基于DEM模拟气固鼓泡床中颗粒碰撞参数对流场间歇性的影响

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20141780

化工学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (6): 2041-2048.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20141780

基于DEM模拟气固鼓泡床中颗粒碰撞参数对流场间歇性的影响

彭丽, 吴迎亚, 李佳瑶, 高金森, 蓝兴英

中国石油大学北京重质油国家重点实验室, 北京 102249

收稿日期:2014-12-01 修回日期:2015-02-28 出版日期:2015-06-05 发布日期:2015-06-05
通讯作者: 蓝兴英
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(91334104);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-13-1027)。

Effect of granular collision parameters on DEM simulation of flow field intermittency in gas-solids bubbling fluidized bed

PENG Li, WU Yingya, LI Jiayao, GAO Jinsen, LAN Xingying

State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2014-12-01 Revised:2015-02-28 Online:2015-06-05 Published:2015-06-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91334104) and the New Century Excellent Talents Program in University (NCET-13-1027).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用计算流体力学和离散元(CFD-DEM)方法研究鼓泡床内的气固流动状态, 考察了颗粒弹性系数和恢复系数对流场间歇性的影响, 并利用小波变化分析方法分析了颗粒弹性系数和恢复系数对流场相干结构的影响。研究结果表明:颗粒弹性系数和恢复系数对颗粒速度脉动能、床层平均高度、平坦因子以及流场间歇性有一定影响。随着颗粒弹性系数取值的变大, 高频区能量和平坦因子先降低后增加, 床层高度先增加后降低, 流场间歇性先减弱后增强;颗粒恢复系数取值越大, 高频区能量和平坦因子越低, 床层高度越大, 流场间歇性越弱。

关键词: 流化床, 多相流, 计算流体力学, 颗粒弹性系数, 颗粒恢复系数, 间歇性

Abstract:

The gas-solids flow in a bubbling bed was simulated by the combined approach of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and Discrete Element Method (DEM). The influence of granular collision parameters of particle elasticity coefficient and restitution coefficient on flow field intermittency was investigated. The continuous wavelet transform analysis was used to obtain the coherent structure behavior influenced by particle elasticity coefficient and restitution coefficient. Particle elasticity coefficient and restitution coefficient had some effect on fluctuating energy of particle velocity, mean bed height, flatness factor, and flow field intermittency. With increasing particle elasticity coefficient, the energy in high frequency domain, flatness factor and flow field intermittency decreased first and then increased, while mean bed height increased first and then decreased. The larger the restitution coefficient, the lower the energy in high frequency domain and flatness factor, and the higher the mean bed height, the weaker the flow field intermittency.

Key words: fluidized-bed, multiphase flow, computational fluid dynamics, elasticity coefficient, restitution coefficient, intermittency

中图分类号:

TQ021.1

彭丽, 吴迎亚, 李佳瑶, 高金森, 蓝兴英. 基于DEM模拟气固鼓泡床中颗粒碰撞参数对流场间歇性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(6): 2041-2048.

PENG Li, WU Yingya, LI Jiayao, GAO Jinsen, LAN Xingying. Effect of granular collision parameters on DEM simulation of flow field intermittency in gas-solids bubbling fluidized bed[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(6): 2041-2048.

