反应器内流场的CFD模拟及组件优化

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20140975

化工学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (1): 402-409.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20140975

膜曝气生物膜反应器内流场的CFD模拟及组件优化

吴云^1,2, 张楠², 张宏伟^1,2, 贾辉^1,2

1 天津工业大学中空纤维膜材料与膜过程教育部重点实验室, 天津 300387;
2 天津工业大学环境与化学工程学院, 天津 300387

收稿日期:2014-06-27 修回日期:2014-09-10 出版日期:2015-01-05 发布日期:2015-01-05
通讯作者: 吴云
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51108316, 51378349)。

CFD simulation of internal hydrodynamic characteristics and optimization of membrane module in membrane aerated biofilm reactor

WU Yun^1,2, ZHANG Nan², ZHANG Hongwei^1,2, JIA Hui^1,2

1 State Key Laboratory of Hollow Fiber Membrane Materials and Processes, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China;
2 School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China

Received:2014-06-27 Revised:2014-09-10 Online:2015-01-05 Published:2015-01-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51108316,51378349).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于数值模拟的方法研究了不同填充方式、填充密度、循环流量下膜曝气生物膜反应器(MABR)内流场特性。研究结果表明, 随机填充时, 反应器内存在偏流沟流现象, 且进口处动能损失大;规则填充时, 截面流速稳定区域较长, 更适于MABR生物膜的生长。填充密度对MABR壳程速度场的影响显著, 并且存在一最佳值;当填充密度为30%时, 反应器整体速度场比较均匀稳定。实验采用三维电磁测速仪对实体模型进行流场测量, 得到反应器内流场速度与模拟值接近, 误差小于10%;当循环流量为7.62 L·min^-1时, 反应器截面平均流速可以维持在0.026 m·s^-1, 并且进口最大流速低于0.20 m·s^-1, 不会导致生物膜的脱落, 该稳定的流场分布符合MABR内部的速度场分布需求。

关键词: MABR, 生物膜, 数值模拟, 流场特性, 优化

Abstract:

Based on numerical simulation, the internal hydrodynamic characteristics of membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR), was investigated at different filling modes, packing densities, and circulation flow rates. With random packing, bias flow and channeling were present, causing great loss of kinetic energy at the entrance of the reactor. However, with even packing, the stability region of cross-section velocity was longer, which was more suitable for the growth of biofilm in MABR. The effect of packing density on the shell flow field of MABR was fairly remarkable, and there was an optimal value. With packing density of 30%, flow field was stable. Three-dimensional electromagnetic tachymeter was used to measure the flow field of the physical model, and the measured velocity was close to the simulated value, with error less than 10%. With circulation flow rate of 7.62 L·min^-1, cross-section velocity of the reactor could be kept at 0.026 m·s^-1, meanwhile maximum inlet velocity of the reactor was less than 0.20 m·s^-1, which would not cause fall-off of biofilm. Stable flow field distribution accorded with the requirements of internal flow field of MABR.

Key words: MABR, biofilm, numerical simulation, flow field characteristics, optimization

中图分类号:

吴云, 张楠, 张宏伟, 贾辉. 膜曝气生物膜反应器内流场的CFD模拟及组件优化[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(1): 402-409.

WU Yun, ZHANG Nan, ZHANG Hongwei, JIA Hui. CFD simulation of internal hydrodynamic characteristics and optimization of membrane module in membrane aerated biofilm reactor[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(1): 402-409.