参考文献 34

[1]	Jin Yong (金涌), Zhu Jingxu (祝京旭), Yu Zhiqing (俞芷青). Fluidization Engineering Principles (流态化工程原理) [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2001: 72-75.
[2]	Cundall P A, Strack O D L. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies [J]. Otechnique, 1997, 29 (1): 331-336.
[3]	Zhu H P, Zhou Z Y, Yang R Y, et al. Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: a review of major applications and findings [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, 63 (23): 5728-5770.
[4]	Enwald H, Peirano E, Almstedt A E. Eulerian two-phase flow theory applied to fluidization [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1996, 22: 21-66.
[5]	Tsuji Y, Kawaguchi T, Tanaka T. Discrete particle simulation of two-dimensional fluidized bed [J]. Powder Technology, 1993, 77 (1): 79-87.
[6]	Kawaguchi T, Tanaka T, Tsuji Y. Numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluidized beds using the discrete element method (comparison between the two- and three-dimensional models) [J]. Powder Technology, 1998, 96 (2): 129-138.
[7]	Feng Y Q, Yu A B. Assessment of model formulations in the discrete particle simulation of gas-solid flow [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43 (26): 8378-8390.
[8]	Pandit J K, Wang X S, Rhodes M J. Study of Geldart's Group A behaviour using the discrete element method simulation [J]. Powder Technology, 2005, 160 (1): 7-14.
[9]	Sun J, Wang J, Yang Y. CFD simulation and wavelet transform analysis of vortex and coherent structure in a gas-solid fluidized bed [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2012, 71 (26): 507-519.
[10]	Sun J, Wang J, Yang Y. CFD investigation of particle fluctuation characteristics of bidisperse mixture in a gas-solid fluidized bed [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2012, 82 (12): 285-298.
[11]	Jiradilok V, Gidaspow D, Breault R W. Computation of gas and solid dispersion coefficients in turbulent risers and bubbling beds [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62 (13): 3397-3409.
[12]	Fang Mingming (房明明), Luo Kun (罗坤), Yang Shiliang (杨世亮), Zhang Ke (张科), Fan Jianren (樊建人). CFD-DEM investigation and parameter sensitivity analysis of a typical bubbling fluidization process [J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics (工程热物理学报), 2013, 34 (6): 1106-1111.
[13]	Navarro H A, de Souza Braun M P. Determination of the normal spring stiffness coefficient in the linear spring-dashpot contact model of discrete element method [J]. Powder Technology, 2013, 246: 707-722.
[14]	Kharaz A H, Gorham D A, Salman A D. An experimental study of the elastic rebound of spheres [J]. Powder Technology, 2001, 120 (3): 281-291.
[15]	Fu J S, Cheong Y S, Reynolds G K, et al. An experimental study of the variability in the properties and quality of wet granules [J]. Powder Technology, 2004, 140 (3): 209-216.
[16]	Müller P, Antonyuk S, Tomas J, et al. Investigations of the Restitution Coefficient of Granules—Micro-Macro-Interaction [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2008: 235-241.
[17]	Xia Zhenyan (夏振炎), Tian Yan (田砚), Jiang Nan (姜楠). Wavelet spectrum analysis on energy transfer of multi-scale structures in wall turbulence [J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (应用数学和力学), 2009, 30 (4): 409-416.
[18]	Wu Yingya (吴迎亚), Lan Xingying (蓝兴英), Gao Jinsen (高金森). Analysis of flow field intermittency and coherent structure of particles based on DEM simulation of gas-solid bubbling bed [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2014, 65 (7): 2724-2732.
[19]	Goldschmidt M J V, Beetstra R, Kuipers J A M. Hydrodynamic modelling of dense gas-fluidised beds:comparison and validation of 3D discrete particle and continuum models [J]. Powder Technology, 2004, 142 (1): 23-47.
[20]	Gidaspow D. Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions [M]. Boston: Academic Press, 1994.
[21]	Zhang Yong (张勇), Jin Baoshen (金保升), Zhong Wenqi (钟文琪). Three-dimensional DEM simulation on particle mixing characteristics of spout-fluid bed [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE (中国电机工程学报), 2008, 28 (2): 33-38.
[22]	Sommerfeld M, Tsuji Y, Crowe C T. Multiphase Flows with Droplets and Particles [M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1997: 12-14.
[23]	Wang Jiajun (王嘉骏), Zhang Wenfeng (张文峰), Feng Lianfang (冯连芳), Gu Xueping (顾雪萍). Wavelets analysis of pressure fluctuation in agitated fluidized bed [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China) (化工学报), 2006, 57 (12): 2855-2859.
[24]	Mallat S G. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation [J]. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 1989, 11 (7): 674-693.
[25]	Giri B K, Mitra C, Panigrahi P K, et al. Multi-scale dynamics of glow discharge plasma through wavelets: self-similar behavior to neutral turbulence and dissipation [OL]. [2014-01-13]. http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1401.2742.
[26]	Zhang Ke (张科). CFD-DEM simulation of complex dense gas-solid flow [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012.
[27]	Tian F G,Zhang M C,Fan H J,et al. Numerical study on microscopic mixing characteristics in fluidized beds via DEM [J]. Fuel Process Technology, 2007, 88 (2): 187-198.
[28]	Tamburini A, Cipollina A, Micale G, et al. CFD simulations of dense solid-liquid suspensions in baffled stirred tanks: prediction of solid particle distribution [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 223: 875-890.
[29]	Jiang Nan (姜楠), Tian Yan (田砚). Wavelet analysis of detecting multi-scale coherent structures and intermittency in wall turbulence [J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University (哈尔滨工程大学学报), 2005, 26 (1): 7-12.
[30]	Liu Haifeng (刘海峰), Wu Tao (吴韬), Wang Fuchen (王辅臣), Gong Xin (龚欣), Yu Zunhong (于遵宏). Coherent structure of turbulence based on wavelet analysis (Ⅰ): Determining coherent structure with energy maxima criterion [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China) (化工学报), 2000, 51 (6): 761-765.
[31]	Liu Haifeng (刘海峰), Zhao Tiejun (赵铁钧), Wang Fuchen (王辅臣), Gong Xin (龚欣), Yu Zunhong (于遵宏). Coherent structure of turbulence based on wavelet analysis (Ⅱ) :Wave shape and local singularity of coherent structure [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China) (化工学报), 2000, 51 (6): 766-770.
[32]	Onorato M, Camussi R, Iuso G. Small scale intermittency and bursting in a turbulent channel flow [J]. Physical Review E, 2000, 61 (2): 1447.
[33]	Zhang Bin (张斌), Wang Tong (王彤), Gu Chuangang (谷传纲), Dai Zhengyuan (戴正元). Identification of turbulent coherent structures based on wavelet and bi-spectrum analysis [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery (农业机械学报), 2009, 40 (11): 203-207.
[34]	Oberleithner K, Sieber M, Nayeri C N, et al. Three-dimensional coherent structures in a swirling jet undergoing vortex breakdown: stability analysis and empirical mode construction [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 679 (1): 383-414.