参考文献 17

[1]	Gong Z, Yang F L, Liu S T, Bao H, Hu S W, Furukawa K. Feasibility of a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor to achieve single-stage autotrophic nitrogen removal based on Anammox [J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 69(5): 776-784
[2]	Wang Xiaodong (王晓东), Zhao Xinhua(赵新华), Li Xia(李霞). Review of study on membrane aerated biofilm reactor [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress(化工进展), 2005, 24(10): 1141-1146
[3]	Syron E, Casey E. Membrane-aerated biofilms for high rate biotreatment: performance appraisal, engineering principles, scale-up, and development requirements [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2008, 42(6): 1833-1844
[4]	Satoh H, Ono H, Rulin B, et al. Macroscale and microscale analyses of nitrification and denitrification in biofilms attached on membrane aerated biofilm reactors [J]. Water Research, 2004, 38(6): 1633-1641
[5]	Beyenal H, Lewandowski Z. Internal and external mass transfer in biofilms grown at various flow velocities [J]. Biotechnology Progress, 2002, 18(1): 55-61
[6]	Picioreanu C, van Loosdrecht M, Heijnen J. Two-dimensional model of biofilm detachment caused by internal stress from liquid flow [J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2001, 72(2): 205-218
[7]	Wu J, Chen V. Shell-side mass transfer performance of randomly packed hollow fiber modules [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2000, 172(1/2): 59-74
[8]	Li Tinggang, Liu Junxin, Bai Renbi. Membrane-aerated biofilm reactor for the treatment of acetonitrile wastewate [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2008, 42(6): 2099-2104
[9]	Casey E, Glennon B, Hamer G. Biofilm development in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor: effect of flow velocity on performance [J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2000, 67(4): 476-486
[10]	Wei X, Li B A, Zhao S, et al. COD and nitrogen removal in facilitated transfer membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (FT-MABR) [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 389(1): 257-264
[11]	Qiang Chengcheng, Li Bao'an, Zhang Jian. A membrane-aerated bioreactor for simulated oilfield wastewater treatment [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 550-553: 2312-2314
[12]	Ding Z W, Liu L Y, Ma R Y. Study on the effect of flow maldistribution on the performance of the hollow fiber modules used in membrane distillation [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2003, 215(1/2): 11-23
[13]	Zhang Xiaoguang (张晓光), Ding Weiping (丁卫平), Zhao Gang (赵刚), Yang Jiming (杨基明), Gao Dayong (高大勇). Shell side mass transfer coefficient in randomly packed hollow fiber bundles [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China)(化工学报), 2006, 57(12): 2823-2827
[14]	Zhang Li (张力), Ju Shunxiang (鞠顺祥), Yan Yunfei (闫云飞), Zhang Zhi'en (张智恩). Numerical study on absorption of carbon dioxide and mass transfer performance in hollow fiber membrane contactor [J]. CIESC Journal(化工学报), 2014, 65(6): 2285-2293
[15]	Yang Yi (杨毅), Wang Baoguo (王保国), Peng Yong (彭勇). Numerical simulation of shell-side flow in hollow fiber membrane modules [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China) (化工学报), 2008, 59(8):1979-1985
[16]	Costello M J, Fane A G, Hogan P A, Schofield R W. The effect of shell side hydrodynamics on the performance of axial flow hollow fiber modules [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 1993, 80: 1-11
[17]	Seong-Hoon Y, Hyung-Soo K, Ik-Tae Y. Optimization model of submerged hollow fiber membrane [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2004, 234(1-2): 147-156

膜曝气生物膜反应器内流场的CFD模拟及组件优化

CFD simulation of internal hydrodynamic characteristics and optimization of membrane module in membrane aerated biofilm reactor

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 17

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨欣, 王文, 徐凯, 马凡华. 高压氢气加注过程中温度特征仿真分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 280-286.
[2]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[3]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[4]	叶展羽, 山訸, 徐震原. 用于太阳能蒸发的折纸式蒸发器性能仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 132-140.
[5]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[6]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[7]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[8]	胡建波, 刘洪超, 胡齐, 黄美英, 宋先雨, 赵双良. 有机笼跨细胞膜易位行为的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3756-3765.
[9]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.
[10]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[11]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[12]	张曼铮, 肖猛, 闫沛伟, 苗政, 徐进良, 纪献兵. 危废焚烧处理耦合有机朗肯循环系统工质筛选与热力学优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3502-3512.
[13]	诸程瑛, 王振雷. 基于改进深度强化学习的乙烯裂解炉操作优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3429-3437.
[14]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[15]	陈国泽, 卫东, 郭倩, 向志平. 负载跟踪状态下的铝空气电池堆最优功率点优化方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3533-3542.