基于DEM模拟气固鼓泡床中颗粒碰撞参数对流场间歇性的影响

Effect of granular collision parameters on DEM simulation of flow field intermittency in gas-solids bubbling fluidized bed

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[2]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[3]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[4]	温凯杰, 郭力, 夏诏杰, 陈建华. 一种耦合CFD与深度学习的气固快速模拟方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3775-3785.
[5]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[6]	岳林静, 廖艺涵, 薛源, 李雪洁, 李玉星, 刘翠伟. 凹坑缺陷对厚孔板喉部空化流动特性影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3292-3308.
[7]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[8]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[9]	牛超, 沈胜强, 杨艳, 潘泊年, 李熠桥. 甲烷BOG喷射器流动过程计算与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2858-2868.
[10]	何晓崐, 刘锐, 薛园, 左然. MOCVD生长AlN单晶薄膜的气相和表面化学反应综述[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2800-2813.
[11]	董明, 徐进良, 刘广林. 超临界水非均质特性分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2836-2847.
[12]	杨峥豪, 何臻, 常玉龙, 靳紫恒, 江霞. 生物质快速热解下行式流化床反应器研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2249-2263.
[13]	郑志航, 马郡男, 闫子涵, 卢春喜. 提升管射流影响区内压力脉动特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2335-2350.
[14]	陈巨辉, 张谦, 舒崚峰, 李丹, 徐鑫, 刘晓刚, 赵晨希, 曹希峰. 基于DEM方法的旋转流化床纳米颗粒流动特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2374-2381.
[15]	张媛媛, 曲江源, 苏欣欣, 杨静, 张锴. 循环流化床燃煤机组SNCR脱硝过程气液传质和反应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2404-2415.